pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.03321 · v1 · pith:3EUPNWJMnew · submitted 2025-03-05 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords attentionvisualtokenslmmsmodelssinktasksinformation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large multimodal models (LMMs) "see" images by leveraging the attention mechanism between text and visual tokens in the transformer decoder. Ideally, these models should focus on key visual information relevant to the text token. However, recent findings indicate that LMMs have an extraordinary tendency to consistently allocate high attention weights to specific visual tokens, even when these tokens are irrelevant to the corresponding text. In this study, we investigate the property behind the appearance of these irrelevant visual tokens and examine their characteristics. Our findings show that this behavior arises due to the massive activation of certain hidden state dimensions, which resembles the attention sink found in language models. Hence, we refer to this phenomenon as the visual attention sink. In particular, our analysis reveals that removing the irrelevant visual sink tokens does not impact model performance, despite receiving high attention weights. Consequently, we recycle the attention to these tokens as surplus resources, redistributing the attention budget to enhance focus on the image. To achieve this, we introduce Visual Attention Redistribution (VAR), a method that redistributes attention in image-centric heads, which we identify as innately focusing on visual information. VAR can be seamlessly applied across different LMMs to improve performance on a wide range of tasks, including general vision-language tasks, visual hallucination tasks, and vision-centric tasks, all without the need for additional training, models, or inference steps. Experimental results demonstrate that VAR enables LMMs to process visual information more effectively by adjusting their internal attention mechanisms, offering a new direction to enhancing the multimodal capabilities of LMMs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 27 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.

  2. Reroute, Don't Remove: Recoverable Visual Token Routing for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    Reroute turns irreversible visual-token pruning into recoverable routing that reuses existing attention scores, improving grounding performance under aggressive reduction on LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen while preserving TFLOPs ...

  3. From Senses to Decisions: The Information Flow of Auditory and Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AVLLMs route audio-visual information sequentially in video tasks and via parallel streams for interleaved items, allowing early token discard with little performance loss across models and scales.

  4. Reason Twice: Segmentation via Candidate Discovery and Comparative Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rea2Seg turns image segmentation into candidate mask discovery from MLLM attention followed by MLLM-based comparative scoring and selection, plus a new multi-dimensional reasoning benchmark ReasonSeg-SGDR.

  5. Mechanistic Insights into Functional Sparsity in Multimodal LLMs via CoRe Heads

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multimodal LLMs exhibit functional sparsity where a small number of CoRe attention heads handle cross-modal retrieval, with ablation of the top 5% degrading performance while others have little effect.

  6. When Graph Tokens Sink: A Mechanistic Analysis of Graph Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Mechanistic analysis of GLMs shows graph sink tokens have high activation but low importance for predictions, indicating decoupling between saliency and graph-semantic utility.

  7. Sink-Token-Aware Pruning for Fine-Grained Video Understanding in Efficient Video LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Sink-Token-aware Pruning (SToP) suppresses semantically uninformative sink tokens during visual token pruning in Video LLMs, boosting fine-grained performance even at 90% pruning rates across hallucination, reasoning,...

  8. HiDe: Rethinking The Zoom-IN method in High Resolution MLLMs via Hierarchical Decoupling

    cs.CV 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    HiDe is a training-free hierarchical decoupling method that separates key visual tokens from background interference in high-resolution MLLMs to achieve new state-of-the-art results on V*Bench, HRBench4K, and HRBench8K.

  9. ADAPT: Attention Dynamics Alignment with Preference Tuning for Faithful MLLMs

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ADAPT reduces MLLM hallucinations 40-60% by aligning cross-attention dynamics via visual anchors, supervised inference, and preference tuning while preserving general capabilities.

  10. VisReflect: Latent Visual Reflection for Fine-Grained Perception in Long Visual Context

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VisReflect generates continuous latent visual reflections to emphasize relevant visual features and guide attention in LVLMs, yielding 4.1% gains on image benchmarks and 1.8% on video benchmarks with 44% less inferenc...

