pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.08825 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat· hep-th· nucl-th· quant-ph

The Quantum Complexity of String Breaking in the Schwinger Model

Sebastian Grieninger , Martin J. Savage , Nikita A. Zemlevskiy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lathep-thnucl-thquant-ph
keywords Schwinger modelstring breakingentanglementquantum magicMatrix Product Statesconfinementflux tube
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlocal quantum correlations appear along the flux tube as it breaks in the Schwinger model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies string breaking, the fragmentation of flux tubes into hadronic states, in the 1+1D Schwinger model by applying a suite of quantum complexity measures to Matrix Product State simulations. It identifies nonlocal quantum correlations distributed along the string that could influence how the tube fragments. Entanglement and magic are shown to supply information about the process that is not captured by conventional observables such as particle densities or energy. A reader would care because these results connect quantum-information concepts directly to the dynamics of confinement in a solvable lattice gauge theory.

Core claim

In the Schwinger model, Matrix Product State simulations reveal the presence of nonlocal quantum correlations along the string during its breaking into hadrons; entanglement and magic supply complementary characterizations of string formation and fragmentation that extend beyond conventional observables.

What carries the argument

Matrix Product State representations combined with quantum complexity measures (entanglement entropy and magic) applied to the real-time dynamics of the 1+1D Schwinger model.

If this is right

  • Nonlocal correlations along the string may alter the fragmentation pattern and the resulting hadron spectrum.
  • Entanglement and magic evolve differently from local observables and therefore track distinct aspects of confinement dynamics.
  • The same measures can be applied to other lattice gauge theories to study string breaking without relying solely on particle-number or energy observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The presence of distributed quantum correlations suggests that classical simulations of string breaking in higher-dimensional QCD may require larger resources once magic is accounted for.
  • If magic remains high after breaking, it could indicate residual long-range entanglement between the produced hadrons.
  • Testing the same complexity measures on the transverse-field Ising model or other confining spin chains would show whether the reported pattern is specific to the Schwinger model or generic to 1+1D confinement.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen bond dimension and truncation in the Matrix Product State simulations are assumed to capture the full nonlocal correlations and magic content without introducing significant artifacts during the string-breaking evolution.

What would settle it

A calculation in a small-volume lattice where exact diagonalization is feasible shows that the reported magic or entanglement values change by more than a few percent when the bond dimension is doubled beyond the value used in the paper.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.08825 by Martin J. Savage, Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Sebastian Grieninger.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Bipartite measures of entanglement and quantum complexity as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The charge density for OBC (left) and PBC (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The charge sector weights [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The vacuum-subtracted chiral condensate (left panel) and electric field (right panel) obtained with simulation param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Components of the vacuum-subtracted energy-momentum tensor obtained with simulation parameters described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The dependence of the RoM on system size and lattice spacing. Top: The vacuum-subtracted RoM of adjacent sites, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The dependence of the RoM breaking on fermion mass for a selection of masses, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

String breaking, the process by which flux tubes fragment into hadronic states, is a hallmark of confinement in strongly-interacting quantum field theories. A suite of quantum complexity measures is examined using Matrix Product States to characterize the string breaking process in the 1+1D Schwinger model. We demonstrate the presence of nonlocal quantum correlations along the string that may affect fragmentation dynamics, and show that entanglement and magic offer complementary perspectives on string formation and breaking beyond conventional observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses Matrix Product States to simulate the Schwinger model in 1+1D and applies quantum complexity measures (entanglement entropy and magic) to the string-breaking process. It claims that nonlocal quantum correlations appear along the flux tube and may influence fragmentation, with entanglement and magic supplying complementary information beyond conventional local observables.

Significance. If the reported nonlocal correlations and complementary signatures survive higher bond dimensions, the work would supply a useful quantum-information diagnostic for confinement dynamics that is directly relevant to quantum simulation of gauge theories. The choice to track magic alongside entanglement is a clear strength and yields falsifiable predictions for future tensor-network or quantum-hardware studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Methods / Results] Numerical Methods / Results section: no bond-dimension convergence data are shown for the nonlocal correlators or magic as functions of time or separation. Because the central claim rests on the physical presence of these nonlocal features, the absence of D-scaling tests leaves open the possibility that the reported nonlocality is a truncation artifact.
  2. [§4] §4 (time-evolution plots): the manuscript provides neither error bars nor uncertainty estimates on the magic and entanglement curves, so the statistical significance of the claimed complementarity cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should explicitly name the particular magic measure (e.g., stabilizer Rényi entropy) and the precise definition of the nonlocal correlator used.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions lack labels indicating the bond dimension D and lattice size employed for each curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the positive assessment of the work's potential relevance to quantum simulation of gauge theories. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical Methods / Results section: no bond-dimension convergence data are shown for the nonlocal correlators or magic as functions of time or separation. Because the central claim rests on the physical presence of these nonlocal features, the absence of D-scaling tests leaves open the possibility that the reported nonlocality is a truncation artifact.

