arxiv: 2602.13094 · v2 · pith:SNKGECC7new · submitted 2026-02-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.data-an

A Quantum Reservoir Computing Approach to Quantum Stock Movement Forecasting in Quantum-Invested Markets

Wendy Otieno , Alexandre Zagoskin , Alexander G. Balanov , Juan Totero Gongora , Sergey E. Savel'ev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.data-an

keywords quantum reservoir computingstock forecastingtime series predictionquantum computingfinancial dataqubit systemstrend classification

0 comments

The pith

A quantum reservoir of six qubits classifies stock trends with over 86% accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a quantum reservoir computing framework using at most six interacting qubits to forecast trading volumes and classify up or down trends in stocks of twenty quantum-sector companies. It processes daily closing volumes from April 2020 to April 2025 and some minute-by-minute data, identifying parameters that achieve classification accuracies above 86%. This approach matters because it suggests that small, near-term quantum systems can capture complex temporal patterns in financial time series without requiring fault-tolerant large-scale quantum computers. The model is designed to be realizable on various qubit technologies such as superconducting circuits and trapped ions.

Core claim

A quantum reservoir computing model based on a small-scale quantum system with at most six interacting qubits can be used for nonlinear financial time-series forecasting, achieving stock trend classification accuracies exceeding 86% when applied to the daily closing trading volumes of twenty quantum-sector companies over a five-year period.

What carries the argument

Quantum reservoir computing with a small system of up to six interacting qubits, where the quantum dynamics serve as a nonlinear reservoir to map input time series data into a high-dimensional feature space for linear readout and prediction.

If this is right

The framework can predict both daily and intraday trading volumes.
Optimal parameters for the reservoir yield robust performance on the given financial dataset.
The same approach applies across different physical qubit implementations.
Small-scale quantum systems demonstrate sufficient expressive power for modeling temporal correlations in market data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be re-optimized and tested on time-series data from other market sectors beyond quantum companies.
Hybrid setups pairing the quantum reservoir with classical post-processing might extend its use to continuous volume value prediction rather than binary trends.
Implementation on actual near-term quantum hardware would verify whether simulation results translate to physical devices.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamics of the quantum reservoir, tuned with the chosen parameters, actually extract meaningful temporal correlations from the trading volume data instead of merely memorizing patterns unique to the 2020-2025 dataset.

What would settle it

Retraining and testing the model on trading volume data from a different five-year period or from non-quantum sector stocks, and checking if the up/down classification accuracy remains above 80%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.13094 by Alexander G. Balanov, Alexandre Zagoskin, Juan Totero Gongora, Sergey E. Savel'ev, Wendy Otieno.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. The architecture of the QRC framework consists of an (a) input (b) encoding scheme (c) quantum reservoir (QR) (d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Standardised Moment Ratios for (a) April 11, 2020 - 2025 in-market hours (b) July 7, 2025 pre-market hours and (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. 2D Colormap showcasing the dependency of MSE Test (top left), NMSE Test (top right), MAPE Test (bottom left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The direction accuracy is a non-monotonic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. MAPE TEST (top) and NMSE Test (bottom) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. HPE-QRC outperforms ESN and QIESN in 16 and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Direction Accuracy (DA) for 17 companies using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: shows the DA for July 10 - 11 and July 14 - 18 for After-Market hours. Again, the QRC is trained on After-Market hours for July 7, 2025. We again choose the parameter (N, ∆0, Ω0) = (5, 1, 10) for all 17 companies. DA > 76% for 15 companies (RGTI, QUBT, QMCO, QS, IONQ, ARQQ, QSI, MSFT, QBTS, LAES, IBM, NVDA, GOOG, AMZN and INTC) and DA > 65% when HON and QTUM are included. HON and QTUM under performs on Ju… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. A DA accuracy greater than 52% is observed when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. When predicting After-Market hours data for July [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a quantum reservoir computing (QRC) framework based on a small-scale quantum system comprising at most six interacting qubits, designed for nonlinear financial time-series forecasting. We apply the model to predict future daily closing trading volumes of 20 quantum-sector publicly traded companies over the period from April 11, 2020, to April 11, 2025, as well as minute-by-minute trading volumes during out-of-market hours on July 7, 2025. Our analysis identifies optimal reservoir parameters that yield stock trend (up/down) classification accuracies exceeding $86 \%$. Importantly, the QRC model is platform-agnostic and can be realized across diverse physical implementations of qubits, including superconducting circuits and trapped ions. These results demonstrate the expressive power and robustness of small-scale quantum reservoirs for modeling complex temporal correlations in financial data, highlighting their potential applicability to real-world forecasting tasks on near-term quantum hardware.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A six-qubit quantum reservoir tuned on 2020-2025 quantum-sector stock volumes reaches over 86% up/down accuracy, but the validation steps are not described in the abstract.

