pith. sign in

arxiv: 2404.09767 · v2 · submitted 2024-04-15 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Electrical conductivity of QGP with quasiparticle quarks and Gribov gluon

Sadaf Madni , Sumit , Lata Thakur , Najmul Haque This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords electrical conductivityquark-gluon plasmaGribov propagatorquasiparticle modelBoltzmann transport equationrelaxation time approximationlattice QCD comparison
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electrical conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma above the deconfinement temperature is computed from quasiparticle quarks scattering via a Gribov-modified gluon propagator and matches lattice QCD results.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the electrical conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma by solving the relativistic Boltzmann transport equation in the relaxation-time approximation. Relaxation times are derived from two-body scattering amplitudes that incorporate a quasiparticle description of quarks and the Gribov-modified gluon propagator. This combination is presented as a unified way to treat transport in both weakly and strongly coupled regimes. The resulting conductivity values above the transition temperature are compared directly to lattice QCD data and other models, with the calculation reproducing the lattice trend.

Core claim

Using quasiparticle quarks and the Gribov-modified gluon propagator inside the relaxation-time approximation to the Boltzmann equation, the electrical conductivity of the QGP is obtained and shown to agree with available lattice QCD results above the deconfinement transition temperature.

What carries the argument

Relaxation times extracted from microscopic two-body scattering amplitudes with quasiparticle quarks and Gribov gluons, inserted into the relaxation-time approximation of the Boltzmann transport equation to obtain conductivity.

If this is right

  • The same framework can be applied to compute other transport coefficients such as shear viscosity in the same temperature window.
  • The conductivity remains finite and comparable to lattice values even when the coupling is not small.
  • Phenomenological models that ignore the Gribov modification would produce systematically different temperature dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be tested by extending the same scattering matrix elements to compute dilepton production rates in the same temperature range.
  • If the model holds, it supplies a parameter-light input for hydrodynamic simulations of heavy-ion collisions near the transition temperature.
  • The quasiparticle plus Gribov combination might be checked against lattice results for the gluon spectral function itself.

Load-bearing premise

The quasiparticle description for quarks combined with the Gribov-modified gluon propagator supplies a valid description of the scattering that sets the transport coefficients throughout the temperature range above deconfinement.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between the computed conductivity and new lattice QCD data at temperatures immediately above the transition temperature would show that the scattering amplitudes or the propagator modification do not capture the relevant dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.09767 by Lata Thakur, Najmul Haque, Sadaf Madni, Sumit.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The running coupling 𝑔(𝑇) and the scaled Gribov parameter (𝛾𝐺/𝑇) as a function of 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 fitted using the lattice data [83] (upper). The quasiparticle masses (Eq.(16)) for the light (u,d) and strange quarks as a function of scaled temperature (lower). In the upper plot of figure 1, we show the running coupling, 𝑔(𝑇) and scaled Gribov parameter 𝛾𝐺/𝑇 as a function of scaled temperature (𝑇/𝑇𝑐). The data has bee… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feynman diagram for 𝑞𝑞′ → 𝑞𝑞′ processes. Left: 𝑡 − 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 and Right: 𝑢 − 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙, when 𝑞 ′ = 𝑞. The black line corresponds to the incoming quarks while the light grey corresponds to the outgoing quarks. The (𝑝𝑖 , 𝑠𝑖) is the four-momentum and the spin of the quark so considered. q(p3, s3) q(p1, s1) q¯ ′(p4, s4) q¯ ′(p2, s2) (p1 − p3) g q¯(p2, s2) q(p1, s1) q¯(p4, s4) q(p3, s3) (p1 + p2) g [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Feynman diagram of 𝑞𝑞¯ ′ → 𝑞𝑞¯ ′ . Left: 𝑡 − 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙 and Right: 𝑠 − 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙, when ¯𝑞 ′ = 𝑞¯. The black line corresponds to the incoming quark/antiquark while the light grey corresponds to the outgoing quark/antiquark. The (𝑝𝑖 , 𝑠𝑖) is the four-momentum and the spin of the (anti)quark so considered. The detailed formulation will be presented elsewhere. How￾ever, we note that in the limit 𝑚𝑖=1,2,3,4 → 0, our… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The cross-sections (𝜎𝑠𝑐) for the quark-quark scattering are plotted as a function of √ 𝑠, with the left plot corresponding to a scaled temperature of 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 = 1.2 and the right plot corresponding to 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 = 2.2. The same processes apply to both the 𝑑 and 𝑠 quarks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The scattering cross-sections for quark-antiquark (flavour changing) and quark-antiquark pair annihilation as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The cross-sections for the quark-antiquark (no flavour change) (left) and quark-gluon (right) scattering as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The relaxation time (𝜏𝑅) as a function of the scaled tem￾perature for the light (Eq. 27) and strange quarks (Eq. 28). The light quark consists of 𝑢 and 𝑑 quarks. 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 5.×10-4 0.001 0.005 0.010 0.050 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The equilibrium number density of the light and strange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the electrical conductivity of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) using a non-perturbative resummation scheme incorporating the Gribov-modified gluon propagator. The electrical conductivity is evaluated by solving the relativistic Boltzmann transport equation within the relaxation-time approximation, where the relaxation times are obtained from microscopic two-body scattering amplitudes. A quasiparticle description is employed for quarks, providing a unified framework for studying transport properties across both weakly and strongly coupled regimes. Above the deconfinement transition temperature, we estimate the electrical conductivity of the QGP and compare our results with available lattice QCD data and various phenomenological models, finding good agreement with the lattice results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the electrical conductivity of the QGP above the deconfinement transition using a quasiparticle description for quarks together with the Gribov-modified gluon propagator. Relaxation times are extracted from microscopic 2→2 scattering amplitudes and inserted into the relaxation-time approximation (RTA) solution of the relativistic Boltzmann equation. Results are compared with lattice QCD data and phenomenological models, with the abstract stating good agreement with the lattice results and claiming a unified framework for weakly and strongly coupled regimes.

