EnergyAgentBench is a new benchmark with 70 task variants that evaluates LLM agents on live energy data for datacenter siting, long-horizon optimization, and causal grid diagnosis.
super hub Canonical reference
AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents
Canonical reference. 86% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
173
Pith papers citing it
Background
86% of classified citations
abstract
The potential of Large Language Model (LLM) as agents has been widely acknowledged recently. Thus, there is an urgent need to quantitatively \textit{evaluate LLMs as agents} on challenging tasks in interactive environments. We present AgentBench, a multi-dimensional benchmark that consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities. Our extensive test over \num API-based and open-sourced (OSS) LLMs shows that, while top commercial LLMs present a strong ability of acting as agents in complex environments, there is a significant disparity in performance between them and many OSS competitors that are no larger than 70B. We identify the typical reasons of failures in environments and LLMs, showing that poor long-term reasoning, decision-making, and instruction following abilities are the main obstacles for developing usable LLM agents. Improving instruction following and training on high quality multi-round alignment data could improve agent performance. And different from existing assumptions, training on code present ambivalent impacts on different agent tasks. Datasets, environments, and an integrated evaluation package for AgentBench are released at https://github.com/THUDM/AgentBench.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 38
dataset 5
baseline 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract The potential of Large Language Model (LLM) as agents has been widely acknowledged recently. Thus, there is an urgent need to quantitatively \textit{evaluate LLMs as agents} on challenging tasks in interactive environments. We present AgentBench, a multi-dimensional benchmark that consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities. Our extensive test over \num API-based and open-sourced (OSS) LLMs shows that, while top commercial LLMs present a strong ability of acting as agents in complex environments, there is a significant disparity in perfo
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
SimWorld Studio deploys an evolving coding agent to create adaptive 3D environments that co-evolve with embodied learners, delivering 18-point success-rate gains over fixed environments in navigation benchmarks.
PhysicianBench is a new benchmark of 100 physician-reviewed, execution-grounded tasks in live EHR environments where the best LLM agent reaches only 46% success and open-source models reach 19%.
AgentDojo introduces an extensible evaluation framework populated with realistic agent tasks and security test cases to measure prompt injection robustness in tool-using LLM agents.
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
LongBench is the first bilingual multi-task benchmark for long context understanding in LLMs, containing 21 datasets in 6 categories with average lengths of 6711 words (English) and 13386 characters (Chinese).
MultiUAV-Plat supplies a new RESTful simulation platform and 1500-task benchmark where Agent4Drone reaches 57.9% task pass rate versus 30.6% for ReAct baseline across 75 multi-UAV missions.
PrincipalBench exposes a sharp split in frontier LLMs between selective and over-refusing behavior on multi-party loyalty, with prompt scaffolding and KL distillation reducing harm rates but only along an existing leak/over-refusal trade-off.
SpreadsheetBench 2 provides 321 expert-validated tasks from authentic business data showing frontier LLMs reach only 34.89% overall accuracy on end-to-end spreadsheet workflows.
CLQT is a new closed-loop, cost-aware benchmark that diagnoses LLM trading agent capabilities through strategy-consistent metrics and hash-verifiable trails rather than outcome rankings.
LLM agents often fail to abstain at the right time in uncertain multi-turn tasks, and the CONVOLVE context engineering method raises timely abstention rates on WebShop from 26.7 to 57.4 without parameter updates.
RigorBench evaluates AI coding agents on process discipline via five pillars and reports 41% higher process scores and 17% better outcome correctness with structured approaches on 30 tasks.
OR-Space is a benchmark for LLM agents performing full-lifecycle optimization tasks across Build, Revise, and Explain modes in executable multi-artifact workspaces.
JobBench is a new benchmark with 130 occupational tasks where the best of 36 tested AI models achieves only 45.9% success.
ScaleWoB generates 100+ synthetic interactive GUI environments and 1000+ verifiable tasks as web pages, releasing a 120-task mobile benchmark where state-of-the-art agents achieve 27.92% success (17.82% on long-horizon tasks) versus 92.08% for humans, with synthetic results generalizing to real apps
Introduces QGP and PushBench to evaluate LLM agent persistence on quantitative goals, showing specialized controllers outperform baselines on verifier-checked artifact collection tasks.
Introduces MCP-TDP benchmark showing near-100% attack success on models like GPT-4o for tool description poisoning and proposes reactive self-correction defense.
