Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 cited by

Interacting bosons with Ohmic dissipation undergo a superconductor-metal transition in the Wilson-Fisher class with dynamical exponent z approximately 2

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 21:37 UTC pith:NM7G3IGK

load-bearing objection Derives dissipative TDGL from 1D boson puddles with a controlled mapping but the universality assignment rests on the completeness of the operator content after the puddle construction. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2605.30746 v2 pith:NM7G3IGK submitted 2026-05-29 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-conquant-ph

Superconductor-"Metal" Transition of One-dimensional Interacting Bosons with Ohmic Quantum Dissipation

Miguel A. Cazalilla This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords one-dimensional bosonsOhmic quantum dissipationsuperconductor-metal transitionWilson-Fisher universality classdissipative Mott insulatorphase diagrambosonization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a one-dimensional lattice of interacting bosons subject to onsite phase dissipation modeling coupling to a diffusive normal metal. It identifies two phases at commensurate filling: a dissipative Mott insulator with exponentially decaying phase correlations and a dissipative Bose-Einstein condensate with long-range order. By modeling the Mott phase as an array of dissipative boson puddles and deriving the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, the transition is shown to belong to the Wilson-Fisher universality class with dynamical exponent z approximately 2. At larger doping, a pseudospin chain mapping combined with bosonization establishes the superconducting phase as stable even for arbitrarily small dissipation.

Core claim

The D-Mott to D-BEC transition criticality belongs to the Wilson-Fisher universality class with dynamical exponent z≈2, obtained by deriving the dissipative TDGL theory from the microscopic picture of weakly coupled dissipative boson puddles. At larger doping the D-BEC phase is the ground state for non-vanishing but arbitrarily small dissipation.

What carries the argument

The dissipative time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory derived from the array of dissipative boson puddles whose size is set by the phase-slip length.

Load-bearing premise

That the commensurate system maps to an array of dissipative boson puddles with size given by the phase-slip length, and that bosonization plus pseudospin mapping produces the Wilson-Fisher fixed point without extra relevant operators.

What would settle it

Measuring dynamical critical exponent z significantly different from 2 or correlation functions not matching Wilson-Fisher predictions at the D-Mott to D-BEC transition.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The D-Mott phase is stable at small doping due to its finite compressibility computed to leading order in perturbation theory.
  • The D-BEC phase prevails at larger doping for arbitrarily small dissipation via pseudospin mapping.
  • The approach shares similarities with deconfinement transitions in arrays of 1D bosonic Mott insulators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The puddle model provides a microscopic justification for phenomenological descriptions of superconductor-metal transitions in quasi-1D wires.
  • This framework could be extended to study effects of disorder or different dissipation spectra in bosonic systems.
  • Experimental realization might involve Josephson junction chains coupled to normal metals to test the predicted critical behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the phase diagram of 1D interacting bosons on a lattice with onsite Ohmic phase dissipation from coupling to a diffusive normal-metal electrode. Starting from commensurate filling, it employs bosonization, pseudospin mapping, and perturbation theory to identify a dissipative Mott insulator (D-Mott) phase, modeled as weakly coupled dissipative boson puddles, and a dissipative BEC (D-BEC) superconductor phase. The puddle construction is used to derive the dissipative TDGL theory, placing the D-Mott/D-BEC transition in the Wilson-Fisher universality class with z≈2. At small doping the D-Mott phase remains stable due to finite compressibility; at larger doping the D-BEC phase is stable for arbitrarily small dissipation.

