Pith. sign in

super hub Baseline reference

MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts

Baseline reference. 56% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

182 Pith papers citing it
6 external citations · Pith
Baseline 56% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit impressive problem-solving skills in many tasks and domains, but their ability in mathematical reasoning in visual contexts has not been systematically studied. To bridge this gap, we present MathVista, a benchmark designed to combine challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks. It consists of 6,141 examples, derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets involving mathematics and 3 newly created datasets (i.e., IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA). Completing these tasks requires fine-grained, deep visual understanding and compositional reasoning, which all state-of-the-art foundation models find challenging. With MathVista, we have conducted a comprehensive, quantitative evaluation of 12 prominent foundation models. The best-performing GPT-4V model achieves an overall accuracy of 49.9%, substantially outperforming Bard, the second-best performer, by 15.1%. Our in-depth analysis reveals that the superiority of GPT-4V is mainly attributed to its enhanced visual perception and mathematical reasoning. However, GPT-4V still falls short of human performance by 10.4%, as it often struggles to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning. This significant gap underscores the critical role that MathVista will play in the development of general-purpose AI agents capable of tackling mathematically intensive and visually rich real-world tasks. We further explore the new ability of self-verification, the application of self-consistency, and the interactive chatbot capabilities of GPT-4V, highlighting its promising potential for future research. The project is available at https://mathvista.github.io/.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 26 background 24 baseline 4

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit impressive problem-solving skills in many tasks and domains, but their ability in mathematical reasoning in visual contexts has not been systematically studied. To bridge this gap, we present MathVista, a benchmark designed to combine challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks. It consists of 6,141 examples, derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets involving mathematics and 3 newly created datasets (i.e., IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA). Completing these tasks requires fine-grained, deep visual understandin

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization: Teacher in Prompts, Not Gradients

cs.CL · 2026-06-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ZPPO improves distillation to small vision-language models by using binary and negative candidate prompts plus a replay buffer for hard questions, outperforming standard distillation and GRPO on a 31-benchmark suite with largest gains at the 0.8B scale.

HLL: Can Agents Cross Humanity's Last Line of Verification?

cs.AI · 2026-06-01 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

HLL is a new benchmark that evaluates eight frontier multimodal agents on closed-loop interactive CAPTCHA solving, showing sharp performance drops under realism stressors and trace validation.

ETCHR: Editing To Clarify and Harness Reasoning

cs.CV · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A decoupled question-conditioned image editor trained via supervised imitation then VLM-reward enhancement improves MLLM visual reasoning Pass@1 by 4.6-5.5 points across models and tasks.

3D Primitives are a Spatial Language for VLMs

cs.CV · 2026-05-12 · conditional · novelty 7.0

3D geometric primitives in executable code act as an effective intermediate spatial language that boosts VLMs on reconstruction and question-answering tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 182 citing papers.