DART is a modular runtime that certifies semantically recoverable boundaries for failed tool-agent instances and selects admissible restore points that preserve downstream commitments or blocks recovery.
Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
PrefBench benchmark shows zero-shot LLMs achieve deal rates above 0.99 but seller profits only slightly above random and far below a simple concession heuristic across 7,500 episodes.
SCICONVBENCH is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on multi-turn disambiguation and inconsistency resolution for task formulation in computational science, with frontier models reaching only 52.7% success on fluid mechanics disambiguation cases.
BioXArena benchmarks LLM agents on generating end-to-end ML pipelines for 76 multi-modal biomedical tasks, with MLEvolve plus Gemini-3.1-Pro scoring highest at 0.666.
π-Bench is a new benchmark for evaluating proactive personal assistant agents on 100 multi-turn tasks that include hidden intents, inter-task dependencies, and cross-session continuity.
citing papers explorer
-
Stop Comparing LLM Agents Without Disclosing the Harness
The Binding Constraint Thesis states that harness configuration governs performance variance more than model choice in long-horizon agent tasks, leading to misattribution in evaluations.
-
Aethon: A Reference-Based Replication Primitive for Constant-Time Instantiation of Stateful AI Agents
Aethon enables near-constant-time instantiation of stateful AI agents via reference-based replication over compositional views, layered memory, and copy-on-write semantics.
-
OpenKedge: Governing Agentic Mutation with Execution-Bound Safety and Evidence Chains
OpenKedge redefines AI agent state mutations as a governed process using intent proposals, policy-evaluated execution contracts, and cryptographic evidence chains to enable safe, auditable agentic behavior.
-
Red Skills or Blue Skills? A Dive Into Skills Published on ClawHub
Analysis of ClawHub shows language-based functional divides in agent skills, with over 30% flagged suspicious and submission-time documentation enabling 73% accurate risk prediction.
-
Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models
The survey structures agentic reasoning for LLMs into foundational, self-evolving, and collective multi-agent layers while distinguishing in-context orchestration from post-training optimization and reviewing applications across domains.
-
SAGE-32B: Agentic Reasoning via Iterative Distillation
SAGE-32B improves multi-tool agentic success rates over same-size baselines by combining iterative distillation with an inverse-reasoning meta-cognition head.
-
A Study on the Framework for Evaluating the Ethics and Trustworthiness of Generative AI
The study develops a multi-dimensional framework for assessing ethical and trustworthiness aspects of generative AI across its lifecycle, informed by policy comparisons from South Korea, the US, the EU, and China.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
-
Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
A survey that provides a taxonomy of methods for improving planning in LLM-based agents across task decomposition, plan selection, external modules, reflection, and memory.
-
Agent AI: Surveying the Horizons of Multimodal Interaction
The paper defines Agent AI as interactive multimodal systems that perceive grounded data and generate embodied actions, arguing this approach can mitigate hallucinations in foundation models.
-
Skills-Coach: A Self-Evolving Skill Optimizer via Training-Free GRPO
Skills-Coach optimizes LLM agent skills via task generation, prompt/code tuning, comparative execution, and traceable evaluation, reporting gains on a 48-skill benchmark called Skill-X.
-
LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Code Generation: A Multi-Vocal Literature Review
A review of 114 studies classifies motivations into nine categories, analyzes common models and benchmarks, synthesizes challenges into six categories with 26 subcategories and solutions, and identifies six future research directions with 18 subcategories.
-
LLMOrbit: A Circular Taxonomy of Large Language Models -From Scaling Walls to Agentic AI Systems
A survey taxonomy of LLMs identifies three scaling crises and six efficiency paradigms while tracing the shift from generation to tool-using agents.
-
Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
-
Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models
The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.
-
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.
-
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
A survey of emerging AI agent architectures that organizes single and multi-agent designs around reasoning, planning, tool use, communication, and reflection phases.
-
Persistent AI Agents in Academic Research: A Single-Investigator Implementation Case Study
A self-observed case study of one persistent AI agent in academic research finds cache-dominant token usage and recommends artifact-level evaluation metrics.
- ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluation
- ClawEnvKit: Automatic Environment Generation for Claw-Like Agents
- StepPO: Step-Aligned Policy Optimization for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- When Identity Overrides Incentives: Representational Choices as Governance Decisions in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- Continuum: Efficient and Robust Multi-Turn LLM Agent Scheduling with KV Cache Time-to-Live