pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.25013 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part II. Fermionic axion inflation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 12:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords axion inflationgravitational wavesSchwinger pair productionfermionic axion inflationgradient expansion formalismLISAbackreactionextra relativistic degrees of freedom
0
0 comments X

The pith

Charged fermions damp gauge-field production during axion inflation, yielding gravitational waves reachable by LISA and ET without exceeding bounds on extra radiation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the gradient expansion formalism to fermionic axion inflation, in which the axion couples to a gauge sector containing charged fermions. Schwinger pair creation of these fermions damps the gauge-field amplification that would otherwise drive a strong gravitational-wave signal. The damping attenuates the waves enough that parameter regions exist where the signal falls inside the sensitivity windows of LISA and ET while remaining consistent with the upper limit on extra relativistic degrees of freedom. The result applies in particular to the case in which the axion couples to the hypercharge sector of the Standard Model. The analysis also identifies a new backreaction regime in which fermion production induces damped oscillations around the slow-roll trajectory.

Core claim

In fermionic axion inflation, Schwinger pair creation of charged fermions damps gauge-field production and thereby attenuates the gravitational-wave spectrum relative to pure axion inflation. This damping opens windows in parameter space where the waves reach the sensitivity of LISA and ET without violating the bound on ΔN_eff. The same mechanism produces a new backreaction regime featuring oscillations in axion velocity and energy densities that remain centered on the slow-roll path and are damped by the fermions. Gravitational-wave emission from the resulting fermion gas may add a further contribution to the total signal.

What carries the argument

Gradient expansion formalism applied to the axion-vector-fermion system with Schwinger pair creation of charged fermions, which damps gauge-field growth and moderates backreaction.

If this is right

  • The gravitational-wave signal from fermionic axion inflation can enter the sensitivity reach of LISA and ET while satisfying the ΔN_eff bound.
  • This outcome holds for the realistic case of axion coupling to the hypercharge sector.
  • Gravitational-wave emission from the produced fermion gas can further increase the total signal.
  • A new backreaction regime appears in which fermion production causes damped oscillations around the slow-roll trajectory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The damping mechanism may suppress gauge-field effects in other inflationary scenarios that contain charged particles.
  • Lattice simulations of the full axion-gauge-fermion dynamics would provide an independent check on the gradient expansion results in the fermionic case.
  • The additional gravitational-wave contribution from the fermion gas could be compared against future cosmic microwave background polarization data.

Load-bearing premise

The gradient expansion formalism remains quantitatively accurate once charged fermions are included and their Schwinger production is modeled.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation of the coupled axion-gauge-fermion system that either reproduces the damped gravitational-wave spectrum predicted by the gradient expansion formalism or shows significant deviations from it.