Significance. If the puddle mapping is free of additional relevant operators, the work supplies a microscopic derivation of the dissipative TDGL theory and assigns a specific universality class (Wilson-Fisher with z≈2) to the superconductor-metal transition in quasi-1D bosonic systems, which would be a useful benchmark for dissipative quantum phase transitions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (puddle-picture paragraph) and the derivation of the TDGL theory] The central assignment of the D-Mott/D-BEC transition to the Wilson-Fisher class with z≈2 rests on the mapping of the commensurate lattice to an array of dissipative boson puddles (size set by phase-slip length) whose effective theory is the dissipative TDGL of Sachdev et al. (abstract). The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the Ohmic bath and lattice do not generate additional relevant operators beyond those in the target TDGL; without this operator-content check the universality-class claim is not secured.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comment on the universality-class assignment. We respond point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (puddle-picture paragraph) and the derivation of the TDGL theory] The central assignment of the D-Mott/D-BEC transition to the Wilson-Fisher class with z≈2 rests on the mapping of the commensurate lattice to an array of dissipative boson puddles (size set by phase-slip length) whose effective theory is the dissipative TDGL of Sachdev et al. (abstract). The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the Ohmic bath and lattice do not generate additional relevant operators beyond those in the target TDGL; without this operator-content check the universality-class claim is not secured.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit operator-content check is required to fully secure the universality-class claim. The puddle construction follows from the bosonization analysis combined with the phase-slip length scale that emerges at commensurate filling; the inter-puddle Josephson coupling together with the local Ohmic dissipation then maps onto the dissipative TDGL. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short appendix) that enumerates the leading operators allowed by the underlying symmetries and the Ohmic bath. Using the scaling dimensions obtained from the dissipative Luttinger-liquid description, we will show that all additional operators generated by the bath or the lattice are irrelevant at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point with z≈2. This explicit check will be included in the next version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation proceeds from microscopic lattice model via standard mappings; no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper starts from a microscopic 1D lattice model of interacting bosons with onsite phase dissipation. It constructs the D-Mott phase as an array of dissipative puddles, applies bosonization and a pseudospin mapping, and derives the dissipative TDGL theory from that picture. The Wilson-Fisher assignment with z≈2 follows from the resulting effective theory. No equation or step equates a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by definition; the cited Sachdev et al. work is external and the derivation runs in the forward direction. The central claims therefore remain independent of the target phenomenology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard condensed-matter techniques (bosonization, pseudospin-chain mapping) whose validity for this dissipative model is assumed rather than re-derived; the puddle-size identification is introduced phenomenologically to match the phase-slip length. No new free parameters are fitted to data; the dissipation strength and Josephson coupling appear as expansion parameters.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bosonization and pseudospin mapping remain valid in the presence of Ohmic phase dissipation at the lattice sites.
    Invoked when the authors map the lattice model to a pseudospin chain and apply bosonization to obtain the phase diagram.
  • domain assumption The dissipative time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory can be obtained by coarse-graining the microscopic puddle array without additional relevant operators.
    Central step that links the microscopic description to the phenomenological theory of Sachdev et al.
invented entities (1)
  • Dissipative boson puddle no independent evidence
    purpose: To describe the local regions of phase coherence in the D-Mott phase whose size is set by phase slips.
    Introduced to connect the microscopic lattice model to the observed exponential decay of phase correlations; no independent experimental signature is provided beyond the phase diagram itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5896 in / 1739 out tokens · 33649 ms · 2026-06-28T21:37:29.003180+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The phase diagram of a system of interacting bosons (Cooper pairs) hoping on a one-dimensional (1D) lattice with onsite phase dissipation describing the Josephson tunneling to a nearby diffusive normal-metal electrode is studied. Starting from the system at commensurate lattice filling, it is shown by a combination of analytical techniques that the phase diagram contains two quantum phases: A dissipative Bose-Einstein condensate (D-BEC) or superconductor with long-range phase coherence, and a dissipative Mott insulator (D-Mott) or "metal" with exponentially decaying phase correlations in space and local imaginary-time correlations decaying as the local pairing correlations of the electrode. The D-Mott/metal phase can be described as a 1D array of dissipative boson puddles, weakly coupled by Josephson tunneling. The puddle size roughly corresponds to the length scale beyond which phase slips suppress phase coherence. The dissipative time-dependent Ginsburg-Landau theory phenomenologically used by Sachdev, Werner, and Troyer [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92} 237003 (2004)] for the superconductor-metal transition in quasi-1D wires is derived from this microscopic puddle picture. Thus, the criticality of the D-Mott/D-BEC transition is shown to belong to the Wilson-Fisher universality class with dynamical exponent $z\approx 2$. At small doping, the D-Mott/metal phase remains stable due to its finite compressibility, which is computed to leading order in a perturbation expansion of the dissipation strength and the inter-puddle Josephson coupling. At larger doping, using a mapping to a pseudospin chain combined with bosonization, the D-BEC/superconductor phase is the ground state for non-vanishing but arbitrarily small dissipation. Similarities and differences with deconfinement transition of an array 1D bosonic Mott insulators in anisotropic optical lattices are also discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30746 by Miguel A. Cazalilla.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Phase diagram for the bosonized model (8) for a com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch of the D-Mott/Metal phase after coarse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Sketch of the D-Mott/Metal phase diagram as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissipation splits the Mott transition in one dimension

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Dissipation splits the 1D Mott transition into two distinct critical points via an intermediate compressible gapless dissipative phase with zero superfluid stiffness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The D-Mott lobes are compressible (unlike their Mott-insulating counterparts) and therefore the lattice filling is not exactly an integer

    Whenn 0 (N0) is tuned to a half- integer value, the dissipative BEC (D-BEC/Superconductor) phase is the ground state for non-vanishing but non-vanishing but arbitrarily smallα. The D-Mott lobes are compressible (unlike their Mott-insulating counterparts) and therefore the lattice filling is not exactly an integer. However, since they derive from the incom...

