arxiv: 2604.10784 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

TorchUMM: A Unified Multimodal Model Codebase for Evaluation, Analysis, and Post-training

Yinyi Luo , Wenwen Wang , Hayes Bai , Hongyu Zhu , Hao Chen , Pan He , Marios Savvides , Sharon Li

show 1 more author

Jindong Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI

keywords unified multimodal modelsevaluation codebasemultimodal benchmarkpost-trainingmultimodal understandinggenerationeditingstandardized protocols

0 comments

The pith

TorchUMM supplies the first unified codebase for evaluating, analyzing, and post-training diverse unified multimodal models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Recent advances have produced many architectures that handle images and text in one system, yet each comes with its own code and training setup that blocks direct comparison. TorchUMM creates a single interface that loads a wide range of these models and runs them on the same tasks and datasets. The benchmark covers understanding, generation, and editing, using both standard and new datasets that test perception, reasoning, compositionality, and following instructions. Standardized protocols remove the need to rewrite evaluation code for every model. This setup lets researchers measure real differences in capability and supports further training on any included backbone.

Core claim

TorchUMM is the first unified codebase that supports comprehensive evaluation, analysis, and post-training across diverse UMM backbones, tasks, and datasets by providing a unified interface and standardized evaluation protocols for multimodal understanding, generation, and editing.

What carries the argument

The unified interface and standardized evaluation protocols that integrate heterogeneous model backbones and remove implementation-specific differences.

If this is right

Fair and reproducible comparisons become possible across models of different scales and designs.
Insights into specific strengths and limitations emerge from tests on perception, reasoning, compositionality, and instruction following.
Post-training can be applied uniformly to any supported backbone.
New datasets can be added to the same evaluation pipeline without rewriting per-model code.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The codebase could serve as a common platform where new models are added and tested immediately upon release.
Patterns of failure that appear across many architectures may become visible for the first time.
The same structure could later incorporate additional modalities such as audio or video with minimal redesign.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen models, tasks, and datasets are representative and the shared interface does not change how any model actually performs.

What would settle it

A model that scores consistently higher or lower when run through TorchUMM than when run in its original dedicated implementation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10784 by Hao Chen, Hayes Bai, Hongyu Zhu, Jindong Wang, Marios Savvides, Pan He, Sharon Li, Wenwen Wang, Yinyi Luo.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overview of TorchUMM. et al., 2023]. A model that achieves notable gains on certain benchmarks may simultaneously experience performance degradation on others, or across different capability dimensions, including understanding, generation, and image editing. This inconsistency suggests that many reported improvements are localized rather than indicative of a holistic enhancement in model capability, raisin… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Representative UEval cases across models with different paradigms of unification. The first row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Query-variation analysis under two backbone–model pairings. In each row, the left panel shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent advances in unified multimodal models (UMMs) have led to a proliferation of architectures capable of understanding, generating, and editing across visual and textual modalities. However, developing a unified framework for UMMs remains challenging due to the diversity of model architectures and the heterogeneity of training paradigms and implementation details. In this paper, we present TorchUMM, the first unified codebase for comprehensive evaluation, analysis, and post-training across diverse UMM backbones, tasks, and datasets. TorchUMM supports a broad spectrum of models covering a wide range of scales and design paradigms. Our benchmark encompasses three core task dimensions: multimodal understanding, generation, and editing, and integrates both established and novel datasets to evaluate perception, reasoning, compositionality, and instruction-following abilities. By providing a unified interface and standardized evaluation protocols, TorchUMM enables fair and reproducible comparisons across heterogeneous models and fosters deeper insights into their strengths and limitations, facilitating the development of more capable unified multimodal systems. Code is available at: https://github.com/AIFrontierLab/TorchUMM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

TorchUMM is a new open codebase that standardizes evaluation protocols for unified multimodal models across understanding, generation, and editing tasks.

