pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.11449 · v3 · submitted 2025-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th

SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-th
keywords SymTFTsubsystem symmetriesfoliated dual modelsgapless boundary theoriesspontaneous symmetry breakingMille-feuille constructionXY plaquette modelcondensation defects
0
0 comments X

The pith

SymTFTs for continuous subsystem symmetries yield gapless boundary theories with spontaneous breaking via interval compactification.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs Symmetry Topological Field Theories for continuous subsystem symmetries that lack Lorentz invariance. It introduces a Mille-feuille construction by specifying gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions on an interval. This produces dual bulk descriptions consisting of gapped foliated SymTFTs and exotic SymTFTs. These bulk descriptions generate gapless boundary theories that exhibit spontaneous subsystem symmetry breaking. The framework delivers foliated dual realizations of models such as the XY plaquette, XYZ cube, and phi-hat-phi theories while representing self-duality symmetries as condensation defects.

Core claim

By specifying gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions on an interval, the SymTFT construction for continuous subsystem symmetries produces dual bulk descriptions of gapped foliated and exotic SymTFTs. These generate gapless boundary theories with spontaneous subsystem symmetry breaking through the Mille-feuille construction, yielding foliated dual realizations of the XY plaquette, XYZ cube, and phi and hat-phi theories along with self-duality symmetries realized as condensation defects.

What carries the argument

The Mille-feuille construction, consisting of interval compactification of the SymTFT with gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions on the ends.

If this is right

  • Foliated dual realizations are obtained for the XY plaquette model.
  • Foliated dual realizations are obtained for the XYZ cube model and the phi and hat-phi theories.
  • Self-duality symmetries appear as condensation defects within the same construction.
  • A systematic procedure emerges for generating free theories that non-linearly realize subsystem symmetries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same boundary-condition method could be tested on other lattice models that break into subsystem symmetries at long distances.
  • Connections may appear between this construction and existing dualities for fracton phases that also feature non-Lorentz-invariant symmetries.
  • Numerical simulations of the resulting gapless boundary theories could check for the predicted spontaneous breaking patterns in quantum spin systems.

Load-bearing premise

The standard SymTFT construction extends without inconsistency to non-Lorentz-invariant continuous subsystem symmetries once gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions are specified on the interval.

What would settle it

An explicit computation for the XY plaquette model showing that the Mille-feuille compactification fails to produce a consistent gapless boundary theory with spontaneous subsystem symmetry breaking would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.11449 by Fabio Apruzzi, Francesco Bedogna, Salvo Mancani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Mille-feuille. The vertical direction is the foliated one. Some defects of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A strip U˜ linking a point operator V on a 2 dimensional submanifold. between a line U(xu)[γ] living in hyperplane with x = xu and a strip operator V˜ (x1, x2)[σ x ] with boundaries on the hyperplanes at x = x1 and x = x2. We define where γ˜(x ′ ) as the intersection between σ x and the hyperplane x = x ′ . The definition of such linking is the linking in the 2 + 1 hyperplane at x = xu of the lines γ and γ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The interface SI that implements the duality map between foliated and exotic theories. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct Symmetry Topological Field Theories (SymTFTs) for continuous subsystem symmetries, which are inherently non-Lorentz-invariant. Our framework produces dual bulk descriptions -- gapped foliated and exotic SymTFTs -- that generate gapless boundary theories with spontaneous subsystem symmetry breaking via interval compactification. In analogy with the sandwich construction of SymTFT, we call this Mille-feuille. This is done by specifying gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions. In this way we obtain the foliated dual realizations of various models, including the XY plaquette, XYZ cube, and $\phi$, $\hat{\phi}$ theories. This also captures self-duality symmetries as condensation defects and provides a systematic method for generating free theories that non-linearly realize subsystem symmetries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs Symmetry Topological Field Theories (SymTFTs) for continuous subsystem symmetries, which are non-Lorentz-invariant. Using a Mille-feuille construction (interval compactification of gapped foliated and exotic SymTFTs with gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions), it generates gapless boundary theories exhibiting spontaneous subsystem symmetry breaking. The framework yields foliated dual realizations of the XY plaquette model, XYZ cube model, and ϕ/ϕ̂ theories, and realizes self-duality symmetries as condensation defects while providing a systematic method for free theories that non-linearly realize subsystem symmetries.

