pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07452 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🪐 quant-ph · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum Simulation of Collective Neutrino Oscillations using Dicke States

Katarina Bleau , Nikolina Ilic , Joachim Kopp , Ushak Rahaman , Xin Yue Yu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords quantum simulationneutrino oscillationsDicke statessu(2) algebracollective neutrinossupernovaequantum computingentanglement
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dicke states enable qubit-efficient quantum simulations of collective neutrino oscillations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes using Dicke states and the su(2) spin algebra to simulate how neutrino flavors entangle in dense gases such as those inside supernovae. Standard approaches waste qubits by ignoring the system's symmetries, while this method encodes the collective behavior directly into symmetric states. The authors test the resulting algorithms on both classical computers and real quantum processors for small toy models. A sympathetic reader cares because better simulations could clarify the role neutrinos play in stellar explosions and in measuring fundamental particle properties.

Core claim

We propose a new class of qubit-efficient algorithms based on Dicke states and the su(2) spin algebra. We demonstrate the excellent performance of these algorithms both on classical and on quantum hardware.

What carries the argument

Dicke states, the fully symmetric multi-qubit states that respect the su(2) spin algebra of the collective neutrino system, which map the many-body flavor dynamics onto a much smaller effective Hilbert space.

If this is right

  • Simulations of collective neutrino oscillations require far fewer qubits than naive product-state encodings.
  • The algorithms run successfully on present-day quantum processors for the tested toy models.
  • The su(2) structure allows direct incorporation of the dominant interaction terms in the neutrino Hamiltonian.
  • Entanglement between neutrino flavors emerges naturally from the symmetric state evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • As quantum hardware scales, the same encoding could handle neutrino numbers large enough to model realistic supernova bursts.
  • The approach may transfer to other many-body spin systems that share su(2) symmetry, such as certain atomic or condensed-matter ensembles.
  • Improved neutrino-flux predictions from such simulations could tighten constraints on neutrino masses and mixing parameters extracted from supernova observations.

Load-bearing premise

The collective neutrino system possesses enough su(2) symmetry that Dicke states can capture its essential dynamics without significant loss for realistic supernova conditions.

What would settle it

Run the Dicke-state circuit on quantum hardware for a small number of neutrinos whose exact oscillation probabilities are known from classical diagonalization, and check whether the measured probabilities agree within device error bars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07452 by Joachim Kopp, Katarina Bleau, Nikolina Ilic, Ushak Rahaman, Xin Yue Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Representative microscopic processes correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Quantum circuit for a single Trotter step of a system of two interacting neutrino modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time-evolution of a system of one “beam” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time-evolution over 16 Trotter steps of a bipolar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The quantum circuit corresponding to one second-order Trotter step in the conventional implementation of collective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Implementation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The implementation of the quantum gates (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The ancilla-based implementation of the quantum gates (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The implementation of the quantum gates (a) EQ (b) controlled increment, and (c) controlled decrement on a 3-qubit (2) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Ancilla-free implementation of the quantum gates (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Implementation of a Pauli string rotation (Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Quantum circuit for a single Trotter step in the diagonal Dicke approach, illustrated here for a 3-qubit quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. KAK decomposed quantum circuit for a single Trotter step in the diagonal Dicke approach. We show the general layout [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In dense neutrino gases, which exist for instance in supernovae, the flavour states of different neutrinos may become entangled with one another. The theoretical description of such systems may therefore call for simulations on a quantum computer. Existing quantum simulations of simple toy systems are not optimal in the sense that they do not fully exploit the symmetries of the system. Here, we propose a new class of qubit-efficient algorithms based on Dicke states and the $su(2)$ spin algebra. We demonstrate the excellent performance of these algorithms both on classical and on quantum hardware.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new class of qubit-efficient algorithms for quantum simulation of collective neutrino oscillations in dense gases (e.g., supernovae), based on encoding in Dicke states and exploiting the su(2) spin algebra symmetries of the collective Hamiltonian. It claims to demonstrate excellent performance of these algorithms on both classical simulators and quantum hardware.

