Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that kagome edge states are governed by lattice termination, spin-orbit coupling, and magnetic order: flat cuts suppress them, Kane-Mele coupling makes helical edge states termination-independent, and magnetism yields Cher

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 23:53 UTC pith:3GVYX24Q

load-bearing objection A useful termination-resolved catalog of kagome edge states, built with standard methods and internally consistent results, but the missing slab-width reporting and a likely typo in Jc need fixing before I'd trust the details. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2602.12223 v2 pith:3GVYX24Q submitted 2026-02-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.supr-con

Kagome edge states under lattice termination, spin-orbit coupling, and magnetic order

Sajid Sekh , Annica M. Black-Schaffer , Andrzej Ptok This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.supr-con
keywords kagome latticeedge stateslattice terminationKane-Mele spin-orbit couplingquantum spin Hall effectChern insulatorquantum anomalous Hall effectscalar spin chirality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Using tight-binding slab calculations, this paper asks when a two-dimensional kagome lattice—a net of corner-sharing triangles—carries localized electronic states at its edges. It finds that in the pristine lattice the answer is decided by the boundary geometry: zigzag, armchair, and cove terminations host one to five edge states, while a flat termination completely removes them. Adding Kane-Mele spin-orbit coupling opens bulk gaps and produces a Z2 topological insulator with helical, spin-polarized edge states that appear for every termination, making the topological edge modes insensitive to the boundary details that control trivial edge states. When time-reversal symmetry is broken, either by a Zeeman field plus Rashba coupling or by a non-coplanar magnetic texture with finite scalar spin chirality, the system enters Chern insulating phases; the number of chiral edge modes seen in the slab matches the computed Chern number in each gap. If these results hold, they give a termination-resolved recipe for engineering edge transport in kagome materials, and explain why different cleaved or terraced surfaces of the same compound can show very different edge spectra.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a termination-resolved map of edge states in a single-orbital tight-binding model of the kagome lattice. In the pristine limit, edge-state existence and multiplicity are highly sensitive to the boundary: out of the four line-cut terminations considered—zigzag, armchair, cove, and flat—only the flat termination completely suppresses localized edge modes, while mixed terminations combine the edge states of their constituents. Kane-Mele spin-orbit coupling changes the picture qualitatively: it opens bulk gaps at the Dirac point and near the flat band, and the system becomes a Z2 topological insulator whose helical edge states are spin-polarized, counter-propagating,

What carries the argument

The argument runs on exact diagonalization of tight-binding Hamiltonians on kagome slabs, and the central objects are the four line-cut terminations (zigzag, armchair, cove, flat) that define the boundary geometry. The topological classification is carried by two invariants: the Z2 index, computed from the odd winding of Wilson-loop eigenvalue phases across half the Brillouin zone (the signature of the Kane-Mele quantum spin Hall phase), and the Chern number, computed from integrated Berry curvature and matched to the number of chiral edge modes in each bulk gap. The magnetic mechanisms are the Zeeman plus Rashba combination, which lifts spin degeneracy to open Chern gaps, and scalar spin ch

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the slab widths used in the exact-diagonalization calculations — stated only as 'large enough to avoid hybridization between edge states' — are genuinely large enough that the reported in-gap edge modes survive the thermodynamic limit and are not finite-size artifacts.

What would settle it

Repeat the slab calculations of Figs. 3–5 and 7 for a systematic series of slab widths (e.g., 10 to 100 unit cells) and track the number, degeneracy, and dispersion of the in-gap edge states; if any of the reported edge modes appears, disappears, or changes its degeneracy as the width grows, the termination-resolved classification is a finite-size artifact rather than a bulk property. Alternatively, on the experimental side, a flat-terminated surface of a pristine kagome material surveyed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy should show no localized edge-state signal near the Fermi level, while

