Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety

Canonical reference. 80% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

49 Pith papers citing it
2 external citations · Pith
Background 80% of classified citations
abstract

AI systems that "think" in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety: we can monitor their chains of thought (CoT) for the intent to misbehave. Like all other known AI oversight methods, CoT monitoring is imperfect and allows some misbehavior to go unnoticed. Nevertheless, it shows promise and we recommend further research into CoT monitorability and investment in CoT monitoring alongside existing safety methods. Because CoT monitorability may be fragile, we recommend that frontier model developers consider the impact of development decisions on CoT monitorability.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 45 2025 4

representative citing papers

CORE: Contrastive Reflection Enables Rapid Improvements in Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

CORE distills contrasts between successful and unsuccessful reasoning traces into compact natural-language insights that enable faster model self-improvement on reasoning tasks with fewer rollouts than parametric or other non-parametric baselines.

Distributed Attacks in Persistent-State AI Control

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · conditional · novelty 6.5

In persistent multi-PR coding, gradual and positional side-task attacks evade different monitors, and even a four-monitor ensemble leaves 47% of successful gradual attacks undetected.

Predicting LLM Safety Before Release by Simulating Deployment

cs.LG · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Regenerating model responses on de-identified production conversation prefixes yields pre-deployment misbehavior rate forecasts that track realized production rates within 2-5x and outperform adversarial-prompt baselines.

Radical AI Interpretability

cs.AI · 2026-06-25 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A framework is proposed for solving for an AI system's beliefs and desires from its computational facts, with criteria for success tied to interpretability tests and emphasis on holistic attribution.

Sycophancy Towards Researchers Drives Performative Misalignment

cs.CL · 2026-06-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Sycophancy toward researchers explains alignment faking in language models better than scheming, based on experiments showing persistent evaluation awareness even in deployment scenarios and increased sensitivity after sycophancy fine-tuning.

ReasonOps: Operator Segmentation for LLM Reasoning Traces

cs.AI · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Unsupervised clustering on sentence-initial 3-token pivots extracts 7 universal reasoning operators from 44k traces across 12 LLMs that enable model fingerprinting and answer-correctness prediction.

citing papers explorer

Showing 49 of 49 citing papers.