pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.05907 · v3 · submitted 2025-02-09 · 💻 cs.RO

EvolvingAgent: Curriculum Self-evolving Agent with Continual World Model for Long-Horizon Tasks

Tongtong Feng , Xin Wang , Zekai Zhou , Ren Wang , Yuwei Zhan , Guangyao Li , Qing Li , Wenwu Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords EvolvingAgentlong-horizon taskscontinual world modelcurriculum learningself-evolving agentembodied agentsMinecraftAtari
0
0 comments X

The pith

EvolvingAgent autonomously completes long-horizon tasks by running a closed loop of planner, controller, and reflector that continually updates its world model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces EvolvingAgent to address reliance on human-created data and catastrophic forgetting in embodied agents tackling long-horizon tasks. It proposes three modules that together form a self-contained loop: an LLM-based planner that turns tasks into sub-tasks using past experiences, a world-model controller that generates actions and verifies outcomes to refresh those experiences, and a curriculum-learning reflector that selects updates for the world model. If the loop works as described, the agent can adapt its knowledge across environments without external intervention, as shown in experiments on Minecraft and Atari. A sympathetic reader would care because successful autonomy here would reduce the need for constant human supervision in complex, open-ended settings.

Core claim

EvolvingAgent contains an experience-driven task planner that converts long-horizon tasks into executable sub-tasks using an LLM and multimodal experiences, a WM-guided action controller that generates low-level actions while using self-verification to update experiences, and a Curriculum Learning-based reflector that applies a two-stage algorithm to select experiences for task-adaptive world-model updates; these three modules create a planner-controller-reflector closed-loop dynamic that lets the continual world model autonomously update multimodal experiences and world knowledge.

What carries the argument

The planner-controller-reflector closed-loop dynamic that autonomously updates multimodal experiences and the world model.

If this is right

  • Average success rate on long-horizon tasks rises by 111.74 percent compared with prior methods.
  • The number of ineffective actions drops by more than a factor of six.
  • The same agent reaches human-level performance when transferred to the Atari environment.
  • Multimodal experiences are updated and selected without any human-created curricula or data.
  • Catastrophic forgetting is avoided when the agent encounters new tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the closed loop remains stable, the same structure could be tested on additional open-ended environments beyond Minecraft and Atari to check cross-domain generalization.
  • The two-stage curriculum selection might be replaced with other selection rules to see whether the performance gains persist.
  • Extending the world-model update frequency or horizon length would provide a direct test of whether the continual update mechanism scales.
  • The approach could be combined with different base planners to isolate how much the self-verification and reflector contribute.

Load-bearing premise

The self-verification step inside the action controller produces reliable experience updates that the reflector can use without adding errors or bias.

What would settle it

Run the agent on a sequence of new long-horizon tasks and measure whether success rate on earlier tasks drops after the world-model update or whether the number of ineffective actions rises instead of falling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05907 by Guangyao Li, Qing Li, Ren Wang, Tongtong Feng, Wenwu Zhu, Xin Wang, Yuwei Zhan, Zekai Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: EvoAgent, a self-evolving agent with a continual World Model (WM). Take Minecraft [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: EvoAgent Framework, which includes three modules empowered by a continual WM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the role of CL-based reflector. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Completing Long-Horizon (LH) tasks in open-ended worlds is an important yet difficult problem for embodied agents. Existing approaches suffer from two key challenges: (1) they heavily rely on experiences obtained from human-created data or curricula, failing to autonomously update and select multimodal experiences, and (2) they may encounter catastrophic forgetting issues when faced with new tasks, failing to autonomously update world knowledge. To solve these challenges, this paper presents {\bf EvolvingAgent}, a curriculum self-evolving agent with a continual World Model (WM), which can autonomously complete various LH tasks across environments through self-planning, self-control, and self-reflection, without human intervention. Specifically, EvolvingAgent contains three modules, i.e., i) the experience-driven task planner, which uses an LLM along with multimodal experiences to convert LH tasks into executable sub-tasks; ii) the WM-guided action controller, which leverages WM to generate low-level actions and incorporates a self-verification mechanism to update multimodal experiences; iii) the Curriculum Learning (CL) -based reflector, which implements a two-stage CL algorithm to select multimodal experiences for task-adaptive WM updates. By building a planner-controller-reflector closed-loop dynamic, the continual WM for EvolvingAgent can autonomously update multimodal experiences and world knowledge. We conducted extensive experiments on Minecraft, compared with existing methods, EvolvingAgent can improve 111.74{\%} average success rate, reduce more than 6x ineffective actions, and generalize to the Atari environment with human-level performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents EvolvingAgent, a curriculum self-evolving agent with a continual world model for long-horizon tasks. It comprises three modules—an experience-driven task planner (LLM + multimodal experiences for sub-task decomposition), a WM-guided action controller (WM-based low-level actions plus self-verification for experience updates), and a two-stage CL-based reflector (for selecting experiences to update the WM)—that interact in a closed-loop dynamic. The system is claimed to operate autonomously without human intervention, yielding a 111.74% average success-rate improvement and >6x reduction in ineffective actions on Minecraft while generalizing to human-level performance on Atari.