read the letter

TorchUMM is a codebase release that puts multiple multimodal model architectures under one interface for evaluation, analysis, and post-training. The paper describes support for a range of model scales and designs, plus benchmarks covering perception, reasoning, compositionality, and instruction following with both standard and newer datasets. The GitHub link makes the implementation available for inspection and use right away. This kind of consolidation can reduce duplicated effort when researchers want consistent comparisons instead of each lab rolling its own evaluation scripts. The standardized protocols are the clearest practical step forward here. The write-up stays descriptive and does not include sample runs, timing numbers, or side-by-side results that would show whether the unified interface actually produces unbiased rankings. Without those checks it is hard to know if implementation details favor certain architectures or if the selected tasks and datasets are balanced enough for broad claims. That gap is typical for tool papers but still limits how much weight the contribution can carry until others test it. The work targets multimodal researchers who need a ready evaluation harness rather than a new algorithm or theory. If the code is clean and the protocols hold up under review, it could become a shared reference point. I would send it to peer review so referees can examine the actual implementations and suggest concrete improvements before wider use.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces TorchUMM, described as the first unified codebase supporting comprehensive evaluation, analysis, and post-training of unified multimodal models (UMMs) across diverse architectures, scales, and design paradigms. It covers three core task dimensions—multimodal understanding, generation, and editing—while integrating established and novel datasets to assess perception, reasoning, compositionality, and instruction-following. The central contribution is a unified interface and standardized evaluation protocols intended to enable fair, reproducible comparisons across heterogeneous models.

Significance. If the implementations deliver the promised standardized interfaces and protocols without introducing model-specific biases, the release would provide a useful practical tool for the multimodal AI community. Standardized benchmarking frameworks can reduce fragmentation in UMM research and support more reliable insights into model capabilities, with the public GitHub release aiding reproducibility.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: The claim that TorchUMM is 'the first' unified codebase for this purpose would be strengthened by an explicit related-work discussion comparing it to prior efforts (e.g., existing multimodal toolkits or evaluation suites); without this, the novelty statement remains unsubstantiated in the provided text.
Abstract: No concrete usage examples, code snippets, supported model lists, or sample benchmark outputs are supplied. Including at least one illustrative workflow or table of covered models/tasks/datasets in the main text would improve clarity and allow readers to assess the scope directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of TorchUMM's potential value as a standardized benchmarking framework for unified multimodal models. No major comments were raised in the report, so we have no specific points to address point-by-point. We will incorporate any minor suggestions during the revision process to further strengthen the manuscript and codebase documentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a tool-release description of the TorchUMM codebase and its standardized interfaces for evaluating UMMs across understanding, generation, and editing tasks. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text or abstract. The central claim is the existence and public release of the framework itself, which does not reduce to any input by construction or self-reference. Representativeness of models and datasets is noted as an external concern but does not create internal circularity in any derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a software engineering and benchmarking contribution; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new postulated entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1016 out tokens · 50684 ms · 2026-05-10T15:28:11.867015+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

UniPath: Adaptive Coordination of Understanding and Generation for Unified Multimodal Reasoning
cs.MM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

UniPath adaptively models coordination-path diversity in unified multimodal models by training a path-conditioned executor and using a lightweight planner for input-dependent selection, improving performance over fixe...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 16 internal anchors

[1]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

Qwen3-VL Technical Report

Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

BLIP3-o: A Family of Fully Open Unified Multimodal Models-Architecture, Training and Dataset

Jiuhai Chen, Zhiyang Xu, Xichen Pan, Yushi Hu, Can Qin, Tom Goldstein, Lifu Huang, Tianyi Zhou, Saining Xie, Silvio Savarese, et al. Blip3-o: A family of fully open unified multimodal models-architecture, training and dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09568, 2025a. Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Zang, Zehui Chen, Haodong Duan, Jiaqi ...

work page Pith review arXiv
[4]

Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scaling

Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, and Chong Ruan. Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17811, 2025b. OpenCompass Contributors. Opencompass: a universal evaluation platform for foundation models (2023). URL https://github. com/open...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[5]

Yufeng Cui, Honghao Chen, Haoge Deng, Xu Huang, Xinghang Li, Jirong Liu, Yang Liu, Zhuoyan Luo, Jinsheng Wang, Wenxuan Wang, et al. Emu3. 5: Native multimodal models are world learners.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26583,

work page arXiv
[6]

Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining

Chaorui Deng, Deyao Zhu, Kunchang Li, Chenhui Gou, Feng Li, Zeyu Wang, Shu Zhong, Weihao Yu, Xiaonan Nie, Ziang Song, et al. Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[7]

From multimodal llm to human-level ai: Modality, instruction, reasoning, efficiency and beyond

Hao Fei, Yuan Yao, Zhuosheng Zhang, Fuxiao Liu, Ao Zhang, and Tat-Seng Chua. From multimodal llm to human-level ai: Modality, instruction, reasoning, efficiency and beyond. InProceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024): Tutorial Summaries, pages 1–8,

2024
[8]

Style outweighs substance: Failure modes of llm judges in alignment benchmarking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15268,

