REVIEW 4 cited by
ChemEval: A Comprehensive Multi-Level Chemical Evaluation for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ChemEval: A Comprehensive Multi-Level Chemical Evaluation for Large Language Models
read the original abstract
There is a growing interest in the role that LLMs play in chemistry which lead to an increased focus on the development of LLMs benchmarks tailored to chemical domains to assess the performance of LLMs across a spectrum of chemical tasks varying in type and complexity. However, existing benchmarks in this domain fail to adequately meet the specific requirements of chemical research professionals. To this end, we propose \textbf{\textit{ChemEval}}, which provides a comprehensive assessment of the capabilities of LLMs across a wide range of chemical domain tasks. Specifically, ChemEval identified 4 crucial progressive levels in chemistry, assessing 12 dimensions of LLMs across 42 distinct chemical tasks which are informed by open-source data and the data meticulously crafted by chemical experts, ensuring that the tasks have practical value and can effectively evaluate the capabilities of LLMs. In the experiment, we evaluate 12 mainstream LLMs on ChemEval under zero-shot and few-shot learning contexts, which included carefully selected demonstration examples and carefully designed prompts. The results show that while general LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude-3.5 excel in literature understanding and instruction following, they fall short in tasks demanding advanced chemical knowledge. Conversely, specialized LLMs exhibit enhanced chemical competencies, albeit with reduced literary comprehension. This suggests that LLMs have significant potential for enhancement when tackling sophisticated tasks in the field of chemistry. We believe our work will facilitate the exploration of their potential to drive progress in chemistry. Our benchmark and analysis will be available at {\color{blue} \url{https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/ChemEval}}.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
From Answers to States: Verifiable Process-Level Evaluation of Chemical Reasoning in Large Language Models
ChemCoTBench-V2 is a new rule-verifiable benchmark with 5,620 samples across 18 tasks that evaluates LLM chemical reasoning traces using deterministic chemistry rules and reference traces rather than final answers alone.
-
Cognitive Mismatch in Multimodal Large Language Models for Discrete Symbol Understanding
MLLMs exhibit a consistent recognition-reasoning inversion on discrete visual symbols across domains, underperforming on elementary perception while appearing competent on higher-level reasoning via linguistic compensation.
-
SelfAug: Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Distribution Self-Alignment
Adding a KL penalty between fine-tuned and original model logits on input tokens during RAG fine-tuning reduces catastrophic forgetting while preserving downstream performance.
-
ChemDFM-R: A Chemical Reasoning LLM Enhanced with Atomized Chemical Knowledge
ChemDFM-R is a chemical reasoning LLM trained via a four-stage pipeline on the ChemFG dataset of functional-group annotations for molecules and reactions, reaching performance comparable to or better than commercial m...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.