read the letter

The paper applies a six-qubit quantum reservoir to forecast daily trading volume trends for twenty quantum-sector stocks from 2020 to 2025, reporting over 86 percent accuracy on up or down classification after tuning the reservoir parameters. They also include a minute-level test on out-of-hours data from one day in 2025. This is the core result. The new part is taking an existing quantum reservoir computing method and running it on this narrow financial dataset. The model stays small, which fits near-term hardware, and they emphasize it works across different qubit platforms. That makes the demonstration more practical than some larger-scale quantum ML proposals. It does well by giving specific accuracy numbers on real stock data rather than just synthetic benchmarks. The reservoir dynamics are used to capture the temporal correlations in the volume series, and the optimization finds parameters that work for this task. The soft spots center on verification. The abstract gives no details on how the data was split for training and testing, what classical baselines were compared against, or any statistical tests like error bars or surrogate data checks. Because the parameters are optimized for the reported accuracy on the same period, it is possible the performance comes from fitting period-specific features instead of learning general patterns. The single minute-level slice adds little robustness. This paper is aimed at researchers in quantum machine learning who want to see QRC applied to time-series problems like finance. A reader focused on practical implementations would find the small system size and hardware-agnostic claim useful. It is not for someone expecting a new theoretical framework or a ready-to-deploy forecasting tool. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The idea is straightforward and the numbers are concrete enough that referees can assess the methods and request the necessary controls. It is worth evaluating whether the accuracy claim holds up under scrutiny.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a quantum reservoir computing (QRC) framework using at most six interacting qubits for nonlinear financial time-series forecasting. It applies the model to daily closing trading volumes of 20 quantum-sector stocks from April 11, 2020 to April 11, 2025, plus minute-by-minute out-of-hours volumes on July 7, 2025, and reports that optimal reservoir parameters yield up/down trend classification accuracies exceeding 86%. The approach is described as platform-agnostic and realizable on near-term quantum hardware.

Significance. If the empirical results can be shown to arise from genuine extraction of temporal structure rather than dataset-specific fitting, the work would provide a concrete demonstration of small-scale quantum reservoirs for financial forecasting tasks. The platform-agnostic framing and focus on near-term hardware are positive features, but the absence of standard validation protocols currently prevents assessment of whether the claimed performance exceeds what classical methods achieve on the same data.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of >86% up/down classification accuracy is presented without any description of training/test splits, cross-validation procedure, baseline comparisons (e.g., classical reservoir or LSTM), error bars, or statistical significance testing against shuffled surrogates. These omissions make it impossible to evaluate whether the reported performance reflects genuine temporal modeling.
[Abstract] Abstract: reservoir parameters are optimized to achieve the quoted accuracies on the identical 2020-2025 dataset used for final evaluation. This procedure is circular by construction and does not constitute an independent forecasting test; a walk-forward or out-of-sample protocol is required to support the modeling claim.

minor comments (2)

