Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLMCO2: Advancing Accurate Carbon Footprint Prediction for LLM Inferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02950 v1 pith:2DC66WNZ submitted 2024-10-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY

LLMCO2: Advancing Accurate Carbon Footprint Prediction for LLM Inferences

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords carboninferencefootprintaccuracyinferencesmodeltrainingcloud
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Throughout its lifecycle, a large language model (LLM) generates a substantially larger carbon footprint during inference than training. LLM inference requests vary in batch size, prompt length, and token generation number, while cloud providers employ different GPU types and quantities to meet diverse service-level objectives for accuracy and latency. It is crucial for both users and cloud providers to have a tool that quickly and accurately estimates the carbon impact of LLM inferences based on a combination of inference request and hardware configurations before execution. Estimating the carbon footprint of LLM inferences is more complex than training due to lower and highly variable model FLOPS utilization, rendering previous equation-based models inaccurate. Additionally, existing machine learning (ML) prediction methods either lack accuracy or demand extensive training data, as they inadequately handle the distinct prefill and decode phases, overlook hardware-specific features, and inefficiently sample uncommon inference configurations. We introduce \coo, a graph neural network (GNN)-based model that greatly improves the accuracy of LLM inference carbon footprint predictions compared to previous methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Guidelines for Empirical Studies in Software Engineering involving Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-08 accept novelty 7.0

    The paper delivers a taxonomy of seven LLM study types in software engineering along with eight guidelines that separate mandatory requirements from recommended practices to address reproducibility challenges.

  2. Guidelines for Empirical Studies in Software Engineering involving Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0

    A group of 22 researchers proposes seven study types and eight guidelines for empirical software engineering studies involving LLMs to enhance reproducibility and replicability.

  3. From Tokens to Watt-hours: Analytical Energy Estimation for LLM Inference on Modern GPUs

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    An analytical, calibration-based estimator of GPU inference energy for LLMs splits energy into compute, parameter access, KV-cache writes, and attention reads, but validates against the same data it was fitted on.