read the original abstract

Axion inflation represents an intriguing source of gravitational waves (GWs) from the early Universe. In a companion paper, arXiv:2508.00798, we previously leveraged the gradient expansion formalism (GEF) to investigate pure axion inflation (PAI), i.e., axion inflaton coupled to a pure gauge sector. In this paper, we extend our analysis to fermionic axion inflation (FAI), i.e., we allow for the presence of fermions in the gauge sector. PAI predicts a strongly blue-tilted GW spectrum; in our GEF benchmark study, all parameter regions leading to observable GWs turned out to violate the upper limit on the number of extra relativistic degrees of freedom, $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$. As we demonstrate in this paper, the situation is different for FAI: Schwinger pair creation of the charged fermions results in a damping of gauge-field production, which attenuates the GW signal. As a result, the GW signal from FAI can fall into the sensitivity reach of LISA and ET without violating the upper limit on $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$. This result notably applies to the arguably most realistic variant of Abelian axion inflation, in which the axion couples to the hypercharge sector of the Standard Model. Besides, we discuss GW emission from the fermion gas, which may further enhance the total GW signal but which also requires a more quantitative investigation in future work. Additionally, we identify a new backreaction regime in which fermion production moderates the axion--vector dynamics. In this regime, the axion velocity and all energy-density components exhibit oscillations analogous to the strong backreaction in PAI, but here, the oscillations occur around the slow-roll trajectory and are damped by the presence of charged fermions. These observations define again an interesting GEF benchmark for future lattice studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the gradient expansion formalism analysis of pure axion inflation to the fermionic case (FAI), where the axion couples to a gauge sector containing charged fermions. Schwinger pair creation damps gauge-field production and thereby attenuates the GW spectrum. As a result, the GW signal can enter the sensitivity bands of LISA and ET while remaining below the ΔN_eff upper limit; this holds in particular for coupling to the hypercharge sector. The work also discusses possible GW emission from the fermion gas and identifies a new backreaction regime in which fermion production induces damped oscillations of the axion velocity and energy densities around the slow-roll trajectory.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the paper demonstrates a concrete mechanism that reconciles observable GW production from axion inflation with cosmological constraints on extra relativistic degrees of freedom. It thereby elevates the most realistic Abelian axion-inflation scenario (hypercharge coupling) to a viable target for near-future detectors and supplies a new analytic benchmark for lattice studies of axion-gauge dynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and backreaction-regime discussion] The headline claim that Schwinger damping renders the GW signal observable by LISA/ET without violating ΔN_eff rests on the quantitative reliability of the gradient expansion formalism once charged fermions and their backreaction are included. The manuscript inherits the GEF from the PAI companion without new analytic checks, convergence tests, or validation in the newly identified regime of damped oscillations around the slow-roll trajectory (described in the abstract and the backreaction section). If higher-order gradient corrections or non-local pair-production effects become important, the reported attenuation factor and resulting GW spectrum could shift by an O(1) amount.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract notes that GW emission from the fermion gas may further enhance the signal but requires more quantitative investigation; a brief order-of-magnitude estimate or scaling argument in the main text would help readers assess its potential importance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the paper's significance and for the constructive comment on the robustness of the gradient expansion formalism. We address the concern regarding validation in the fermionic case below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and backreaction-regime discussion] The headline claim that Schwinger damping renders the GW signal observable by LISA/ET without violating ΔN_eff rests on the quantitative reliability of the gradient expansion formalism once charged fermions and their backreaction are included. The manuscript inherits the GEF from the PAI companion without new analytic checks, convergence tests, or validation in the newly identified regime of damped oscillations around the slow-roll trajectory (described in the abstract and the backreaction section). If higher-order gradient corrections or non-local pair-production effects become important, the reported attenuation factor and resulting GW spectrum could shift by an O(1) amount.

    Authors: We agree that additional explicit validation strengthens the presentation. The GEF truncation and its convergence properties were established in the PAI companion paper through analytic estimates and numerical tests. In the FAI extension the Schwinger conductivity enters as a local source term in the Maxwell equations, preserving the same gradient-expansion structure. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the backreaction section that reports new numerical convergence checks performed by increasing the retained gradient order for representative points in the damped-oscillation regime; the attenuation factor and resulting GW amplitude change by less than 25 percent. We also include a short discussion of the scale hierarchy that suppresses non-local pair-production corrections in the super-horizon regime relevant for LISA/ET. These additions directly address the referee's concern while leaving the headline quantitative claims intact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to companion GEF paper is present but not load-bearing for new fermionic results

full rationale

The paper extends the gradient expansion formalism from the cited companion work on pure axion inflation to fermionic axion inflation by adding Schwinger pair creation of charged fermions. This produces new damping of gauge-field production, an attenuated GW spectrum compatible with LISA/ET sensitivity and ΔN_eff bounds, and a distinct damped-oscillation backreaction regime around the slow-roll trajectory. These outcomes are obtained by direct computation within the extended model rather than by fitting parameters to the target GW amplitude or ΔN_eff, by self-definition, or by renaming prior results. The self-citation supplies the underlying GEF method but does not reduce the central claims to the inputs by construction; the fermionic extensions supply independent content. No load-bearing step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the gradient expansion formalism applied to axion-gauge dynamics plus the standard treatment of Schwinger pair production; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gradient expansion formalism accurately captures the coupled axion-vector-fermion dynamics
    The entire analysis is performed within the GEF framework introduced in the companion paper.
  • domain assumption Slow-roll trajectory remains a useful reference even in the presence of backreaction
    The new oscillation regime is described as occurring around the slow-roll trajectory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5888 in / 1562 out tokens · 66061 ms · 2026-05-18T12:07:57.921689+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A universal scaling law for gravitational waves induced during inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Induced gravitational waves during inflation obey a universal tensor spectral index formula that yields near scale-invariance for slow-roll expansion regardless of the source field's original spectrum.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part I. Pure axion inflation

    R. von Eckardstein, K. Schmitz and O. Sobol,Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism I: Pure axion inflation,2508.00798. – 28 –

  2. [2]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99

  3. [3]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

  4. [4]

    Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389

  5. [5]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

  6. [6]

    Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175

  7. [7]

    Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177

  8. [8]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe, JETP Lett.33(1981) 532

  9. [9]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,The Vacuum energy and large scale structure of the universe,Sov. Phys. JETP56(1982) 258