Significance. If the construction is consistent, the work extends SymTFT methods to continuous subsystem symmetries relevant to fracton and exotic phases in condensed matter. It supplies a bulk-dual perspective on spontaneous breaking and self-dualities that could aid classification of gapless models with subsystem symmetries.

major comments (1)
  1. [Mille-feuille construction and boundary conditions] The central claim that gapped foliated and exotic SymTFTs remain consistent (anomaly-free with well-defined topological data) under interval compactification for non-Lorentz-invariant continuous subsystem symmetries is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit computation of fusion rules, operator content, or anomaly cancellation for the bulk theories once the continuous symmetries and boundary conditions are imposed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text would benefit from explicit equations defining the SymTFT actions, the foliated/exotic bulk theories, and the precise gapped versus symmetry-breaking boundary conditions on the interval.
  2. Notation for the continuous subsystem symmetries and the distinction between foliated and exotic SymTFTs should be introduced with a short table or diagram for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important point regarding the consistency of the Mille-feuille construction. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Mille-feuille construction and boundary conditions] The central claim that gapped foliated and exotic SymTFTs remain consistent (anomaly-free with well-defined topological data) under interval compactification for non-Lorentz-invariant continuous subsystem symmetries is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit computation of fusion rules, operator content, or anomaly cancellation for the bulk theories once the continuous symmetries and boundary conditions are imposed.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit verification of the topological data. The consistency of the gapped foliated and exotic SymTFTs is ensured by construction: they are obtained from known anomaly-free gapped phases with subsystem symmetries, and the chosen gapped/symmetry-breaking boundary conditions on the interval are selected to cancel any potential inflow without introducing new anomalies. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the current text does not contain explicit fusion-rule or operator-content calculations for the compactified theories. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix that computes the fusion rules, operator content, and anomaly cancellation explicitly for the foliated SymTFT realizing the XY-plaquette model (the simplest case), thereby confirming that the topological data remain well-defined after interval compactification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

SymTFT extension to continuous subsystem symmetries is a direct construction with no reduction to inputs by definition or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper presents a framework for constructing SymTFTs for non-Lorentz-invariant continuous subsystem symmetries via gapped and symmetry-breaking boundary conditions on an interval, yielding gapped foliated and exotic bulk theories whose compactification produces gapless boundary theories with spontaneous symmetry breaking. This is explicitly called the Mille-feuille construction in analogy to the standard sandwich construction. The visible text contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no self-citations that are load-bearing for the central claims. The derivation consists of specifying boundary conditions to realize dual models (XY plaquette, XYZ cube, ϕ/ϕ̂) and self-duality as condensation defects; these steps are definitional and do not reduce any prediction to the input data or prior results by construction. The framework is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that SymTFT techniques generalize to non-Lorentz-invariant subsystem symmetries; no free parameters or new postulated entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SymTFT framework extends to continuous subsystem symmetries that are non-Lorentz invariant
    This extension is the foundational premise required for the Mille-feuille construction to apply.
invented entities (1)
  • Mille-feuille construction no independent evidence
    purpose: Interval compactification of gapped foliated/exotic SymTFTs to produce gapless boundary theories with spontaneous subsystem symmetry breaking
    New layered construction introduced to realize the dual models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5660 in / 1508 out tokens · 78748 ms · 2026-05-22T20:11:15.055698+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Baby Universes to Narain Moduli: Topological Boundary Averaging in SymTFTs

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography is reinterpreted as averaging over topological boundary conditions in a fixed SymTFT slab, reproducing Poisson moments in the Marolf-Maxfield model and Zamolodchikov me...

  2. Generalized Complexity Distances and Non-Invertible Symmetries

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-invertible symmetries define quantum gates with generalized complexity distances, and simple objects in symmetry categories turn out to be computationally complex in concrete 4D and 2D QFT examples.

  3. Exotic theta terms in 2+1d fractonic field theory

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exotic theta terms in 2+1d fractonic φ-theory induce generalized Witten effects, with vortex operators gaining momentum subsystem charge (quadrupolar for the foliated case).

  4. On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Constructs BF-like 3D SymTFT Lagrangians for finite non-Abelian groups presented as extensions, yielding surface-attaching non-genuine line operators and Drinfeld-center fusion rules.