  2. [2]

    (11) withK≃1)

    Since we assume short-range interactions that yieldK≃1,S D turns out to be strongly relevant and drives the system into the ordered D-BEC phase (at smallα, the runaway flow to strong coupling is described by Eq. (11) withK≃1). Indeed, when the (renormalized) theory is treated semi- classically in theα∼1 limit,S D favors long-range order in the phase field...

  3. [3]

    ERDF A way of making Europe

    term that remains isS D[θ], which again favors the D-BEC phase as the ground state of the system. In this case, there is also the possibility of stabilizing a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid (TLL) as the ground state, as long as the screening of the boson-boson interactions is sufficiently poor and results in long-range repulsive tailV l,l′ mapping to the Ising...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  4. [4]

    Feigel’man and A

    M. Feigel’man and A. Larkin, Quantum superconductor- metal transition in a 2d proximity-coupled array, Chem- ical Physics235, 107 (1998)

    1998

  5. [5]

    M. V. Feigel’man, A. I. Larkin, and M. A. Skvortsov, Quantum superconductor-metal transition in a proximity array, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1869 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    Sachdev, P

    S. Sachdev, P. Werner, and M. Troyer, Universal conduc- tance of nanowires near the superconductor-metal quan- tum transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 237003 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Werner, M

    P. Werner, M. Troyer, and S. Sachdev, Quan- tum spin chains with site dissipation, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan74, 67 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJS.74S.67

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsjs.74s.67 2005

  8. [8]

    A. M. Lobos, A. Iucci, M. M¨ uller, and T. Giamarchi, Dissipation-driven phase transitions in superconducting wires, Phys. Rev. B80, 214515 (2009)

    2009

  9. [9]

    A. M. Lobos and T. Giamarchi, Superconductor-to- insulator transition in linear arrays of josephson junc- tions capacitively coupled to metallic films, Phys. Rev. B 84, 024523 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    R. M. Lutchyn, V. Galitski, G. Refael, and S. Das Sarma, Dissipation-driven quantum phase transition in superconductor-graphene systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 106402 (2008)

    2008

  11. [11]

    J. R. Tucker and B. I. Halperin, Onset of superconduc- tivity in one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B3, 3768 (1971)

    1971

  12. [12]

    Pankov, S

    S. Pankov, S. Florens, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and S. Sachdev, Non-fermi-liquid behavior from two-dimensional antiferromagnetic fluctuations: A renormalization-group and large-nanalysis, Phys. Rev. B69, 054426 (2004)

    2004

  13. [13]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  14. [14]

    M. A. Cazalilla, F. Sols, and F. Guinea, Dissipation- driven quantum phase transitions in a tomonaga- luttinger liquid electrostatically coupled to a metallic gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 076401 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    A. O. Gogolin, A. A. Nersesyan, and A. M. Tsvelik, Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    1999

  16. [16]

    M. A. Cazalilla, Bosonizing one-dimensional cold atomic gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics37, S1 (2004)

    2004

  17. [17]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed mat- ter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1405 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    Syassen, D

    N. Syassen, D. M. Bauer, M. Lettner, T. Volz, D. Dietze, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, J. I. Cirac, G. Rempe, and S. D¨ urr, Strong dissipation inhibits losses and induces correlations in cold molecular gases, Science320, 1329 (2008)

    2008

  19. [19]

    Huang, T

    C.-H. Huang, T. Giamarchi, and M. A. Cazalilla, Mod- eling particle loss in open systems using keldysh path in- tegral and second order cumulant expansion, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043192 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Tomita, S

    T. Tomita, S. Nakajima, I. Danshita, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of the Mott insulator to superfluid crossover of a driven-dissipative Bose- Hubbard system, Science Advances3, e1701513 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1701513

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701513 2017

  21. [21]

    Uchino, Comparative study for two-terminal transport 23 through a lossy one-dimensional quantum wire, Phys

    S. Uchino, Comparative study for two-terminal transport 23 through a lossy one-dimensional quantum wire, Phys. Rev. A106, 053320 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Bouverot-Dupuis, V

