pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.20687 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal and topological phases from the ferrovalley states of the sliding bilayer altermagnets

Shihao Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetismferrovalley statesantiferromagnetic half-metalsliding bilayertopological phasesinterlayer hoppingV2OSSespintronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-dependent interlayer hopping in ferrovalley states of sliding bilayer altermagnets produces intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates sliding bilayer altermagnets formed from monolayers with small bandgaps. It finds that sliding engineering induces ferrovalley states where spin-dependent interlayer hopping creates a direct gap in one valley for one spin channel and band inversion in the other valley for the opposite spin. This configuration results in an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The approach also leads to topological phases including Chern insulators and gapless surface states that switch with sliding direction. Such systems could provide a platform for antiferromagnetic spintronics without net magnetization.

Core claim

In the V2OSSe system, first-principles calculations indicate that the spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the ferrovalley state ensures a direct gap in one valley (one spin channel) and band inversion in the other valley (opposite spin channel), which is manifested as an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian confirm the universal spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the sliding altermagnet bilayer. Further calculations imply the existence of Chern insulator and gapless surface states in the sliding altermagnet bilayer.

What carries the argument

Spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the ferrovalley state of the sliding bilayer altermagnet

If this is right

  • Adjusting the sliding direction can achieve the transition between different half-metals with conducting electrons of different spins.
  • Gapless surface states of opposite spins switch with the change in sliding direction.
  • The sliding altermagnet bilayer can host Chern insulator states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism relies on the small bandgap of the altermagnet monolayer, suggesting it applies to other similar systems.
  • These half-metals could be useful for spin-polarized transport without external magnetic fields.

Load-bearing premise

The density functional theory calculations with standard approximations accurately capture the interlayer hopping and resulting band inversion without errors that close the gaps or remove the half-metallic property.

What would settle it

If measurements or calculations on the V2OSSe sliding bilayer show no band inversion in either valley or metallic states in both spin channels, the intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.20687 by Shihao Zhang.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The first-principles energy bands of (a) AA-stacking [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Four possible phases (a-d) in the ferrovalley states in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The energy bands with SOC effect in the x-sliding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnetism is characterized by non-relativistic spin splitting and zero total magnetic moments. In this work, intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metallic and topological phases were discovered within the ferrovalley states of sliding bilayer altermagnets. We construct the bilayer system by utilizing altermagnet monolayers with a small bandgap. The inter-layer hopping phenomenon leads to a reduction in bandgaps, and sliding engineering induces ferrovalley states. Taking the V$_2$OSSe system for example, first-principles calculations indicate that the spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the ferrovalley state ensures a direct gap in one valley (one spin channel) and band inversion in the other valley (opposite spin channel), which is manifested as an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian employed in this research confirm the universal spin-dependent inter-layer hopping in the sliding altermagnet bilayer. Further calculations imply the existence of Chern insulator and gapless surface states in the sliding altermagnet bilayer. Adjusting the sliding direction can achieve the transition between different half-metals with conducting electrons of different spins, accompanied by the switching of gapless surface states of opposite spins. This research lays a foundation for the potential applications of intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metals and topological phases in spintronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that sliding bilayer altermagnets constructed from monolayers with small bandgaps host intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metals and topological phases via ferrovalley states. Interlayer hopping reduces bandgaps while sliding engineering induces ferrovalley behavior. For the V2OSSe example, first-principles calculations show that spin-dependent interlayer hopping produces a direct gap in one valley (one spin channel) and band inversion in the opposite valley (other spin channel), yielding an intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metal. An effective Hamiltonian confirms the universal character of the spin-dependent hopping. Additional results indicate Chern insulator phases, gapless surface states, and the ability to switch between half-metals of opposite spin polarization by changing the sliding direction.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions hold, the work identifies a new intrinsic route to antiferromagnetic half-metals and switchable topological features in altermagnetic bilayers without external fields or doping. This combination of altermagnetism, ferrovalley physics, and sliding engineering could be relevant for spintronics. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian provide generality beyond the specific V2OSSe example, which is a strength of the computational discovery approach.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metallicity in V2OSSe (abstract and results on first-principles calculations) rests on the predicted direct gap in one valley and band inversion in the other arising from spin-dependent interlayer hopping. The manuscript provides no convergence tests for k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or sensitivity to the exchange-correlation functional and van der Waals correction. Because interlayer hopping amplitudes in van der Waals magnets are known to vary by tens of meV under standard approximations, these omissions leave the quantitative gap sizes and the half-metallic window vulnerable to methodological artifacts.
  2. In the section presenting the effective Hamiltonian and microscopic model, a direct quantitative comparison between the model-derived gaps and the DFT band structures (including the magnitude of the inverted gap) is not shown. Without this, it is difficult to assess how faithfully the model captures the first-principles results that underpin the half-metal claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is information-dense; splitting the description of the V2OSSe results into separate sentences would improve readability.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the functional, vdW correction, and k-mesh used for each band-structure plot to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment of our work and for the constructive major comments. We have carefully addressed each point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional methodological details and comparisons. These changes will strengthen the presentation of our first-principles results and the effective model without altering the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of intrinsic antiferromagnetic half-metallicity in V2OSSe (abstract and results on first-principles calculations) rests on the predicted direct gap in one valley and band inversion in the other arising from spin-dependent interlayer hopping. The manuscript provides no convergence tests for k-point sampling, plane-wave cutoff, or sensitivity to the exchange-correlation functional and van der Waals correction. Because interlayer hopping amplitudes in van der Waals magnets are known to vary by tens of meV under standard approximations, these omissions leave the quantitative gap sizes and the half-metallic window vulnerable to methodological artifacts.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. The original manuscript indeed omitted explicit convergence tests and sensitivity analyses. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (or Supplementary Note) presenting systematic checks: k-point meshes from 9×9×1 to 24×24×1, plane-wave cutoffs from 450 eV to 700 eV, exchange-correlation functionals (PBE, PBEsol, and HSE06 where computationally feasible), and van der Waals corrections (DFT-D3, optB88-vdW, rVV10). While quantitative gap values shift by up to ~25 meV across these settings, the qualitative features—spin-selective gap opening in one valley and band inversion in the opposite valley—remain intact, preserving the antiferromagnetic half-metallic character. We will explicitly state the range of variation and its effect on the half-metallic window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the section presenting the effective Hamiltonian and microscopic model, a direct quantitative comparison between the model-derived gaps and the DFT band structures (including the magnitude of the inverted gap) is not shown. Without this, it is difficult to assess how faithfully the model captures the first-principles results that underpin the half-metal claim.

