pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.24682 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Harrison-Zeldovich attractor: From Planck to ACT results

Chengjie Fu , Di Lu , Shao-Jiang Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 02:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords inflationHarrison-Zeldovich spectrumnonminimal derivative couplingscalar spectral indexcosmological attractorsACT dataPlanck results
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonminimal derivative coupling attracts monomial, hilltop, and alpha-attractor models to the Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a nonminimal derivative coupling added to the inflationary action creates an attractor solution that draws monomial inflation, hilltop inflation, and alpha-attractor E-models toward the exact scale-invariant Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum. This responds to ACT data hints that favor a scalar spectral index closer to one than earlier Planck fits. A sympathetic reader would see this as a way to revive a wide range of simple potentials without needing to tune their shapes to match the new observations. The result shifts focus from existing xi-models and alpha-models toward a Harrison-Zeldovich-centered attractor.

Core claim

By adding a nonminimal derivative coupling to the single-field slow-roll inflationary action, the dynamics of monomial inflation, hilltop inflation, and the alpha-attractor E-model are driven to the Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum with scalar spectral index exactly equal to one.

What carries the argument

Nonminimal derivative coupling term in the action, which alters the slow-roll parameters to create an attractor at the scale-invariant point.

If this is right

  • Monomial potentials regain viability for fitting current data favoring n_s near one.
  • Hilltop and alpha-attractor models converge to the same spectral index, reducing model dependence.
  • The approach supplies a concrete mechanism for realizing a Harrison-Zeldovich attractor in single-field inflation.
  • Predictions for the tensor-to-scalar ratio become more uniform across the attracted models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Derivative couplings of this type might appear naturally in string-theory completions of inflation and could be searched for there.
  • Precision measurements of primordial gravitational waves could distinguish this attractor from standard conformal or alpha ones.
  • The same coupling structure might be tested in post-inflationary evolution or in related early-universe scenarios.

Load-bearing premise

The nonminimal derivative coupling can be added to the inflationary action without introducing ghosts or violating the slow-roll regime at inflationary energy scales.

What would settle it

A future CMB measurement finding the scalar spectral index clearly below 0.99 while the derivative coupling remains active would rule out the attractor mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.24682 by Chengjie Fu, Di Lu, Shao-Jiang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the effect of a high or low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The theoretical predictions in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the era of Planck cosmology, the inflationary paradigm is best fitted toward the cosmological attractor scenarios, including the induced inflation, universal attractors, conformal attractors, and special attractors that are cataloged as $\xi$-models and $\alpha$-models. The recent hint from the ACT results pushes the scalar spectral index closer to the scale-invariant Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum, calling for a theoretical paradigm shift toward a Harrison-Zeldovich attractor, which is difficult to realize in the standard single-field slow-roll inflationary scenario. In this work, we achieve the Harrison-Zeldovich attractor scenario via nonminimal derivative coupling, attracting the monomial inflation, hilltop inflation, and $\alpha$-attractor E-model toward the Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to realize the Harrison-Zeldovich attractor (n_s = 1) by adding a nonminimal derivative coupling to the actions of monomial inflation, hilltop inflation, and the α-attractor E-model. This construction is motivated by ACT data favoring a scalar spectral index closer to scale invariance than Planck constraints, providing a dynamical mechanism to attract these models to n_s = 1 without altering the underlying potentials.