Significance. If the microscopic amplitudes derived from the Gribov propagator correctly encode the dominant non-perturbative dynamics and the RTA remains valid, the work would supply a concrete, microscopically motivated route to transport coefficients that bridges perturbative and non-perturbative regimes, with direct relevance to hydrodynamic modeling of heavy-ion collisions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Boltzmann transport equation and RTA implementation] The central claim of a 'unified framework' for both weakly and strongly coupled regimes rests on the assertion that the Gribov-modified amplitudes capture the relevant non-perturbative physics. However, the RTA itself presupposes a well-defined quasiparticle mean free path and neglects higher-order and off-shell contributions that are expected to be important near Tc; no quantitative test of the RTA validity range (e.g., comparison of mean free path to inverse temperature or to the Debye length) is provided in the transport-equation section.
  2. [Quasiparticle model for quarks] Quasiparticle quark masses are temperature-dependent and typically fitted to thermodynamic observables (pressure, energy density). The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly whether the conductivity result is independent of those fits or is largely inherited from them; otherwise the reported lattice agreement risks being circular. This point is load-bearing for the 'parameter-free' or 'microscopic' character of the prediction.
  3. [Results and comparison with lattice QCD] The abstract states 'good agreement with the lattice results,' yet the strength of this agreement (e.g., χ² per degree of freedom, systematic uncertainty bands from the Gribov parameter or mass ansatz) is not quantified. A direct overlay of the computed σ_el(T)/T versus lattice data points with error bands is required to assess whether the agreement is robust or confined to a narrow temperature window.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Gluon propagator] Notation for the Gribov parameter and its running should be introduced once and used consistently; the current presentation mixes γ and γ(T) without a clear definition paragraph.
  2. [Introduction and results section] The manuscript should cite the specific lattice references (e.g., which groups and which observables) used for the comparison, rather than the generic phrase 'available lattice QCD data.'

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Boltzmann transport equation and RTA implementation] The central claim of a 'unified framework' for both weakly and strongly coupled regimes rests on the assertion that the Gribov-modified amplitudes capture the relevant non-perturbative physics. However, the RTA itself presupposes a well-defined quasiparticle mean free path and neglects higher-order and off-shell contributions that are expected to be important near Tc; no quantitative test of the RTA validity range (e.g., comparison of mean free path to inverse temperature or to the Debye length) is provided in the transport-equation section.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative test of RTA validity would strengthen the manuscript. In the revised version we will add an estimate of the mean free path extracted from the relaxation times and compare it to 1/T and the Debye length over the temperature range of interest, thereby providing evidence that the RTA remains applicable above Tc. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Quasiparticle model for quarks] Quasiparticle quark masses are temperature-dependent and typically fitted to thermodynamic observables (pressure, energy density). The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly whether the conductivity result is independent of those fits or is largely inherited from them; otherwise the reported lattice agreement risks being circular. This point is load-bearing for the 'parameter-free' or 'microscopic' character of the prediction.

