pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.18689 · v1 · submitted 2025-10-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-lat· hep-th· math-ph· math.MP· quant-ph

Modulated symmetries from generalized Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies

Hiromi Ebisu , Bo Han , Weiguang Cao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-lathep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords modulated symmetriesLieb-Schultz-Mattis anomaliesgaugingdipole algebrashigher-group symmetriesquantum lattice modelsanomaly inflow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gauging ordinary symmetries in the presence of generalized Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies produces spatially modulated symmetries and dipole algebras.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that spatially modulated symmetries, whose actions change with position and restrict particle mobility, arise directly when ordinary symmetries are gauged in systems that carry generalized Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies. This link was known in one dimension; the work extends it by building explicit lattice models in two and three dimensions and by giving field-theory descriptions valid in any spatial dimension. A sympathetic reader cares because the construction ties together sharp constraints on allowed quantum phases with the appearance of higher-group symmetry structures that control fracton-like behavior. The framework unifies anomaly inflow with the emergence of dipole algebras, offering a nonperturbative route to new classes of lattice models.

Core claim

Spatially modulated symmetries and their associated dipole algebras naturally emerge from gauging ordinary symmetries in the presence of generalized LSM type anomalies. Explicit lattice models are constructed in two and three spatial dimensions, while complementary field-theoretic descriptions in arbitrary dimensions connect LSM anomaly inflow to higher-group symmetry structures that govern the modulated symmetries.

What carries the argument

The gauging of ordinary symmetries in the presence of generalized LSM anomalies, which generates modulated symmetries together with their dipole algebras and higher-group structures.

If this is right

  • Lattice models in two and three dimensions realize spatially modulated symmetries with restricted mobility excitations.
  • Field theories in any dimension link LSM anomaly inflow to higher-group symmetries controlling the modulated phases.
  • The construction supplies a unified nonperturbative framework that ties LSM constraints directly to the dipole algebras of modulated symmetries.
  • New classes of quantum phases become classifiable by the type of generalized anomaly that generates their modulated symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gauging mechanism may generate modulated symmetries in systems with mixed anomalies or in the presence of disorder.
  • Higher-dimensional realizations could be used to engineer lattice models with tunable fracton-like excitations by choosing different anomaly classes.
  • The connection to higher-group symmetries suggests that similar modulated structures might appear in topological field theories beyond the lattice setting.

Load-bearing premise

That the gauging procedure and the structure of generalized LSM anomalies extend from one dimension to two and three dimensions without new obstructions that would block the emergence of modulated symmetries.

What would settle it

An explicit two-dimensional lattice model in which gauging an ordinary symmetry that carries a generalized LSM anomaly fails to produce a modulated symmetry or dipole algebra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.18689 by Bo Han, Hiromi Ebisu, Weiguang Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visual illustration of the LSM anomaly in the 1D cha [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Three types of terms defined in (14) that respecting the 0-form dipole symmetry (15). (b) 0- form dipole symmetry, forming dipole algebra (15) which is schematically portrayed as an inverse of a triangle in the bottom. 2.2 Examples of modulated symmetries in 2D and dipole algebra In this subsection, we briefly review modulated symmetries in 2D with a focus on 0-form and 1-form dipole symmetries. Here w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Three types of terms defined in (18) which constitute the Hamiltonian (17). (b) 1-form dipole symmetry, forming dipole algebra (21) which is schematically portrayed as a triangle in the bottom. where TI denotes lattice translational operator in the Ith-direction with the action TIOrT −1 I = Or+eI on local operator Or. The symmetry operators (15) realize the lattice analog of the dipole symmetry in the … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The first three terms in (29). (b) Example of the dipole algebra (34) in the case of N = 2 and Lx even. Note that as opposed to previous studies which discuss dipole algebra involving the same form, we have unusual dipole algebra which involves 0-form and 1-form symmetry. Namely, acting a translational operator on the 0-form symmetry yields stack of 1-form symmetries. In the present case, the stack of … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Spin coupling terms in the first line of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual illustration of the charge Q[Σ2,Σ y 1 ,e x ], which is composed of stack of the currents ∗ j (2) located on Σ y 1 (blue lines on the right hand side) along the x-direction. In summary, we introduce a (d + 1)-dimensional theory where there are p-form and (d − p − 1)- form ZN global symmetries with LSM type anomaly (71). Gauging either of the global symmetry leads to a dual modulated symmetry. This is… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) [The first three configurations]: Spin coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Three terms in (100). The top view of Glz from the z-axis is also shown. (b) Nine flux operators introduced in (99). (c) An example of the dipole algebra in the case of N = 2, even Ly and odd Lz . When acting a translational operator on a noncontractible membrane operator, a loop operator is generated. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Gauss’s laws corresponding to (104). (b) The action of translational operator in the x￾direction on 0-form symmetry Q (0)zx,2 (left) gives rise to 1-form symmetry, Q (1)zx (right) in the case of N = 2, even Lx and odd Ly. The similar constraint Q (0)xy,1 cx × [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Symmetries rigidly delimit the landscape of quantum matter. Recently uncovered spatially modulated symmetries, whose actions vary with position, enable excitations with restricted mobility, while Lieb-Schultz-Mattis (LSM) type anomalies impose sharp constraints on which lattice phases are realizable. In one dimensional a spin chain, gauging procedures have linked modulated symmetry to LSM type anomaly, but a general understanding beyond 1D remains incomplete. We show that spatially modulated symmetries and their associated dipole algebras naturally emerge from gauging ordinary symmetries in the presence of generalized LSM type anomalies. We construct explicit lattice models in two and three spatial dimensions and develop complementary field theoretic descriptions in arbitrary spatial dimensions that connect LSM anomaly inflow to higher-group symmetry structures governing the modulated symmetries. Our results provide a unified, nonperturbative framework that ties together LSM constraints and spatially modulated symmetries across dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that spatially modulated symmetries and their associated dipole algebras naturally emerge from gauging ordinary symmetries in the presence of generalized LSM-type anomalies. It constructs explicit lattice models in two and three spatial dimensions and develops complementary field-theoretic descriptions in arbitrary dimensions that connect LSM anomaly inflow to higher-group symmetry structures.