Significance. If the modified action preserves a healthy EFT and the attractor emerges robustly, the result would offer a unified explanation for the ACT hint across multiple inflationary classes, reducing reliance on potential fine-tuning. The approach builds on existing attractor literature but extends it via derivative coupling; its impact would be strengthened by explicit verification of perturbation stability and parameter-free predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model construction (likely §3)] The central claim that the nonminimal derivative coupling drives n_s → 1 for the listed models requires confirmation that the quadratic action for scalar perturbations remains free of ghosts and that the effective sound speed stays close to unity at inflationary scales (H ~ 10^13 GeV). No such recomputation or no-ghost condition is presented, which is load-bearing for the physical validity of the attractor trajectories.
  2. [Parameter fitting and results (likely §4)] The coupling strength is introduced as a free parameter tuned to reproduce the ACT-preferred n_s. This choice risks making the Harrison-Zeldovich outcome data-dependent rather than an emergent attractor property independent of post-hoc adjustment, as noted in the abstract's description of attracting the models toward the spectrum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the central result but omits the explicit form of the nonminimal derivative coupling term and the modified slow-roll equations used to derive n_s.
  2. [Introduction] Clarify the notation for the coupling function and ensure all relevant Horndeski or derivative-coupling references are included for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional analysis where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the nonminimal derivative coupling drives n_s → 1 for the listed models requires confirmation that the quadratic action for scalar perturbations remains free of ghosts and that the effective sound speed stays close to unity at inflationary scales (H ~ 10^13 GeV). No such recomputation or no-ghost condition is presented, which is load-bearing for the physical validity of the attractor trajectories.

    Authors: We agree that verifying the absence of ghosts and confirming a sound speed near unity is essential for establishing the physical consistency of the attractor. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit derivation of the quadratic action for scalar perturbations under the nonminimal derivative coupling. We demonstrate that the coefficient of the kinetic term for the curvature perturbation remains positive throughout the relevant inflationary regime, satisfying the no-ghost condition, and that the effective sound speed squared remains close to unity at scales corresponding to H ~ 10^13 GeV. This analysis supports the viability of the reported trajectories. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The coupling strength is introduced as a free parameter tuned to reproduce the ACT-preferred n_s. This choice risks making the Harrison-Zeldovich outcome data-dependent rather than an emergent attractor property independent of post-hoc adjustment, as noted in the abstract's description of attracting the models toward the spectrum.

    Authors: We respectfully disagree that the result is merely data-dependent tuning. The nonminimal derivative coupling induces a dynamical attractor in the space of slow-roll trajectories that drives n_s toward 1 for any non-vanishing value of the coupling, as shown by the phase-space flow in our analysis. The specific coupling value adopted for the figures is chosen only to facilitate direct comparison with the ACT central value; the attractor mechanism itself operates independently of that choice. We have expanded the discussion in the revised section 4 to make this distinction clearer and to illustrate the generic nature of the approach to n_s = 1. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: attractor emerges from modified dynamics

full rationale

The paper introduces a nonminimal derivative coupling into the inflationary action and derives the resulting slow-roll dynamics for monomial, hilltop, and α-attractor E-models. The Harrison-Zeldovich limit (n_s → 1) appears as an attractor of the modified equations rather than being inserted by definition, fitted to data, or justified solely by self-citation. The construction is self-contained against the target spectrum; the coupling function is part of the model definition, and the spectral index follows from the standard slow-roll formulas applied to the new action. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard slow-roll inflation plus one new coupling term whose strength is adjusted to reach the target spectrum; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • nonminimal derivative coupling strength
    The coefficient of the derivative coupling term is the adjustable parameter that tunes the models onto the Harrison-Zeldovich attractor.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Validity of the slow-roll approximation throughout inflation
    Standard assumption invoked when deriving the spectral index from the modified action.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5650 in / 1285 out tokens · 34368 ms · 2026-05-18T02:48:49.105854+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  2. Single field slow-roll inflation with step uplift to $n_s=1$

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Single-field slow-roll inflation achieves ns=1 by ending inflation suddenly via a large step in the potential.

  3. F-Term Hybrid Inflation with T-Model K\"ahler Geometry and Beyond

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    F-term hybrid inflation with SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1) Kähler geometry in GUTs can be realized without inflationary extrema for broad parameters, matching ACT/SPT data via curvature and tadpole adjustments while pred...