    Authors: The masses are fixed by thermodynamic observables while the scattering amplitudes are fixed independently by the Gribov propagator. In the revision we will add a sensitivity study varying the mass parametrization within its thermodynamic uncertainty and show the resulting variation in σ_el/T, thereby clarifying the separate roles of the thermodynamic input and the Gribov interaction. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results and comparison with lattice QCD] The abstract states 'good agreement with the lattice results,' yet the strength of this agreement (e.g., χ² per degree of freedom, systematic uncertainty bands from the Gribov parameter or mass ansatz) is not quantified. A direct overlay of the computed σ_el(T)/T versus lattice data points with error bands is required to assess whether the agreement is robust or confined to a narrow temperature window.

    Authors: We accept the criticism. The revised manuscript will include an updated figure overlaying our results on the lattice data points together with systematic uncertainty bands from the Gribov parameter and mass ansatz; we will also report a χ² per degree of freedom to quantify the agreement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses independent microscopic inputs for transport coefficient

full rationale

The paper computes electrical conductivity via RTA solution of the Boltzmann equation, with relaxation times obtained from explicit 2→2 scattering amplitudes constructed using the Gribov gluon propagator and quasiparticle quark dispersion. These steps introduce dynamical content (scattering matrix elements) beyond any thermodynamic fitting used to fix quasiparticle masses. No quoted equation reduces a claimed result to its own input by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central result, and the lattice comparison is an external benchmark rather than a tautology. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents enumeration of specific free parameters or axioms; typical quasiparticle models introduce fitted effective masses and the Gribov parameter is an external input.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5642 in / 1042 out tokens · 27887 ms · 2026-05-24T01:59:29.363356+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Quark-Gluon Plasma at Finite Chemical Potential with a DNN framework

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A deep neural network emulates lattice QCD equation of state within a quasi-particle model to compute QGP speed of sound, specific heat, viscosity, and conductivity at finite baryon chemical potential.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The equilibrium pressure and energy density can be obtained from eq

    = 16. The equilibrium pressure and energy density can be obtained from eq. (2) using the relation Peq = −1 3 Δ𝜇𝜈 𝑇 𝜇𝜈 (0) = PGribov − 𝐵0 (𝑇) . (5) Eeq = 𝑢 𝜇𝑢𝜈𝑇 𝜇𝜈 (0) = EGribov + 𝐵0(𝑇) . (6) where Δ𝜇𝜈 = 𝑔 𝜇𝜈 − 𝑢 𝜇𝑢𝜈 , 𝑢 𝜇 is the fluid four velocities satis- fying 𝑢 𝜇𝑢 𝜇 = 1. In fluid rest frame, 𝑢 𝜇 = (1, 0, 0, 0) = (1, ®0). PGribov and EGribov are the pa...

    work page

  2. [2]

    𝑢 + 𝑢 → 𝑢 + 𝑢; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑡, 𝑢

    work page

  3. [3]

    𝑢 + 𝑑 → 𝑢 + 𝑑; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑡

    work page

  4. [4]

    𝑢 + 𝑠 → 𝑢 + 𝑠; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑡

    work page

  5. [5]

    𝑢 + ¯𝑢 → 𝑢 + ¯𝑢; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑠, 𝑡

    work page

  6. [6]

    𝑢 + ¯𝑢 → 𝑑 + ¯𝑑; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑠

    work page

  7. [7]

    𝑢 + ¯𝑢 → 𝑠 + ¯𝑠; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑠

    work page

  8. [8]

    𝑢 + ¯𝑑 → 𝑢 + ¯𝑑; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑡

    work page

  9. [9]

    𝑢 + ¯𝑠 → 𝑢 + ¯𝑠; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑡

    work page

  10. [10]

    𝑢 + 𝑔 → 𝑢 + 𝑔; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑡

    work page

  11. [11]

    𝑢 + ¯𝑢 → 𝑔 + 𝑔; channel/’s:⇒ 𝑠, 𝑡, 𝑢 5 Figure 4. The cross-sections ( 𝜎𝑠𝑐) for the quark-quark scattering are plotted as a function of √𝑠, with the left plot corresponding to a scaled temperature of 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 = 1.2 and the right plot corresponding to 𝑇/𝑇𝑐 = 2.2. The same processes apply to both the 𝑑 and 𝑠 quarks. Figure 4 shows the cross-section for quark-qua...