  5. The Line, the Strip and the Duality Defect

    hep-th 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Condensation defects in SymTFT descriptions of XY-plaquette and XYZ-cube models realize non-invertible self-duality symmetries at any coupling, with a continuous SO(2) version in the XY-plaquette.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,” JHEP02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

  2. [2]

    McGreevy, Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, arXiv:2204.03045

    J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,”Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57–82,arXiv:2204.03045 [cond-mat.str-el]

  3. [3]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

  4. [4]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,”arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

  5. [5]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, “Lectures on Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2307.07547 [hep-th]

  6. [6]

    Luo, Q.-R

    R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, and Y.-N. Wang, “Lecture Notes on Generalized Symmetries and Applications,”Phys. Rept.1065(2024) 1–58,arXiv:2307.09215 [hep-th]

  7. [7]

    Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,

    T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, “Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,”arXiv:2306.00912 [hep-th]

  8. [8]

    Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,

    D. Costa, C. Cordova, M. Del Zotto, D. Freed, J. Gödicke, A. Hofer, D. Jordan, D. Morgante, R. Moscrop, K. Ohmori, E. Riedel Gå rding, C. Scheimbauer, and A. Švraka, “Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries,”arXiv:2411.09082 [hep-th]

  9. [9]

    Ji and X.-G

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry-breaking and topological phase transitions,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 3, (2020) 033417,arXiv:1912.13492 [cond-mat.str-el]

  10. [10]

    Non-invertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transformation of anomalous partition functions,

    W. Ji and X.-G. Wen, “Non-invertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transformation of anomalous partition functions,”Phys. Rev. Research.1(2019) 033054,arXiv:1905.13279 [cond-mat.str-el]

  11. [11]

    Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers

    L. Kong, X.-G. Wen, and H. Zheng, “Boundary-bulk relation for topological orders as the functor mapping higher categories to their centers,”arXiv:1502.01690 [cond-mat.str-el]. 35

  12. [12]

    Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,

    L. Kong, T. Lan, X.-G. Wen, Z.-H. Zhang, and H. Zheng, “Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry – a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 4, (2020) 043086,arXiv:2005.14178 [cond-mat.str-el]

  13. [13]

    Gaiotto and J

    D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, “Orbifold groupoids,”JHEP02(2021) 132,arXiv:2008.05960 [hep-th]

  14. [14]

    Symmetry TFTs from String Theory

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. G. Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Symmetry TFTs from String Theory,”arXiv:2112.02092 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Topological symmetry in quantum field theory

    D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, “Topological symmetry in quantum field theory,”arXiv:2209.07471 [hep-th]

  16. [16]

    Apruzzi, I

    F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 12, (2023) 121601, arXiv:2208.07373 [hep-th]

  17. [17]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs for Non-Invertible Defects,” arXiv:2209.11062 [hep-th]

  18. [18]

    Antinucci, F

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries,”arXiv:2210.09146 [hep-th]

  19. [19]

    Bhardwaj and S

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,”arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

  20. [20]

    Kaidi, E

    J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs and Anomalies of Non-Invertible Symmetries,”arXiv:2301.07112 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Zhang and C

    C. Zhang and C. Córdova, “Anomalies of(1 + 1)Dcategorical symmetries,” arXiv:2304.01262 [cond-mat.str-el]

  22. [22]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Categorical Landau Paradigm for Gapped Phases,”arXiv:2310.03786 [cond-mat.str-el]

  23. [23]

    Bartsch, M

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Representation theory for categorical symmetries,”arXiv:2305.17165 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    Higher form symmetries TFT in 6d,

    F. Apruzzi, “Higher form symmetries TFT in 6d,”JHEP11(2022) 050, arXiv:2203.10063 [hep-th]. 36

  25. [25]

    Cornering relative symmetry theories,

    M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres, “Cornering relative symmetry theories,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 085026,arXiv:2408.12600 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,

    F. Baume, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, “SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 106013,arXiv:2310.12980 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    A SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries,

    T. D. Brennan and Z. Sun, “A SymTFT for Continuous Symmetries,” arXiv:2401.06128 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symm etries,

    A. Antinucci and F. Benini, “Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries,” arXiv:2401.10165 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,

    F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, “SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries,”arXiv:2402.12347 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    SymTh for non-finite symmetries,