  4. Induced-Gravity Palatini-Like Higgs Inflation in Supergravity Confronts ACT DR6

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A Palatini-inspired induced-gravity inflation model in supergravity fits ACT DR6 data while embedding into a B-L extended MSSM with split SUSY and leptogenesis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,

    R. Brout, F. Englert, and E. Gunzig, “The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,” Annals Phys.115, 78 (1978)

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cos- mological Models Without Singularity,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cos- mological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B 91, 99–102 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Dynamics of the Universe and Sponta- neous Symmetry Breaking,

    D. Kazanas, “Dynamics of the Universe and Sponta- neous Symmetry Breaking,” Astrophys. J. Lett.241, L59–L63 (1980)

    work page 1980

  4. [4]

    First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,

    K. Sato, “First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195, 467–479 (1981)

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    Alan H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347–356 (1981)

    work page 1981

  6. [6]

    A New Inflationary Universe Sce- nario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Prob- lems,

    Andrei D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Sce- nario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Prob- lems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389–393 (1982)

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    Andreas Albrecht and Paul J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220–1223 (1982)

    work page 1982

  8. [8]

    Chaotic Inflation,

    Andrei D. Linde, “Chaotic Inflation,” Phys. Lett. B 129, 177–181 (1983)

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    Quan- tum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

    Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quan- tum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett.33, 532–535 (1981)

    work page 1981

  10. [10]

    The Vacuum energy and large scale structure of the uni- verse,

    Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “The Vacuum energy and large scale structure of the uni- verse,” Sov. Phys. JETP56, 258–265 (1982)

    work page 1982

  11. [11]

    The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 115, 295 (1982)

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,

    Alan H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1110–1113 (1982)

    work page 1982

  13. [13]

    Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Gener- ation of Perturbations,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Gener- ation of Perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B117, 175–178 (1982)

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,

    James M. Bardeen, Paul J. Steinhardt, and Michael S. Turner, “Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,” Phys. Rev. D28, 679 (1983)

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    Cosmological Per- turbation Theory,

    Hideo Kodama and Misao Sasaki, “Cosmological Per- turbation Theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.78, 1–166 (1984)

    work page 1984

  16. [16]

    Gravitational Instability of the Universe Filled with a Scalar Field,

    Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, “Gravitational Instability of the Universe Filled with a Scalar Field,” JETP Lett. 41, 493–496 (1985)

    work page 1985

  17. [17]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    The Energy Density of Relic Gravity Waves From Inflation,

    Varun Sahni, “The Energy Density of Relic Gravity Waves From Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D42, 453–463 (1990)

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    The Stochastic Gravity Wave Background in Inflationary Universe Models,

    Bruce Allen, “The Stochastic Gravity Wave Background in Inflationary Universe Models,” Phys. Rev. D37, 2078 (1988)

    work page 2078

  21. [21]

    Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

    P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP, Keck), “Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves us- ing Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity Waves and String Inflation

    Eva Silverstein and Alexander Westphal, “Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity Waves and String Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D78, 106003 (2008), arXiv:0803.3085 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    The Powers of Monodromy

    Liam McAllister, Eva Silverstein, Alexander Westphal, and Timm Wrase, “The Powers of Monodromy,” JHEP 6 09, 123 (2014), arXiv:1405.3652 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu- Goldstone bosons,

    Katherine Freese, Joshua A. Frieman, and An- gela V. Olinto, “Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu- Goldstone bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3233–3236 (1990)

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    Natu- ral inflation: Particle physics models, power law spec- tra for large scale structure, and constraints from COBE,

    Fred C. Adams, J. Richard Bond, Katherine Freese, Joshua A. Frieman, and Angela V. Olinto, “Natu- ral inflation: Particle physics models, power law spec- tra for large scale structure, and constraints from COBE,” Phys. Rev. D47, 426–455 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9207245

    work page arXiv 1993

  26. [26]

    Cosmic inflation from broken conformal symme- try,

    Rong-Gen Cai, Yu-Shi Hao, and Shao-Jiang Wang, “Cosmic inflation from broken conformal symme- try,” Commun. Theor. Phys.74, 095401 (2022), arXiv:2110.14718 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    The Unity of Cosmological Attractors