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Flat-terminated kagome surfaces should show no pristine edge states; any edge conductance observed there must come from spin-orbit or magnetic effects, not from the bare lattice.
  • In the Kane-Mele regime, edge channels are helical and termination-independent, so transport along arbitrarily cut edges of a Z2 kagome insulator should be backscattering-free.
  • In the Zeeman+Rashba and non-coplanar regimes, measuring the quantized anomalous Hall conductance sigma_xy = C e^2/h directly counts the number of chiral edge modes, providing a sharp experimental test of bulk-boundary correspondence.
  • Kane-Mele coupling acts as a switch: it can create new Chern phases (C=-1 from non-coplanar order), flip the sign of an existing phase (C=1 to C=-1 in the Zeeman+Rashba case), or destroy all Chern phases, so tuning intrinsic SOC is a practical knob for controlling the direction and presence of chiral edge transport.
  • The sign changes of the anomalous Hall conductivity at van Hove singularities (Lifshitz transitions) connect the Hall response to Fermi-surface topology, meaning that Hall measurements can track Lifshitz transitions in kagome metals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: STM measurements on flat-terminated versus armchair-terminated terraces of a real kagome material (e.g., FeGe or Co3Sn2S2) should show an absence of edge-state LDOS at flat steps and clear edge-state peaks at zigzag or armchair steps, isolating the termination effect in a material with finite spin-orbit coupling.
  • The paper's results suggest termination can be used as a design parameter for valley-selective or orbital-angular-momentum-carrying edge channels; the triangular LDOS pattern at armchair edges implies a net orbital angular momentum that could be read out in orbital Hall or optospintronic experiments.
  • The critical exchange field Jc and the phase diagram's sensitivity to Kane-Mele coupling imply that alloying or strain, which modifies intrinsic SOC, could drive a kagome magnet across a topological transition; this is an inference about materials control that the paper does not claim directly.
  • The finding that KMSOC transforms chiral modes into helical-like modes at higher coupling (mentioned for the non-coplanar case) suggests a general competition between Chern and spin-Hall orderings that could appear in other frustrated lattices with both intrinsic SOC and non-coplanar order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical tight-binding study of a two-dimensional kagome lattice in slab geometry. It first identifies four lattice terminations (zigzag, armchair, cove, flat) and reports that in the pristine limit the existence and number of localized in-gap states depend strongly on termination, with the flat edge hosting no edge states. It then adds Kane–Mele spin–orbit coupling, computes the Z2 index via Wilson-loop winding, and reports spin-polarized helical edge states in a quantum spin Hall phase that are insensitive to edge termination. Breaking time-reversal symmetry by an out-of-plane Zeeman field plus Rashba spin–orbit coupling gives quantum anomalous Hall phases with Chern numbers resolved from Berry curvature, Hall conductivity, and edge-mode counting, with Kane–Mele coupling further modifying the Chern phases. Finally, non-coplanar q=0 magnetic order with scalar spin chirality is shown to produce subcritical and supercritical exchange regimes with multiple Chern phases. The central claim is a termination-resolved map of kagome edge states and topology across these models.

