pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.21659 · v2 · submitted 2025-06-26 · ✦ hep-ph

Ultralight Dilatonic Dark Matter

Abhishek Banerjee , Csaba Cs\'aki , Michael Geller , Zamir Heller-Algazi , Ameen Ismail This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 07:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords ultralight dark matterdilatonsupersymmetryscale invariancemisalignment mechanismdark matter couplings
0
0 comments X

The pith

Supersymmetry and gravity force dilaton dark matter couplings below experimental reach.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The dilaton arises as a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson when scale invariance is broken, offering an ultralight dark matter candidate whose mass is protected by conformal symmetry. Its large non-derivative self-interactions would normally generate a mass comparable to its decay constant, forcing the decay constant below an eV and producing observable deviations in structure formation that conflict with data. Supersymmetry can shield the required hierarchy between mass and decay constant, yet only if a novel stabilization mechanism keeps the mass light against supersymmetry-breaking effects. Gravity-mediated supersymmetry breaking then introduces irreducible corrections that drive all dilaton couplings to the Standard Model far below the sensitivity of any current or planned experiment. The observed dark matter density can still arise via the misalignment mechanism for masses between 10^{-11} and 1 eV, but the model becomes difficult to realize consistently.

Core claim

To produce the observed dark matter abundance through misalignment, an ultralight dilaton must have mass between 10^{-11} eV and 1 eV. Supersymmetry protects the mass hierarchy against radiative corrections only when supplemented by a novel stabilization mechanism that remains robust to realistic supersymmetry breaking. Even then, irreducible gravitational corrections from supersymmetry breaking restrict the dilaton-Standard Model couplings to values too small for detection in any existing or proposed experiment, rendering construction of a viable ultralight dilaton dark matter model quite involved.

What carries the argument

The novel dilaton stabilization mechanism that maintains an ultralight mass robust against supersymmetry-breaking contributions while gravity-mediated corrections suppress couplings to the Standard Model.

If this is right

  • The misalignment mechanism produces the correct dark matter abundance for dilaton masses from 10^{-11} eV to 1 eV.
  • All dilaton couplings to the Standard Model are forced below the sensitivity of tabletop experiments and proposed searches.
  • Any consistent ultralight dilaton dark matter model requires additional structure beyond minimal supersymmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Scale-invariance-protected scalars may face similar undetectability issues when embedded in supersymmetric completions of the Standard Model.
  • The tension between mass protection and coupling suppression could extend to other light scalar dark matter candidates that rely on approximate global symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

A novel dilaton stabilization mechanism exists that keeps the mass ultralight and stable against realistic supersymmetry-breaking contributions.

What would settle it

An experimental detection of dilaton-induced forces, oscillations, or fifth-force effects at coupling strengths larger than the gravitational supersymmetry-breaking suppression scale would directly contradict the predicted undetectability.