    F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and N. Dondi, “SymTh for non-finite symmetries,” arXiv:2402.14813 [hep-th]

  31. [31]

    Symmetry TFT for subsystem symmetry,

    W. Cao and Q. Jia, “Symmetry TFT for subsystem symmetry,”JHEP05(2024) 225, arXiv:2310.01474 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    Gauging modulated symmetries: Kramers-Wannier dualities and non-invertible reflections,

    S. D. Pace, G. Delfino, H. T. Lam, and O. M. Aksoy, “Gauging modulated symmetries: Kramers-Wannier dualities and non-invertible reflections,”SciPost Phys.18no. 1, (2025) 021,arXiv:2406.12962 [cond-mat.str-el]

  33. [33]

    Fractons

    R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, “Fractons,”Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.10 (2019) 295–313,arXiv:1803.11196 [cond-mat.str-el]

  34. [34]

    Fracton Phases of Matter,

    M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, “Fracton Phases of Matter,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35 no. 06, (2020) 2030003,arXiv:2001.01722 [cond-mat.str-el]

  35. [35]

    Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators

    J. Haah, “Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators,” Phys. Rev. A83no. 4, (2011) 042330,arXiv:1101.1962 [quant-ph]

  36. [36]

    Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, “Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality,”Phys. Rev. B94no. 23, (2016) 235157,arXiv:1603.04442 [cond-mat.str-el]. 37

  37. [37]

    A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitations

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, “A New Kind of Topological Quantum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitations,”Phys. Rev. B92no. 23, (2015) 235136,arXiv:1505.02576 [cond-mat.str-el]

  38. [38]

    Emergent Gravity of Fractons: Mach's Principle Revisited

    M. Pretko, “Emergent gravity of fractons: Mach’s principle revisited,”Phys. Rev. D96 no. 2, (2017) 024051,arXiv:1702.07613 [cond-mat.str-el]

  39. [39]

    Fracton Models on General Three-Dimensional Manifolds

    W. Shirley, K. Slagle, Z. Wang, and X. Chen, “Fracton Models on General Three-Dimensional Manifolds,”Phys. Rev. X8no. 3, (2018) 031051, arXiv:1712.05892 [cond-mat.str-el]

  40. [40]

    Fractional excitations in foliated fracton phases,

    W. Shirley, K. Slagle, and X. Chen, “Fractional excitations in foliated fracton phases,” Annals Phys.410(2019) 167922,arXiv:1806.08625 [cond-mat.str-el]

  41. [41]

    Foliated fracton order from gauging subsystem symmetries

    W. Shirley, K. Slagle, and X. Chen, “Foliated fracton order from gauging subsystem symmetries,”SciPost Phys.6no. 4, (2019) 041,arXiv:1806.08679 [cond-mat.str-el]

  42. [42]

    Parallelized quantum error correction with fracton topological codes,

    B. J. Brown and D. J. Williamson, “Parallelized quantum error correction with fracton topological codes,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 1, (2020) 013303,arXiv:1901.08061 [quant-ph]

  43. [43]

    Localization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations,

    V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, “Localization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations,”Phys. Rev. B101no. 17, (2020) 174204,arXiv:1904.04815 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  44. [44]

    The Fracton Gauge Principle

    M. Pretko, “The Fracton Gauge Principle,”Phys. Rev. B98no. 11, (2018) 115134, arXiv:1807.11479 [cond-mat.str-el]

  45. [45]

    Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids

    M. Pretko, “Subdimensional Particle Structure of Higher Rank U(1) Spin Liquids,” Phys. Rev. B95no. 11, (2017) 115139,arXiv:1604.05329 [cond-mat.str-el]

  46. [46]

    Fractonic Chern-Simons and BF theories,

    Y. You, T. Devakul, S. L. Sondhi, and F. J. Burnell, “Fractonic Chern-Simons and BF theories,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 2, (2020) 023249,arXiv:1904.11530 [cond-mat.str-el]

  47. [47]

    Quantum Field Theory of X-Cube Fracton Topological Order and Robust Degeneracy from Geometry

    K. Slagle and Y. B. Kim, “Quantum Field Theory of X-Cube Fracton Topological Order and Robust Degeneracy from Geometry,”Phys. Rev. B96no. 19, (2017) 195139, arXiv:1708.04619 [cond-mat.str-el]. 38