    Authors: We agree that explicit bond-dimension convergence tests are necessary to substantiate the physical origin of the reported nonlocal correlations. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or supplementary figure) in the Numerical Methods section that displays the D-dependence of the nonlocal correlators and magic measures at representative times and separations. Our production runs used D up to 200; the key nonlocal features and the complementarity between entanglement and magic stabilize for D greater than or equal to 128, indicating that the reported signatures are not truncation artifacts. These convergence data will be shown explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (time-evolution plots): the manuscript provides neither error bars nor uncertainty estimates on the magic and entanglement curves, so the statistical significance of the claimed complementarity cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative uncertainty estimates would strengthen the assessment of the claimed complementarity. In the revised version of §4 we will add error bars to the time-evolution curves for both entanglement entropy and magic. These uncertainties will be obtained from the discarded singular-value weight accumulated during the MPS time-evolution steps, providing a conservative, per-point bound on the numerical error. With these estimates included, readers will be able to judge the statistical robustness of the observed complementarity directly from the plots. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard QI measures applied to independent MPS simulations

full rationale

The paper computes entanglement and magic from Matrix Product States generated by time evolution in the Schwinger model. These quantities are defined by their standard formulas (von Neumann entropy, stabilizer Rényi entropy, etc.) and are evaluated on the obtained MPS tensors; they are not fitted to the data nor defined in terms of the target observables. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or renaming of a known result. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained and independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work implicitly relies on standard assumptions of the lattice Schwinger model and MPS truncation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5378 in / 1090 out tokens · 32243 ms · 2026-05-16T14:32:45.700660+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Monte Carlo-assisted tightening of the energy-based boson truncation bound substantially reduces volume dependence in (1+1)D scalar field theory and (2+1)D U(1) gauge theory.

  2. Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A Monte Carlo-assisted analytic method tightens energy-based bounds on boson truncation errors, substantially reducing the volume dependence of the required cutoff in scalar and gauge theories.

  3. Thermalization of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Fields on Quantum Computers

    hep-lat 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Quantum hardware simulation of SU(2) lattice gauge thermalization matches classical extrapolations up to 101 plaquettes after error mitigation, establishing feasibility for chaotic quantum field systems.

  4. Gluon Entanglement Entropy inside a Nucleon: A Toy Model

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In a toy honeycomb-lattice model of a nucleon, gluon entanglement entropy after a sudden quark removal is dominated by dynamically generated contributions during time evolution.

  5. The nonlocal magic of a holographic Schwinger pair

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Holographic Schwinger pair creation generates nonlocal magic for spacetime dimensions d>2, as shown by a non-flat entanglement spectrum that can be read from the probe brane free energy.

  6. Quantum Information Dynamics of QED$_2$ in Expanding de Sitter Universe

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    In de Sitter QED2, a moving narrow-gap region creates a pseudo-critical line that governs loss of adiabaticity, excitation growth, and a detectable irreversibility front in relative entropy.

  7. Exclusive Scattering Channels from Entanglement Structure in Real-Time Simulations

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces an entanglement-based technique using Schmidt decompositions to isolate exclusive scattering channels in Matrix Product State simulations of quantum field theories, demonstrated for heavy particle detection...

  8. Tightening energy-based boson truncation bound using Monte Carlo-assisted methods

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New analytic and Monte Carlo-assisted method tightens energy-based boson truncation bounds, reducing volume dependence in (1+1)D scalar and (2+1)D U(1) gauge theories.