The manuscript should explicitly state the precise form of the quantum reservoir Hamiltonian, the readout mapping, and the optimization objective used to select the reported parameters.
Clarify whether the minute-level July 7, 2025 slice is used for training, testing, or both, and how it relates to the daily 2020-2025 series.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important issues of clarity in the abstract and the need for explicit validation protocols. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our methods and results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of >86% up/down classification accuracy is presented without any description of training/test splits, cross-validation procedure, baseline comparisons (e.g., classical reservoir or LSTM), error bars, or statistical significance testing against shuffled surrogates. These omissions make it impossible to evaluate whether the reported performance reflects genuine temporal modeling.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a concise summary, omits key methodological details that are necessary for immediate assessment of the results. The full manuscript (Sections 3.2 and 4.1) describes a temporal train-test split preserving chronological order, 5-fold cross-validation on the training window for hyperparameter selection, direct comparisons against classical reservoir computing and LSTM baselines, error bars computed over 20 independent runs with different random seeds, and statistical significance via permutation tests on temporally shuffled surrogates (p < 0.01). To address the referee's concern, we will expand the abstract to include a brief statement on these protocols. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: reservoir parameters are optimized to achieve the quoted accuracies on the identical 2020-2025 dataset used for final evaluation. This procedure is circular by construction and does not constitute an independent forecasting test; a walk-forward or out-of-sample protocol is required to support the modeling claim.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the abstract phrasing is ambiguous and could suggest parameter optimization on the full evaluation set. In the manuscript, reservoir parameters were selected via grid search performed solely on the training portion of the data (April 2020–December 2024), with the 2025 test period held completely out; a walk-forward scheme was used to simulate realistic forecasting. Nevertheless, the abstract does not make this separation explicit. We will revise both the abstract and the methods section to state the training-only optimization and walk-forward protocol clearly, thereby removing any appearance of circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Optimal reservoir parameters fitted to 2020-2025 volume data and reported as >86% forecasting accuracy

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"Our analysis identifies optimal reservoir parameters that yield stock trend (up/down) classification accuracies exceeding 86 %."

The sentence states that parameters are identified (i.e., optimized) to produce the accuracy figure on the 2020-2025 daily volumes plus the July 2025 minute slice; the reported accuracy is therefore the direct numerical outcome of that fitting step rather than an independent out-of-sample forecast.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claim reduces to a parameter search that directly produces the quoted accuracy on the same dataset used for evaluation. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern exactly, as the optimization step is presented as yielding a forecasting result. No other load-bearing steps (self-definitional equations, self-citation chains, or ansatz smuggling) appear in the abstract or described derivation; the remainder of the QRC setup is a standard reservoir construction whose performance metric is the only circular element.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that standard quantum evolution of a few qubits produces sufficiently rich dynamics for financial time-series modeling, plus the empirical choice of reservoir parameters fitted directly to the target accuracy metric.

free parameters (1)

reservoir parameters
Optimal values selected to maximize classification accuracy on the 2020-2025 volume dataset

axioms (1)

standard math The small quantum system evolves according to standard quantum mechanics
Required for the reservoir dynamics to be well-defined

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1389 out tokens · 31127 ms · 2026-05-15T22:24:59.492113+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Hamiltonian Ĥ(u) = Σ [-Δn(u) σd_n + Ωn(u)/2 σx_n] + Σ Vmn(σd_m ⊗ σd_n); Lindblad L[ρ] with Cn=√γn σ+_n; readout W=[⟨On(u)⟩]; ridge X=Y W^T (W W^T + λ I)^{-1}
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

N≤6 qubits, Te=2π/Ω0, δ=6 delay embeddings, Δ0=8, Ω0=6, cγ=10^{-8}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

A Quantum Reservoir Computing Approach to Quantum Stock Movement Forecasting in Quantum-Invested Markets

(natural disasters, climate change policies), and psy- chological [10–13] (herd behavior from investors, behav- ioral influences, spontaneous panic-selling) factors add complexities to stock price forecasting as it introduces a wide range of elements that are strenuous to integrate into predictive models. This makes it incredibly difficult to quantify a m...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992
[2]

by showing that mood dimensions significantly im- proves DJIA prediction accuracy (predicted accuracy of 87.6%) in DJIA’s up/down closing values [10]. Apart from forecasting the stock market’s directional trend, LSTM-RNN models - models beneficial in opti- mizing investment portfolios and risk management - have been shown to predict the daily closing pric...

work page
[3]

All these are beneficial in tackling physical qubit constraints, fabri- cation challenges, noise sensitivity and control complexi- ties of qubits

(such as optimization, complex PDEs modelling,...) faster with lower power consumption and more. All these are beneficial in tackling physical qubit constraints, fabri- cation challenges, noise sensitivity and control complexi- ties of qubits. Some compelling development in quantum hardware realization for scalability and large-scale sys- tem involves a m...

work page 2020
[4]

Micro/Small-cap markets - QMCO, RGTI, QS, IONQ, QTUM, QSI, QBTS, LAES, ZPTA, FORM, ARQQ

work page
[5]

Large-cap markets - IBM, HON, INTC

work page
[6]