Significance. If the constructions are correct, this work supplies a unified nonperturbative framework tying LSM constraints to modulated symmetries across dimensions, with potential implications for understanding restricted-mobility excitations. The explicit lattice models in d=2,3 and the field-theory connection to higher-group structures are concrete strengths that go beyond abstract anomaly matching.

major comments (1)
  1. [lattice models in two and three dimensions] The gauging construction in d=2,3 (lattice models section): the manuscript must explicitly verify that the modulated symmetry operators and dipole algebra close without additional cocycle factors or mobility obstructions that are absent in the 1D case; the abstract and introduction present this extension as direct, but the 1D commutation relations do not automatically guarantee the same structure on a higher-dimensional lattice.
minor comments (1)
  1. [field theoretic descriptions] Notation for the higher-group structures in the field-theory section could be clarified with a short table comparing the 1D and higher-d cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point regarding the lattice models in two and three dimensions below, providing a direct response and indicating the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [lattice models in two and three dimensions] The gauging construction in d=2,3 (lattice models section): the manuscript must explicitly verify that the modulated symmetry operators and dipole algebra close without additional cocycle factors or mobility obstructions that are absent in the 1D case; the abstract and introduction present this extension as direct, but the 1D commutation relations do not automatically guarantee the same structure on a higher-dimensional lattice.

    Authors: We agree that the one-dimensional commutation relations do not automatically extend to higher dimensions and that explicit verification is required. In the lattice models section we construct the modulated symmetry operators for the two- and three-dimensional cases by gauging the ordinary symmetries subject to the generalized LSM anomalies. We compute the commutation relations of these operators directly on the finite lattice, confirming that the dipole algebra closes without additional cocycle phases. The absence of mobility obstructions follows from the explicit form of the gauged operators, which inherit the anomaly inflow structure already verified in one dimension; this is cross-checked against the higher-group symmetry description developed in the field-theory sections. To make the verification fully transparent and independent of the one-dimensional results, we will add a new subsection that tabulates the operator definitions and commutation relations for representative 2D and 3D lattices, together with a short proof that no extra phases arise from the periodic boundary conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: explicit lattice constructions and field theory derivations are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper demonstrates the emergence of modulated symmetries and dipole algebras by constructing explicit lattice models in two and three dimensions and by developing complementary field-theoretic descriptions that link LSM anomaly inflow to higher-group structures. These steps rely on direct gauging procedures and anomaly matching rather than self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior unverified inputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the constructed models, with no quoted reductions where outputs equal inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and gaugability of generalized LSM anomalies in higher dimensions and on the validity of the anomaly-inflow mechanism linking to higher-group symmetry.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Generalized LSM-type anomalies exist and behave analogously under gauging in dimensions greater than one.
    Invoked to derive the emergence of modulated symmetries from ordinary symmetry gauging.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1168 out tokens · 34690 ms · 2026-05-18T04:51:48.846744+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Type-IV 't Hooft Anomalies on the Lattice: Emergent Higher-Categorical Symmetries and Applications to LSM Systems

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A concrete lattice model realizing a type-IV mixed anomaly yields emergent higher-categorical symmetries upon gauging, and the same framework applied to Lieb-Schultz-Mattis systems produces modulated symmetries whose ...

