Chain-of-thought prompting, by including intermediate reasoning steps in few-shot examples, elicits strong reasoning abilities in large language models on arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic tasks.
super hub Mixed citations
Program Synthesis with Large Language Models
Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (52%).
465
Pith papers citing it
Background
52% of classified citations
abstract
This paper explores the limits of the current generation of large language models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages. We evaluate a collection of such models (with between 244M and 137B parameters) on two new benchmarks, MBPP and MathQA-Python, in both the few-shot and fine-tuning regimes. Our benchmarks are designed to measure the ability of these models to synthesize short Python programs from natural language descriptions. The Mostly Basic Programming Problems (MBPP) dataset contains 974 programming tasks, designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. The MathQA-Python dataset, a Python version of the MathQA benchmark, contains 23914 problems that evaluate the ability of the models to synthesize code from more complex text. On both datasets, we find that synthesis performance scales log-linearly with model size. Our largest models, even without finetuning on a code dataset, can synthesize solutions to 59.6 percent of the problems from MBPP using few-shot learning with a well-designed prompt. Fine-tuning on a held-out portion of the dataset improves performance by about 10 percentage points across most model sizes. On the MathQA-Python dataset, the largest fine-tuned model achieves 83.8 percent accuracy. Going further, we study the model's ability to engage in dialog about code, incorporating human feedback to improve its solutions. We find that natural language feedback from a human halves the error rate compared to the model's initial prediction. Additionally, we conduct an error analysis to shed light on where these models fall short and what types of programs are most difficult to generate. Finally, we explore the semantic grounding of these models by fine-tuning them to predict the results of program execution. We find that even our best models are generally unable to predict the output of a program given a specific input.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 57
dataset 41
method 4
other 2
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract This paper explores the limits of the current generation of large language models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages. We evaluate a collection of such models (with between 244M and 137B parameters) on two new benchmarks, MBPP and MathQA-Python, in both the few-shot and fine-tuning regimes. Our benchmarks are designed to measure the ability of these models to synthesize short Python programs from natural language descriptions. The Mostly Basic Programming Problems (MBPP) dataset contains 974 programming tasks, designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. The M
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
A new benchmark with cognitive traps shows frontier deep research agents achieve only 13-16% acceptance on expert consulting tasks under combined verifier and rubric criteria.
BoLT is a benchmark of surrogate models fitted to real LLM experiment data that enables evaluation of Bayesian and black-box optimization methods on multi-fidelity, multi-objective, high-dimensional LLM tasks.
PDEAgent-Bench is the first multi-metric, multi-library benchmark for AI-generated PDE solvers, evaluating executability, numerical accuracy, and efficiency across DOLFINx, Firedrake, and deal.II.
SimWorld Studio deploys an evolving coding agent to create adaptive 3D environments that co-evolve with embodied learners, delivering 18-point success-rate gains over fixed environments in navigation benchmarks.
Backdoored model code enables deterministic, verifiable stealing of sparse secrets during local LLM fine-tuning via tensor-rule matching and gradient injection, achieving over 98% strict attack success rate while bypassing DP-SGD and auditing defenses.
StabilizerBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents on generating, optimizing, and making fault-tolerant stabilizer circuits for quantum error correction, with efficient verification and multi-tier scoring.
NLI autonomously discovers a vocabulary of primitive operations and interprets variable-length programs via a neural executor, allowing end-to-end training and gradient-based test-time adaptation that outperforms prior methods on combinatorial generalization tasks.
Derives an exact unbiased policy gradient for RL post-training of diffusion LLMs via entropy-guided step selection and one-step denoising rewards, achieving state-of-the-art results on coding and logical reasoning benchmarks.
Molmo2 delivers state-of-the-art open-weight video VLMs with new grounding datasets and training methods that outperform prior open models and match or exceed some proprietary ones on pointing and tracking tasks.
CritPt benchmark shows state-of-the-art LLMs reach only 5.7% average accuracy on full-scale unpublished physics research tasks, rising to about 10% with coding tools.
ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.
LLaDA is a scalable diffusion-based language model that matches autoregressive LLMs like LLaMA3 8B on tasks and surpasses GPT-4o on reversal poem completion.
Language models generate robot policy code from natural language commands via few-shot prompting, enabling spatial-geometric reasoning, generalization, and precise control on real robots.
Training language models to generate intermediate computation steps on a scratchpad enables them to perform multi-step tasks such as long addition and arbitrary program execution that they otherwise fail at.
AxDafny achieves 92.7% verification success on DafnyBench (6.5 points above prior proof-hint baselines) via verifier-guided repair and introduces the LCB-Pro-Dafny benchmark of 250 problems.
Preregistered placebo-controlled decomposition shows external executable counterexamples drive self-repair gains in small code models more than re-exposure or self-critique.
Empirical evaluation of three LLMs finds prevalent overconfidence in insecure code generation, with security calibration outperforming functional calibration but both degrading in repository-level settings.
Masked diffusion LMs can use continuous x-prediction flow with token-wise asynchronous updates and an RL policy network to reach 97% performance on HumanEval using only 25% of the usual decoding budget.
FlipGuard perturbs LLM weights prior to quantization to neutralize quantization-conditioned backdoor attacks, evaluated via the Defense Effectiveness Ratio on multiple models and quantization schemes.
DynaSteer dynamically steers LLM reasoning trajectories toward truth via pattern clustering, Fisher-LDA projection, and entropy-triggered representation edits, improving performance on MATH and generalizing to coding.
Introduces evaluation of LLMs' implicit software world models via prediction of execution resources on real software tasks, finding modest and brittle performance across models including frontier ones.
CodeChat-Eval shows LLMs lose 19.2% to 69.2% functional correctness over multi-turn refinement dialogues, with largest drops on logic-level and additive changes.
TAC is a bandit curriculum for multi-domain RLVR that prioritizes domains whose gradient updates align with and benefit other domains, yielding up to 2.8-point macro accuracy gains over learnability-only baselines on Qwen3-1.7B and Llama3.2-3B.
citing papers explorer
-
SmartEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-Generated Smart Contracts from Natural Language Specifications
SmartEval is a new benchmark showing LLM-generated smart contracts score 8.29 points higher than expert versions on average but frequently omit logic (35.3%) or mishandle state transitions (23.4%).
-
SWE-WebDevBench: Evaluating Coding Agent Application Platforms as Virtual Software Agencies
SWE-WebDevBench finds that AI app builders commonly fail at translating business needs into complete, secure, production-ready software due to specification bottlenecks, frontend-backend decoupling, low engineering quality, and security weaknesses.
-
Evolve as a Team: Collaborative Self-Evolution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
Meta-Team is a collaborative self-evolution framework that turns multi-agent execution experience into reusable improvements at agent, coordination, and team levels, outperforming baselines on six benchmarks.