Significance. If the reported identification is correct, the work provides a useful systematic catalogue of boundary-sensitive and boundary-insensitive edge states in a widely studied model. It connects termination-dependent spectral features to experimental observations in kagome materials and gives concrete model predictions for Chern and Z2 edge-mode counts. The methods are standard and the manuscript is transparent about importing the critical-exchange expression from Ref. [45]. I find no fitting-to-data circularity: parameters are hand-chosen, and the Wilson-loop and Berry-curvature invariants are evaluated with independent standard tools. The main obstacle is that the finite-slab evidence is not yet quantitatively supported; once slab widths and convergence tests are provided, and the Eq. (19) typo is fixed, the central conclusions are likely to hold.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections III–VI, Figs. 2–7] No slab width (in unit cells or sites) is reported for any slab calculation, and no convergence test is given. Section IV only says that the width is kept 'large enough to avoid hybridization' without quantitative support. This is load-bearing: the termination-resolved edge-state inventories of Fig. 2, the complete suppression for flat termination, and the matching of chiral edge-mode counts to Chern numbers in Figs. 4–7 all depend on the chosen finite width. I request per-termination and per-gap widths, BZ sampling, and a short convergence study showing that the in-gap states and their splittings stabilize with increasing width.
  2. [Section VI, Eq. (19)] As typeset, J_c(θ)/t = ±2√(1+3cos²θ) gives J_c/t ≈ 2.646 at θ=π/3, inconsistent with the quoted J_c/t ≈ 1.51. The quoted value corresponds to J_c/t = ±2/√(1+3cos²θ). Since J_c separates the subcritical and supercritical regimes used throughout Section VI, especially in Figs. 6 and 7, the formula must be corrected and the numerical values and phase assignments re-verified. If the reciprocal form is intended, the manuscript should state this explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II and Sec. IV] Typographical errors: 'anihilates' after Eq. (1) should be 'annihilates'; 'egeinvalue' in the Wilson-loop discussion should be 'eigenvalue'.
  2. [Eq. (8) and Figs. 3–7] The position-weighted amplitude ρ_{n,a}(k) uses r·ê_a, but r is not defined as the position vector in the slab coordinate system. Please clarify the origin and normalization of r, and add color bars to the slab band-structure figures showing the position expectation value.
  3. [Fig. 2 captions] The middle panels show energy levels versus 'state index'; the ordering of the state index and the counting of degenerate edge states should be explained in the caption or text.
  4. [Fig. 4(c)] The text notes that chiral modes appear twice because of the projected BZ period. This should be made explicit in the caption at first occurrence to avoid confusion about edge-mode counting.
  5. [Supplemental Material] Figures SF1 and SF2 lack axis labels and color bars for spin polarization and position expectation; please add them for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: all claimed edge-state and topological classifications are independent calculations from the stated tight-binding Hamiltonians, using standard bulk-boundary-correspondence checks rather than fitted or self-referential inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not fit any parameter to data and then rename that fit as a prediction. The Hamiltonians in Eqs. (1), (6), (12), (13), and (17) are hand-chosen model inputs; the edge-state inventories in Figs. 2, 4, 5, and 7 and the topological invariants (Z2 via Wilson loop, Chern numbers via anomalous Hall conductivity) are computed from those Hamiltonians by standard exact-diagonalization and Berry-curvature methods. The statement that the number of chiral edge modes matches the Chern number is a check of bulk-boundary correspondence, not a circular reduction: both quantities are independently computed from the same band structure, and the direction/slope of edge modes is used only as verification. The Z2 classification uses the Wilson-loop eigenvalue winding, an external and standard criterion, and does not assume the existence of helical edge states. The critical exchange formula Jc in Eq. (19) is imported with explicit attribution to Ref. [45]; even though the printed formula is numerically inconsistent with the quoted value Jc ≈ 1.51 (this is a correctness/typesetting concern, not circularity), it is an externally sourced result and not a self-citation. The two self-citations, Ref. [53] for position-weighted amplitude and Ref. [67] for Rashba modeling, are methodological and do not carry the central claims: the termination-dependent edge states, Z2 phase, and Chern phases do not reduce to these citations. Unreported slab widths and the absence of a convergence test are finite-size-validity concerns, but they do not constitute circular reasoning. Overall, no step in the derivation chain equates a prediction to an input by construction or relies on a load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a numerical study of standard tight-binding models. No data fitting is performed, and the parameters are hand-chosen model couplings. The main external inputs are the bulk-boundary correspondence, Wilson-loop methodology, and the critical-exchange formula from prior literature. No new particles, fields, or entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Kane-Mele coupling lambda_KM/t = 0.15 for band plots; phase diagrams explored up to 0.3-1.0