  2. Lattice Gauging Interfaces and Noninvertible Defects in Higher Dimensions

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Explicit lattice constructions of gauging interfaces and condensation defects are given for higher-dimensional systems with higher-form symmetries, using movement operators to manage constrained Hilbert spaces.

  3. Matrix Product States for Modulated Topological Phases: Crystalline Equivalence Principle and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Constraints

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Modulated SPT phases in 1D are classified by H²(G, U(1)_s) and obey LSM-type theorems forbidding symmetric short-range entangled ground states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nussinov and G

    Z. Nussinov and G. Ortiz, “Sufficient symmetry condition s for topological quantum order,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 no. 40, (2009) 16944–16949 . https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.0803726105

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0803726105 2009

  2. [2]

    Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory

    J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “Dua lity and defects in rational conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 763 (2007) 354–430 , arXiv:hep-th/0607247

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  3. [3]

    Feiguin, S

    A. Feiguin, S. Trebst, A. W. Ludwig, M. Troyer, A. Kitaev, Z. Wang, and M. H. Freedman Physical review letters 98 no. 16, (2007) 160409

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Gen eralized Global Symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Topological defe cts on the lattice: I. the ising model,

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, and P . Fendley, “Topological defe cts on the lattice: I. the ising model,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49 no. 35, (Aug, 2016) 354001 . https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/35/354001

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/35/354001 2016

  6. [6]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y .-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y . Wang, and X. Yin, “T opological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,” JHEP 01 (2019) 026, arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases

    R. Thorngren and Y . Wang, “Fusion category symmetry i: an omaly in-flow and gapped phases,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02817 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1912

  8. [8]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Categorical symmetry and noninvert ible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (Sep, 2020) 033417 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033417

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033417 2020

  9. [9]

    McGreevy, Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, arXiv:2204.03045

    J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matt er,” Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 14 (2023) 57–82 , arXiv:2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H . Shao, “Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond, ” in Snowmass 2021. 5, 2022. arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lecture s on Non-Invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Glad den, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on generalized symmetries,” Phys. Rept. 1051 (2024) 1–87 , arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th] . 36

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP lectures on (non-)invertibl e generalized symmetries,” Phys. Rept. 1063 (2024) 1–55 , arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Chamon, Quantum glassiness in strongly correlated clean systems: An example of topological overprotection, Physical Review Letters94, 10.1103/physrevlett.94.040402 (2005)

    C. Chamon, “Quantum glassiness in strongly correlated clean systems: An example of topological overprotection,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (Jan, 2005) 040402. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.040402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.040402 2005

  15. [15]

    Physical Review A83(4) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.83.042330

    J. Haah, “Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions wi thout string logical operators,” Phys. Rev. A 83 (Apr, 2011) 042330. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.042330

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042330 2011

  16. [16]

    Vijay, J

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, “Fracton topological order , generalized lattice gauge theory, and duality,” Phys. Rev. B 94 (Dec, 2016) 235157 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235157

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.235157 2016

  17. [17]

    Scalar Field Theories with Polynomial Shift Symmetries

    T. Griffin, K. T. Grosvenor, P . Horava, and Z. Y an, “Scala r Field Theories with Polynomial Shift Symmetries,” Commun. Math. Phys. 340 no. 3, (2015) 985–1048 , arXiv:1412.1046 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    The Fracton Gauge Principle

    M. Pretko, “The Fracton Gauge Principle,” Phys. Rev. B 98 no. 11, (2018) 115134 , arXiv:1807.11479 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Gromov, Phys

    A. Gromov, “Towards classification of fracton phases: T he multipole algebra,” Phys. Rev. X 9 (Aug, 2019) 031035 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031035 2019

  20. [20]

    Pretko, Z

    M. Pretko, Z. Zhai, and L. Radzihovsky, “Crystal-to-fr acton tensor gauge theory dualities,” Phys. Rev. B 100 (Oct, 2019) 134113. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.134113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.134113 2019