Benjamin Feuer, Micah Goldblum, Teresa Datta, Sanjana Nambiar, Raz Besaleli, Samuel Dooley, Max Cembalest, and John P Dickerson. Style outweighs substance: Failure modes of llm judges in alignment benchmarking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.15268,

work page arXiv
[9]

MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

15 Chaoyou Fu, Peixian Chen, Yunhang Shen, Yulei Qin, Mengdan Zhang, Xu Lin, Jinrui Yang, Xiawu Zheng, Ke Li, Xing Sun, et al. Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[10]

Tokenflow: Con- sistent diffusion features for consistent video editing,

Michal Geyer, Omer Bar-Tal, Shai Bagon, and Tali Dekel. Tokenflow: Consistent diffusion features for consistent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10373,

work page arXiv
[11]

Unicorn: Towards self-improving unified multimodal models through self-generated supervision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03193, 2026

Ruiyan Han, Zhen Fang, XinYu Sun, Yuchen Ma, Ziheng Wang, Yu Zeng, Zehui Chen, Lin Chen, Wenxuan Huang, Wei-Jie Xu, et al. Unicorn: Towards self-improving unified multimodal models through self- generated supervision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03193,

work page arXiv
[12]

ELLA: Equip Diffusion Models with LLM for Enhanced Semantic Alignment

Xiwei Hu, Rui Wang, Yixiao Fang, Bin Fu, Pei Cheng, and Gang Yu. Ella: Equip diffusion models with llm for enhanced semantic alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05135,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[13]

Interleaving reasoning for better text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06945, 2025

Wenxuan Huang, Shuang Chen, Zheyong Xie, Shaosheng Cao, Shixiang Tang, Yufan Shen, Qingyu Yin, Wenbo Hu, Xiaoman Wang, Yuntian Tang, et al. Interleaving reasoning for better text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06945,

work page arXiv
[14]

Ueval: A benchmark for unified multimodal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22155,

Bo Li, Yida Yin, Wenhao Chai, Xingyu Fu, and Zhuang Liu. Ueval: A benchmark for unified multimodal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22155,

work page arXiv
[15]

Step1X-Edit: A Practical Framework for General Image Editing

Shiyu Liu, Yucheng Han, Peng Xing, Fukun Yin, Rui Wang, Wei Cheng, Jiaqi Liao, Yingming Wang, Honghao Fu, Chunrui Han, et al. Step1x-edit: A practical framework for general image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[16]

MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts

Pan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu, Chunyuan Li, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Hao Cheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02255,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[17]

Do instruction-tuned models always perform better than base models? evidence from math and domain-shifted benchmarks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13244,

16 Prateek Munjal, Clement Christophe, Ronnie Rajan, and Praveenkumar Kanithi. Do instruction-tuned models always perform better than base models? evidence from math and domain-shifted benchmarks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13244,

work page arXiv
[18]

Wise: A world knowledge-informed semantic evaluation for text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07265,

Yuwei Niu, Munan Ning, Mengren Zheng, Weiyang Jin, Bin Lin, Peng Jin, Jiaqi Liao, Chaoran Feng, Kunpeng Ning, Bin Zhu, et al. Wise: A world knowledge-informed semantic evaluation for text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07265,

work page arXiv
[19]

Uni-cot: Towards unified chain-of-thought reasoning across text and vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05606,

Luozheng Qin, Jia Gong, Yuqing Sun, Tianjiao Li, Mengping Yang, Xiaomeng Yang, Chao Qu, Zhiyu Tan, and Hao Li. Uni-cot: Towards unified chain-of-thought reasoning across text and vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05606,

work page arXiv
[20]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13073 (2025)

Qwen Team. Qwen3.5: Towards native multimodal agents, February 2026a. URL https://qwen.ai/ blog?id=qwen3.5. Qwen Team. Qwen3-vl-embedding-8b, 2026b. URL https://huggingface.co/Qwen/ Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B. Hugging Face model card. Rui Shao, Wei Li, Lingsen Zhang, Renshan Zhang, Zhiyang Liu, Ran Chen, and Liqiang Nie. Large vlm- based vision-language-action...

work page arXiv
[21]

OpenWorldLib: A Unified Codebase and Definition of Advanced World Models

DataFlow Team et al. Openworldlib: A unified codebase and definition of advanced world models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.04707,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[22]

Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

Quantifying the gap between understanding and generation within unified multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02140, 2026a