    Hand-picked SOC strength that controls which topological gaps open; no fitting to experimental data.
  • Rashba coupling lambda_R/t = 0.2 (and 0.5 in Sec. VI scans)
    Hand-picked to open Chern gaps in the Zeeman case; the central phase diagrams depend on this choice.
  • Zeeman field hz/t = 0.6
    Model parameter representing ferromagnetic exchange; chosen to produce spin splitting without fully depolarizing the bands.
  • Exchange coupling J/t for non-coplanar order = 0.5 (subcritical) and 2 (supercritical)
    Chosen relative to the reported Jc to place the system in two regimes; the regime labels depend on the Jc formula.
  • Canting angle theta = pi/3
    Chosen from experimental estimates of canting in kagome minerals; sets Jc and the spin chirality magnitude.
  • Critical exchange Jc(θ)/t = 1.51 at theta=pi/3 (quoted)
    Imported from ref. [45] and used to classify subcritical versus supercritical regimes. As typeset in Eq. (19) the formula gives 2.646, not 1.51; a correction is needed.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Single-orbital nearest-neighbor tight-binding model of the kagome lattice (Eq. 1) captures the relevant edge physics.
    All results are computed within this model; real kagome materials have multiple orbitals, longer-range hoppings, and interactions that are neglected.
  • standard math Bulk-boundary correspondence relates Chern/Z2 invariants to edge modes.
    Used throughout Sections IV-VI to identify the observed edge states with the computed topological invariants.
  • domain assumption Fixed classical-spin description of magnetic order; spins are non-fluctuating vectors (Eqs. 17-18).
    The non-coplanar texture and the critical coupling Jc from ref. [45] are derived in this classical Kondo-lattice picture.
  • standard math Wilson-loop winding criterion for the Z2 invariant (Eqs. 9-10).
    Standard method; applied with a specific reference line theta_c=-0.3 to detect odd crossings.
  • domain assumption Critical exchange formula Jc(θ)/t from ref. [45] (Eq. 19).
    Used to separate subcritical and supercritical exchange regimes; as typeset it is inconsistent with the quoted numerical value.
  • domain assumption Kane-Mele (Eq. 6) and Rashba (Eq. 12) forms exhaust the relevant spin-orbit coupling.
    Other spin-orbit terms and multi-orbital effects are neglected, which could change the reported phase boundaries.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 20856 in / 23632 out tokens · 223312 ms · 2026-08-02T23:53:53.614529+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the edge state properties of a two-dimensional kagome lattice using a tight-binding approach, focusing on the role of lattice termination, spin-orbit coupling, and magnetic order. In the pristine limit, we show that the existence of localized edge states is highly sensitive to boundary geometry, with certain terminations completely suppressing edge modes. Kane-Mele spin-orbit coupling opens a bulk gap and stabilizes topologically protected helical edge states, yielding a robust $\mathbb{Z}_2$ insulating phase that is insensitive to termination details. In contrast, the combined effect of a Zeeman field and Rashba spin-orbit coupling drives the system into Chern insulating phases, with Chern numbers consistent with the number of chiral edge modes. We further demonstrate that non-coplanar magnetic textures generate multiple Chern phases through finite scalar spin chirality, with Kane-Mele coupling strongly tuning the topological gaps. Our results provide important insights into the tunability of edge states in the kagome lattice, which can be key to designing materials with novel electronic properties and topological phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.12223 by Andrzej Ptok, Annica M. Black-Schaffer, Sajid Sekh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Kagome lattice, schematically highlighting the four edge types arising from termination by a line cut. Solid arrows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Kagome slab band structure for different lattice terminations (left), with energy levels at a specific momentum (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Bulk kagome bands for the QSH phase and the slab band structure for (b) armchair-flat and (c) zigzag-cove type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Bulk kagome bands for the QAH phase without (red) and with RSOC ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Bulk kagome bands for the QAH phase without (red) and with KMSOC ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effect of (a,c) Kane–Mele and (b,d) Rashba SOC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Kagome bulk (a,e) and slab (b,c,f,g) band structure along with topological phase diagram (d,h) for subcritical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anomalous Pairing Currents and a Second Topological Edge Channel in Bosonic Lattices