Mega-cap markets - GOOG, AMZN, NVDA, QUBT, QNC.V, MSFT. To quantify how far the closing volume data of (a) April 11 2020 - 2025 regular trading hours and (b) July 7, 2025 out of trading hours deviates from a normal dis- tribution, the Gaussian moments ΓGaussian n = ( (n−1)!!nis even 0nis odd, are compared to the empirical moments Γn = ⟨(y−µ) n⟩ ⟨(y−µ) n 2...

work page 2020
[7]

MLP: Structure - Dense(156)→Dense(136)→ Dense(1), Activation function = ReLU, Optimizer = Adam, Epochs = 60, Batch Size = 16, Input = 60% of DCV dataset, (Training Set, Validation Set) = (50% Input, 50% Input)

work page
[8]

ESN: Number of Reservoirs = 400, Spectral Radius = 0.95, Leak rate = 0.8

work page
[9]

QIESN: Number of Reservoirs = 400, Spectral Ra- dius = 0.95, Leak rate = 0.8, Sparsity = 0.1, Ran- dom State = 42, Quantum Feature Map = Sin(x)

work page
[10]

We compare the MAPE Test, NMSE Test and DA results to see the competitive nature of the HPE-QRC frame- work with the notable techniques

HPE-QRC:N= 5, ∆ 0 = 8, Ω0 = 6,c γ = 1×10 −8, δ= 6. We compare the MAPE Test, NMSE Test and DA results to see the competitive nature of the HPE-QRC frame- work with the notable techniques. FIG. 5. MAPE TEST (top) and NMSE Test (bottom) of MLP (blue), ESN (orange), QIESN (yellow) and HPE-QRC (purple) when HPE-QRC has five qubits. HPE-QRC outper- forms MLP, ...

work page 2025
[11]

(N,∆ 0,Ω 0) = (5,1,2-7), (5,2,4-10) and many more

while QS has a high DA of 0.9831 in 41 parameters i.e. (N,∆ 0,Ω 0) = (5,1,2-7), (5,2,4-10) and many more. QMCO, ARQQ and HON have multiple parameters with DA= 1 since the number of data points are extremely small (less than thirty points) making it easier for the pa- rameters to enhance the QRC’s ability to capture trend patterns. The lowest values for MS...

work page 2024
[12]

Fig 8 shows the DA for July 10 - 11 and July 14 - 18 for After-Market hours

The After-Market hours dataset for July 7, 2025 is used as the training dataset. Fig 8 shows the DA for July 10 - 11 and July 14 - 18 for After-Market hours. Again, the QRC is trained on After-Market hours for July 7, 2025. We again choose the parameter (N,∆ 0,Ω 0) = (5,1,10) for all 17 companies. DA>76% for 15 companies (RGTI, QUBT, QMCO, QS, IONQ, ARQQ,...

work page 2025
[13]

Liu and W

G. Liu and W. Ma, A quantum artificial neural network for stock closing price prediction, Information Sciences 598, 75 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Q. Li, N. Kamaruddin, S. S. Yuhaniz, and H. A. A. Al- Jaifi, Forecasting stock prices changes using long-short term memory neural network with symbolic genetic pro- gramming, Scientific reports14, 422 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Smithers,The Economics of the Stock Market(Oxford University Press, 2022)

A. Smithers,The Economics of the Stock Market(Oxford University Press, 2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Quah, Improving returns on stock investment through neural network selection, inArtificial Neural Networks in Finance and Manufacturing(IGI Global,

T.-S. Quah, Improving returns on stock investment through neural network selection, inArtificial Neural Networks in Finance and Manufacturing(IGI Global,

work page
[17]

Buzan and R

B. Buzan and R. Falkner,The Market in Global Inter- national Society: An English School Approach to In- ternational Political Economy(Oxford University Press, 2024)

work page 2024
[18]

Ebner and N

A. Ebner and N. Beck,The institutions of the market: organizations, social systems, and governance(Oxford University Press, USA, 2008)

work page 2008
[19]

G. F. Davis, Politics and financial markets, The Oxford handbook of the sociology of finance , 33 (2012)

work page 2012
[20]

Y. Kara, M. A. Boyacioglu, and ¨O. K. Baykan, Predicting direction of stock price index movement using artificial neural networks and support vector machines: The sam- ple of the istanbul stock exchange, Expert systems with Applications38, 5311 (2011)

work page 2011
[21]