read the original abstract

The dilaton, a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) of broken scale invariance, is an appealing ultralight dark matter (DM) candidate. Its mass is protected by conformal invariance and it can be searched for in tabletop experiments. However, contrary to standard pNGBs of internal symmetries, the dilaton generically has a large non-derivative self-coupling, leading to radiative contributions to its mass of the order of its decay constant. Hence typical ultralight dilatons should also have sub-eV decay constants, which would incur significant deviations from standard DM behavior at structure formation times, in severe tension with observations. Therefore, a fine-tuning is required to generate a hierarchy between the mass and the decay constant. In this work, we consider whether supersymmetry (SUSY) can be used to protect this hierarchy from quantum corrections. To ensure an ultralight dilaton mass robust against realistic SUSY-breaking contributions, we must consider a novel dilaton stabilization mechanism. The observed DM abundance can be produced by the misalignment mechanism for dilaton masses ranging from $10^{-11}$ to $1$ eV. Unfortunately, irreducible SUSY-breaking corrections due to gravity restrict the couplings between the dilaton and the Standard Model to be extremely small, beyond the reach of any current or proposed experiments. Our work demonstrates that constructing a consistent model of ultralight dilaton DM is quite involved.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores ultralight dilaton dark matter as a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance. It argues that supersymmetry can protect the required hierarchy between the dilaton mass and decay constant against radiative corrections, but a novel stabilization mechanism is needed to keep the mass ultralight and robust against realistic SUSY-breaking contributions. The observed DM abundance is achievable via the misalignment mechanism for dilaton masses in the range 10^{-11} eV to 1 eV. The central conclusion is that irreducible gravity-induced SUSY-breaking corrections suppress dilaton-Standard Model couplings to levels beyond the reach of current or proposed experiments, illustrating the model-building challenges for consistent ultralight dilaton DM.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work demonstrates that scale-invariant ultralight scalar DM candidates face significant theoretical obstacles from gravity-mediated effects in SUSY frameworks, rendering them effectively unobservable. It builds on standard EFT reasoning for pNGBs and the misalignment mechanism, providing a clear statement of the tension between mass protection and coupling suppression. This could usefully inform the scope of experimental searches for ultralight DM by emphasizing the need for careful operator analysis in any viable construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'irreducible SUSY-breaking corrections due to gravity restrict the couplings between the dilaton and the Standard Model to be extremely small, beyond the reach of any current or proposed experiments' is load-bearing for the negative conclusion on observability. The manuscript notes that a novel dilaton stabilization mechanism is required to ensure an ultralight mass robust against SUSY-breaking contributions, yet provides no explicit supergravity Lagrangian, Kähler potential, or operator analysis demonstrating that this mechanism cannot cancel or further suppress the leading Planck-suppressed dilaton-SM portal operators. Without such a demonstration, the independence of the corrections from stabilization details remains unverified.
  2. [Introduction] Introduction: the discussion of the novel stabilization mechanism (required for robustness of the ultralight mass) does not address whether the additional fields, modified potentials, or discrete symmetries involved could simultaneously affect gravity-mediated corrections in the supergravity sector. A concrete example of the effective operators after SUSY breaking would be needed to establish that the lower bound on couplings is truly independent of stabilization choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the mass range and conclusions clearly but could briefly indicate the form of the proposed stabilization mechanism to improve accessibility for readers unfamiliar with the specific construction.
  2. Notation for the dilaton decay constant and its relation to the scale of symmetry breaking should be compared explicitly to standard axion conventions to avoid potential confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below, providing additional reasoning on why the gravity-mediated corrections remain independent of the stabilization details. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications where this strengthens the argument without altering the core conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'irreducible SUSY-breaking corrections due to gravity restrict the couplings between the dilaton and the Standard Model to be extremely small, beyond the reach of any current or proposed experiments' is load-bearing for the negative conclusion on observability. The manuscript notes that a novel dilaton stabilization mechanism is required to ensure an ultralight mass robust against SUSY-breaking contributions, yet provides no explicit supergravity Lagrangian, Kähler potential, or operator analysis demonstrating that this mechanism cannot cancel or further suppress the leading Planck-suppressed dilaton-SM portal operators. Without such a demonstration, the independence of the corrections from stabilization details remains unverified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Our claim of irreducibility follows from the structure of supergravity: the leading Planck-suppressed dilaton-SM portal operators arise from the minimal coupling of the dilaton to the Kähler potential and the gravitational sector, which are fixed by the requirement of local supersymmetry and scale invariance breaking. These operators are generated at order 1/M_Pl independently of the specific form of the dilaton potential. The novel stabilization mechanism, which introduces additional fields or discrete symmetries to protect the ultralight mass against SUSY-breaking contributions, acts on the dilaton self-interactions and does not modify or cancel these universal gravity-mediated portals to the SM at leading order. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the revised manuscript explaining this separation of scales and operator independence, while noting that a complete explicit supergravity construction lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Introduction] Introduction: the discussion of the novel stabilization mechanism (required for robustness of the ultralight mass) does not address whether the additional fields, modified potentials, or discrete symmetries involved could simultaneously affect gravity-mediated corrections in the supergravity sector. A concrete example of the effective operators after SUSY breaking would be needed to establish that the lower bound on couplings is truly independent of stabilization choices.