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bosonic pairing on a 2D kagome lattice opens a second anomalous pairing current channel with chiral circulation in gapped phases and a tunable phase-sensitive leakage ratio around defects, distinct from the hopping current.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  2. [2]

    Matan, D

    K. Matan, D. Grohol, D. G. Nocera, T. Yildirim, A. B. Harris, S. H. Lee, S. E. Nagler, and Y. S. Lee, Spin waves in the frustrated kagom´ e lattice antiferromagnet KFe3(OH)6(SO4)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 247201 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Ising models of quantum frustration, Phys. Rev. B63, 224401 (2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    Hermele, M

    M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore photons: TheU(1) spin liquid in aS= 1 2 three- dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B69, 064404 (2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    Balents, M

    L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and S. M. Girvin, Fraction- alization in an easy-axis kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B65, 224412 (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    T.-H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, D. G. Nocera, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Fraction- alized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome- lattice antiferromagnet, Nature492, 406 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    X. Teng, L. Chen, F. Ye, E. Rosenberg, Z. Liu, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, J. S. Oh, M. Z. Hasan, K. J. Neubauer, B. Gao, Y. Xie, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, R. J. Birgeneau, J.-H. Chu, M. Yi, and P. Dai, Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Nature609, 490 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    H. Tan, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and B. Yan, Charge den- sity waves and electronic properties of superconducting kagome metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 046401 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    A. Ptok, A. Kobia lka, M. Sternik, J. La˙ zewski, P. T. Jochym, A. M. Ole´ s, and P. Piekarz, Dynamical study of the origin of the charge density wave inAV 3Sb5 (A=K, Rb, Cs) compounds, Phys. Rev. B105, 235134 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    P. Park, B. R. Ortiz, M. Sprague, A. P. Sakhya, S. A. Chen, M. D. Frontzek, W. Tian, R. Sibille, D. G. Maz- zone, C. Tabata, K. Kaneko, L. M. DeBeer-Schmitt, M. B. Stone, D. S. Parker, G. D. Samolyuk, H. Miao, M. Neupane, and A. D. Christianson, Spin density wave and van Hove singularity in the kagome metal CeTi3Bi4, 12 Nat. Commun.16, 4384 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconduc- tor, Nature599, 222 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    H. Yang, Y. Ye, Z. Zhao, J. Liu, X.-W. Yi, Y. Zhang, H. Xiao, J. Shi, J.-Y. You, Z. Huang, B. Wang, J. Wang, H. Guo, X. Lin, C. Shen, W. Zhou, H. Chen, X. Dong, G. Su, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Superconductivity and nematic order in a new titanium-based kagome metal CsTi3Bi5 without charge density wave order, Nat. Com- mun.15, 9626 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Asaba, A

    T. Asaba, A. Onishi, Y. Kageyama, T. Kiyosue, K. Oht- suka, S. Suetsugu, Y. Kohsaka, T. Gaggl, Y. Kasahara, H. Murayama, K. Hashimoto, R. Tazai, H. Kontani, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, Q. Li, H. H. Wen, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Evidence for an odd-parity nematic phase above the charge-density-wave transition in a kagome metal, Nat. Phys.20, 40 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    L. Nie, K. Sun, W. Ma, D. Song, L. Zheng, Z. Liang, P. Wu, F. Yu, J. Li, M. Shan, D. Zhao, S. Li, B. Kang, Z. Wu, Y. Zhou, K. Liu, Z. Xiang, J. Ying, Z. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Charge-density-wave-driven elec- tronic nematicity in a kagome superconductor, Nature 604, 59 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Y. Xu, Z. Ni, Y. Liu, B. R. Ortiz, Q. Deng, S. D. Wil- son, B. Yan, L. Balents, and L. Wu, Three-state nematic- ity and magneto-optical kerr effect in the charge density waves in kagome superconductors, Nat. Phys.18, 1470 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Hirschberger, T

    M. Hirschberger, T. Nakajima, S. Gao, L. Peng, A. Kikkawa, T. Kurumaji, M. Kriener, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, K. Kakurai, Y. Taguchi, X. Yu, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion phase and competing magnetic orders on a breathing kagom´ e lattice, Nat. Commun.10, 5831 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    Hirschberger, B

    M. Hirschberger, B. G. Szigeti, M. Hemmida, M. M. Hirschmann, S. Esser, H. Ohsumi, Y. Tanaka, L. Spitz, S. Gao, K. K. Kolincio, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Ya- masaki, L. Forr´ o, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, I. Kezsmarki, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Lattice-commensurate skyrmion texture in a centrosymmetric breathing kagome magnet, npj Quantum Mater.9, 45 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Mielke, D

    C. Mielke, D. Das, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, R. Gupta, Y.- X. Jiang, M. Medarde, X. Wu, H. C. Lei, J. Chang, P. Dai, Q. Si, H. Miao, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, Y. Shi, R. Khasanov, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superconductor, Nature602, 245 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Ba- lents, J. He, and S. D. Wilson, CsV 3Sb5: AZ 2 topolog- ical kagome metal with a superconducting ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 247002 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    B. R. Ortiz, P. M. Sarte, E. M. Kenney, M. J. Graf, S. M. L. Teicher, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Super- conductivity in theZ 2 kagome metal KV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 034801 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Guguchia, C

    Z. Guguchia, C. Mielke, D. Das, R. Gupta, J.-X. Yin, H. Liu, Q. Yin, M. H. Christensen, Z. Tu, C. Gong, N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, T. Gamsakhurdashvili, M. Elender, P. Dai, A. Amato, Y. Shi, H. C. Lei, R. M. Fernandes, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and R. Khasanov, Tunable unconventional kagome superconductivity in charge ordered RbV 3Sb5 and KV 3Sb5, Nat. Co...

