Pith. sign in

hub

Wildteaming at scale: From in-the-wild jailbreaks to (adversarially) safer language models

20 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

20 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics, and then composes multiple tactics for systematic exploration of novel jailbreaks. Compared to prior work that performed red-teaming via recruited human workers, gradient-based optimization, or iterative revision with LLMs, our work investigates jailbreaks from chatbot users who were not specifically instructed to break the system. WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks compared to state-of-the-art jailbreak methods. While many datasets exist for jailbreak evaluation, very few open-source datasets exist for jailbreak training, as safety training data has been closed even when model weights are open. With WildTeaming we create WildJailbreak, a large-scale open-source synthetic safety dataset with 262K vanilla (direct request) and adversarial (complex jailbreak) prompt-response pairs. To mitigate exaggerated safety behaviors, WildJailbreak provides two contrastive types of queries: 1) harmful queries (vanilla & adversarial) and 2) benign queries that resemble harmful queries in form but contain no harm. As WildJailbreak considerably upgrades the quality and scale of existing safety resources, it uniquely enables us to examine the scaling effects of data and the interplay of data properties and model capabilities during safety training. Through extensive experiments, we identify the training properties that enable an ideal balance of safety behaviors: appropriate safeguarding without over-refusal, effective handling of vanilla and adversarial queries, and minimal, if any, decrease in general capabilities. All components of WildJailbeak contribute to achieving balanced safety behaviors of models.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

roles

dataset 1

polarities

use dataset 1

representative citing papers

Self-Mined Hardness for Safety Fine-Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Self-mined hardness from model rollouts lowers WildJailbreak attack success to 1-3% on Llama-3 models while raising over-refusal, mitigated by 1:1 interleaving with benign prompts.

The Impact of Off-Policy Training Data on Probe Generalisation

cs.AI · 2025-11-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Off-policy training data for LLM behavior probes causes significant generalization failures especially for intent-based behaviors like deception, and performance on coerced incentivised data correlates with real on-policy success.

Do Linear Probes Generalize Better in Persona Coordinates?

cs.AI · 2026-05-10 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

Persona axes derived from contrastive prompts and PCA yield linear probes that generalize better than raw-activation probes across 10 datasets for deception and sycophancy.

Online Safety Monitoring for LLMs

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

Simple thresholding on an external verifier signal, calibrated by risk control, performs competitively with sequential hypothesis testing monitors on math reasoning and red-teaming datasets.

citing papers explorer

Showing 20 of 20 citing papers.