pith. sign in

hub Baseline reference

WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild

Baseline reference. 60% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

31 Pith papers citing it
Baseline 60% of classified citations
abstract

Chatbots such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT are now serving millions of users. Despite their widespread use, there remains a lack of public datasets showcasing how these tools are used by a population of users in practice. To bridge this gap, we offered free access to ChatGPT for online users in exchange for their affirmative, consensual opt-in to anonymously collect their chat transcripts and request headers. From this, we compiled WildChat, a corpus of 1 million user-ChatGPT conversations, which consists of over 2.5 million interaction turns. We compare WildChat with other popular user-chatbot interaction datasets, and find that our dataset offers the most diverse user prompts, contains the largest number of languages, and presents the richest variety of potentially toxic use-cases for researchers to study. In addition to timestamped chat transcripts, we enrich the dataset with demographic data, including state, country, and hashed IP addresses, alongside request headers. This augmentation allows for more detailed analysis of user behaviors across different geographical regions and temporal dimensions. Finally, because it captures a broad range of use cases, we demonstrate the dataset's potential utility in fine-tuning instruction-following models. WildChat is released at https://wildchat.allen.ai under AI2 ImpACT Licenses.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 3 background 2

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

AI Fiction in the Wild

cs.CL · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Analysis of 500k ChatGPT logs shows over one-third of conversations generate fiction, dominated by power users with repetitive and niche patterns.

Probing Persona-Dependent Preferences in Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Linear probes on residual-stream activations identify a shared preference vector in LLMs that tracks choices across prompts and causally steers decisions even for anti-correlated personas.

Annotations Mitigate Post-Training Mode Collapse

cs.CL · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Annotation-anchored training reduces semantic diversity collapse in post-trained language models by a factor of six compared to standard supervised fine-tuning while preserving instruction-following and improving with scale.

A paradox of AI fluency

cs.CL · 2026-04-28 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Fluent AI users adopt an active, iterative collaboration mode that produces more visible failures but better recovery and success on hard tasks, whereas novices experience more invisible failures from passive use.

RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation

cs.CL · 2025-06-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RewardBench 2 is a new benchmark that supplies challenging fresh human prompts for reward model evaluation, yielding lower average scores but higher correlation with downstream best-of-N sampling and RLHF training performance.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.