    2023

  22. [22]

    Nakada, M

    K. Nakada, M. Fujita, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dressel- haus, Edge state in graphene ribbons: Nanometer size ef- fect and edge shape dependence, Phys. Rev. B54, 17954 (1996)

    1996

  23. [23]

    Fujita, K

    M. Fujita, K. Wakabayashi, K. Nakada, and K. Kusak- abe, Peculiar localized state at zigzag graphite edge, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65, 1920 (1996)

    1920

  24. [24]

    Y.-W. Son, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Half-metallic graphene nanoribbons, Nature444, 347 (2006)

    2006

  25. [25]

    Garc ´ ıa-Fuente, D

    A. Garc ´ ıa-Fuente, D. Carrascal, G. Ross, and J. Ferrer, Full analytical solution of finite-length armchair/zigzag nanoribbons, Phys. Rev. B107, 115403 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Guo, Z.-R

    G.-P. Guo, Z.-R. Lin, T. Tu, G. Cao, X.-P. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Quantum computation with graphene nanoribbon, New J. Phys.11, 123005 (2009)

    2009

  27. [27]

    Y. Li, Z. Zhou, C. R. Cabrera, and Z. Chen, Preserving the edge magnetism of zigzag graphene nanoribbons by ethylene termination: Insight by Clar’s rule, Sci. Rep.3, 2030 (2013)

    2030

  28. [28]

    O. V. Zakharova, E. E. Mastalygina, K. S. Golokhvast, and A. A. Gusev, Graphene Nanoribbons: Prospects of Application in Biomedicine and Toxicity, Nanomaterials 11, 2425 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Mazzola, S

    F. Mazzola, S. Enzner, P. Eck, C. Bigi, M. Jugovac, I. Co- jocariu, V. Feyer, Z. Shu, G. M. Pierantozzi, A. De Vita, P. Carrara, J. Fujii, P. D. C. King, G. Vinai, P. Orgiani, C. Cacho, M. D. Watson, G. Rossi, I. Vobornik, T. Kong, D. Di Sante, G. Sangiovanni, and G. Panaccione, Obser- vation of termination-dependent topological connectivity in a magnetic...

    2023

  30. [30]

    Yin, Y.-X

    J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, X. Teng, M. S. Hossain, S. Mar- danya, T.-R. Chang, Z. Ye, G. Xu, M. M. Denner, T. Neupert, B. Lienhard, H.-B. Deng, C. Setty, Q. Si, G. Chang, Z. Guguchia, B. Gao, N. Shumiya, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Yi, P. Dai, and M. Z. Hasan, Discovery of charge order and corresponding edge state in kagome magnet FeGe, Phys. Rev....

    2022

  31. [31]

    G. Liu, T. Yang, Y.-X. Jiang, S. Hossain, H. Deng, M. Z. Hasan, and J.-X. Yin, Perspective: imaging atomic step geometry to determine surface terminations of kagome materials and beyond, Quantum Front.3, 19 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Sun, G.-H

    Y.-L. Sun, G.-H. Chen, S.-C. Du, Z.-B. Chen, Y.-W. Zhou, and E.-J. Ye, Spin-valley polarized edge states in quasi-one-dimensional asymmetric kagome lattice, Front. Phys.10, 1033836 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  34. [34]

    E. Liu, Y. Sun, N. Kumar, L. Muechler, A. Sun, L. Jiao, S.-Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Liang, Q. Xu, J. Kroder, V. S¨ uß, H. Borrmann, C. Shekhar, Z. Wang, C. Xi, W. Wang, W. Schnelle, S. Wirth, Y. Chen, S. T. B. Goennenwein, and C. Felser, Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferro- magnetic kagome-lattice semimetal, Nat. Phys.14, 1125 (2018)

    2018

  35. [35]