Significance. If the performance claims and autonomy assertions hold under rigorous scrutiny, the work would be significant for embodied AI, as it directly targets reliance on human-curated curricula and catastrophic forgetting via a self-contained experience-update loop and continual WM.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline quantitative claims (111.74% success-rate lift, >6x fewer ineffective actions, Atari human-level generalization) are stated without any experimental protocol, baseline definitions, task/environment counts, number of trials, statistical tests, or error bars, so the central performance result cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph describing the three modules and closed-loop): The self-verification mechanism inside the WM-guided action controller is described only at the level of 'update multimodal experiences'; no concrete criteria for verification success, encoding/filtering of multimodal tuples, or the precise two-stage CL selection rule in the reflector are supplied, leaving the reliability of the experience flow that supports all reported gains unspecified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity while preserving the manuscript's core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline quantitative claims (111.74% success-rate lift, >6x fewer ineffective actions, Atari human-level generalization) are stated without any experimental protocol, baseline definitions, task/environment counts, number of trials, statistical tests, or error bars, so the central performance result cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a concise summary, omits the full experimental protocol. The complete details—including environments (Minecraft with specific tasks and Atari), baseline methods, number of trials per task, statistical tests, and error bars—are provided in Section 4 (Experiments) and the associated tables/figures. To enhance evaluability of the headline claims, we will revise the abstract to include a brief clause referencing the evaluation settings and metrics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph describing the three modules and closed-loop): The self-verification mechanism inside the WM-guided action controller is described only at the level of 'update multimodal experiences'; no concrete criteria for verification success, encoding/filtering of multimodal tuples, or the precise two-stage CL selection rule in the reflector are supplied, leaving the reliability of the experience flow that supports all reported gains unspecified.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the architecture at a high level by design. Concrete criteria for verification success (e.g., success thresholds and feedback loops), encoding/filtering of multimodal tuples, and the exact two-stage CL selection algorithm (including scoring and retention rules) are specified in Sections 3.2 (WM-guided action controller) and 3.3 (CL-based reflector). We will add a short clarifying phrase to the abstract to indicate that these operational details appear in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in claimed results or architecture

full rationale

The paper describes an agent architecture consisting of an experience-driven task planner, WM-guided action controller with self-verification, and CL-based reflector forming a closed loop for updating experiences and world model. Performance claims (111.74% success rate improvement, 6x fewer ineffective actions, Atari generalization) are presented as outcomes of experiments on Minecraft and Atari benchmarks, not as quantities derived by construction from the loop definition itself. No equations appear in the provided text that reduce a prediction to a fitted input. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The closed-loop dynamic is the proposed method, but its empirical results are measured externally and do not reduce to the inputs by definition. This is the standard case of an architectural proposal evaluated on independent tasks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that LLM-driven planning and self-verification produce usable multimodal experiences and that the two-stage CL procedure selects them without bias; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5829 in / 1126 out tokens · 34446 ms · 2026-05-23T03:28:34.631134+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Improve Large Language Model Systems with User Logs

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    UNO distills user logs into semi-structured rules and preferences, applies query-and-feedback clustering to handle heterogeneity, quantifies cognitive gaps to filter noise, and builds primary and reflective modules th...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Plan4mc: Skill reinforcement learning and planning for open-world minecraft tasks

    PKU BAAI. Plan4mc: Skill reinforcement learning and planning for open-world minecraft tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16563,