Chenlong Wang, Yuhang Chen, Zhihan Hu, Dongping Chen, Wenhu Chen, Sarah Wiegreffe, and Tianyi Zhou. Quantifying the gap between understanding and generation within unified multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02140, 2026a. Dianyi Wang, Ruihang Li, Feng Han, Chaofan Ma, Wei Song, Siyuan Wang, Yibin Wang, Yi Xin, Hongjian Liu, Zhixiong Zhang, et al. ...

work page arXiv
[24]

Qwen2.5 Technical Report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13848, 2024

Chengyue Wu, Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Yiyang Ma, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, Chong Ruan, et al. Janus: Decoupling visual encoding for unified multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13848,

work page arXiv
[25]

OmniGen2: Towards Instruction-Aligned Multimodal Generation

Chenyuan Wu, Pengfei Zheng, Ruiran Yan, Shitao Xiao, Xin Luo, Yueze Wang, Wanli Li, Xiyan Jiang, Yexin Liu, Junjie Zhou, et al. Omnigen2: Exploration to advanced multimodal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18871, 2025a. Mingrui Wu, Hang Liu, Jiayi Ji, Xiaoshuai Sun, and Rongrong Ji. Micon-bench: Benchmarking and enhancing multi-image context image gen...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[26]

Openuni: A simple baseline for unified multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23661, 2025c

Size Wu, Zhonghua Wu, Zerui Gong, Qingyi Tao, Sheng Jin, Qinyue Li, Wei Li, and Chen Change Loy. Openuni: A simple baseline for unified multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23661, 2025b. Ji Xie, Trevor Darrell, Luke Zettlemoyer, and XuDong Wang. Reconstruction alignment improves unified multimodal models. InICLR,

work page arXiv
[27]

Show-o: One Single Transformer to Unify Multimodal Understanding and Generation

Jinheng Xie, Weijia Mao, Zechen Bai, David Junhao Zhang, Weihao Wang, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Yuchao Gu, Zhijie Chen, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12528,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[28]

Show-o2: Improved Native Unified Multimodal Models

Jinheng Xie, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o2: Improved native unified multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15564,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[29]

Mmada: Multimodal large diffusion language models

Ling Yang, Ye Tian, Bowen Li, Xinchen Zhang, Ke Shen, Yunhai Tong, and Mengdi Wang. Mmada: Multimodal large diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15809,

work page arXiv
[30]

ImgEdit: A Unified Image Editing Dataset and Benchmark

Yang Ye, Xianyi He, Zongjian Li, Bin Lin, Shenghai Yuan, Zhiyuan Yan, Bohan Hou, and Li Yuan. Imgedit: A unified image editing dataset and benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20275,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[31]

MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities

Weihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Kevin Lin, Zicheng Liu, Xinchao Wang, and Lijuan Wang. Mm-vet: Evaluating large multimodal models for integrated capabilities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02490,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[32]

Lmms-eval: Reality check on the evaluation of large multimodal models

Kaichen Zhang, Bo Li, Peiyuan Zhang, Fanyi Pu, Joshua Adrian Cahyono, Kairui Hu, Shuai Liu, Yuanhan Zhang, Jingkang Yang, Chunyuan Li, et al. Lmms-eval: Reality check on the evaluation of large multimodal models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025, pages 881–916,

2025
[33]

thinking with images

Shanshan Zhao, Xinjie Zhang, Jintao Guo, Jiakui Hu, Lunhao Duan, Minghao Fu, Yong Xien Chng, Guo- Hua Wang, Qing-Guo Chen, Zhao Xu, et al. Unified multimodal understanding and generation models: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02567,

work page arXiv
[34]

Uni-MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Unified Benchmark

Kai Zou, Ziqi Huang, Yuhao Dong, Shulin Tian, Dian Zheng, Hongbo Liu, Jingwen He, Bin Liu, Yu Qiao, and Ziwei Liu. Uni-mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal unified benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13759,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[35]

Table 7: Geneval sub-score. model single_object two_object counting colors position color_attr overall bagel(w/o think) 99.38 94.19 78.75 87.77 51 61.75 78.81 blip3o 98.12 93.18 73.44 86.17 72.75 64.5 81.36 show_o2(7B) 97.81 71.46 48.75 78.46 20 42.75 59.87 show_o2(1.5B) 96.88 64.39 46.88 76.06 16.75 32 55.49 Janus_pro 97.81 86.62 57.5 89.36 76 66.25 78.9...

1905