  21. [21]

    Gorantla, H

    P . Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, “Glob al dipole symmetry, compact Lifshitz theory, tensor gauge theory, and fractons,” Phys. Rev. B 106 no. 4, (2022) 045112 , arXiv:2201.10589 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Dipolar bose-hubb ard model,

    E. Lake, M. Hermele, and T. Senthil, “Dipolar bose-hubb ard model,” Physical Review B 106 no. 6, (Aug, 2022) 064511 , arXiv:2201.04132 [cond-mat.quant-gas] . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.064511

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.064511 2022

  23. [23]

    Dipole con densates in tilted bose-hubbard chains,

    E. Lake, H.-Y . Lee, J. H. Han, and T. Senthil, “Dipole con densates in tilted bose-hubbard chains,” Physical Review B 107 no. 19, (May, 2023) 195132 , arXiv:2210.02470 [cond-mat.quant-gas] . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195132

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.195132 2023

  24. [24]

    Frac tonic luttinger liquids and supersolids in a constrained bose-hubbard model,

    P . Zechmann, E. Altman, M. Knap, and J. Feldmeier, “Frac tonic luttinger liquids and supersolids in a constrained bose-hubbard model,” Physical Review B 107 no. 19, (May, 2023) 195131 , arXiv:2210.11072 [cond-mat.quant-gas] . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195131. 37

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.195131 2023

  25. [25]

    Dyn amics in systems with modulated symmetries,

    P . Sala, J. Lehmann, T. Rakovszky, and F. Pollmann, “Dyn amics in systems with modulated symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (Oct, 2022) 170601. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.170601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.170601 2022

  26. [26]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, “Quantum many-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results,” Reports on Progress in Physics 85 no. 8, (Jul, 2022) 086501 . https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ac73a0

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac73a0 2022

  27. [27]

    Position-dependent excitati ons and uv/ir mixing in the ̥ N rank-2 toric code and its low-energy effective field theory,

    S. D. Pace and X.-G. Wen, “Position-dependent excitati ons and uv/ir mixing in the ̥ N rank-2 toric code and its low-energy effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 045145. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045145

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.045145 2022

  28. [28]

    Anyon condensation web and multip artite entanglement in two-dimensional modulated gauge theories,

    G. Delfino and Y . Y ou, “Anyon condensation web and multip artite entanglement in two-dimensional modulated gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. B 109 no. 20, (2024) 205146 , arXiv:2310.09490 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Foliated field the ories and multipole symmetries,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, and T. Nakanishi, “Foliated field the ories and multipole symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 109 (Apr, 2024) 165112. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.165112

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.165112 2024

  30. [30]

    Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids,

    X.-G. Wen, “Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, ” Phys. Rev. B 65 (Apr, 2002) 165113. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.165113 2002

  31. [31]

    Classifying fractionaliza tion: Symmetry classification of gapped ̥ 2 spin liquids in two dimensions,

    A. M. Essin and M. Hermele, “Classifying fractionaliza tion: Symmetry classification of gapped ̥ 2 spin liquids in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 87 (Mar, 2013) 104406. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.104406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.104406 2013

  32. [32]

    Classification of symmetry enric hed topological phases with exactly solvable models,

    A. Mesaros and Y . Ran, “Classification of symmetry enric hed topological phases with exactly solvable models,” Phys. Rev. B 87 (Apr, 2013) 155115. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.155115

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.155115 2013

  33. [33]

    Translational symmetry and microscopic constraints on symmetry-enriched topological phases: a view from the surface

    M. Cheng, M. Zaletel, M. Barkeshli, A. Vishwanath, and P . Bonderson, “Translational Symmetry and Microscopic Constraints on Symmetry-Enriched Topolog ical Phases: A View from the Surface,” Phys. Rev. X 6 no. 4, (2016) 041068 , arXiv:1511.02263 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Multipole and fra cton topological order via gauging foliated symmetry protected topological phases,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, and T. Nakanishi, “Multipole and fra cton topological order via gauging foliated symmetry protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (May, 2024) 023166. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023166

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023166 2024

  35. [35]

    Spacetime symmetr y-enriched SymTFT: from LSM anomalies to modulated symmetries and beyond,

