Pith. sign in

REVIEW 17 cited by

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.18654 v3 pith:BZKHMBUM submitted 2023-05-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords taskscompositionalreasoningllmsmodelsmulti-stepproblemstransformer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Transformer large language models (LLMs) have sparked admiration for their exceptional performance on tasks that demand intricate multi-step reasoning. Yet, these models simultaneously show failures on surprisingly trivial problems. This begs the question: Are these errors incidental, or do they signal more substantial limitations? In an attempt to demystify transformer LLMs, we investigate the limits of these models across three representative compositional tasks -- multi-digit multiplication, logic grid puzzles, and a classic dynamic programming problem. These tasks require breaking problems down into sub-steps and synthesizing these steps into a precise answer. We formulate compositional tasks as computation graphs to systematically quantify the level of complexity, and break down reasoning steps into intermediate sub-procedures. Our empirical findings suggest that transformer LLMs solve compositional tasks by reducing multi-step compositional reasoning into linearized subgraph matching, without necessarily developing systematic problem-solving skills. To round off our empirical study, we provide theoretical arguments on abstract multi-step reasoning problems that highlight how autoregressive generations' performance can rapidly decay with\,increased\,task\,complexity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Verifiable Search Is Not a Learnable Chain-of-Thought

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Verifiable search procedures cannot be learned as forward chain-of-thought by language models; they instead learn memorization, verification, or require precomputed catalogs.

  2. Proper Scoring Rules for Agentic Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces Trajectory Proper Score (TPS) as a strictly proper family of trajectory-level scoring rules that elicits the complete prefix-conditioned success probability process.

  3. Training Transformers as a Universal Computer

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A transformer trained on random meaningless MicroPy programs generalizes to execute diverse human-written programs, providing empirical evidence it can act as a universal computer.

  4. TSVer: A Benchmark for Fact Verification Against Time-Series Evidence

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TSVer is a new benchmark dataset for fact verification against time-series evidence, with 304 annotated real-world claims, 400 time series, verdicts, and justifications, plus baseline results showing current models struggle.

  5. Arithmetic Pedagogy for Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A small GPT-2 model trained from scratch on GASING-derived CoT supervision for arithmetic reaches over 80% held-out accuracy, exhibits three learning phases, and develops both procedural and associative reasoning.

  6. CausalFlip: A Benchmark for LLM Causal Judgment Beyond Semantic Matching

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new benchmark and training strategy show LLMs trained to internalize causal reasoning steps are less fooled by semantically similar, label-flipped questions than models using explicit chain-of-thought.

  7. Teaching and Evaluating LLMs to Reason About Polymer Design Related Tasks

    cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Small 7B-14B parameter language models trained on the new PolyBench dataset for polymer design tasks outperform similar-sized models and compete with large frontier LLMs while improving on external benchmarks.

  8. Teaching and Evaluating LLMs to Reason About Polymer Design Related Tasks

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    PolyBench, a 125K-question benchmark with chain-of-thought reasoning, lets small language models achieve competitive polymer design performance.

  9. When Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency inMulti-Step Agentic AI Tasks

    cs.HC 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A decision-theoretic model based on the observed Confirmation-Diagnosis-Correction-Redo user pattern places intermediate confirmations in AI agent tasks, yielding 81% user preference and 13.54% faster completion versu...

  10. How Do Language Models Compose Functions?

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    LLMs solve compositional factual recall either by computing intermediates or directly, with mechanism choice correlated to translation geometry in embedding spaces.

  11. Unveiling the Mechanisms of Multi-Hop Reasoning in Transformers via Identity Bridge

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding identity supervision on bridge tokens enables out-of-distribution two-hop reasoning in simple transformers, with a nuclear-norm theory explaining the benefit.

  12. LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code

    cs.SE 2024-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LiveCodeBench collects 400 recent contest problems to create a contamination-free benchmark evaluating LLMs on code generation and related capabilities like self-repair and execution.

  13. Confidently Wrong: Exception Chain Collapse in Frontier LLM Rule Evaluation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Nested exception-chain eligibility breaks frontier LLMs in unstable ways; an SMT execution layer makes outcomes deterministic given authored rules.

  14. Game Theory Driven Multi-Agent Framework Mitigates Language Model Hallucination

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A game-framed multi-agent system synthesizes large chemistry CoT/QA corpora and trains OmniChem-7B to near GPT-4o-mini performance with a large reported drop in hallucinations.

  15. Handling Feature Heterogeneity with Learnable Graph Patches

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Learnable graph patches enable domain-agnostic pre-training of graph models by decomposing heterogeneous graphs into transferable semantic units via patch encoders and aggregators.

  16. Beyond Exponential Decay: Rethinking Error Accumulation in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLM errors concentrate in sparse key tokens (5-10% of sequence) at semantic decision junctions, yielding a new reliability model that explains sustained long-context coherence.

  17. Embodied Spatial Intelligence: from Implicit Scene Modeling to Spatial Reasoning

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    The thesis demonstrates that combining implicit 3D scene representations with LLM-based reasoning, using text as an interface, yields strong performance on robotic perception and spatial language tasks.