Significance. If the central symmetry assumptions hold and the approach extends beyond toy models, the qubit reduction from O(N) to O(log N) via the Dicke manifold could enable simulations of larger neutrino systems than standard product-state encodings, providing a concrete algorithmic advance in quantum simulation of many-body neutrino dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'excellent performance' on classical and quantum hardware is asserted without any quantitative metrics, system sizes, error rates, baseline comparisons, or error bars, which is load-bearing for evaluating the demonstration of the proposed algorithms.
  2. [Theoretical framework] Theoretical framework section (on Hamiltonian symmetry): the qubit-efficient encoding and confinement to the (N+1)-dimensional Dicke subspace rely on the collective forward-scattering Hamiltonian exactly preserving total spin; however, the manuscript does not bound or quantify leakage out of this manifold when realistic supernova effects (matter potentials, non-uniform densities, multi-angle scattering) break the global su(2) symmetry, undermining the applicability claim beyond the tested toy models.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: clarify the precise mapping from neutrino flavor states to Dicke states and the implementation of the time-evolution operator under the su(2) algebra.
  2. [Results] Figure captions: add explicit labels for the toy-model parameters used in the classical and hardware demonstrations to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below. We have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the referee's suggestions where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'excellent performance' on classical and quantum hardware is asserted without any quantitative metrics, system sizes, error rates, baseline comparisons, or error bars, which is load-bearing for evaluating the demonstration of the proposed algorithms.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's claim of 'excellent performance' would be more convincing with supporting quantitative details. The main text of the manuscript does include demonstrations on classical simulators and quantum hardware with specific system sizes and performance indicators. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to briefly include key metrics, such as the maximum number of neutrinos simulated and the observed fidelities, along with references to the relevant figures and tables for baselines and error bars. This addresses the concern without overstating the results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theoretical framework] Theoretical framework section (on Hamiltonian symmetry): the qubit-efficient encoding and confinement to the (N+1)-dimensional Dicke subspace rely on the collective forward-scattering Hamiltonian exactly preserving total spin; however, the manuscript does not bound or quantify leakage out of this manifold when realistic supernova effects (matter potentials, non-uniform densities, multi-angle scattering) break the global su(2) symmetry, undermining the applicability claim beyond the tested toy models.

    Authors: The referee is correct that our qubit-efficient encoding assumes the preservation of total spin by the collective Hamiltonian. The manuscript primarily addresses the idealized case where this symmetry holds exactly, as is common in initial studies of collective neutrino oscillations. We have added a new paragraph in the Theoretical framework section discussing the potential for leakage when additional effects like matter potentials or multi-angle scattering are included. However, providing a quantitative bound on such leakage for full supernova models is beyond the current scope of this work, as it would require incorporating more complex Hamiltonians and performing extensive additional simulations. We clarify in the revision that the applicability to realistic scenarios is an approximation and subject to future investigation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A quantitative bound or estimate of leakage from the Dicke subspace due to symmetry-breaking terms in realistic neutrino environments

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic construction with external hardware validation

full rationale

The paper proposes qubit-efficient algorithms exploiting su(2) symmetry and Dicke states for collective neutrino oscillations, then demonstrates them on classical simulators and quantum hardware. No derivation step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain justifies the central premise, and the symmetry is an explicit modeling assumption tested in toy models rather than derived from the results. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the neutrino Hamiltonian exhibits exact su(2) symmetry allowing Dicke-state encoding; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The collective neutrino system can be faithfully represented using the su(2) spin algebra and symmetric Dicke states.
    Invoked in the proposal of the new algorithm class for qubit efficiency.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1106 out tokens · 58263 ms · 2026-05-10T17:32:00.651519+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Monte Carlo-assisted tightening of the energy-based boson truncation bound substantially reduces volume dependence in (1+1)D scalar field theory and (2+1)D U(1) gauge theory.

  2. Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Monte Carlo-assisted analytic method tightens energy-based bounds on boson truncation errors, substantially reducing the volume dependence of the required cutoff in scalar and gauge theories.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum Simulation of Collective Neutrino Oscillations using Dicke States

    may break down, and it may become necessary to consider full multiparticle evolution. This would entail a computational complexity that scales exponentially with the number of simulated neutrinos, N. Such systems a kbleau@uni-mainz.de b nikolina.ilic@cern.ch c jkopp@cern.ch d ushak.rahaman@cern.ch e xyz.yu@mail.utoronto.ca are therefore a prime applicatio...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    7 (a) for the specific example of a 3-qubit register

    Single-qubit RZ gates: A rotation RZ(ϕj) is applied to each qubit, where the rotation angle for the j-th qubit is ϕj =−2 −2 j−1β+α c (1) j δt, where c(1) j ≡ −2 X l al X j aj .(A23) This is completely analogous to the circuit shown above in Fig. 7 (a) for the specific example of a 3-qubit register

  3. [3]

    We neglect global phases as they do not affect measurable quantities

    Two-qubit RZZ gates: For each pair ( j, l) with j < l , a rotation RZZ (ϕjl)≡exp(−i ϕjl 2 ˆZj ⊗ ˆZl) is applied, withϕ jl =−2α c (2) jl δt, where c(2) jl ≡2 X j<l aj al .(A24) Each RZZ gate is implemented using two CNOT gates and a singleR Z rotation. We neglect global phases as they do not affect measurable quantities. 11 q0 RZ(φ0) RZZ (0, 1) RZZ (0, 2) ...