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    New Forms of QCD Matter Discovered at RHIC

    M. Gyulassy and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A750, 30-63 (2005) [arXiv:nucl-th/0405013 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Matter in extremis: ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions at RHIC

    P. Jacobs and X. N. Wang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 54, 443-534 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0405125 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal and W. van der Schee, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 339-376 (2018) [arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a Quark Gluon Plasma Signature

    D. Teaney, J. Lauret and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4783-4786 (2001) [arXiv:nucl-th/0011058 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  16. [16]

    Huovinen, P

    P. Huovinen, P. F. Kolb, U. W. Heinz, P. V. Ruuskanen and S. A. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 503, 58-64 (2001) [arXiv:hep- ph/0101136 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Collective flow and two-pion correlations from a relativistic hydrodynamic model with early chemical freeze out

    T. Hirano and K. Tsuda, Phys. Rev. C 66, 054905 (2002) [arXiv:nucl-th/0205043 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Initial condition for hydrodynamics, partonic free streaming, and the uniform description of soft observables at RHIC

    W. Broniowski, M. Chojnacki, W. Florkowski and A. Kisiel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 022301 (2008) [arXiv:0801.4361 [nucl- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    3+1D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C82, 014903 (2010) [arXiv:1004.1408 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    Viscosity Information from Relativistic Nuclear Collisions: How Perfect is the Fluid Observed at RHIC?

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 172301 (2007) [arXiv:0706.1522 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Suppression of elliptic flow in a minimally viscous quark-gluon plasma

    H. Song and U. W. Heinz, Phys. Lett. B 658, 279-283 (2008) [arXiv:0709.0742 [nucl-th]], J. Phys. G 36, 064033 (2009) [arXiv:0812.4274 [nucl-th]], Phys. Rev. C 81, 024905 (2010) [arXiv:0909.1549 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Simulating elliptic flow with viscous hydrodynamics

    K. Dusling and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 77, 034905 (2008) [arXiv:0710.5932 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Bulk and shear viscosities of matter created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    P. Bozek, Phys. Rev. C 81, 034909 (2010) [arXiv:0911.2397 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Particle spectra in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV

    P. Bozek and I. Wyskiel-Piekarska, Phys. Rev. C 85, 064915 (2012) [arXiv:1203.6513 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    S. Ryu, J. F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, B. Schenke, S. Jeon and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, no.13, 132301 (2015) [arXiv:1502.01675 [nucl-th]], Phys. Rev. C 97, no.3, 034910 (2018) [arXiv:1704.04216 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Du and U

    L. Du and U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 251, 107090 (2020) [arXiv:1906.11181 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123- 151 (2013) [arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Introduction to Hydrodynamics

    S. Jeon and U. Heinz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, no.10, 1530010 (2015) [arXiv:1503.03931 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon and B. Schenke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340011 (2013) [arXiv:1301.5893 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Schenke, S

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon and C. Gale, J. Phys. G 38, 124169 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore and L. G. Yaffe, JHEP 0011, 001 (2000)

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore and L. G. Yaffe, JHEP 0305, 051 (2003)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Gupta,Phys

    S. Gupta,Phys. Lett. B 597 , 57 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Aarts, C

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, J. Foley, S. Hands and S. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    P. V. Buividovich, M. N. Chernodub, D. E. Kharzeev, T. Kalay- dzhyan, E. V. Luschevskaya and M. I. Polikarpov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 132001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    H.-T. Ding, A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann and W. Soeldner, Phys. Rev. D83, 034504 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Burnier and M

    Y. Burnier and M. Laine, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1902 (2012)

    work page 1902

  38. [38]

    B. B. Brandt, A. Francis, H. B. Meyer and H. Wittig, JHEP 1303, 100 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Amato, G

    A. Amato, G. Aarts, C. Allton, P. Giudice, S. Hands and J. I. Skullerud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, no. 17, 172001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Aarts, C

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, A. Amato, P. Giudice, S. Hands and J. I. Skullerud, JHEP 1502, 186 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Cassing, O

    W. Cassing, O. Linnyk, T. Steinert and V. Ozvenchuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no. 18, 182301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Steinert and W

    T. Steinert and W. Cassing, Phys. Rev. C 89, no. 3, 035203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Hirono, M

    Y. Hirono, M. Hongo and T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 90, no. 2, 021903 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Greif, I

    M. Greif, I. Bouras, C. Greiner and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 9, 094014 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Puglisi, S

    A. Puglisi, S. Plumari and V. Greco, Phys. Lett. B 751, 326 (2015). 9

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Puglisi, S

    A. Puglisi, S. Plumari and V. Greco, Phys. Rev. D 90, 114009 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 89, no. 10, 106008 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Greif, C

    M. Greif, C. Greiner and G. S. Denicol, Phys. Rev. D 93, no. 9, 096012 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Mitra and V

    S. Mitra and V. Chandra, Phys. Rev. D94, no. 3, 034025 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    P. K. Srivastava, L. Thakur and B. K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C91, no. 4, 044903 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Thakur, P