    Tanaka, Y

    H. Tanaka, Y. Fujisawa, K. Kuroda, R. Noguchi, 13 S. Sakuragi, C. Bareille, B. Smith, C. Cacho, S. W. Jung, T. Muro, Y. Okada, and T. Kondo, Three-dimensional electronic structure in ferromagnetic Fe3Sn2 with breath- ing kagome bilayers, Phys. Rev. B101, 161114 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    L. Ye, M. Kang, J. Liu, F. von Cube, C. R. Wicker, T. Suzuki, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, D. C. Bell, L. Fu, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Massive Dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagome metal, Nature 555, 638 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Zhou, M.-K

    Y. Zhou, M.-K. Lee, S. Hammouda, S. Devi, S.-I. Yano, R. Sibille, O. Zaharko, W. Schmidt, K. Schmalzl, K. Beauvois, E. Ressouche, P.-C. Chang, C.-H. Huang, L.-J. Chang, T. Br¨ uckel, and Y. Su, Ground-state mag- netic structures of topological kagome metalsRV 6Sn6 (R= Tb, Dy, Ho, Er), Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043291 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  39. [39]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    P. W. Shor, Fault-tolerant quantum computation (1996), arXiv:quant-ph/9605011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Chubukov, Order from disorder in a kagom´ e antifer- romagnet, Phys

    A. Chubukov, Order from disorder in a kagom´ e antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 832 (1992)

    1992

  42. [42]

    A. B. Harris, C. Kallin, and A. J. Berlinsky, Possible N´ eel orderings of the kagom´ e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2899 (1992)

    1992

  43. [43]

    G¨ otze, D

    O. G¨ otze, D. J. J. Farnell, R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li, and J. Richter, Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice with arbitrary spin: A higher-order coupled clus- ter treatment, Phys. Rev. B84, 224428 (2011)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Watanabe, Y

    J. Watanabe, Y. Araki, K. Kobayashi, A. Ozawa, and K. Nomura, Magnetic orderings from spin–orbit coupled electrons on kagome lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 083702 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Taillefumier, B

    M. Taillefumier, B. Canals, C. Lacroix, V. K. Dugaev, and P. Bruno, Anomalous Hall effect due to spin chirality in the kagom´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. B74, 085105 (2006)

    2006

  46. [46]

    Elhajal, B

    M. Elhajal, B. Canals, and C. Lacroix, Symmetry break- ing due to Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya interactions in the kagom´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 014422 (2002)

    2002

  47. [47]

    Bolens and N

    A. Bolens and N. Nagaosa, Topological states on the breathing kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 165141 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    S. Fang, L. Ye, M. P. Ghimire, M. Kang, J. Liu, M. Han, L. Fu, M. Richter, J. van den Brink, E. Kaxiras, R. Comin, and J. G. Checkelsky, Ferromagnetic helical nodal line and Kane–Mele spin-orbit coupling in kagome metal Fe3Sn2, Phys. Rev. B105, 035107 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Titvinidze, J

    I. Titvinidze, J. Legendre, K. Le Hur, and W. Hofstetter, Hubbard model on the kagome lattice with time-reversal invariant flux and spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B105, 235102 (2022)

    2022

  50. [50]

    Busch, I

    O. Busch, I. Mertig, and B. G¨ obel, Orbital Hall effect and orbital edge states caused byselectrons, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043052 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    L. Ye, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, M. Kang, J. Liu, T. Suzuki, R. Comin, L. Fu, and J. G. Checkelsky, de Haas-van Alphen effect of correlated Dirac states in kagome metal Fe3Sn2, Nat. Commun.10, 4870 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Di Sante, C

    D. Di Sante, C. Bigi, P. Eck, S. Enzner, A. Consiglio, G. Pokharel, P. Carrara, P. Orgiani, V. Polewczyk, J. Fu- jii, P. D. C. King, I. Vobornik, G. Rossi, I. Zeljkovic, S. D. Wilson, R. Thomale, G. Sangiovanni, G. Panaccione, and F. Mazzola, Flat band separation and robust spin Berry curvature in bilayer kagome metals, Nat. Phys.19, 1135 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    Sajid and A

    S. Sajid and A. Chakrabarti, Localization, transport, and edge states in a two-strand ladder network in an aperiod- ically staggered magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B102, 134401 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  55. [55]

    R. Yu, X. L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Equiv- alent expression ofZ 2 topological invariant for band in- sulators using the non-Abelian Berry connection, Phys. Rev. B84, 075119 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Alexandradinata, X