  4. [4]

    We use theX pXm sequence

    mitigates this problem by applying dummy pulse sequences to idle qubits, which are designed such that the time-integrated interaction Hamiltonian between the qubit and its thermal environment averages to zero in the limit that the pulse sequence is much faster than the decoherence time [45]. We use theX pXm sequence. b Zero-Noise Extrapolation.The goal of...

  5. [5]

    M. Nakahata, History of solar neutrino observations, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2022, 12B103 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2022/12/12B103/48422428/ptac039.pdf

    2022

  6. [6]

    Fukuda et al

    Y. Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande), Evidence for os- cillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1562 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9807003

    work page arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    First results from Kam- LAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappear- ance,

    K. Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), First results from Kam- LAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappear- ance, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 021802 (2003), arXiv:hep- ex/0212021

    work page arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS), Improved search for muon- neutrino to electron-neutrino oscillations in MINOS, Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS), Improved search for muon- neutrino to electron-neutrino oscillations in MINOS, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 181802 (2011), arXiv:1108.0015 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, Resonance Amplifica- tion of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42, 913 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    Wolfenstein, Neutrino Oscillations in Matter, Phys.Rev

    L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino Oscillations in Matter, Phys.Rev. D17, 2369 (1978)

    1978

  11. [11]

    J. T. Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations at high densities, Phys. Lett. B287, 128 (1992)

    1992

  12. [12]

    J. T. Pantaleone, Dirac neutrinos in dense matter, Phys. Rev. D46, 510 (1992)

    1992

  13. [13]

    Y. Z. Qian and G. M. Fuller, Neutrino-neutrino scattering and matter enhanced neutrino flavor transformation in Supernovae, Phys. Rev. D51, 1479 (1995), arXiv:astro- ph/9406073

    work page arXiv 1995

  14. [14]

    Samuel, Bimodal coherence in dense selfinteracting neutrino gases, Phys

    S. Samuel, Bimodal coherence in dense selfinteracting neutrino gases, Phys. Rev. D53, 5382 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9604341

    work page arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    Pastor and G

    S. Pastor and G. Raffelt, Flavor oscillations in the super- nova hot bubble region: Nonlinear effects of neutrino back- ground, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 191101 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0207281

    work page arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    A. B. Balantekin and H. Yuksel, Neutrino mixing and nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae, New J. Phys. 7, 51 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0411159

    work page arXiv 2005

  17. [17]

    Friedland and C

    A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, Neutrino flavor conversion in a neutrino background: Single particle versus multi- particle description, Phys. Rev. D68, 013007 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0304055

    work page arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    Friedland and C

    A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, Do many particle neutrino interactions cause a novel coherent effect?, JHEP10, 043, arXiv:hep-ph/0307140

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Shalgar and I

    S. Shalgar and I. Tamborra, Do we have enough evidence to invalidate the mean-field approximation adopted to model collective neutrino oscillations?, Phys. Rev. D107, 123004 (2023), arXiv:2304.13050 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Johns, Int

    L. Johns, Neutrino many-body correlations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39, 2450122 (2024), arXiv:2305.04916 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    M. J. Cervia, A. V. Patwardhan, A. B. Balantekin,‡. S. N. Coppersmith, and C. W. Johnson, Entanglement and collective flavor oscillations in a dense neutrino gas, Phys. Rev. D100, 083001 (2019), arXiv:1908.03511 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Sigl and G

    G. Sigl and G. Raffelt, General kinetic description of rel- ativistic mixed neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B406, 423 (1993)

    1993

  23. [23]

    B. Hall, A. Roggero, A. Baroni, and J. Carlson, Simula- tion of collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum com- puter, Phys. Rev. D104, 063009 (2021), arXiv:2102.12556 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Yeter-Aydeniz, S

    K. Yeter-Aydeniz, S. Bangar, G. Siopsis, and R. C. Pooser, Collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum computer, Quant. Inf. Proc.21, 84 (2022), arXiv:2104.03273 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    A. K. Jha and A. Chatla, Quantum studies of neutrinos on IBMQ processors, Eur. Phys. J. ST231, 141 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Amitrano, A

    V. Amitrano, A. Roggero, P. Luchi, F. Turro, L. Vespucci, and F. Pederiva, Trapped-ion quantum simulation of col- lective neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D107, 023007 (2023), arXiv:2207.03189 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    A. B. Balantekin, M. J. Cervia, A. V. Patwardhan, E. Rra- paj, and P. Siwach, Quantum information and quantum simulation of neutrino physics, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 186 (2023), arXiv:2305.01150 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Siwach, K