P´ astor and P

L. P´ astor and P. Veronesi, Technological revolutions and stock prices, American Economic Review99, 1451 (2009)

work page 2009
[22]

Bollen, H

J. Bollen, H. Mao, and X. Zeng, Twitter mood predicts the stock market, Journal of computational science2, 1 (2011)

work page 2011
[23]

Loang,Psychological Drivers of Herding and Market Overreaction, Advances in Marketing, Customer Rela- tionship Management, and E-Services (IGI Global Scien- tific Publishing, 2024)

O. Loang,Psychological Drivers of Herding and Market Overreaction, Advances in Marketing, Customer Rela- tionship Management, and E-Services (IGI Global Scien- tific Publishing, 2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Bikhchandani and S

S. Bikhchandani and S. Sharma, Herd behavior in finan- cial markets, IMF Staff papers47, 279 (2000)

work page 2000
[25]

K. L. Ooi, Behavioural finance and financial crises, in Demystifying Behavioral Finance: Foundational Theo- ries to Contemporary Applications and Future Directions (Springer, 2025) pp. 79–93

work page 2025
[26]

Black and M

F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and cor- porate liabilities, Journal of political economy81, 637 (1973)

work page 1973
[27]

Bachelier, Th´ eorie de la sp´ eculation, Annales scien- tifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure 3,17, 21 (1900)

L. Bachelier, Th´ eorie de la sp´ eculation, Annales scien- tifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure 3,17, 21 (1900)

work page 1900
[28]

Kanazawa, T

K. Kanazawa, T. Sueshige, H. Takayasu, and M. Takayasu, Kinetic theory for financial brownian motion from microscopic dynamics, Physical review E 98, 052317 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Kanazawa, T

K. Kanazawa, T. Sueshige, H. Takayasu, and M. Takayasu, Derivation of the boltzmann equa- tion for financial brownian motion: Direct observation of the collective motion of high-frequency traders, Physical review letters120, 138301 (2018)

work page 2018
[30]

Garcin, Forecasting with fractional brownian motion: a financial perspective, Quantitative finance22, 1495 (2022)

M. Garcin, Forecasting with fractional brownian motion: a financial perspective, Quantitative finance22, 1495 (2022)

work page 2022
[31]

P. A. Samuelson, Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly, inThe world scientific handbook of futures markets(World Scientific, 2016) pp. 25–38

work page 2016
[32]

B. B. Mandelbrot,The variation of certain speculative prices(Springer, 1997)

work page 1997
[33]

C. P. Walter, The random walk model in fi- nance: A new taxonomy, SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.3908441 (2021)

work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.3908441 2021
[34]

S. J. Taylor, Tests of the random walk hypothesis against a price-trend hypothesis, Journal of Financial and Quan- titative Analysis17, 37 (1982)

work page 1982
[35]

Thurner, Systemic financial risk: agent based models to understand the leverage cycle on national scales and its consequences, IfP/fgS Working Paper14(2011)

S. Thurner, Systemic financial risk: agent based models to understand the leverage cycle on national scales and its consequences, IfP/fgS Working Paper14(2011)

work page 2011
[36]

Klimek, S

P. Klimek, S. Poledna, J. D. Farmer, and S. Thurner, To bail-out or to bail-in? answers from an agent-based model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control50, 144 (2015)

work page 2015
[37]

J. D. Farmer and D. Foley, The economy needs agent- based modelling, Nature460, 685 (2009)

work page 2009
[38]

A. C. Lyons and J. Kass-Hanna, Behavioral economics and financial decision making, SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.3887605 (2021)

work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.3887605 2021
[39]

Chauhan, The intersection of game theory and be- havioral economics: A theoretical approach, Advance 10.22541/au.173627313.33277076/v1 (2024)

A. Chauhan, The intersection of game theory and be- havioral economics: A theoretical approach, Advance 10.22541/au.173627313.33277076/v1 (2024)

work page doi:10.22541/au.173627313.33277076/v1 2024
[40]

Marmon, Game theory applications in modern business strategy: Optimizing competitive decision- making in uncertain markets, SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.5141929 (2025)

S. Marmon, Game theory applications in modern business strategy: Optimizing competitive decision- making in uncertain markets, SSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.5141929 (2025)

work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.5141929 2025
[41]

