Pith. sign in

hub

Mid-Infrared Selection of AGN with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer. I. Characterizing WISE-Selected AGN in COSMOS

26 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 796 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

26 Pith papers citing it
796 external citations · Pith
abstract

The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) is an extremely capable and efficient black hole finder. We present a simple mid-infrared color criterion, W1-W2 \geq 0.8 (i.e., [3.4]-[4.6] \geq 0.8, Vega), which identifies 61.9 \pm 5.4 AGN candidates per deg2 to a depth of W2 = 15.0. This implies a much larger census of luminous AGN than found by typical wide-area surveys, attributable to the fact that mid-infrared selection identifies both unobscured (type 1) and obscured (type 2) AGN. Optical and soft X-ray surveys alone are highly biased towards only unobscured AGN, while this simple WISE selection likely identifies even heavily obscured, Compton-thick AGN. Using deep, public data in the COSMOS field, we explore the properties of WISE-selected AGN candidates. At the mid-infrared depth considered, 160 uJy at 4.6 microns, this simple criterion identifies 78% of Spitzer mid-infrared AGN candidates according to the criteria of Stern et al. (2005) and the reliability is 95%. We explore the demographics, multiwavelength properties and redshift distribution of WISE-selected AGN candidates in the COSMOS field.

hub tools

years

2026 24 2025 2

representative citing papers

Infrared Echoes of Precessing Tidal Disruption Events

astro-ph.HE · 2026-06-05 · conditional · novelty 5.0

Precessing TDE disks imprint double-to-single peak transitions and periodic ripples on infrared dust echoes, which the authors fit to AT 2022agi and AT 2020nov.

Identifying the host of compact binary mergers

astro-ph.CO · 2026-04-30 · conditional · novelty 4.0

Applying the brightest-galaxy method to three well-localized GW events yields 1, 1, and 4 candidate host galaxies and a Hubble constant estimate of ~79 km/s/Mpc, but with 29–36% random-association probability and a selection bias.

citing papers explorer

Showing 26 of 26 citing papers.