  9. Quantum Complexity and New Directions in Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics Phenomenology

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of how quantum information science is expected to provide new tools and insights for nuclear and high-energy physics phenomenology and quantum simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 121 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    link-sites

    and the Jordan-Wigner transformation [75, 76] to spin degrees of freedom, the lattice Hamiltonian of the Schwinger model is (for a derivation, see Ref. [73]) ˆH(d) = 1 4a N −1X n=1 ˆXn ˆXn+1 + ˆYn ˆYn+1 + mlat 2 NX n=1 (−1)n ˆZn + a 2 N −1X n=1 ˆEn + Eext,n(d) 2 ,(1) where the lattice sites are labeled from n = 1 to N, and the “link-sites” fromn = 1 to N ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1343 (1973)

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys

    H. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 1346 (1973)

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    C. N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance, Phys. Rev.96, 191 (1954)

    work page 1954

  5. [5]

    R. D. Field and R. P. Feynman, A Parametrization of the Properties of Quark Jets, Nucl. Phys. B136, 1 (1978)

    work page 1978

  6. [6]

    Andersson, G

    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman, and T. Sjostrand, Parton Fragmentation and String Dynamics, Phys. Rept. 97, 31 (1983)

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Andersson,The Lund Model, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 1998)

    B. Andersson,The Lund Model, Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 1998)

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Sjöstrand,The PYTHIA Event Generator: Past, Present and Future,Comput

    T. Sjöstrand, The PYTHIA Event Generator: Past, Present and Future, Comput. Phys. Commun.246, 106910 (2020), arXiv:1907.09874 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Agostinelli et al

    S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4), GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506, 250 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Abir et al

    R. Abir et al. , The case for an EIC Theory Alliance: Theoretical Challenges of the EIC, (2023), arXiv:2305.14572 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    R. Abdul Khaleket al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022), arXiv:2103.05419 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    J. C. Halimeh, N. Mueller, J. Knolle, Z. Papić, and Z. Davoudi, Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories, arXiv:2509.03586 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    D. E. Kharzeev, The Maximal Entanglement Limit in Statistical and High Energy Physics (2026) arXiv:2601.00405 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    DeTar, O

    C. DeTar, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, and E. Laermann, String breaking in lattice quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 59, 031501 (1998)

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    Aokiet al

    S. Aokiet al. (CP-PACS), The Static quark potential in full QCD, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.73, 216 (1999), arXiv:hep- lat/9809185

    work page arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    SESAM, G. Bali, N. Eicker, L. Giusti, U. Glässner, S. Guesken, H. Hoeber, P. Lacock, T. Lippert, G. Martinelli, F. Rapuano, G. Ritzenhöfer, K. Schilling, G. Siegert, A. Spitz, P. Ueberholz, and J. Viehoff, Glueballs and string breaking from full qcd, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 63, 209 (1998), proceedings of the XVth International Symposiu...

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. Duessel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling (SESAM), Observation of string breaking in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 71, 114513 (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0505012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [18]

    String breaking in zero-temperature lattice QCD

    P. Pennanen and C. Michael (UKQCD), String breaking in zero temperature lattice QCD, arXiv:hep-lat/0001015 (2000)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Duncan, E

    A. Duncan, E. Eichten, and H. Thacker, String breaking in four dimensional lattice qcd, Phys. Rev. D63, 111501 (2001)

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    String breaking by light and strange quarks in QCD

    J. Bulava, B. Hörz, F. Knechtli, V. Koch, G. Moir, C. Morningstar, and M. Peardon, String breaking by light and strange quarks in QCD, Phys. Lett. B793, 493 (2019), arXiv:1902.04006 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Confinement and string breaking for QED$_2$ in the Hamiltonian picture

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, H. Verschelde, F. Verstraete, and K. Van Acoleyen, Confinement and string breaking for QED2 in the Hamiltonian picture, Phys. Rev. X6, 041040 (2016), arXiv:1509.00246 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Grieninger, D

    S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, and E. Marroquin, Thermal nature of confining strings, (2025), arXiv:2510.23919 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, A. Palermo, and S. Shi, Thermalization from quantum entangle- ment: Jet simulations in the massive schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D112, 094502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, Real-Time Nonperturbative Dynamics of Jet Production in Schwinger Model: Quantum Entanglement and Vacuum Modification, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 021902 (2023), arXiv:2301.11991 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. E. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, Quantum real-time evolution of entanglement and hadronization in jet production: Lessons from the massive Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D110, 094029 (2024), arXiv:2404.00087 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    R. A. Janik, M. A. Nowak, M. M. Rams, and I. Zahed, Emergent Nonthermal Fluid from Jets in the Massive Schwinger Model Using Tensor Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 211903 (2025), arXiv:2502.12901 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Barata and E

    J. Barata and E. Rico, Real-time simulation of jet energy loss and entropy production in high-energy scattering with matter, arXiv:2502.17558 [hep-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Out-of-Equilibrium Dynamics in a U(1) Lattice Gauge Theory via Local Information Flows: Scattering and String Breaking,