    Authors: We agree that further discussion improves clarity. In the revised introduction and a new subsection on effective operators, we provide a concrete illustration: after SUSY breaking, the gravity-mediated terms yield effective operators such as (dilaton / M_Pl) * (SM bilinear) with coefficients fixed by the supergravity Kähler metric and not altered by the stabilization fields, which are assumed to be heavy or decoupled from the SM sector. Discrete symmetries protecting the mass do not forbid these Planck-suppressed terms, as they are required by diffeomorphism invariance. This establishes that the lower bound on couplings is robust against stabilization choices. We have incorporated this example and the associated operator analysis into the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard mechanisms and external assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central results—the allowed mass range from misalignment production and the restriction on dilaton-SM couplings from gravity-induced SUSY-breaking corrections—are presented as consequences of established physics plus the need for a novel stabilization mechanism. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim collapse to a self-citation or self-definition. The abstract explicitly separates the mass hierarchy requirement from the coupling bound, treating the latter as an output of irreducible Planck-suppressed operators rather than an input. This keeps the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard effective field theory for scale invariance breaking, the misalignment mechanism for dark matter production, and the existence of a novel stabilization mechanism whose details are not expanded in the abstract. No new particles or forces are postulated beyond the dilaton itself.

free parameters (1)
  • dilaton mass range
    The interval from 10^{-11} eV to 1 eV is stated as the range that produces the observed DM abundance via misalignment; it is an output of the mechanism rather than an ad-hoc fit.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Misalignment mechanism produces the observed dark matter abundance for the stated mass window
    Invoked in the abstract to connect the dilaton mass to cosmology without further derivation shown.
  • domain assumption Supersymmetry can be arranged to protect the dilaton mass hierarchy when a novel stabilization mechanism is used
    Central premise required for the SUSY-protection argument; location: abstract paragraph on stabilization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1431 out tokens · 32723 ms · 2026-05-19T07:28:11.715748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Time-dependent signals of new physics at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Incorporating timing information from time-dependent new physics signals can improve LHC search sensitivity by up to a factor of two compared to standard time-invariant analyses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Jaeckel, G

    J. Jaeckel, G. Rybka and L. Winslow, Report of the Topical Group on Wave Dark Matter for Snowmass 2021, 2209.08125

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter

    L. Hui, J.P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043541 [ 1610.08297]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Ann

    L. Hui, Wave Dark Matter , Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59 (2021) 247 [ 2101.11735]

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Zimmermann, J

    T. Zimmermann, J. Alvey, D.J.E. Marsh, M. Fairbairn and J.I. Read, Dwarf galaxies imply dark matter is heavier than 2.2 × 10−21 eV, 2405.20374

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Axion Cosmology

    D.J.E. Marsh, Axion Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 643 (2016) 1 [ 1510.07633]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,

    D. Antypas et al., New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter , 2203.14915

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Broadberry, S

    E. Broadberry, S. Das, A. Hook and G. Marques Tavares, Adiabatic conversion of ALPs into dark photon dark matter , JHEP 03 (2025) 215 [ 2408.03370]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Sub-eV scalar dark matter through the super-renormalizable Higgs portal

    F. Piazza and M. Pospelov, Sub-eV scalar dark matter through the super-renormalizable Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 043533 [ 1003.2313]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Banerjee, H

    A. Banerjee, H. Kim and G. Perez, Coherent relaxion dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115026 [1810.01889]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Brzeminski, Z

    D. Brzeminski, Z. Chacko, A. Dev and A. Hook, Time-varying fine structure constant from naturally ultralight dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075019 [ 2012.02787]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Cho and Y.Y

    Y.M. Cho and Y.Y. Keum, Dilatonic dark matter and unified cosmology: A new paradigm , Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 907

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    Phenomenology of the Equivalence Principle with Light Scalars

    T. Damour and J.F. Donoghue, Phenomenology of the Equivalence Principle with Light Scalars, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 202001 [ 1007.2790]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Equivalence Principle Violations and Couplings of a Light Dilaton

    T. Damour and J.F. Donoghue, Equivalence Principle Violations and Couplings of a Light Dilaton, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 084033 [ 1007.2792]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks

    A. Arvanitaki, J. Huang and K. Van Tilburg, Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 015015 [ 1405.2925]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [ hep-ph/9905221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Composite Higgses