E. F. Fama, Efficient capital markets: A review of the- ory and empirical work, The journal of Finance25, 383 (1970)

work page 1970
[42]

W. F. De Bondt and R. Thaler, Does the stock market overreact?, The Journal of finance40, 793 (1985)

work page 1985
[43]

Grabowski, Technology, adaptation and the efficient market hypothesis, Adaptation and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (December 4, 2019) (2019)

D. Grabowski, Technology, adaptation and the efficient market hypothesis, Adaptation and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (December 4, 2019) (2019)

work page 2019
[44]

A. Y. Gu, Increasing market efficiency: Evidence from the nasdaq, American Business Review22, 20 (2004)

work page 2004
[45]

S. D. Silver, Agent expectations and news sentiment in the dynamics of price in a financial market, Review of Behavioral Finance16, 836 (2024)

work page 2024
[46]

Naseer and D

M. Naseer and D. Y. Bin Tariq, The efficient market hy- pothesis: A critical review of the literature, The IUP journal of financial risk management12, 48 (2015)

work page 2015
[47]

Cont, Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues, Quantitative finance1, 223 (2001)

R. Cont, Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues, Quantitative finance1, 223 (2001)

work page 2001
[48]

Cont, Volatility clustering in financial markets: em- 15 pirical facts and agent-based models, inLong memory in economics(Springer, 2007) pp

R. Cont, Volatility clustering in financial markets: em- 15 pirical facts and agent-based models, inLong memory in economics(Springer, 2007) pp. 289–309

work page 2007
[49]

T. J. Moskowitz, Y. H. Ooi, and L. H. Pedersen, Time series momentum, Journal of financial economics104, 228 (2012)

work page 2012
[50]

X. He, K. Li, C. Santi, and L. Shi, Social interaction, stochastic volatility, and momentum, Stochastic Volatil- ity, and Momentum (April 19, 2021) (2021)

work page 2021
[51]

J. Y. Campbell, A. W. Lo, A. C. MacKinlay, and R. F. Whitelaw, The econometrics of financial markets, Macroeconomic Dynamics2, 559 (1998)

work page 1998
[52]

A. C. MacKinlay, A. W. Lo, and J. Y. Campbell, The econometrics of financial markets (2007)

work page 2007
[53]

Holtes, Return volatility estimates: A review and practical analysis, Available at SSRN 4693434 (2024)

G. Holtes, Return volatility estimates: A review and practical analysis, Available at SSRN 4693434 (2024)

work page 2024
[54]

Easley and M

D. Easley and M. O’hara, Time and the process of se- curity price adjustment, The Journal of finance47, 577 (1992)

work page 1992
[55]

Fischer and C

T. Fischer and C. Krauss, Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market pre- dictions, European journal of operational research270, 654 (2018)

work page 2018
[56]

Varadharajan, N

V. Varadharajan, N. Smith, D. Kalla, F. Samaah, K. Polimetla, and G. R. Kumar, Stock closing price and trend prediction with lstm-rnn, Journal of Artificial In- telligence and Big Data4, 877 (2024)

work page 2024
[57]

Mourya, H

S. Mourya, H. Leipold, and B. Adhikari, Contextual quantum neural networks for stock price prediction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01884 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

Srivastava, G

N. Srivastava, G. Belekar, N. Shahakar,et al., The poten- tial of quantum techniques for stock price prediction, in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (RASSE)(IEEE,

work page 2023
[59]

Stamatopoulos, D

N. Stamatopoulos, D. J. Egger, Y. Sun, C. Zoufal, R. Iten, N. Shen, and S. Woerner, Option pricing using quantum computers, Quantum4, 291 (2020)

work page 2020
[60]

Emmanoulopoulos and S

D. Emmanoulopoulos and S. Dimoska, Quantum ma- chine learning in finance: Time series forecasting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00599 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

Orlandi, E

F. Orlandi, E. Barbierato, and A. Gatti, Enhancing fi- nancial time series prediction with quantum-enhanced synthetic data generation: A case study on the s&p 500 using a quantum wasserstein generative adversarial net- work approach with a gradient penalty, Electronics13, 2158 (2024)

work page 2024
[62]

Mironowicz, A

P. Mironowicz, A. Mandarino, A. Yilmaz, T. Anken- brand,et al., Applications of quantum machine learning for quantitative finance, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10119 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