    A. Alexandradinata, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Wilson- loop characterization of inversion-symmetric topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B89, 155114 (2014)

    2014

  57. [57]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Wannier representa- tion ofZ 2 topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B83, 035108 (2011)

    2011

  58. [58]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Computing topolog- ical invariants without inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 83, 235401 (2011)

    2011

  59. [59]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional theoretical results

  60. [60]

    Y. Yang, Z. Xu, L. Sheng, B. Wang, D. Y. Xing, and D. N. Sheng, Time-reversal-symmetry-broken quantum spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 066602 (2011)

    2011

  61. [61]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Sci- ence340, 167 (2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    D. Chen, C. Le, C. Fu, H. Lin, W. Schnelle, Y. Sun, and C. Felser, Large anomalous Hall effect in the kagome fer- romagnet LiMn6Sn6, Phys. Rev. B103, 144410 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    Mielke, Ferromagnetism in single-band Hubbard mod- els with a partially flat band, Phys

    A. Mielke, Ferromagnetism in single-band Hubbard mod- els with a partially flat band, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4312 (1999)

    1999

  64. [64]

    E. C. Stoner, Collective electron ferromagnetism, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A165, 372 (1938)

    1938

  65. [65]

    Kuroda, T

    K. Kuroda, T. Tomita, M.-T. Suzuki, C. Bareille, A. A. Nugroho, P. Goswami, M. Ochi, M. Ikhlas, M. Nakayama, S. Akebi, R. Noguchi, R. Ishii, N. In- ami, K. Ono, H. Kumigashira, A. Varykhalov, T. Muro, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, S. Shin, T. Kondo, and S. Nakat- suji, Evidence for magnetic Weyl fermions in a correlated metal, Nature Mater.16, 1090 (2017)

    2017

  66. [66]

    D. F. Liu, E. K. Liu, Q. N. Xu, J. L. Shen, Y. W. Li, D. Pei, A. J. Liang, P. Dudin, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, Y. F. Xu, Y. Sun, L. X. Yang, Z. K. Liu, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, and Y. L. Chen, Direct observation of the spin–orbit coupling effect in magnetic Weyl semimetal Co3Sn2S2, npj Quantum Mater.7, 11 (2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    Sekh and I

    S. Sekh and I. Mandal, Magnus Hall effect in three- dimensional topological semimetals, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 736 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 14 (1982)

    1982

  69. [69]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  70. [70]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators, Science329, 61 (2010)

    2010

  71. [71]

    Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y. Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in graphene from Rashba and exchange effects, Phys. Rev. B82, 161414 (2010)

    2010

  72. [72]

    J. Ding, Z. Qiao, W. Feng, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Engineer- ing quantum anomalous/valley Hall states in graphene via metal-atom adsorption: An ab-initio study, Phys. Rev. B84, 195444 (2011)

    2011

  73. [73]

    Jungwirth, Q

    T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 207208 (2002)

    2002

  74. [74]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  75. [75]

    I. M. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Soviet Physics JETP 11, 1130 (1960)

    1960

  76. [76]

    G. E. Volovik, Topological Lifshitz transitions, Low Temp. Phys.43, 47 (2017)

    2017

  77. [77]

    B. Li, S. Sandhoefner, and A. A. Kovalev, Intrinsic spin Nernst effect of magnons in a noncollinear antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013079 (2020)

    2020

  78. [78]

    Yildirim and A

    T. Yildirim and A. B. Harris, Magnetic structure and spin waves in the kagom´ e jarosite compound KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, Phys. Rev. B73, 214446 (2006)

    2006

  79. [79]

    Verrier, F

    A. Verrier, F. Bert, J. M. Parent, M. El-Amine, J. C. Orain, D. Boldrin, A. S. Wills, P. Mendels, and J. A. Quilliam, Canted antiferromagnetic order in the kagome material Sr-vesignieite, Phys. Rev. B101, 054425 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Fujiwara, Y

    K. Fujiwara, Y. Kato, T. Seki, K. Nomura, K. Takanashi, Y. Motome, and A. Tsukazaki, Tuning scalar spin chiral- ity in ultrathin films of the kagome-lattice ferromagnet Fe3Sn, Commun. Mater.2, 113 (2021)

    2021

Showing first 80 references.