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cs´ aki and J. Serra, Composite Higgses, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2766 [1401.2457]. – 32 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs

    G. Panico and A. Wulzer, The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs , vol. 913, Springer (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-22617-0, [1506.01961]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22617-0 2016

  18. [18]

    C. Csaki, TASI lectures on extra dimensions and branes , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 2002): Particle Physics and Cosmology: The Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model(s) , pp. 605–698, 4, 2004 [ hep-ph/0404096]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    TASI Lectures on Non-Supersymmetric BSM Models

    C. Cs´ aki, S. Lombardo and O. Telem,TASI Lectures on Non-supersymmetric BSM Models , in Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics : Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics (TASI 2016): Boulder, CO, USA, June 6-July 1, 2016 , R. Essig and I. Low, eds., pp. 501–570, WSP (2018), DOI [ 1811.04279]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Hubisz, S

    J. Hubisz, S. Ironi, G. Perez and R. Rosenfeld, A Note on the Quality of Dilatonic Ultralight Dark Matter, 2401.08737

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Numerical Simulations of the Dark Universe: State of the Art and the Next Decade

    M. Kuhlen, M. Vogelsberger and R. Angulo, Numerical Simulations of the Dark Universe: State of the Art and the Next Decade , Phys. Dark Univ. 1 (2012) 50 [ 1209.5745]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    A naturally light dilaton

    F. Coradeschi, P. Lodone, D. Pappadopulo, R. Rattazzi and L. Vitale, A naturally light dilaton, JHEP 11 (2013) 057 [ 1306.4601]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning, A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant , Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2790 [ 1305.3919]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Modulus stabilization with bulk fields , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4922 [ hep-ph/9907447]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  25. [25]

    Phenomenology of a Stabilized Modulus

    W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus , Phys. Lett. B 475 (2000) 275 [ hep-ph/9911457]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  26. [26]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Geller, Z. Heller-Algazi and A. Ismail, Relevant dilaton stabilization , JHEP 06 (2023) 202 [ 2301.10247]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    ATLAS collaboration, The quest to discover supersymmetry at the ATLAS experiment , 2403.02455

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Theories with Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking

    G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking , Phys. Rept. 322 (1999) 419 [ hep-ph/9801271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    Cacciapaglia, A

    G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea and W. Isnard, Hidden supersymmetric dark sectors , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 015024 [ 2304.05431]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Comments on the Holographic Picture of the Randall-Sundrum Model

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model, JHEP 04 (2001) 021 [ hep-th/0012248]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    Holography and Phenomenology

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall, Holography and phenomenology, JHEP 08 (2001) 017 [ hep-th/0012148]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  32. [32]

    Out Of This World Supersymmetry Breaking

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Out of this world supersymmetry breaking , Nucl. Phys. B 557 (1999) 79 [ hep-th/9810155]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  33. [33]

    Supersymmetry Breaking and Composite Extra Dimensions

    M.A. Luty and R. Sundrum, Supersymmetry breaking and composite extra dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 066004 [ hep-th/0105137]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    Anomaly Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking in Four Dimensions, Naturally

    M. Luty and R. Sundrum, Anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking in four-dimensions, naturally, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 045007 [ hep-th/0111231]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  35. [35]

    Conformal Sequestering Simplified

    M. Schmaltz and R. Sundrum, Conformal Sequestering Simplified, JHEP 11 (2006) 011 [hep-th/0608051]. – 33 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    R Symmetry Breaking Versus Supersymmetry Breaking

    A.E. Nelson and N. Seiberg, R symmetry breaking versus supersymmetry breaking , Nucl. Phys. B 416 (1994) 46 [ hep-ph/9309299]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  37. [37]

    Hierarchy Stabilization in Warped Supersymmetry

    M.A. Luty and R. Sundrum, Hierarchy stabilization in warped supersymmetry , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 065012 [ hep-th/0012158]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    Dimensions of Supersymmetric Operators from AdS/CFT

    G. Cacciapaglia, G. Marandella and J. Terning, Dimensions of Supersymmetric Operators from AdS/CFT, JHEP 06 (2009) 027 [ 0802.2946]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    SUSY Splits, But Then Returns