    P. Siwach, K. Harrison, and A. B. Balantekin, Collective neutrino oscillations on a quantum computer with hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, Phys. Rev. D108, 083039 (2023), arXiv:2308.09123 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Turro, I

    F. Turro, I. A. Chernyshev, R. Bhaskar, and M. Illa, Qutrit and qubit circuits for three-flavor collective neu- trino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D111, 043038 (2025), arXiv:2407.13914 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Chernyshev, C

    I. Chernyshev, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Quantum magic and computational complexity in the neutrino sec- tor, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023228 (2025), arXiv:2411.04203 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Singh, Arvind, and K

    G. Singh, Arvind, and K. Dorai, Simulating three-flavor neutrino oscillations on a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum processor, Phys. Scripta100, 085106 (2025), arXiv:2412.15617 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Spagnoli, N

    L. Spagnoliet al., Collective neutrino oscillations in three flavors on qubit and qutrit processors, Phys. Rev. D111, 103054 (2025), arXiv:2503.00607 [quant-ph]. 13

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Tripathi, S

    S. Tripathi, S. Joshi, G. Rajpoot, and P. Shukla, Quantum Simulation of Collective Neutrino Oscillations in Dense Neutrino Environment, (2025), arXiv:2508.11610 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Bleau, N

    K. Bleau, N. Ilic, J. Kopp, U. Ramahan, and X. Y. Yu, Quantum entanglement in collective neutrino oscillations – the role of quantum computing, (2026), in preparation

    2026

  35. [35]

    E. K. Akhmedov, Neutrino physics, inICTP Summer School in Particle Physics(1999) pp. 103–164, arXiv:hep- ph/0001264

    work page arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    Haeffneret al., Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions, Nature438, 643 (2005), arXiv:quant- ph/0603217

    H. Haeffneret al., Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions, Nature438, 643 (2005), arXiv:quant- ph/0603217

    work page arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    Haeffner, C

    H. Haeffner, C. F. Roos, and R. Blatt, Quantum com- puting with trapped ions, Phys. Rept.469, 155 (2008), arXiv:0809.4368 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Monroeet al., Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev

    C. Monroeet al., Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021), arXiv:1912.07845 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Phys.16, 132 (2020), arXiv:2002.07413 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, J

    M. Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, J. Phys. B49, 202001 (2016), arXiv:1605.05207 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, Dynami- cally protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation, New J. Phys.16, 045014 (2014), arXiv:1312.2017 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    J. T. Muhonenet al., Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device, Nature Nanotech. 9, 986 (2014), arXiv:1402.7140 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Veldhorstet al., An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity, Nature Nanotech.9, 981 (2014)

    M. Veldhorstet al., An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity, Nature Nanotech.9, 981 (2014)

    2014

  44. [44]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals Phys.303, 2 (2003), arXiv:quant- ph/9707021

    work page arXiv 2003

  45. [45]

    Simon and Ady Stern and Das Sarma, Sankar , Date-Added =

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1083 (2008), arXiv:0707.1889 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    R. W. Heeres, B. Vlastakis, E. Holland, S. Krastanov, V. V. Albert, L. Frunzio, L. Jiang, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity State Manipulation Using Photon-Number Selec- tive Phase Gates, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 137002 (2015), arXiv:1503.01496 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    T. J. Stavenger, E. Crane, K. C. Smith, C. T. Kang, S. M. Girvin, and N. Wiebe, C2QA - Bosonic Qiskit, in 26th IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing(2022) arXiv:2209.11153 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    J. Y. Araz, M. Grau, J. Montgomery, and F. Ringer, Hybrid quantum simulations with qubits and qumodes on trapped-ion platforms, Phys. Rev. A112, 012620 (2025), arXiv:2410.07346 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Quantum computing with Qiskit

    A. Javadi-Abhari, M. Treinish, K. Krsulich, C. J. Wood, J. Lishman, J. Gacon, S. Martiel, P. D. Nation, L. S. Bishop, A. W. Cross, B. R. Johnson, and J. M. Gambetta, Quantum computing with qiskit (2024), arXiv:2405.08810 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Viola, E

    L. Viola, E. Knill, and S. Lloyd, Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2417 (1999)

    1999

  51. [51]

    Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits

    K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, Error Mitiga- tion for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017), arXiv:1612.02058 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Giurgica-Tiron, Y

    T. Giurgica-Tiron, Y. Hindy, R. LaRose, A. Mari, and W. J. Zeng, Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation, in2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)(2020) pp. 306–316

    2020

  53. [53]

    J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A94, 052325 (2016), arXiv:1512.01098 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    van den Berg, Z

    E. van den Berg, Z. K. Minev, and K. Temme, Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values, Phys. Rev. A105, 032620 (2022)

    2022