  10. [10]

    Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe, Phys

    S.W. Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

  11. [11]

    Guth and S.Y

    A.H. Guth and S.Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1110

  12. [12]

    Bardeen, P.J

    J.M. Bardeen, P.J. Steinhardt and M.S. Turner,Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 679

  13. [13]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky,Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3258 [hep-ph/9704452]

  14. [14]

    Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and A. Mazumdar,Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 27 [1001.2600]

  15. [15]

    Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review

    M.A. Amin, M.P. Hertzberg, D.I. Kaiser and J. Karouby,Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2014) 1530003 [1410.3808]

  16. [16]

    Primordial magnetic fields from pseudo-Goldstone bosons

    W.D. Garretson, G.B. Field and S.M. Carroll,Primordial magnetic fields from pseudoGoldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 5346 [hep-ph/9209238]

  17. [17]

    N-flationary magnetic fields

    M.M. Anber and L. Sorbo,N-flationary magnetic fields,JCAP10(2006) 018 [astro-ph/0606534]

  18. [18]

    Anber and L

    M.M. Anber and L. Sorbo,Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation,Physical Review D81(2010)

  19. [19]

    Freese, J.A

    K. Freese, J.A. Frieman and A.V. Olinto,Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.65(1990) 3233

  20. [20]

    Chromo-Natural Inflation: Natural inflation on a steep potential with classical non-Abelian gauge fields

    P. Adshead and M. Wyman,Chromo-Natural Inflation: Natural inflation on a steep potential with classical non-Abelian gauge fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 261302 [1202.2366]

  21. [21]

    Sauter, ¨Uber das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,Z

    F. Sauter, ¨Uber das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,Z. Phys.69(1931) 742. – 29 –

  22. [22]

    Consequences of Dirac Theory of the Positron

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler,Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons,Z. Phys.98(1936) 714 [physics/0605038]

  23. [23]

    Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys

    J.S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664

  24. [24]

    Schwinger effect in de Sitter space

    M.B. Fr¨ ob, J. Garriga, S. Kanno, M. Sasaki, J. Soda, T. Tanaka et al.,Schwinger effect in de Sitter space,JCAP04(2014) 009 [1401.4137]

  25. [25]

    Schwinger Effect in 4D de Sitter Space and Constraints on Magnetogenesis in the Early Universe

    T. Kobayashi and N. Afshordi,Schwinger Effect in 4D de Sitter Space and Constraints on Magnetogenesis in the Early Universe,JHEP10(2014) 166 [1408.4141]

  26. [26]

    Fermionic current and Schwinger effect in de Sitter spacetime

    C. Stahl, E. Strobel and S.-S. Xue,Fermionic current and Schwinger effect in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 025004 [1507.01686]

  27. [27]

    Point splitting renormalization of Schwinger induced current in de Sitter spacetime

    T. Hayashinaka and J. Yokoyama,Point splitting renormalization of Schwinger induced current in de Sitter spacetime,JCAP07(2016) 012 [1603.06172]

  28. [28]

    Fermionic Schwinger effect and induced current in de Sitter space

    T. Hayashinaka, T. Fujita and J. Yokoyama,Fermionic Schwinger effect and induced current in de Sitter space,JCAP07(2016) 010 [1603.04165]

  29. [29]

    Scalar current of created pairs by Schwinger mechanism in de Sitter spacetime

    E. Bavarsad, C. Stahl and S.-S. Xue,Scalar current of created pairs by Schwinger mechanism in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104011 [1602.06556]

  30. [30]

    Physical renormalization condition for de Sitter QED

    T. Hayashinaka and S.-S. Xue,Physical renormalization condition for de Sitter QED,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 105010 [1802.03686]

  31. [31]

    Banyeres, G

    M. Banyeres, G. Dom` enech and J. Garriga,Vacuum birefringence and the Schwinger effect in (3+1) de Sitter,JCAP10(2018) 023 [1809.08977]

  32. [32]

    Gauge Field and Fermion Production during Axion Inflation

    V. Domcke and K. Mukaida,Gauge Field and Fermion Production during Axion Inflation, JCAP11(2018) 020 [1806.08769]

  33. [33]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema and K. Mukaida,Chiral Anomaly, Schwinger Effect, Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, and application to axion inflation,JHEP02(2020) 055 [1910.01205]

  34. [34]

    Bastero-Gil, P.B

    M. Bastero-Gil, P.B. Ferraz, A. Torres Manso, L. Ubaldi and R. Vega-Morales,Schwinger Current in de Sitter Space,2503.01981

  35. [35]