  11. Inference Time Optimization with Confidence Dynamics

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Correct reasoning traces exhibit positive confidence gain while incorrect traces show declining confidence, enabling CDG-based voting that boosts performance on AIME, HMMT and BRUMO benchmarks across multiple LLM arch...

  12. MLLMs Know When Before Speaking: Revealing and Recovering Temporal Grounding via Attention Cues

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MLLMs know event timing during prefill via sparse Temporal Grounding Heads but lose it in autoregressive decoding; restricting visual context to the high-attention interval at inference time improves VTG performance o...

  13. Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In LVLMs, attention can be replaced by random Gaussian weights with little or no performance loss, indicating that current models get lost in attention rather than efficiently using visual context.

  14. Latent Denoising Improves Visual Alignment in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A latent denoising objective with saliency-aware corruption and contrastive distillation improves visual alignment and corruption robustness in large multimodal models.

  15. Sink-Token-Aware Pruning for Fine-Grained Video Understanding in Efficient Video LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Sink-Token-aware Pruning (SToP) uses a sink score to suppress attention-sink tokens during visual token pruning, improving fine-grained video understanding in Video LLMs at high pruning rates.

  16. The Cost of Language: Centroid Erasure Exposes and Exploits Modal Competition in Multimodal Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Centroid erasure shows language representations overshadow vision in multimodal models, and text-centroid contrastive decoding recovers substantial accuracy on visual reasoning tasks.

  17. Counting to Four is still a Chore for VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VLMs fail at counting because visual evidence degrades in later language layers, and a lightweight Modality Attention Share intervention can encourage better use of image information during answer generation.

  18. Deeper Thought, Weaker Aim: Understanding and Mitigating Perceptual Impairment during Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Attention dispersion during extended reasoning impairs MLLM perception on images, and a training-free VRGA framework mitigates it by selecting and reweighting visual attention heads using an entropy-focus criterion.

  19. EAGLE: Expert-Augmented Attention Guidance for Tuning-Free Industrial Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EAGLE achieves up to 94.4% anomaly detection accuracy on MVTec-AD and 88.1% on VisA by guiding frozen MLLMs with expert-derived thresholds and confidence-aware attention without parameter updates.

  20. Can Vision-Language Models Count? A Synthetic Benchmark and Analysis of Attention-Based Interventions

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    VLMs show systematic drops in counting accuracy as visual and linguistic complexity rise, with modest gains from targeted attention reweighting in the decoder.

  21. The Hidden Evolution of Disguised Visual Context inside the VLM

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Visual tokens enter VLMs as raw signals and are reshaped differently by in-context versus layer-injection paradigms, each capturing distinct frequency characteristics that drive task performance.

  22. Last But Not Least: Boundary Attention CalibratiON for Multimodal KV Cache Compression

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    BACON calibrates observation-window attention using last-query evidence and coherence filters to raise average multimodal KV compression performance by 7.5% (up to 30.9%) under aggressive budgets.

  23. Addressing Exacerbated Attention Sink for Source-Free Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes dynamic token re-weighting during target-domain fine-tuning to mitigate exacerbated attention sink in source-free CDFSL, achieving SOTA on four benchmarks.

  24. RAVE: Re-Allocating Visual Attention in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RAVE is a lightweight pair-gating addition to self-attention that improves visual token allocation in LMMs and delivers an average 3-point gain on multimodal benchmarks, largest on perception-heavy tasks.

  25. RAVE: Re-Allocating Visual Attention in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RAVE is a lightweight pair-gating mechanism that adds a learned bias to pre-softmax attention over visual keys in LMMs, yielding an average 3-point gain on multimodal benchmarks with larger improvements on perception tasks.

  26. Combating Visual Neglect and Semantic Drift in Large Multimodal Models for Enhanced Cross-Modal Retrieval

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SSA-ME uses saliency-aware modeling to reduce visual neglect and semantic drift, achieving SOTA results on the MMEB benchmark for multimodal retrieval.

  27. Information-Regularized Attention for Visual-Centric Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    IRA is a stochastic attention mechanism that regulates visual information injection in VLMs to yield smoother embedding trajectories and reduced attention sinks.