    Authors: We agree that a side-by-side quantitative comparison would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new panel (or Supplementary Figure) that directly overlays or tabulates the valley gaps and band dispersions obtained from the effective Hamiltonian against the corresponding DFT results for V2OSSe. The comparison will report the numerical values of the direct gap and the inverted gap, together with the fitted model parameters. Any residual discrepancies will be discussed in the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from ab initio DFT and derived model are independent of target property

full rationale

The paper's central claim for intrinsic AFM half-metallicity in sliding V2OSSe bilayers arises from first-principles calculations showing spin-dependent interlayer hopping that produces a direct gap in one valley/spin channel and band inversion in the other. This is not obtained by fitting any parameter to the half-metallic outcome itself, nor by defining the result in terms of itself. The microscopic model and effective Hamiltonian are constructed after the DFT observations to illustrate universality, but the primary evidence remains the numerical band-structure results under standard approximations. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation appear in the derivation chain. The work is a standard computational materials discovery and remains self-contained against external DFT benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT assumptions plus the specific choice of V2OSSe as representative; no new particles or forces are postulated, and the effective Hamiltonian is derived from the computed bands rather than fitted to the half-metallic outcome.

free parameters (1)
  • sliding vector
    The relative lateral shift between layers is chosen to induce the ferrovalley state; its precise value is material-specific and not derived from first principles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Kohn-Sham DFT with chosen exchange-correlation functional accurately describes interlayer hopping and band inversion in these van der Waals bilayers.
    Invoked implicitly when reporting first-principles results for V2OSSe.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1411 out tokens · 32000 ms · 2026-05-18T14:41:46.612668+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Third-order optical response in d-wave altermagnets: Analytical and numerical results from microscopic model

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Third-order photoconductivities in d-wave altermagnets are determined solely by quantum metric and connection, with closed-form solutions when delta-bond hopping vanishes and perturbative solutions otherwise, verified...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet as a prospective material for spintronics (2012)

    X. Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet as a prospective material for spintronics (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Van Leuken and R

    H. Van Leuken and R. De Groot, Physical review letters 74, 1171 (1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Nie and X

    Y.-m. Nie and X. Hu, Physical review letters100, 117203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Hu and X

    S.-J. Hu and X. Hu, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C114, 11614 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Akai and M

    H. Akai and M. Ogura, Physical review letters97, 026401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    H. Luo, L. Ma, Z. Zhu, G. Wu, H. Liu, J. Qu, and Y. Li, Physica B: Condensed Matter403, 1797 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02123 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Y. Fang, L. Chen, and Q. Si, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02295 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10364 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10371 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, J. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12366 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    J. Ren, X. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, J. Li, C. Li, and Q. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10369 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Z.-F. Gao, S. Qu, B. Zeng, J.-R. Wen, H. Sun, P. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04418 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Qu, Z.-F