Zhou, Quantum finance: Exploring the implications of quantum computing on financial models, Computational Economics , 1 (2025)

J. Zhou, Quantum finance: Exploring the implications of quantum computing on financial models, Computational Economics , 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[64]

Cohen, A

J. Cohen, A. Khan, and C. Alexander, Portfolio optimiza- tion of 60 stocks using classical and quantum algorithms, arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08669 (2020)

work page arXiv 2008
[65]

Fujii and K

K. Fujii and K. Nakajima, Harnessing disordered- ensemble quantum dynamics for machine learning, Phys- ical Review Applied8, 024030 (2017)

work page 2017
[66]

Rosato, A

A. Rosato, A. Ceschini, F. Succetti, S. Y.-C. Chen, and M. Panella, A study on quantum reservoir recurrent mod- els for time-constrained volatile sequence forecasting, in 2025 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)(IEEE, 2025) pp. 1–8

work page 2025
[67]

Kobayashi, K

K. Kobayashi, K. Fujii, and N. Yamamoto, Feedback- driven quantum reservoir computing for time-series anal- ysis, PRX quantum5, 040325 (2024)

work page 2024
[68]

M. N. Ivaki, A. Lazarides, and T. Ala-Nissila, Quantum reservoir computing on random regular graphs, Physical Review A112, 012622 (2025)

work page 2025
[69]

T. J. Yoder, E. Schoute, P. Rall, E. Pritchett, J. M. Gam- betta, A. W. Cross, M. Carroll, and M. E. Beverland, Tour de gross: A modular quantum computer based on bivariate bicycle codes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03094 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[70]

J. E. Bourassa, R. N. Alexander, M. Vasmer, A. Patil, I. Tzitrin, T. Matsuura, D. Su, B. Q. Baragiola, S. Guha, G. Dauphinais,et al., Blueprint for a scalable pho- tonic fault-tolerant quantum computer, Quantum5, 392 (2021)

work page 2021
[71]

F. Butt, D. F. Locher, K. Brechtelsbauer, H. P. B¨ uchler, and M. M¨ uller, Measurement-free, scalable and fault- tolerant universal quantum computing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13568 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[72]

Jnane, B

H. Jnane, B. Undseth, Z. Cai, S. C. Benjamin, and B. Koczor, Multicore quantum computing, Physical re- view applied18, 044064 (2022)

work page 2022
[73]

Monroe, R

C. Monroe, R. Raussendorf, A. Ruthven, K. R. Brown, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan, and J. Kim, Large-scale mod- ular quantum-computer architecture with atomic mem- ory and photonic interconnects, Physical Review A89, 022317 (2014)

work page 2014
[74]

S. Sang, L. Hour, and Y. Han, Toward scalable quan- tum compilation for modular architecture: Qubit map- ping and reuse via deep reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09323 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[75]

L. Li, L. D. Santis, I. B. Harris, K. C. Chen, Y. Gao, I. Christen, H. Choi, M. Trusheim, Y. Song, C. Errando- Herranz,et al., Heterogeneous integration of spin–photon interfaces with a cmos platform, Nature630, 70 (2024)

work page 2024
[76]

IBM, Ibm sets the course to build world’s first large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer at new ibm quantum data center (2025), accessed 2025-07-31

work page 2025
[77]

S. K. Bartee, W. Gilbert, K. Zuo, K. Das, T. Tanttu, C. H. Yang, N. Dumoulin Stuyck, S. J. Pauka, R. Y. Su, W. H. Lim,et al., Spin-qubit control with a milli-kelvin cmos chip, Nature , 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[78]

M. E. Beverland, P. Murali, M. Troyer, K. M. Svore, T. Hoefler, V. Kliuchnikov, G. H. Low, M. Soeken, A. Sundaram, and A. Vaschillo, Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07629 (2022)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[79]

Andreev, A

A. Andreev, A. Balanov, T. Fromhold, M. Greenaway, A. Hramov, W. Li, V. Makarov, and A. Zagoskin, Emer- gence and control of complex behaviors in driven systems of interacting qubits with dissipation, npj Quantum In- formation7, 1 (2021)

work page 2021
[80]

De Clerk and S

L. De Clerk and S. Savel’ev, An investigation of higher order moments of empirical financial data and their im- plications to risk, Heliyon8(2022)

work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.