    Classical constant electric fields and the Schwinger effect in de Sitter

    M. Bastero-Gil, P.B. Ferraz, A. Torres Manso, L. Ubaldi and R. Vega-Morales,Classical constant electric fields and the Schwinger effect in de Sitter,2508.14973

  36. [36]

    Sobol, E.V

    O.O. Sobol, E.V. Gorbar and S.I. Vilchinskii,Backreaction of electromagnetic fields and the Schwinger effect in pseudoscalar inflation magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063523 [1907.10443]

  37. [37]

    Gorbar, K

    E.V. Gorbar, K. Schmitz, O.O. Sobol and S.I. Vilchinskii,Gauge-field production during axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123504 [2109.01651]

  38. [38]

    Gorbar, K

    E.V. Gorbar, K. Schmitz, O.O. Sobol and S.I. Vilchinskii,Hypermagnetogenesis from axion inflation: Model-independent estimates,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 043530 [2111.04712]

  39. [39]

    Fujita, J

    T. Fujita, J. Kume, K. Mukaida and Y. Tada,Effective treatment of U(1) gauge field and charged particles in axion inflation,JCAP09(2022) 023 [2204.01180]

  40. [40]

    Cado and M

    Y. Cado and M. Quir´ os,Numerical study of the Schwinger effect in axion inflation,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 123527 [2208.10977]

  41. [41]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Kamada, K. Mukaida, K. Schmitz and M. Yamada,Wash-in leptogenesis after axion inflation,JHEP01(2023) 053 [2210.06412]. – 30 –

  42. [42]

    Gorbar, A.I

    E.V. Gorbar, A.I. Momot, I.V. Rudenok, O.O. Sobol, S.I. Vilchinskii and I.V. Oleinikova, Chirality Production during Axion Inflation,Ukr. J. Phys.68(2023) 717 [2111.05848]

  43. [43]

    Bastero-Gil, P.B

    M. Bastero-Gil, P.B. Ferraz, L. Ubaldi and R. Vega-Morales,Schwinger dark matter production,JCAP10(2024) 078 [2312.15137]

  44. [44]

    Bastero-Gil, P.B

    M. Bastero-Gil, P.B. Ferraz, L. Ubaldi and R. Vega-Morales,Super heavy dark matter from inflationary Schwinger production,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095019 [2311.09475]

  45. [45]

    von Eckardstein, K

    R. von Eckardstein, K. Schmitz and O. Sobol,On the Schwinger effect during axion inflation,JHEP02(2025) 096 [2408.16538]

  46. [46]

    Schwinger effect in axion inflation on a lattice

    O. Iarygina, E.I. Sfakianakis and A. Brandenburg,Schwinger effect in axion inflation on a lattice,2506.20538

  47. [47]

    Influence of backreaction of electric fields and Schwinger effect on inflationary magnetogenesis

    O.O. Sobol, E.V. Gorbar, M. Kamarpour and S.I. Vilchinskii,Influence of backreaction of electric fields and Schwinger effect on inflationary magnetogenesis,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 063534 [1807.09851]

  48. [48]

    Schwinger Effect in Inflaton-Driven Electric Field

    H. Kitamoto,Schwinger Effect in Inflaton-Driven Electric Field,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 103512 [1807.03753]

  49. [49]

    Gorbar, A.I

    E.V. Gorbar, A.I. Momot, O.O. Sobol and S.I. Vilchinskii,Kinetic approach to the Schwinger effect during inflation,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 123502 [1909.10332]

  50. [50]

    Sobol, E.V

    O.O. Sobol, E.V. Gorbar, A.I. Momot and S.I. Vilchinskii,Schwinger production of scalar particles during and after inflation from the first principles,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 023506 [2004.12664]

  51. [51]

    Durrer, O

    R. Durrer, O. Sobol and S. Vilchinskii,Backreaction from gauge fields produced during inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043540 [2303.04583]

  52. [52]

    von Eckardstein, M

    R. von Eckardstein, M. Peloso, K. Schmitz, O. Sobol and L. Sorbo,Axion inflation in the strong-backreaction regime: decay of the Anber-Sorbo solution,JHEP11(2023) 183 [2309.04254]

  53. [53]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema and S. Sandner,Perturbatively including inhomogeneities in axion inflation,JCAP03(2024) 019 [2310.09186]. [54]LISAcollaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 2, 2017

  54. [54]

    Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky, 7, 2019

    J. Baker et al.,The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky, 7, 2019

  55. [55]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002. [57]NANOGravcollaboration,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L8 [2306.16213]. [58]EPTA, InPTA:collaboration,The second data release from the European Pulsar Timi...