    L. Thakur, P. K. Srivastava, G. P. Kadam, M. George and H. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D95, 096009 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Marty, E

    R. Marty, E. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, J. Aichelin and H. Berrehrah, Phys. Rev. C88, 045204 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Fern ´andez-Fraile and A

    D. Fern ´andez-Fraile and A. Gomez Nicola, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045025 (2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    G. P. Kadam, H. Mishra and L. Thakur, Phys. Rev. D98, no. 11, 114001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Thakur and P

    L. Thakur and P. K. Srivastava, Phys. Rev. D100, no.7, 076016 (2019) [arXiv:1910.12087 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    A dynamical quasiparticle approach for the Quark-Gluon-Plasma bulk and transport properties

    H. Berrehrah, E. Bratkovskaya, T. Steinert and W. Cassing, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, no.07, 1642003 (2016) [arXiv:1605.02371 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Covariant kinetic theory for effective fugacity quasi particle model and first order transport coefficients for hot QCD matter

    S. Mitra and V. Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 97, no.3, 034032 (2018) [arXiv:1801.01700 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Soloveva, P

    O. Soloveva, P. Moreau and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C101, no.4, 045203 (2020) [arXiv:1911.08547 [nucl-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Calculations of Shear, Bulk viscosities and Electrical conductivity in Polyakov-Quark-Meson model

    P. Singha, A. Abhishek, G. Kadam, S. Ghosh and H. Mishra, J. Phys. G 46, no.1, 015201 (2019) [arXiv:1705.03084 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Transport coefficients of a hot QCD medium and their relative significance in heavy-ion collisions

    S. Mitra and V. Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.9, 094003 (2017) [arXiv:1702.05728 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Ghosh and I

    R. Ghosh and I. A. Shovkovy, [arXiv:2404.01388 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Tuchin, Adv

    K. Tuchin, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 490495 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev and H. J. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran and H. J. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008)

    work page 2008

  65. [65]

    Hadronic Production of Thermal Photons

    S. Turbide, R. Rapp and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C69, 014903 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0308085 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  66. [66]

    Centrality dependence of the direct photon yield and elliptic flow in heavy-ion collisions at sqrt(s)=200 GeV

    O. Linnyk, W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C89, no.3, 034908 (2014) [arXiv:1311.0279 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Zwanziger, Phys

    D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 182301 (2005) [arXiv:hep- ph/0407103 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2005

  68. [68]

    Stabilizing perturbative Yang-Mills thermodynamics with Gribov quantization

    K. Fukushima and N. Su, Phys. Rev. D 88, 076008 (2013)[arXiv:1304.8004 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Zwanziger, Phys

    D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev. D 76, 125014 (2007) [arXiv:hep- ph/0610021 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2007

  70. [71]

    H. B. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 162001 (2008) [arXiv:0710.3717 [hep-lat]], Phys. Rev. D 76, 101701 (2007) [arXiv:0704.1801 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  71. [72]

    V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B 139, 1 (1978)

    work page 1978

  72. [73]

    Zwanziger, Nucl

    D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B 323, 513-544 (1989)

    work page 1989

  73. [74]

    Transport coefficients of the Gribov-Zwanziger plasma

    W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, N. Su and K. Tywoniuk, Phys. Rev. C 94, no.4, 044904 (2016) [arXiv:1509.01242 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [75]

    Bulk viscosity in a plasma of Gribov-Zwanziger gluons

    W. Florkowski, R. Ryblewski, N. Su and K. Tywoniuk, Acta Phys. Polon. B 47, 1833 (2016) [arXiv:1504.03176 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [76]

    Thermodynamics and kinetics of Gribov-Zwanziger plasma with temperature dependent Gribov parameter

    V. Begun, W. Florkowski and R. Ryblewski, Acta Phys. Polon. B 48, 125 (2017) [arXiv:1602.08308 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [77]

    Dilepton rate and quark number susceptibility with the Gribov action

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D93, no.6, 065004 (2016) [arXiv:1508.06249 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [78]

    Jaiswal and N

    A. Jaiswal and N. Haque, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135936 (2020) [arXiv:2005.01303 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [79]

    Mukherjee, N

    Sumit, A. Mukherjee, N. Haque and B. K. Patra, [arXiv:2311.18560 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  79. [80]

    Madni, A

    S. Madni, A. Mukherjee, A. Jaiswal and N. Haque, [arXiv:2401.08384 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  80. [81]

    Debnath, R

    M. Debnath, R. Ghosh and N. Haque, [arXiv:2305.16250 [hep- ph]]

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.