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    A backbone for long-horizon robot task understanding.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 10: 2048–2055,

    Xiaoshuai Chen, Wei Chen, Dongmyoung Lee, Yukun Ge, Nicol´as Rojas, and Petar Kormushev. A backbone for long-horizon robot task understanding.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 10: 2048–2055,

    work page 2048

  3. [3]

    Iql-td-mpc: Implicit q-learning for hierarchical model predictive control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00867,

    Rohan Chitnis, Yingchen Xu, Bobak Hashemi, Lucas Lehnert, Urun Dogan, Zheqing Zhu, and Olivier Delalleau. Iql-td-mpc: Implicit q-learning for hierarchical model predictive control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00867,

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Model-Based Value Estimation for Efficient Model-Free Reinforcement Learning

    Vladimir Feinberg, Alvin Wan, Ion Stoica, Michael I Jordan, Joseph E Gonzalez, and Sergey Levine. Model-based value estimation for efficient model-free reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.00101,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    World Models

    David Ha and J¨urgen Schmidhuber. World models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination

    Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, and Mohammad Norouzi. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination.arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603, 2019a. Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, and Mohammad Norouzi. Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels.International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2019b. Danijar Hafner...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  7. [7]

    TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control

    Nicklas Hansen, Hao Su, and Xiaolong Wang. Td-mpc2: Scalable, robust world models for contin- uous control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16828,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Measuring ai ability to complete long tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14499,

    Thomas Kwa, Ben West, Joel Becker, Amy Deng, Katharyn Garcia, Max Hasin, Sami Jawhar, Megan Kinniment, Nate Rush, Sydney V on Arx, et al. Measuring ai ability to complete long tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14499,

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Enhancing robot route optimization in smart logistics with transformer and gnn integration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02749,

    Hao Luo, Jianjun Wei, Shuchen Zhao, Ankai Liang, Zhongjin Xu, and Ruxue Jiang. Enhancing robot route optimization in smart logistics with transformer and gnn integration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02749,

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Detach: Cross-domain learning for long-horizon tasks via mixture of disentangled experts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07842,

    Yutong Shen, Hangxu Liu, Penghui Liu, Ruizhe Xia, Tianyi Yao, Yitong Sun, and Tongtong Feng. Detach: Cross-domain learning for long-horizon tasks via mixture of disentangled experts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.07842,

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models

    11 Under review as a conference paper Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. V oyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291, 2023a. Yucen Wang, Shenghua Wan, Le Gan, Shuai Feng, and De-Chuan Zhan. Ad3: Implicit action is the key for ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agents

    Zihao Wang, Shaofei Cai, Guanzhou Chen, Anji Liu, Xiaojian Ma, and Yitao Liang. Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive planning with large language models enables open-world multi-task agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01560, 2023b. Zihao Wang, Shaofei Cai, Anji Liu, Yonggang Jin, Jinbing Hou, Bowei Zhang, Haowei Lin, Zhaofeng He, Zilong Zheng, Ya...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Steve-eye: Equipping llm-based embodied agents with visual perception in open worlds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13255,

    Sipeng Zheng, Jiazheng Liu, Yicheng Feng, and Zongqing Lu. Steve-eye: Equipping llm-based embodied agents with visual perception in open worlds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13255,

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    12 Under review as a conference paper A CONTINUALWORLDMODEL Algorithm 1Continual World Model via Closed-Loop Planning-Control-Reflection Require:EnvironmentE, TaskT, initial MEPD 0 MEP andM 0 w, HorizonH, Max stepsT max Ensure:OptimizedD ∗ MEP,M ∗ w 1:Current stateS ←(O obs,S self,S assets) 2:forTaskT=T 0 toT n do 3:{g i} ←Ψ plan(S,T,D MEP){Experience-dri...

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Table 4: Atari100k scores. Task Random Human PPO DreamerV3 EvoAgent Steps — — 400K 400K 400K Alien 228 7128 276 1118 1392 Amidar 6 1720 26 97 329 Assault 222 742 327 683 981 Asterix 210 8503 292 1062 1492 Bank Heist 14 753 14398 362 Battle Zone 2360 37188 2233 20300 24830 Boxing 0 12 3 82 91 Breakout 2 30 3 10 13 Chopper Command 811 7388 1005 2222 4375 Cr...

    work page 1971