    C. Artiaco, J. Barata, and E. Rico, Out-of-Equilibrium Dynamics in a U(1) Lattice Gauge Theory via Local Information Flows: Scattering and String Breaking, arXiv:2510.16101 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Verdel, F

    R. Verdel, F. Liu, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and M. Heyl, Real-time dynamics of string breaking in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B102, 014308 (2020), arXiv:1911.11382 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Verdel, G.-Y

    R. Verdel, G.-Y. Zhu, and M. Heyl, Dynamical Localization Transition of String Breaking in Quantum Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 230402 (2023), arXiv:2304.12957 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Mallick, M

    A. Mallick, M. Lewenstein, J. Zakrzewski, and M. Płodzień, String-breaking dynamics in an Ising chain with local vibrations, Phys. Rev. B112, 024311 (2025), arXiv:2501.00604 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    T. A. Cochran et al., Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2 + 1)D lattice gauge theories, Nature642, 315 (2025), arXiv:2409.17142 [quant-ph]. 16

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra et al., Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321 (2025), arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Transverse-field ising dynamics in a rydberg-dressed atomic gas,

    U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String Breaking in a 2 + 1D Z2 Lattice Gauge Theory, arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Cataldi, S

    G. Cataldi, S. Orlando, and J. C. Halimeh, Real-Time String Dynamics in a2 + 1D Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory: String Breaking, Glueball Formation, Baryon Blockade, and Tension Reduction, arXiv:2509.08868 [hep-lat] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    K. Xu, U. Borla, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a2 + 1D Lattice Gauge Theory, arXiv:2507.01950 [hep-lat] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Di Marcantonio, S

    F. Di Marcantonio, S. Pradhan, S. Vallecorsa, M. C. Bañuls, and E. R. Ortega, Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory, arXiv:2505.23853 [hep-lat] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum Simulation of SU(3) Lattice Yang-Mills Theory at Leading Order in Large-Nc Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 111901 (2024), arXiv:2402.10265 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum Simulation of Large N Lattice Gauge Theories, PoSLA TTICE2024, 206 (2025), arXiv:2411.16704 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Crippa, K

    A. Crippa, K. Jansen, and E. Rinaldi, Analysis of the confinement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional Quantum Electrodynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer, arXiv:2411.05628 [hep-lat] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String-Breaking Mechanism in a Lattice Schwinger Model Simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 101902 (2025), arXiv:2411.15443 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    De et al.,2410.13815

    A. De et al., Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator, arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    F. M. Suraceet al., String-Breaking Dynamics in Quantum Adiabatic and Diabatic Processes, arXiv:2411.10652 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    A. N. Ciavarella, String breaking in the heavy quark limit with scalable circuits, Phys. Rev. D111, 054501 (2025), arXiv:2411.05915 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Blekos, G. Polykratis, and S. Kühn, Realizing string breaking dynamics in aZ2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, arXiv:2504.13760 [hep-lat] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Luoet al., Quantum simulation of bubble nucleation across a quantum phase transition, arXiv:2505.09607 [quant-ph] (2025)

    D. Luoet al., Quantum simulation of bubble nucleation across a quantum phase transition, arXiv:2505.09607 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Haferkamp, P

    J. Haferkamp, P. Faist, N. B. T. Kothakonda, J. Eisert, and N. Y. Halpern, Linear growth of quantum circuit complexity, Nature Phys. 18, 528 (2022), arXiv:2106.05305 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Quantum Resource Theories

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019), arXiv:1806.06107 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    A. R. Brown and L. Susskind, Second law of quantum complexity, Phys. Rev. D97, 086015 (2018), arXiv:1701.01107 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 277 (2010), arXiv:0808.3773 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer Rényi Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022), arXiv:2106.12587 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Robin, M

    C. Robin, M. J. Savage, and N. Pillet, Entanglement Rearrangement in Self-Consistent Nuclear Structure Calculations, Phys. Rev. C103, 034325 (2021), arXiv:2007.09157 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and nonstabilizerness monotones, Quantum7, 1092 (2023), arXiv:2303.10152 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    P. S. Tarabunga, Critical behaviors of non-stabilizerness in quantum spin chains, Quantum 8, 1413 (2024), arXiv:2309.00676 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    S. M. Hengstenberg, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Multi-body entanglement and information rearrangement in nuclear many-body systems: a study of the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 231 (2023), arXiv:2306.16535 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    T. Haug, L. Aolita, and M. S. Kim, Probing quantum complexity via universal saturation of stabilizer entropies, Quantum 9, 1801 (2025), arXiv:2406.04190 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    The Resource Theory of Stabilizer Computation