    R. Sundrum, SUSY Splits, But Then Returns , JHEP 01 (2011) 062 [ 0909.5430]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    Radion Dynamics and Electroweak Physics

    C. Csaki, M.L. Graesser and G.D. Kribs, Radion dynamics and electroweak physics , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 065002 [ hep-th/0008151]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  41. [41]

    Effective Theory of a Light Dilaton

    Z. Chacko and R.K. Mishra, Effective Theory of a Light Dilaton , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115006 [1209.3022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Gaugino Mass without Singlets

    G.F. Giudice, M.A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, Gaugino mass without singlets , JHEP 12 (1998) 027 [ hep-ph/9810442]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  43. [43]

    Weak Scale Supersymmetry Without Weak Scale Supergravity

    M.A. Luty, Weak scale supersymmetry without weak scale supergravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 141801 [ hep-th/0205077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  44. [44]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137

    work page 1983

  45. [45]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    work page 1983

  46. [46]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133

    work page 1983

  47. [47]

    Hook,TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions, PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004, [1812.02669]

    A. Hook, TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions , PoS TASI2018 (2019) 004 [1812.02669]

    work page arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Holography and the Electroweak Phase Transition

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Holography and the electroweak phase transition , JHEP 03 (2002) 051 [ hep-th/0107141]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Turner, Cosmic and Local Mass Density of Invisible Axions , Phys

    M.S. Turner, Cosmic and Local Mass Density of Invisible Axions , Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 889

    work page 1986

  51. [51]

    Lyth, Axions and inflation: Sitting in the vacuum , Phys

    D.H. Lyth, Axions and inflation: Sitting in the vacuum , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 3394

    work page 1992

  52. [52]

    Anharmonic Evolution of the Cosmic Axion Density Spectrum

    K. Strobl and T.J. Weiler, Anharmonic evolution of the cosmic axion density spectrum , Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7690 [ astro-ph/9405028]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  53. [53]

    Update of axion CDM energy density

    K.J. Bae, J.-H. Huh and J.E. Kim, Update of axion CDM energy , JCAP 09 (2008) 005 [0806.0497]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    Visinelli and P

    L. Visinelli and P. Gondolo, Dark Matter Axions Revisited , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 035024 [0903.4377]

    work page arXiv 2009

  55. [55]

    Chatrchyan, C

    A. Chatrchyan, C. Er¨ oncel, M. Koschnitzke and G. Servant,ALP dark matter with non-periodic potentials: parametric resonance, halo formation and gravitational signatures , JCAP 10 (2023) 068 [ 2305.03756]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Isocurvature Constraints and Anharmonic Effects on QCD Axion Dark Matter

    T. Kobayashi, R. Kurematsu and F. Takahashi, Isocurvature Constraints and Anharmonic Effects on QCD Axion Dark Matter , JCAP 09 (2013) 032 [ 1304.0922]. – 34 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Axion Isocurvature Perturbations in Low-Scale Models of Hybrid Inflation

    K. Schmitz and T.T. Yanagida, Axion Isocurvature Perturbations in Low-Scale Models of Hybrid Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075003 [ 1806.06056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Turner, Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe , Phys

    M.S. Turner, Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 1243

    work page 1983

  59. [59]

    Adelberger, J.H

    E.G. Adelberger, J.H. Gundlach, B.R. Heckel, S. Hoedl and S. Schlamminger, Torsion balance experiments: A low-energy frontier of particle physics , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62 (2009) 102

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Review of short-range gravity experiments in the LHC era

    J. Murata and S. Tanaka, A review of short-range gravity experiments in the LHC era , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 033001 [ 1408.3588]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Stronger limits on hypothetical Yukawa interactions in the 40--8000 nm range

    Y.J. Chen, W.K. Tham, D.E. Krause, D. Lopez, E. Fischbach and R.S. Decca, Stronger Limits on Hypothetical Yukawa Interactions in the 30–8000 nm Range , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 221102 [ 1410.7267]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    New Test of the Gravitational 1/r2 Law at Separations down to 52 µm,