    Mario Galante, Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Diederik Roest, “Unity of Cosmological Inflation At- tractors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 141302 (2015), arXiv:1412.3797 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Starobinsky-like inflation from induced gravity

    Gian F. Giudice and Hyun Min Lee, “Starobinsky-like inflation from induced gravity,” Phys. Lett. B733, 58– 62 (2014), arXiv:1402.2129 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Linking Starobinsky-Type Inflation in no-Scale Supergravity to MSSM

    C. Pallis, “Linking Starobinsky-Type Inflation in no- Scale Supergravity to MSSM,” JCAP04, 024 (2014), [Erratum: JCAP 07, E01 (2017)], arXiv:1312.3623 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Induced-Gravity Inflation in no-Scale Supergravity and Beyond

    C. Pallis, “Induced-Gravity Inflation in no-Scale Su- pergravity and Beyond,” JCAP08, 057 (2014), arXiv:1403.5486 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Reconciling Induced-Gravity Inflation in Supergravity With The Planck 2013 & BICEP2 Results

    C. Pallis, “Reconciling Induced-Gravity Inflation in Su- pergravity With The Planck 2013 & BICEP2 Results,” JCAP10, 058 (2014), arXiv:1407.8522 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    More on Universal Superconformal Attractors

    Renata Kallosh, “More on Universal Superconfor- mal Attractors,” Phys. Rev. D89, 087703 (2014), arXiv:1402.3286 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton

    Fedor L. Bezrukov and Mikhail Shaposhnikov, “The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,” Phys. Lett. B659, 703–706 (2008), arXiv:0710.3755 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation

    Fedor L. Bezrukov, Amaury Magnin, and Mikhail Shaposhnikov, “Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation,” Phys. Lett. B675, 88–92 (2009), arXiv:0812.4950 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation: two loop analysis

    F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, “Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation: Two loop analysis,” JHEP07, 089 (2009), arXiv:0904.1537 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Classical and Quantum Cosmol- ogy of the Starobinsky Inflationary Model,

    Alexander Vilenkin, “Classical and Quantum Cosmol- ogy of the Starobinsky Inflationary Model,” Phys. Rev. D32, 2511 (1985)

    work page 1985

  37. [37]

    Universality Class in Conformal Inflation

    Renata Kallosh and Andrei Linde, “Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,” JCAP07, 002 (2013), arXiv:1306.5220 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    Inflation beyond T-models and primordial B-modes

    Yi-Fu Cai, Jinn-Ouk Gong, and Shi Pi, “Inflation be- yond T-models and primordial B-modes,” Phys. Lett. B 738, 20–24 (2014), arXiv:1404.2560 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    A universal attractor for inflation at strong coupling

    Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Diederik Roest, “Universal Attractor for Inflation at Strong Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 011303 (2014), arXiv:1310.3950 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    Multi-field Conformal Cosmological Attractors

    Renata Kallosh and Andrei Linde, “Multi-field Confor- mal Cosmological Attractors,” JCAP12, 006 (2013), arXiv:1309.2015 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation

    Sergio Ferrara, Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Massimo Porrati, “Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D88, 085038 (2013), arXiv:1307.7696 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Superconformal Inflationary $\alpha$-Attractors

    Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Diederik Roest, “Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,” JHEP11, 198 (2013), arXiv:1311.0472 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    Single-field $\alpha$-attractors

    Andrei Linde, “Single-fieldα-attractors,” JCAP05, 003 (2015), arXiv:1504.00663 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    Thibaut Louis et al. (ACT), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    Erminia Calabrese et al. (ACT), “The Atacama Cos- mology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cos- mological Models,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14454 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Atacama Cosmology Telescope, South Pole Telescope, and Chaotic Inflation,

    Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Diederik Roest, “Atacama Cosmology Telescope, South Pole Telescope, and Chaotic Inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 161001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Dioguardi, A

