Are large language models superhuman chemists?
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread interest due to their ability to process human language and perform tasks on which they have not been explicitly trained. However, we possess only a limited systematic understanding of the chemical capabilities of LLMs, which would be required to improve models and mitigate potential harm. Here, we introduce "ChemBench," an automated framework for evaluating the chemical knowledge and reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs against the expertise of chemists. We curated more than 2,700 question-answer pairs, evaluated leading open- and closed-source LLMs, and found that the best models outperformed the best human chemists in our study on average. However, the models struggle with some basic tasks and provide overconfident predictions. These findings reveal LLMs' impressive chemical capabilities while emphasizing the need for further research to improve their safety and usefulness. They also suggest adapting chemistry education and show the value of benchmarking frameworks for evaluating LLMs in specific domains.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Agentic generation of verifiable rules for deterministic, self-expanding reaction classification
Multi-agent LLMs generate and verify 14,073 deterministic reaction rules from 665,901 patents, enabling 97.7% classification of unseen reactions with finer resolution than fixed proprietary systems.
-
From Answers to States: Verifiable Process-Level Evaluation of Chemical Reasoning in Large Language Models
ChemCoTBench-V2 is a new rule-verifiable benchmark with 5,620 samples across 18 tasks that evaluates LLM chemical reasoning traces using deterministic chemistry rules and reference traces rather than final answers alone.
-
Matter to Mechanism: A Benchmark for AI Co-Scientists in Materials and Battery Research
Introduces the Matter to Mechanism benchmark of 2,645 structured instances and a composite metric suite for evaluating AI co-scientists on problem-to-hypothesis reasoning in battery materials research.
-
PolyReal: A Benchmark for Real-World Polymer Science Workflows
PolyReal benchmark shows leading MLLMs perform well on polymer knowledge reasoning but drop sharply on practical tasks like lab safety analysis and raw data extraction.
-
SCI-PRM: A Tool Aware Process Reward Model for Scientific Reasoning Verification
Sci-PRM is a tool-aware process reward model trained on the SCIPRM70K dataset to provide fine-grained supervision for scientific reasoning and shown to boost foundation models via Best-of-N selection and RL.
-
From Knowledge to Action: Outcomes of the 2025 Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry
Hackathon submissions indicate LLMs are moving from general assistants toward composable multi-agent systems for structuring scientific knowledge and automating tasks in materials science and chemistry.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.