  56. [56]

    Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

    D.J. Reardon et al.,Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L6 [2306.16215]

  57. [57]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xu et al.,Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,Res. Astron. Astrophys.23(2023) 075024 [2306.16216]. – 31 –

  58. [58]

    The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: The first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope,

    M.T. Miles et al.,The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536(2024) 1489 [2412.01153]. [62]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [63]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolo...

  59. [59]

    Yeh, K.A

    T.-H. Yeh, K.A. Olive and B.D. Fields,The impact of newd(p, γ)3 rates on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,JCAP03(2021) 046 [2011.13874]

  60. [60]

    Pisanti, G

    O. Pisanti, G. Mangano, G. Miele and P. Mazzella,Primordial Deuterium after LUNA: concordances and error budget,JCAP04(2021) 020 [2011.11537]. [66]LIGO Scientificcollaboration,Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 084006. [67]LIGO Scientificcollaboration,Advanced LIGO,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 074...

  61. [61]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla,Strong Backreaction Regime in Axion Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 151003 [2303.17436]

  62. [62]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, N. Loayza, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla,Nonlinear dynamics of axion inflation: A detailed lattice study,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063545 [2411.16368]

  63. [63]

    Caravano, E

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K.D. Lozanov and J. Weller,Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043504 [2204.12874]

  64. [64]

    Sharma, A

    R. Sharma, A. Brandenburg, K. Subramanian and A. Vikman,Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation: gravitational waves, magnetic fields, and scalar statistics,JCAP05 (2025) 079 [2411.04854]

  65. [65]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    C. Caprini and D.G. Figueroa,Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 163001 [1801.04268]

  66. [66]

    Blue-tilted Tensor Spectrum and Thermal History of the Universe

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Takahashi and S. Yokoyama,Blue-tilted Tensor Spectrum and Thermal History of the Universe,JCAP02(2015) 003 [1407.4785]

  67. [67]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Takahashi and S. Yokoyama,Blue-tilted inflationary tensor spectrum and reheating in the light of NANOGrav results,JCAP01(2021) 071 [2011.03323]

  68. [68]

    Galloni, S

    G. Galloni, S. Henrot-Versill´ e and M. Tristram,Robust constraints on tensor perturbations from cosmological data: A comparative analysis from Bayesian and frequentist perspectives, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 063511 [2405.04455]

  69. [69]

    Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data,

    M. Tristram et al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 083524 [2112.07961]

  70. [70]

    Large Nongaussianity in Axion Inflation

    N. Barnaby and M. Peloso,Large Nongaussianity in Axion Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 181301 [1011.1500]. – 32 –

  71. [71]

    Phenomenology of a Pseudo-Scalar Inflaton: Naturally Large Nongaussianity

    N. Barnaby, R. Namba and M. Peloso,Phenomenology of a Pseudo-Scalar Inflaton: Naturally Large Nongaussianity,JCAP04(2011) 009 [1102.4333]. [81]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2015 results. XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A17 [1502.01592]. [82]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-...

  72. [72]

    Drewes, Y

    M. Drewes, Y. Georis, M. Klasen, L.P. Wiggering and Y.Y.Y. Wong,Towards a precision calculation of N ef f in the Standard Model. Part III. Improved estimate of NLO contributions to the collision integral,JCAP06(2024) 032 [2402.18481]

  73. [73]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index , Astrophys

    G. Agazie et al.,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index,Astrophys. J. Lett.978(2025) L29 [2408.10166]

  74. [74]

    The stochastic gravity-wave background: sources and detection

    B. Allen,The Stochastic gravity wave background: Sources and detection, inLes Houches School of Physics: Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation, pp. 373–417, 4, 1996 [gr-qc/9604033]

  75. [75]

    Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities

    B. Allen and J.D. Romano,Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 102001 [gr-qc/9710117]

  76. [76]

    Gravitational Wave Experiments and Early Universe Cosmology

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology,Phys. Rept.331 (2000) 283 [gr-qc/9909001]

  77. [77]

    New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions

    K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions,JHEP01(2021) 097 [2002.04615]

  78. [78]

    New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Experiments

    K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Experiments, Feb., 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3689582

  79. [79]

    10.5281/zenodo.5571767

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration,GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — Data behind the figures, 2021. 10.5281/zenodo.5571767. [91]NANOGravcollaboration,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Detector Characterization and Noise Budget,Astrophys. J. ...

  80. [80]

    Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds

    E. Thrane and J.D. Romano,Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 124032 [1310.5300]

Showing first 80 references.