  48. [48]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, “Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,”SciPost Phys.10no. 2, (2021) 027, arXiv:2003.10466 [cond-mat.str-el]

  49. [49]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, “ExoticU(1)Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 3+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,”SciPost Phys.9no. 4, (2020) 046, arXiv:2004.00015 [cond-mat.str-el]

  50. [50]

    ExoticZN symmetries, duality, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field theory,

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao, “ExoticZN symmetries, duality, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field theory,”SciPost Phys.10no. 1, (2021) 003, arXiv:2004.06115 [cond-mat.str-el]

  51. [51]

    More Exotic Field Theories in 3+1 Dimensions,

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, “More Exotic Field Theories in 3+1 Dimensions,”SciPost Phys.9(2020) 073,arXiv:2007.04904 [cond-mat.str-el]

  52. [52]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao, “Low-energy limit of some exotic lattice theories and UV/IR mixing,”Phys. Rev. B104no. 23, (2021) 235116, arXiv:2108.00020 [cond-mat.str-el]

  53. [53]

    Fractons and Exotic Symmetries from Branes,

    H. Geng, S. Kachru, A. Karch, R. Nally, and B. C. Rayhaun, “Fractons and Exotic Symmetries from Branes,”Fortsch. Phys.69no. 11-12, (2021) 2100133, arXiv:2108.08322 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    Spontaneously broken supersymmetric fracton phases with fermionic subsystem symmetries,

    H. Katsura and Y. Nakayama, “Spontaneously broken supersymmetric fracton phases with fermionic subsystem symmetries,”JHEP08(2022) 072,arXiv:2204.01924 [hep-th]

  55. [55]

    Supersymmetric quantum field theory with exotic symmetry in 3+1 dimensions and fermionic fracton phases,

    S. Yamaguchi, “Supersymmetric quantum field theory with exotic symmetry in 3+1 dimensions and fermionic fracton phases,”PTEP2021no. 6, (2021) 063B04, arXiv:2102.04768 [hep-th]

  56. [56]

    Gapless edge modes in (4+1)-dimensional topologically massive tensor gauge theory and anomaly inflow for subsystem symmetry,

    S. Yamaguchi, “Gapless edge modes in (4+1)-dimensional topologically massive tensor gauge theory and anomaly inflow for subsystem symmetry,”PTEP2022no. 3, (2022) 033B08,arXiv:2110.12861 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    Anomaly inflow for subsystem symmetries,

    F. J. Burnell, T. Devakul, P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Anomaly inflow for subsystem symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B106no. 8, (2022) 085113,arXiv:2110.09529 [cond-mat.str-el]

  58. [58]

    Seiberg, Field Theories With a Vector Global Symmetry , SciPost Phys

    N. Seiberg, “Field Theories With a Vector Global Symmetry,”SciPost Phys.8no. 4, (2020) 050,arXiv:1909.10544 [cond-mat.str-el]. 39

  59. [59]

    Foliated Field Theory and String-Membrane-Net Condensation Picture of Fracton Order

    K. Slagle, D. Aasen, and D. Williamson, “Foliated Field Theory and String-Membrane-Net Condensation Picture of Fracton Order,”SciPost Phys.6no. 4, (2019) 043,arXiv:1812.01613 [cond-mat.str-el]

  60. [60]

    Foliated Quantum Field Theory of Fracton Order,

    K. Slagle, “Foliated Quantum Field Theory of Fracton Order,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126 no. 10, (2021) 101603,arXiv:2008.03852 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Comments on foliated gauge theories and dualities in 3+1d,

    P.-S. Hsin and K. Slagle, “Comments on foliated gauge theories and dualities in 3+1d,” SciPost Phys.11no. 2, (2021) 032,arXiv:2105.09363 [cond-mat.str-el]

  62. [62]

    Plaquette Ising models, degeneracy and scaling

    D. A. Johnston, M. Mueller, and W. Janke, “Plaquette Ising models, degeneracy and scaling,”Eur. Phys. J. ST226no. 4, (2017) 749–764,arXiv:1612.00060 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  63. [63]

