Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Democratizing Diplomacy: A Harness for Evaluating Any Large Language Model on Full-Press Diplomacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.07485 v1 pith:KWXIMKAM submitted 2025-08-10 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

Democratizing Diplomacy: A Harness for Evaluating Any Large Language Model on Full-Press Diplomacy

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords diplomacyllmsmodelsfine-tuninggameharnessstateacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the first evaluation harness that enables any out-of-the-box, local, Large Language Models (LLMs) to play full-press Diplomacy without fine-tuning or specialized training. Previous work required frontier LLMs, or fine-tuning, due to the high complexity and information density of Diplomacy's game state. Combined with the high variance of matches, these factors made Diplomacy prohibitive for study. In this work, we used data-driven iteration to optimize a textual game state representation such that a 24B model can reliably complete matches without any fine tuning. We develop tooling to facilitate hypothesis testing and statistical analysis, and we present case studies on persuasion, aggressive playstyles, and performance across a range of models. We conduct a variety of experiments across many popular LLMs, finding the larger models perform the best, but the smaller models still play adequately. We also introduce Critical State Analysis: an experimental protocol for rapidly iterating and analyzing key moments in a game at depth. Our harness democratizes the evaluation of strategic reasoning in LLMs by eliminating the need for fine-tuning, and it provides insights into how these capabilities emerge naturally from widely used LLMs. Our code is available in the supplement and will be open sourced.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Foreign Policy AI Evaluation Gap

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Public technical AI governance almost never evaluates real foreign-policy AI workflows; the paper maps that gap and proposes task-scoped, human-recombined evaluation instead of model leaderboards.