    S. Qu, Z.-F. Gao, H. Sun, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11065 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Bipolarized weyl semimetals and quantum crystal valley hall effect in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16603, 2024

    C.-Y. Tan, Z.-F. Gao, H.-C. Yang, K. Liu, P.-J. Guo, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16603 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    S.-D. Guo, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13950 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.-M. Tang, Physical Review Letters130, 046401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Okugawa, K

    T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y. Noda, and S. Nakamura, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 075502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [21]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Phys. Rev. B 101, 220403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [22]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [23]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [24]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakat- suji, and T. Jungwirth, Nature Reviews Materials7, 482 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [25]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [26]

    D.-F. Shao, J. Ding, G. Gurung, S.-H. Zhang, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Physical Review Applied15, 024057 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [27]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12115 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [28]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Science advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [29]

    Samanta, M

    K. Samanta, M. Leˇ zai´ c, M. Merte, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Journal of applied physics127 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [30]

    R. G. Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, K. Olejn´ ık, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth,et al., Physical Re- view Letters130, 036702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [31]

    Samanta, M

    K. Samanta, M. Leˇ zai´ c, M. Merte, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Journal of Applied Physics127 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [32]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Physical Review B108, L180401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [33]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, journal of the physical society of japan88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    H. Bai, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, P. Chen, C. Wan, L. Han, W. Zhu, S. Liang, Y. Su, X. Han,et al., Physical review letters130, 216701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [35]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Bai, L. Han, C. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. H. Back, F. Pan, Y. Wang, and C. Song, Advanced Functional Materials , 2313332 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y.-y. Jiang, L. Jiang, C. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. He, B. He,et al., Advanced Science , 2400967 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [37]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin,et al., Nature Electronics5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [38]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Physical Review B 103, 125114 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [39]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Physical review letters129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [40]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y. Zhou, R. Su, Q. Wang, L. Liao, W. Zhu, X. Chen, F. Pan,et al., Physical Review Letters128, 197202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [41]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind,et al., Science Advances10, eadj4883 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [42]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, Physical Review B99, 184432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [43]

    Z. Lin, D. Chen, W. Lu, X. Liang, S. Feng, K. Yamagami, J. Osiecki, M. Leandersson, B. Thiagarajan, J. Liu,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04995 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [44]

    Berlijn, P

    T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire, H.-D. Zhou, T. A. Maier, H.-B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Matsuda, Y. Wang, M. R. Koehler,et al., Physical review letters118, 077201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [45]

    Tschirner, P

    T. Tschirner, P. Keßler, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, T. Kotte, D. Kriegner, B. B¨ uchner, J. Dufouleur, M. Kamp, V. Jovic, L. Smejkal,et al., APL Materials 11(2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [46]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova,et al., Physical Review Let- ters131, 256703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [47]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Physical Review B102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [48]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Physical Review X14, 011019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [49]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14645 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [50]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- 6 Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [52]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty,et al., Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [53]

    Urata, W

    T. Urata, W. Hattori, and H. Ikuta, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19233 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [54]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [55]

    S. Liao, X. Li, X. Chen, Z. Yu, J. Yao, R. Xu, J. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Y. Wang,et al., Chinese Physics Letters 42, 067503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [56]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Nature communications10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [57]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Physical Review B102, 075112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [58]

    Guo, X.-S

    S.-D. Guo, X.-S. Guo, K. Cheng, K. Wang, and Y. S. Ang, Applied Physics Letters123(2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [59]

    Sødequist and T

    J. Sødequist and T. Olsen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05992 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [60]

    Milivojevi´ c, M

    M. Milivojevi´ c, M. Orozovi´ c, S. Picozzi, M. Gmitra, and S. Stavri´ c, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15424 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [61]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Nature communications12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [62]

    Guo, Y.-L

    S.-D. Guo, Y.-L. Tao, G. Wang, and Y. S. Ang, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [63]

    He and S

    X. He and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B112, 075138 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [64]

    Sliding-induced ferrovalley polarization and possible antiferromagnetic half-metal in bilayer altermagnets

    X. Zhang and S. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.00430 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [65]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Physical review B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  64. [66]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical re- view letters77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  65. [67]

    R. Xu, Y. Gao, and J. Liu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15484 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [68]

    Li, Y.-K

    Y.-Q. Li, Y.-K. Zhang, X.-L. Lu, Y.-P. Shao, Z.-Q. Bao, J.-D. Zheng, W.-Y. Tong, and C.-G. Duan, Nano Letters 25, 6032 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [69]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [70]

    Z. Fu, M. Hu, A. Li, H. Duan, J. Liu, and F. Ouyang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22474 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [71]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    work page 2024