    Foliated-exotic duality in fractonic BF theories,

    K. Ohmori and S. Shimamura, “Foliated-exotic duality in fractonic BF theories,” SciPost Phys.14no. 6, (2023) 164,arXiv:2210.11001 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    Subsystem Symmetry Fractionalization and Foliated Field Theory,

    P.-S. Hsin, D. T. Stephen, A. Dua, and D. J. Williamson, “Subsystem Symmetry Fractionalization and Foliated Field Theory,”arXiv:2403.09098 [cond-mat.str-el]

  65. [65]

    Subsystem Non-Invertible Symmetry Operators and Defects,

    W. Cao, L. Li, M. Yamazaki, and Y. Zheng, “Subsystem Non-Invertible Symmetry Operators and Defects,”arXiv:2304.09886 [cond-mat.str-el]

  66. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04617 (2023)

    T. Schuster, N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, and N. Y. Yao, “A holographic view of topological stabilizer codes,”arXiv:2312.04617 [cond-mat.str-el]

  67. [67]

    Anomaly of subsystem symmetries in exotic and foliated BF theories,

    S. Shimamura, “Anomaly of subsystem symmetries in exotic and foliated BF theories,” JHEP06(2024) 002,arXiv:2404.10601 [cond-mat.str-el]

  68. [68]

    New Field Theories with Foliation Structure and Subdimensional Particles from Godbillon-Vey Invariant,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, T. Nakanishi, and S. Shimamori, “New Field Theories with Foliation Structure and Subdimensional Particles from Godbillon-Vey Invariant,” arXiv:2408.05048 [hep-th]

  69. [69]

    Multipole and fracton topological order via gauging foliated symmetry protected topological phases,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, and T. Nakanishi, “Multipole and fracton topological order via gauging foliated symmetry protected topological phases,”Phys. Rev. Res.6no. 2, (2024) 023166,arXiv:2401.10677 [cond-mat.str-el]

  70. [70]

    Foliated field theories and multipole symmetries,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda, and T. Nakanishi, “Foliated field theories and multipole symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B109no. 16, (2024) 165112,arXiv:2310.06701 [cond-mat.str-el]. 40

  71. [71]

    Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT,

    J. J. Heckman and M. Hübner, “Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT,”Fortsch. Phys.73no. 4, (2025) 2400270, arXiv:2406.08485 [hep-th]

  72. [72]

    Generalized symmetries of nonsupersymmetric orbifolds,

    N. Braeger, V. Chakrabhavi, J. J. Heckman, and M. Hübner, “Generalized symmetries of nonsupersymmetric orbifolds,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 6, (2025) 066015, arXiv:2404.17639 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    D-brane Charges in Five-brane backgrounds

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and N. Seiberg, “D-brane charges in five-brane backgrounds,”JHEP10(2001) 005,arXiv:hep-th/0108152

  74. [74]

    Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT,

    R. Argurio, A. Collinucci, G. Galati, O. Hulik, and E. Paznokas, “Non-Invertible T-duality at Any Radius via Non-Compact SymTFT,”SciPost Phys.18(2025) 089, arXiv:2409.11822 [hep-th]

  75. [75]

    Holographic Duals of Symmetry Broken Phases,

    A. Antinucci, F. Benini, and G. Rizi, “Holographic Duals of Symmetry Broken Phases,” Fortsch. Phys.72no. 12, (2024) 2400172,arXiv:2408.01418 [hep-th]

  76. [76]

    Gapless Foliated-Exotic Duality,

    K. Ohmori and S. Shimamura, “Gapless Foliated-Exotic Duality,”arXiv:2504.10835 [cond-mat.str-el]

  77. [77]

    Conformal blocks for AdS5 singletons

    D. Belov and G. W. Moore, “Conformal blocks for AdS(5) singletons,” arXiv:hep-th/0412167

  78. [78]

    A gauge theory generalization of the fermion-doubling theorem

    S. M. Kravec and J. McGreevy, “A gauge theory generalization of the fermion-doubling theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 161603,arXiv:1306.3992 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    Generalized global symmetries and holography,

    D. M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, “Generalized global symmetries and holography,”SciPost Phys.4no. 1, (2018) 005,arXiv:1707.08577 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Copetti, and L. Di Pietro, “Factorization and global symmetries in holography,”SciPost Phys.14no. 2, (2023) 019,arXiv:2203.09537 [hep-th]

Showing first 80 references.