    O. Bouverot-Dupuis, V. Grison, and N. Paris, Func- tional renormalization group study of a dissipative bose- hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B113, 174503 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    Malatsetxebarria, Z

    E. Malatsetxebarria, Z. Cai, U. Schollw¨ ock, and M. A. Cazalilla, Dissipative effects on the superfluid-to- insulator transition in mixed-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A88, 063630 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Luther and V

    A. Luther and V. J. Emery, Backward scattering in the one-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 589 (1974)

    1974

  25. [25]

    Majumdar, L

    S. Majumdar, L. Foini, T. Giamarchi, and A. Rosso, Bath-induced phase transition in a luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B107, 165113 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    M. A. Cazalilla, A. F. Ho, and T. Giamarchi, Interacting bose gases in quasi-one-dimensional optical lattices, New Journal of Physics8, 158 (2006)

    2006

  27. [27]

    A. F. Ho, M. A. Cazalilla, and T. Giamarchi, Deconfine- ment in a 2d optical lattice of coupled 1d boson systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 130405 (2004)

    2004

  28. [28]

    A. M. Lobos, M. A. Cazalilla, and P. Chudzinski, Mag- netic phases in the one-dimensional kondo chain on a metallic surface, Phys. Rev. B86, 035455 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    Y. Guo, H. Yao, S. Ramanjanappa, S. Dhar, M. Hor- vath, L. Pizzino, T. Giamarchi, M. Landini, and H.-C. N˜A¤gerl, Observation of the 2d–1d crossover in strongly interacting ultracold bosons, Nature Physics20, 934 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Effective harmonic-fluid approach to low-energy properties of one-dimensional quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 1840 (1981)

    1981

  31. [31]

    G. I. Dzhaparidze and A. A. Nersesyan, Magnetic-field phase transition in a one-dimensional system of electrons with attraction, JETP Lett.27, 334 (1978)

    1978

  32. [32]

    V. L. Pokrovsky and A. L. Talapov, Ground state, spec- trum, and phase diagram of two-dimensional incommen- surate crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 65 (1979)

    1979

  33. [33]

    Drewes, D

    S. Drewes, D. P. Arovas, and S. Renn, Quantum phase transitions in dissipative tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. B 68, 165345 (2003)

    2003

  34. [34]

    G¨ oppert, H

    G. G¨ oppert, H. Grabert, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svis- tunov, Effect of tunneling conductance on the coulomb staircase, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2324 (1998)

    1998

  35. [35]

    Hofstetter and W

    W. Hofstetter and W. Zwerger, Single-electron box and the helicity modulus of an inverse square xy model, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3737 (1997)

    1997

  36. [36]

    Spohn and W

    H. Spohn and W. Zwerger, Decay of the two-point func- tion in one-dimensional o(n) spin models with long- range interactions, Journal of Statistical Physics94, 1037 (1999)

    1999

  37. [37]

    S. L. Lukyanov and P. Werner, Universal scaling be- haviour of the single electron box in the strong tunnelling limit, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2006, P11002 (2006)

    2006

  38. [38]

    Horovitz and P

    B. Horovitz and P. Le Doussal, Aharonov-bohm effect in the presence of dissipative environments, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155127 (2010)

    2010

  39. [39]

    S. R. Renn, Large n behavior of non-ohmic tunnel junc- tions (1997), arXiv:cond-mat/9708194 [cond-mat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  40. [40]

    K. A. Matveev, Quantum fluctuations of the charge of a metal particle under the coulomb blockade condi- tions, Sov. Phys. Journal of Experimental and Theoreti- cal Physics72, 892 (1991)

    1991

  41. [41]

    I. S. Burmistrov and A. M. M. Pruisken, Macroscopic charge quantization in single-electron devices, Phys. Rev. B81, 085428 (2010)

    2010

  42. [42]

    A. L. S. Ribeiro, P. McClarty, P. Ribeiro, and M. Weber, Dissipation-induced long-range order in the one-dimensional bose-hubbard model (2023), arXiv:2311.07683 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  44. [44]

    completing the square

    In this expressionE 0 P =N P (EC N 2 0 /2−E C N 2 0 /2) = 0 is the ground state energy of theN P free rotors (the first term being the contribution from the charging energy EC P l(nl −N 0)2/2 in the ground state wheren l = 0 forl= 1, . . . , N P , and the second term is the correction that arises after “completing the square” and introducing the chemical ...