REVIEW 1 cited by
Wisdom from Diversity: Bias Mitigation Through Hybrid Human-LLM Crowds
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Wisdom from Diversity: Bias Mitigation Through Hybrid Human-LLM Crowds
read the original abstract
Despite their performance, large language models (LLMs) can inadvertently perpetuate biases found in the data they are trained on. By analyzing LLM responses to bias-eliciting headlines, we find that these models often mirror human biases. To address this, we explore crowd-based strategies for mitigating bias through response aggregation. We first demonstrate that simply averaging responses from multiple LLMs, intended to leverage the "wisdom of the crowd", can exacerbate existing biases due to the limited diversity within LLM crowds. In contrast, we show that locally weighted aggregation methods more effectively leverage the wisdom of the LLM crowd, achieving both bias mitigation and improved accuracy. Finally, recognizing the complementary strengths of LLMs (accuracy) and humans (diversity), we demonstrate that hybrid crowds containing both significantly enhance performance and further reduce biases across ethnic and gender-related contexts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Floor, Ceiling, and the Fusion Gap: How Much of Crowd Reading Attention Can Machines Predict?
Machines recover up to 53% of the crowd-highlight prediction headroom, and fusing five frontier models reaches about 60%, confirmed in a pre-registered replication.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.