    J.G. Lee, E.G. Adelberger, T.S. Cook, S.M. Fleischer and B.R. Heckel, New Test of the Gravitational 1/r2 Law at Separations down to 52 µm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 101101 [2002.11761]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3932430

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932430 2020

  64. [64]

    Searching for ultra-light dark matter with optical cavities

    A.A. Geraci, C. Bradley, D. Gao, J. Weinstein and A. Derevianko, Searching for Ultralight Dark Matter with Optical Cavities , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 031304 [ 1808.00540]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Badurina, O

    L. Badurina, O. Buchmueller, J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, C. McCabe and V. Vaskonen, Prospective sensitivities of atom interferometers to gravitational waves and ultralight dark matter , Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380 (2021) 20210060 [ 2108.02468]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    MAGIS-100 collaboration, Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100), Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (2021) 044003 [ 2104.02835]

    work page arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Kozyryev, Z

    I. Kozyryev, Z. Lasner and J.M. Doyle, Enhanced sensitivity to ultralight bosonic dark matter in the spectra of the linear radical SrOH , Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021) 043313 [ 1805.08185]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Searching for Scalar Dark Matter with Compact Mechanical Resonators,

    J. Manley, D. Wilson, R. Stump, D. Grin and S. Singh, Searching for Scalar Dark Matter with Compact Mechanical Resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 151301 [ 1910.07574]

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Lorenzo and K.C

    L.A. Lorenzo and K.C. Schwab, Ultra-High Q Acoustic Resonance in Superfluid 4 He, J. Low Temp. Phys. 186 (2017) 233

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Rowan, G

    S. Rowan, G. Cagnoli, P. Sneddon, J. Hough, R. Route, E.K. Gustafson et al., Investigation of mechanical loss factors of some candidate materials for the test masses of gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Lett. A 265 (2000) 5

    work page 2000

  71. [71]

    Neuhaus, Cooling a macroscopic mechanical oscillator close to its quantum ground state , Ph.D

    L. Neuhaus, Cooling a macroscopic mechanical oscillator close to its quantum ground state , Ph.D. thesis, Universit´ e Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, 2016

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Goryachev, D.L

    M. Goryachev, D.L. Creedon, S. Galliou and M.E. Tobar, Observation of rayleigh phonon scattering through excitation of extremely high overtones in low-loss cryogenic acoustic cavities for hybrid quantum systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 085502

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Galliou, M

    S. Galliou, M. Goryachev, R. Bourquin, P. Abb´ e, J.P. Aubry and M.E. Tobar, Extremely low loss phonon-trapping cryogenic acoustic cavities for future physical experiments , Scientific Reports 3 (2013) 2132. – 35 –

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    Sound of Dark Matter: Searching for Light Scalars with Resonant-Mass Detectors

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos and K. Van Tilburg, Sound of Dark Matter: Searching for Light Scalars with Resonant-Mass Detectors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 031102 [1508.01798]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-$\alpha$ forest data

    V. Irˇ siˇ c et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman- α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023522 [ 1702.01764]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Palanque-Delabrouille , C

    N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, N. Sch¨ oneberg, J. Lesgourgues, M. Walther, S. Chabanier et al., Hints, neutrino bounds and WDM constraints from SDSS DR14 Lyman-α and Planck full-survey data , JCAP 04 (2020) 038 [ 1911.09073]

    work page arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Garzilli , A

    A. Garzilli, A. Magalich, O. Ruchayskiy and A. Boyarsky, How to constrain warm dark matter with the Lyman- α forest, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502 (2021) 2356 [1912.09397]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Constraints on neutrino masses from Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum with BOSS and XQ-100

    C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, J. Baur and H. du Mas des Bourboux, Constraints on neutrino masses from Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum with BOSS and XQ-100 , JCAP 06 (2017) 047 [ 1702.03314]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    Supersymmetric theories with compact extra dimensions in N=1 superfields

    D. Marti and A. Pomarol, Supersymmetric theories with compact extra dimensions in N=1 superfields, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105025 [ hep-th/0106256]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  80. [80]

    Bulk Fields and Supersymmetry in a Slice of AdS

    T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS , Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 141 [ hep-ph/0003129]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

Showing first 80 references.