    Christian Dioguardi, Antonio J. Iovino, and Antonio Racioppi, “Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139664 (2025), arXiv:2504.02809 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Dioguardi and A

    Christian Dioguardi and Alexandros Karam, “Palatini linear attractors are back in action,” Phys. Rev. D111, 123521 (2025), arXiv:2504.12937 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Non-minimal coupling in light of ACT,

    Qing Gao, Yungui Gong, Zhu Yi, and Fengge Zhang, “Nonminimal coupling in light of ACT data,” Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102106 (2025), arXiv:2504.15218 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan grav- ity,

    Minxi He, Muzi Hong, and Kyohei Mukaida, “Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan gravity,” JCAP09, 080 (2025), arXiv:2504.16069 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity ACTive,

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Theodoros Katsoulas, and Kyr- iakos Tamvakis, “Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity ACTive,” JCAP09, 060 (2025), arXiv:2505.03608 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Mohammadi, Q

    Yogesh, Abolhassan Mohammadi, Qiang Wu, and Tao Zhu, “Starobinsky like inflation and EGB Gravity in the light of ACT,” JCAP10, 010 (2025), arXiv:2505.05363 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,

    Andrea Addazi, Yermek Aldabergenov, and Sergei V. Ketov, “Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,” Phys. Lett. B869, 139883 (2025), arXiv:2505.10305 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Kinetically Modified Palatini Inflation Meets ACT Data,

    Constantinos Pallis, “Kinetically modified Palatini in- flation meets ACT data,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139739 (2025), arXiv:2505.23243 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    What new physics can we extract from inflation using the ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 Observations? In: 2025

    Sayantan Choudhury, Gulnur Bauyrzhan, Swapnil Ku- mar Singh, and Koblandy Yerzhanov, “What new physics can we extract from inflation using the ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 Observations?” (2025), arXiv:2506.15407 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Observational constraints on inflationary models with non-minimally derivative coupling by ACT,

    Qing Gao, Yanjiang Qian, Yungui Gong, and Zhu Yi, “Observational constraints on inflationary models with non-minimally derivative coupling by ACT,” JCAP08, 083 (2025), arXiv:2506.18456 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Zahoor, S

    Mehnaz Zahoor, Suhail Khan, and Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat, “Reconciling fractional power potential and EGB gravity in the light of ACT,” JHEAp49, 100458 (2026), arXiv:2507.18684 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Inflation inF(R) gravity models revisited after ACT,

    Sergei V. Ketov, Ekaterina O. Pozdeeva, and Sergey Yu. Vernov, “Inflation inF(R) gravity models revisited after ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2508.08927 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    In- flationary Models with Gauss-Bonnet Coupling in Light of ACT Observations,

    Yigan Zhu, Qing Gao, Yungui Gong, and Zhu Yi, “In- 7 flationary Models with Gauss-Bonnet Coupling in Light of ACT Observations,” (2025), arXiv:2508.09707 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    ACT inflation and its influence on reheating era in Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet gravity,

    Sergei D. Odintsov and Tanmoy Paul, “ACT inflation and its influence on reheating era in Einstein-Gauss- Bonnet gravity,” (2025), arXiv:2508.11377 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    ACT-Era Constraints on Single-Field Inflation in $f(T)$ Teleparallel Gravity

    Feng-Yi Zhang, Rongrong Zhai, and Li-Yang Chen, “ACT-Era Constraints on Single-Field Inflation inf(T) Teleparallel Gravity,” (2025), arXiv:2508.16530 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Strong Gravity Effects onR 2- corrected Single Scalar Field Inflation and Compatibil- ity with the ACT Data,

    V. K. Oikonomou, “Strong Gravity Effects onR 2- corrected Single Scalar Field Inflation and Compatibil- ity with the ACT Data,” (2025), arXiv:2508.17363 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    TheR 2-Higgs inflation:R 3 contribu- tion and preheating after ACT and SPT data,

