pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance

Canonical reference. 88% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

41 Pith papers citing it
Background 88% of classified citations
abstract

Recent advances in large reasoning models (LRMs) demonstrate that sophisticated behaviors such as multi-step reasoning and self-reflection can emerge via reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards~(\textit{RLVR}). However, existing \textit{RLVR} approaches are inherently ``on-policy'', limiting learning to a model's own outputs and failing to acquire reasoning abilities beyond its initial capabilities. To address this issue, we introduce \textbf{LUFFY} (\textbf{L}earning to reason \textbf{U}nder o\textbf{FF}-polic\textbf{Y} guidance), a framework that augments \textit{RLVR} with off-policy reasoning traces. LUFFY dynamically balances imitation and exploration by combining off-policy demonstrations with on-policy rollouts during training. Specifically, LUFFY combines the Mixed-Policy GRPO framework, which has a theoretically guaranteed convergence rate, alongside policy shaping via regularized importance sampling to avoid superficial and rigid imitation during mixed-policy training. Compared with previous RLVR methods, LUFFY achieves an over \textbf{+6.4} average gain across six math benchmarks and an advantage of over \textbf{+6.2} points in out-of-distribution tasks. Most significantly, we show that LUFFY successfully trains weak models in scenarios where on-policy RLVR completely fails. These results provide compelling evidence that LUFFY transcends the fundamental limitations of on-policy RLVR and demonstrates the great potential of utilizing off-policy guidance in RLVR.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 33 2025 8

clear filters

representative citing papers

Learning Agentic Policy from Action Guidance

cs.CL · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ActGuide-RL uses human action data as plan-style guidance in mixed-policy RL to overcome exploration barriers in LLM agents, matching SFT+RL performance on search benchmarks without cold-start training.

Near-Future Policy Optimization

cs.LG · 2026-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

NPO uses a policy's own near-future checkpoint as auxiliary trajectories to maximize effective learning signal S = Q/V, improving performance from 57.88 to 63.15 on Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct with GRPO while accelerating convergence.

RASFT: Rollout-Adaptive Supervised Fine-Tuning for Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RASFT is an adaptive SFT method that strengthens or relaxes expert imitation per problem based on on-policy rollout solvability and adds clipped reference-policy ratio to limit drift, reporting better results than standard SFT and RL on math and code benchmarks.

Beyond Mode Collapse: Distribution Matching for Diverse Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DMPO approximates forward KL minimization in on-policy RL by aligning the policy to a group-level reward-proportional target distribution, yielding 9-12% relative gains over GRPO on NP-Bench and smaller gains on math reasoning.

Harnessing LLM Agents with Skill Programs

cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · conditional · novelty 6.0

HASP upgrades textual skills into executable Program Functions that intervene in LLM agent loops at inference, post-training, or self-evolution, delivering 25% gains over ReAct and 30.4% over Search-R1 on reasoning benchmarks.

STRIDE: Learnable Stepwise Language Feedback for LLM Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

STRIDE co-trains generator and verifier on outcome rewards alone to deliver learnable stepwise language feedback that redirects LLM reasoning trajectories and outperforms scalar-reward baselines.

Can LLMs Learn to Reason Robustly under Noisy Supervision?

cs.LG · 2026-04-05 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Online Label Refinement lets LLMs learn robust reasoning from noisy supervision by correcting labels when majority answers show rising rollout success and stable history, delivering 3-4% gains on math and reasoning benchmarks even at high noise levels.

citing papers explorer

Showing 41 of 41 citing papers.