pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (62%).

53 Pith papers citing it
Background 62% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities, but are prone to outputting falsehoods. Recent work has developed techniques for inferring whether a LLM is telling the truth by training probes on the LLM's internal activations. However, this line of work is controversial, with some authors pointing out failures of these probes to generalize in basic ways, among other conceptual issues. In this work, we use high-quality datasets of simple true/false statements to study in detail the structure of LLM representations of truth, drawing on three lines of evidence: 1. Visualizations of LLM true/false statement representations, which reveal clear linear structure. 2. Transfer experiments in which probes trained on one dataset generalize to different datasets. 3. Causal evidence obtained by surgically intervening in a LLM's forward pass, causing it to treat false statements as true and vice versa. Overall, we present evidence that at sufficient scale, LLMs linearly represent the truth or falsehood of factual statements. We also show that simple difference-in-mean probes generalize as well as other probing techniques while identifying directions which are more causally implicated in model outputs.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities, but are prone to outputting falsehoods. Recent work has developed techniques for inferring whether a LLM is telling the truth by training probes on the LLM's internal activations. However, this line of work is controversial, with some authors pointing out failures of these probes to generalize in basic ways, among other conceptual issues. In this work, we use high-quality datasets of simple true/false statements to study in detail the structure of LLM representations of truth, drawing on three lines of evidence: 1. Visualizations of LL

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Geometric Factual Recall in Transformers

cs.CL · 2026-05-12 · conditional · novelty 8.0

A single-layer transformer memorizes random subject-attribute bijections using logarithmic embedding dimension via linear superpositions in embeddings and ReLU-gated selection in the MLP, with zero-shot transfer to new facts and matching multi-hop constructions.

Deep Minds and Shallow Probes

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Symmetry under affine reparameterizations of hidden coordinates selects a unique hierarchy of shallow coordinate-stable probes and a probe-visible quotient for cross-model transfer.

Cell-Based Representation of Relational Binding in Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Large language models encode relational bindings via a cell-based representation: a low-dimensional linear subspace in which each cell corresponds to an entity-relation index pair and attributes are retrieved from the matching cell.

Emotion Concepts and their Function in a Large Language Model

cs.AI · 2026-04-09 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Claude Sonnet 4.5 exhibits functional emotions via abstract internal representations of emotion concepts that causally influence its preferences and misaligned behaviors without implying subjective experience.

Reading Calibrated Uncertainty from Language Model Trajectories

cs.LG · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Geometric features from per-layer MLP update trajectories fed to a sparse linear probe outperform maximum softmax probability for uncertainty quantification under selective abstention, with gains up to 21 AURC points.

Probing Persona-Dependent Preferences in Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Linear probes on residual-stream activations identify a shared preference vector in LLMs that tracks choices across prompts and causally steers decisions even for anti-correlated personas.

Not Just RLHF: Why Alignment Alone Won't Fix Multi-Agent Sycophancy

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Base LLMs show multi-agent yield to peer pressure at rates equal to or higher than aligned models, localized by activation patching to mid-layers where attention dominates, with one dissenter cutting yield by 54-73 points while prompt defenses fail on variants.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 53 citing papers.