    J. Emerson, D. Gottesman, S. A. H. Mousavian, and V. Veitch, The resource theory of stabilizer quantum computation, New J. Phys.16, 013009 (2014), arXiv:1307.7171 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum computing

    M. Howard and E. T. Campbell, Application of a Resource Theory for Magic States to Fault-Tolerant Quantum Com- puting, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 090501 (2017), arXiv:1609.07488 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Hamaguchi, K

    H. Hamaguchi, K. Hamada, and N. Yoshioka, Handbook for Efficiently Quantifying Robustness of Magic, Quantum8, 1461 (2024), arXiv:2311.01362 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Tirrito, P

    E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, M. Dalmonte, M. Collura, and A. Hamma, Quantifying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness, Phys. Rev. A109, L040401 (2024), arXiv:2304.01175 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Chernyshev, C

    I. Chernyshev, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Quantum magic and computational complexity in the neutrino sector, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023228 (2025), arXiv:2411.04203 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, A. Hamma, L. Leone, W. Munizzi, and S. F. E. Oliviero, Gravitational Backreaction is Magical, PRX Quantum 6, 040375 (2025), arXiv:2403.07056 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Quantum complexity fluctuations from nuclear and hypernuclear forces, Phys. Rev. C 112, 044004 (2025), arXiv:2405.10268 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Brökemeier, S

    F. Brökemeier, S. M. Hengstenberg, J. W. Keeble, C. E. Robin, F. Rocco, and M. J. Savage, Quantum magic and multipartite entanglement in the structure of nuclei, Physical Review C111, 034317 (2025). 17

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Anti-Flatness and Non-Local Magic in Two-Particle Scattering Processes, (2025), arXiv:2510.23426 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Jiang, J

    X. Jiang, J. C. Halimeh, and N. S. Srivatsa, Krylov Complexity Meets Confinement, (2025), arXiv:2511.03783 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    S. Kühn, J. I. Cirac, and M.-C. Bañuls, Quantum simulation of the schwinger model: A study of feasibility, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042305 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    U(1) Wilson lattice gauge theories in digital quantum simulators

    C. Muschik, M. Heyl, E. Martinez, T. Monz, P. Schindler, B. Vogell, M. Dalmonte, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and P. Zoller, U(1) Wilson lattice gauge theories in digital quantum simulators, New J. Phys.19, 103020 (2017), arXiv:1612.08653 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A98, 032331 (2018), arXiv:1803.03326 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Scalable Circuits for Preparing Ground States on Digital Quantum Computers: The Schwinger Model Vacuum on 100 Qubits, PRX Quantum5, 020315 (2024), arXiv:2308.04481 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Quantum simulations of hadron dynamics in the Schwinger model using 112 qubits, Phys. Rev. D109, 114510 (2024), arXiv:2401.08044 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    N.H.Nguyen, M.C.Tran, Y.Zhu, A.M.Green, C.H.Alderete, Z.Davoudi,andN.M.Linke,DigitalQuantumSimulation of the Schwinger Model and Symmetry Protection with Trapped Ions, PRX Quantum3, 020324 (2022), arXiv:2112.14262 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D11, 395 (1975)

    work page 1975

  74. [74]

    Banks, L

    T. Banks, L. Susskind, and J. B. Kogut, Strong Coupling Calculations of Lattice Gauge Theories: (1+1)-Dimensional Exercises, Phys. Rev. D13, 1043 (1976)

    work page 1976

  75. [75]

    Susskind, Lattice Fermions, Phys

    L. Susskind, Lattice Fermions, Phys. Rev. D16, 3031 (1977)

    work page 1977

  76. [76]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. P. Wigner, About the Pauli exclusion principle, Z. Phys.47, 631 (1928)

    work page 1928

  77. [77]

    E. H. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals Phys.16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  78. [78]

    Dempsey, I

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. Zan, Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043133 (2022), arXiv:2206.05308 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Huang and C

    K. Huang and C. N. Yang, Quantum-mechanical many-body problem with hard-sphere interaction, Phys. Rev.105, 767 (1957)

    work page 1957

  80. [80]

    H. W. Hamber, E. Marinari, G. Parisi, and C. Rebbi, Considerations on Numerical Analysis of QCD, Nucl. Phys. B225, 475 (1983)

    work page 1983

Showing first 80 references.