    S. D. Pace, Ö. M. Aksoy, and H. T. Lam, “Spacetime symmetr y-enriched SymTFT: from LSM anomalies to modulated symmetries and beyond,” arXiv:2507.02036 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Nondiagonal anisotropic quant um Hall states,

    P . M. Tam and C. L. Kane, “Nondiagonal anisotropic quant um Hall states,” Phys. Rev. B 103 no. 3, (2021) 035142 , arXiv:2009.08993 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Toric-code insulator enriched by translation symmetry,

    P . M. Tam, J. W. F. V enderbos, and C. L. Kane, “Toric-code insulator enriched by translation symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B 105 no. 4, (2022) 045106 , arXiv:2107.04030 [cond-mat.str-el] . 38

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Classification of dipolar symmetry-protect ed topological phases: Matrix product states, stabilizer hamiltonians, and finite tensor gauge th eories,

    H. T. Lam, “Classification of dipolar symmetry-protect ed topological phases: Matrix product states, stabilizer hamiltonians, and finite tensor gauge th eories,” Phys. Rev. B 109 (Mar, 2024) 115142. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.115142

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.115142 2024

  39. [40]

    Defect networks for topological phases pr otected by modulated symmetries,

    D. Bulmash, “Defect networks for topological phases pr otected by modulated symmetries,” 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06604

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    Lattice Translation Modulated Symmetries and TFTs,

    C.-Y . Y ao, “Lattice Translation Modulated Symmetries and TFTs,” arXiv:2510.03889 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  41. [42]

    Seifnashri, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries, arXiv:2308.05151

    S. Seifnashri, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obs tructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,” SciPost Phys. 16 no. 4, (2024) 098 , arXiv:2308.05151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [43]

    Gauging modulated symmetries: Kramers-Wannier dualities and non-invertible reflections,

    S. D. Pace, G. Delfino, H. T. Lam, and O. M. Aksoy, “Gauging modulated symmetries: Kramers-Wannier dualities and non-invertible reflections ,” arXiv:2406.12962 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  43. [44]

    Generating Lattice Non- invertible Symmetries,

    W. Cao, L. Li, and M. Y amazaki, “Generating Lattice Non- invertible Symmetries,” arXiv:2406.05454 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  44. [45]

    Lieb- Schultz-Mattis anomalies and web of dualities induced by gauging in quantum spin chains,

    Ö. M. Aksoy, C. Mudry, A. Furusaki, and A. Tiwari, “Lieb- Schultz-Mattis anomalies and web of dualities induced by gauging in quantum spin chains,” SciPost Phys. 16 no. 1, (2024) 022 , arXiv:2308.00743 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    Partition function of the Eight-Vertex lattice model

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, “Two soluble models o f an antiferromagnetic chain,” Annals of Physics 16 no. 3, (1961) 407–466 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491661901154

    work page arXiv 1961

  46. [47]

    A proof of part of Haldane’s con jecture on spin chains,

    I. Affleck and E. H. Lieb, “A proof of part of Haldane’s con jecture on spin chains,” Letters in Mathematical Physics 12 no. 1, (July, 1986) 57–69

    work page 1986

  47. [48]

    Commensurability, excitation gap, and t opology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice,

    M. Oshikawa, “Commensurability, excitation gap, and t opology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (Feb, 2000) 1535–1538 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1535

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.1535 2000

  48. [49]

    Lieb-schultz-mattis in higher dimens ions,

    M. B. Hastings, “Lieb-schultz-mattis in higher dimens ions,” Phys. Rev. B 69 (Mar, 2004) 104431. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.104431

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.104431 2004

  49. [50]

    Noninvertible operators in one, tw o, and three dimensions via gauging spatially modulated symmetry,

    H. Ebisu and B. Han, “Noninvertible operators in one, tw o, and three dimensions via gauging spatially modulated symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B 111 (Jan, 2025) 035149 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.035149

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.035149 2025

  50. [51]

    Foliated field theories and multipole symmetries,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, and T. Nakanishi, “Foliated field the ories and multipole symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 109 no. 16, (2024) 165112 , arXiv:2310.06701 [cond-mat.str-el] . 39

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [52]

    Anomaly inflow for dipole symmetry and higher form foliated field theories,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, and T. Nakanishi, “Anomaly inflow for dipole symmetry and higher form foliated field theories,” arXiv:2406.04919 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  52. [53]

    Anomalies and unusual st ability of multicomponent Luttinger liquids in Zn×Zn spin chains,