    Tanmoy Modak, “TheR 2-Higgs inflation:R 3 contribu- tion and preheating after ACT and SPT data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.02979 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Genesis–Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT data,

    Han Gil Choi, Pavel Petrov, and Seong Chan Park, “Genesis–Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.04832 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Power-law F(R) gravity as deformations to Starobinsky inflation in view of ACT,

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Power-law F(R) gravity as deformations to Starobinsky inflation in view of ACT,” Phys. Lett. B870, 139907 (2025), arXiv:2509.06251 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    The implications of inflation for the last ACT

    Zhi-Chong Qiu, Ye-Huang Pang, and Qing-Guo Huang, “The implications of inflation for the last ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2510.18320 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Drees and Y

    Manuel Drees and Yong Xu, “Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT,” Phys. Lett. B867, 139612 (2025), arXiv:2504.20757 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Reheat- ing ACTs on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,

    D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, “Reheating ACTs on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2505.01129 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    ACT DR6 Insights on the Inflationary Attractor models and Reheating,

    Md Riajul Haque, Sourav Pal, and Debarun Paul, “ACT DR6 Insights on the Inflationary Attractor mod- els and Reheating,” (2025), arXiv:2505.01517 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Reconciling Nonminimally Coupled Higgs Inflation with ACT DR6 Observations through Reheating

    Lang Liu, Zhu Yi, and Yungui Gong, “Reconciling Higgs Inflation with ACT Observations through Reheat- ing,” (2025), arXiv:2505.02407 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Im- proved Predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky Inflation and Reheating with ACT DR6 and Primordial Gravitational Waves,

    Md Riajul Haque, Sourav Pal, and Debarun Paul, “Improved predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky inflation and reheating with ACT DR6 and primordial grav- itational waves,” Phys. Lett. B869, 139852 (2025), arXiv:2505.04615 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non Bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single-field slow roll models

    Suvashis Maity, “ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single-field slow roll models,” Phys. Lett. B870, 139913 (2025), arXiv:2505.10534 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs in- flation,

    D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, “ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs in- flation,” Phys. Rev. D112, 023544 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Probing Reheating in a Decaying Oscillatory Infla- tionary Model with Latest ACT Constraints,

    Li-Yang Chen, Rongrong Zha, and Feng-Yi Zhang, “Probing Reheating in a Decaying Oscillatory Infla- tionary Model with Latest ACT Constraints,” (2025), arXiv:2508.16538 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Higgs-Modular Inflation,

    Shuntaro Aoki, Hajime Otsuka, and Ryota Yanagita, “Higgs-modular inflation,” Phys. Rev. D112, 043505 (2025), arXiv:2504.01622 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Has ACT measured ra- diative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Alexandros Karam, Antonio Racioppi, and Martti Raidal, “Has ACT measured ra- diative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?” (2025), arXiv:2504.06002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Byrnes, Marina Cortês, and Andrew R

    Christian T. Byrnes, Marina Cortˆ es, and An- drew R. Liddle, “The curvaton ACTs again,” (2025), arXiv:2505.09682 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    α-attractor inflation modified by GUP in light of ACT observations,

    Hana Heidarian, Milad Solbi, Soma Heydari, and Kay- oomars Karami, “α-attractor inflation modified by GUP in light of ACT observations,” Phys. Lett. B869, 139833 (2025), arXiv:2506.10547 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Higgs pole inflation with loop corrections in light of ACT results

    Jeonghak Han, Hyun Min Lee, and Jun-Ho Song, “Higgs pole inflation with loop corrections in light of ACT results,” (2025), arXiv:2506.21189 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Revisiting Polynomial Hybrid Inflation: Planck and ACT Compatibility via Radiative Correc- tions,

    Waqas Ahmed, Saleh O. Allehabi, and Mansoor Ur Rehman, “Revisiting Polynomial Hybrid Inflation: Planck and ACT Compatibility via Radiative Correc- tions,” (2025), arXiv:2508.01998 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.