    Y . Alavirad and M. Barkeshli, “Anomalies and unusual st ability of multicomponent Luttinger liquids in Zn×Zn spin chains,” Phys. Rev. B 104 no. 4, (2021) 045151 , arXiv:1910.00589 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [54]

    Duality in field theory and statistical syste ms,

    R. Savit, “Duality in field theory and statistical syste ms,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (Apr, 1980) 453–487 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.453

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.453 1980

  54. [55]

    Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases,

    M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, “Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B 86 (Sep, 2012) 115109 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115109

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.115109 2012

  55. [56]

    Topological quantum chains protected by dipolar and other modulated symmetries,

    J. H. Han, E. Lake, H. T. Lam, R. V erresen, and Y . Y ou, “Topological quantum chains protected by dipolar and other modulated symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 109 no. 12, (2024) 125121 , arXiv:2309.10036 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by any ons,

    A. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by any ons,” Annals of Physics 303 no. 1, (2003) 2–30 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491602000180

    work page 2003

  57. [58]

    Anomalous discrete symm etries in three dimensions and group cohomology,

    A. Kapustin and R. Thorngren, “Anomalous discrete symm etries in three dimensions and group cohomology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (Jun, 2014) 231602 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.231602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.231602 2014

  58. [59]

    Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries

    C. Córdova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator, “Exp loring 2-Group Global Symmetries,” JHEP 02 (2019) 184, arXiv:1802.04790 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [60]

    A symmetry pri nciple for gauge theories with fractons,

    Y . Hirono, M. Y ou, S. Angus, and G. Y . Cho, “A symmetry pri nciple for gauge theories with fractons,” SciPost Phys. 16 no. 2, (2024) 050 , arXiv:2207.00854 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [61]

    Foliated quantum field theory of fracton ord er,

    K. Slagle, “Foliated quantum field theory of fracton ord er,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (Mar, 2021) 101603. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.101603 2021

  61. [62]

    Slagle, D

    K. Slagle, D. Aasen, and D. Williamson, “Foliated field t heory and string-membrane-net condensation picture of fracton order,” SciPost Phys. 6 (2019) 043. https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.4.043

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.6.4.043 2019

  62. [63]

    Topological insulator s in three dimensions,

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, “Topological insulator s in three dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (Mar, 2007) 106803. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.106803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.106803 2007

  63. [64]

    Stripe melting, a transition between weak and strong symmetry protected topological phases

    Y . Y ou and Y .-Z. Y ou, “Stripe melting and a transition between weak and strong symmetry protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B 93 no. 19, (2016) 195141 , arXiv:1601.00657 [cond-mat.str-el] . 40

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [65]

    Fermionic Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorems and Weak Symmetry-Protected Phases

    M. Cheng, “Fermionic Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorems an d weak symmetry-protected phases,” Phys. Rev. B 99 no. 7, (2019) 075143 , arXiv:1804.10122 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [66]

    Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups , SciPost Phys

    Y . Tachikawa, “On gauging finite subgroups,” SciPost Phys. 8 no. 1, (2020) 015 , arXiv:1712.09542 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  66. [67]

    Subsystem Symmetry Fractionalization and Foliated Field Theory,

    P .-S. Hsin, D. T. Stephen, A. Dua, and D. J. Williamson, “ Subsystem symmetry fractionalization and foliated field theory,” SciPost Phys. 18 no. 5, (2025) 147 , arXiv:2403.09098 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    Symmetric higher rank topological phases on generic graphs,

    H. Ebisu, “Symmetric higher rank topological phases on generic graphs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03747 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [69]

    Matrix product st ate classification of 1D multipole symmetry protected topological phases,

    T. Saito, W. Cao, B. Han, and H. Ebisu, “Matrix product st ate classification of 1D multipole symmetry protected topological phases,” arXiv:2509.09244 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  69. [70]

    New Field Theories with Foliation Structure and Subdimensional Particles from Godbillon-Vey Invariant,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, T. Nakanishi, and S. Shimamori, “New field theories with foliation structure and subdimensional particles from the Godbillon-V ey invariant,” Phys. Rev. D 112 no. 2, (2025) 025010 , arXiv:2408.05048 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    Exact Quant um Many-Body Scars in 2D Quantum Gauge Models,

    Y . Miao, L. Li, H. Katsura, and M. Y amazaki, “Exact Quant um Many-Body Scars in 2D Quantum Gauge Models,” arXiv:2505.21921 [cond-mat.str-el] . 41

    work page arXiv