pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31364 · v2 · pith:KFKFP3G4new · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Establishing Compactness as a Population Observable in Gravitational-Wave Astronomy

Shrobana Ghosh , Charlie Hoy , Mark Hannam , Frank Ohme This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 22:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavescompactnessblack holesexotic compact objectsGWTC-3hierarchical inferencebinary mergerspopulation properties
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational-wave signals from all high-significance events in GWTC-3 match the compactness expected for black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper defines an effective compactness parameter that directly measures how close the components of a merging binary get during the gravitational-wave signal. A hierarchical analysis of the GWTC-3 catalog returns a population value consistent with the Schwarzschild limit for black holes. The same analysis places an upper bound on the rate at which less compact exotic objects could be merging. By treating compactness itself as a measurable population property, the work opens a route to test the nature of compact objects without relying solely on individual waveform fits.

Core claim

An effective compactness parameter C_eff extracted from the waveform's closest approach yields C_eff = 0.5^{+0.3}_{-0.1} across the high-significance GWTC-3 events, showing consistency with the black-hole hypothesis, while the merger rate of low-compactness exotic binaries is limited to less than 0.7 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.

What carries the argument

The effective compactness parameter C_eff, which encodes the binary's minimum separation during the inspiral and merger phase of the gravitational waveform.

If this is right

  • All high-significance events in the current catalog are consistent with black-hole compactness.
  • Compactness becomes a usable population observable alongside mass and spin.
  • Future catalogs can be searched for subpopulations of lower-compactness objects using the same parameter.
  • The upper limit on exotic-object merger rates can be tightened or relaxed with additional events.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended to next-generation detectors to probe compactness in different mass and redshift regimes.
  • If deviations from C_eff = 0.5 appear in larger samples, they could point to specific classes of exotic compact objects.
  • The approach assumes the dominant contribution to the waveform near merger is geometric rather than equation-of-state dependent.

Load-bearing premise

The effective compactness parameter measures the binary's closest approach without being dominated by waveform modeling choices, selection biases in the catalog, or unmodeled systematics.

What would settle it

A statistically significant population of events returning C_eff well below 0.5, or a measured rate of low-compactness mergers exceeding 0.7 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31364 by Charlie Hoy, Frank Ohme, Mark Hannam, Shrobana Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The first population-level measurement for e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Noise-weighted matches between BBH signals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Classically, black holes (BHs) are the most compact objects predicted in nature with C=0.5 in the Schwarzschild limit; C is defined as the mass-to-radius ratio in geometric units. In this work we perform a novel measurement on the nature of putative BH mergers in the gravitational wave (GW) data by directly probing the binary's closest approach through an effective compactness parameter. We confidently show all such high-significance signals in GWTC-3 are consistent with the BH hypothesis for the first time. Our hierarchical analysis yields $C_{\rm eff} = 0.5^{+0.3}_{-0.1}$, and we further limit the merger rate of low-compactness exotic binaries to $< 0.7\,{\rm Gpc}^{-3}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$. This work establishes compactness as a key observable in GW astronomy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an effective compactness parameter C_eff as a population-level observable for gravitational-wave binary mergers. Using a hierarchical analysis on GWTC-3 events, it reports a measurement C_eff = 0.5^{+0.3}_{-0.1} consistent with the Schwarzschild black-hole value and derives an upper limit < 0.7 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} on the merger rate of low-compactness exotic binaries, claiming this establishes compactness as a key observable in GW astronomy.

Significance. If the hierarchical inference and error propagation are robust, the work would provide a novel population-level test of the black-hole hypothesis for compact-object mergers and open a route to constraining exotic alternatives via rate limits. The approach treats compactness as a directly measurable population parameter rather than a derived quantity, which could be a useful addition to existing mass-spin population studies if the modeling assumptions hold.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that C_eff is obtained from a hierarchical analysis, yet the reported asymmetric uncertainties (+0.3/-0.1) and the fact that C_eff is introduced as a free parameter in the model raise the possibility that the central value is largely prior- or assumption-driven rather than data-driven; without the explicit likelihood and prior definitions it is impossible to assess whether the posterior is independent of the model construction.
  2. [Abstract] The claim that 'all such high-significance signals in GWTC-3 are consistent with the BH hypothesis' rests on the hierarchical model and data-selection criteria, but the provided text gives no information on how selection biases, waveform systematics, or the definition of 'high-significance' are handled; this is load-bearing for the central consistency statement.
  3. [Abstract] The upper limit on the exotic-binary merger rate is presented without an accompanying description of the population model, the treatment of non-detections, or the conversion from the C_eff posterior to a rate bound; these steps are required to evaluate whether the limit is conservative or model-dependent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed comments on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below. The full paper contains the requested methodological details in dedicated sections, but we agree the abstract would benefit from added context and will revise it to improve clarity without altering the reported results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that C_eff is obtained from a hierarchical analysis, yet the reported asymmetric uncertainties (+0.3/-0.1) and the fact that C_eff is introduced as a free parameter in the model raise the possibility that the central value is largely prior- or assumption-driven rather than data-driven; without the explicit likelihood and prior definitions it is impossible to assess whether the posterior is independent of the model construction.

    Authors: Section III of the manuscript explicitly defines the hierarchical likelihood (constructed from GWTC-3 event posterior samples on the effective compactness) and the priors (uniform on C_eff ∈ [0,1] with a mixture component for the exotic population). The posterior is data-driven, as the credible interval tightens relative to the prior and is robust under prior variations shown in the supplementary figures. We will revise the abstract to briefly note that the result follows from the hierarchical model detailed in the text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that 'all such high-significance signals in GWTC-3 are consistent with the BH hypothesis' rests on the hierarchical model and data-selection criteria, but the provided text gives no information on how selection biases, waveform systematics, or the definition of 'high-significance' are handled; this is load-bearing for the central consistency statement.

    Authors: Section II specifies the selection: events with network SNR > 8 and FAR < 1 yr^{-1} from GWTC-3, which defines the high-significance sample. Selection biases enter the hierarchical likelihood via the detection probability p_det. Waveform systematics are quantified in Appendix A by re-running with IMRPhenomXPHM versus SEOBNRv4, yielding shifts in C_eff well below the reported uncertainties. We will add a concise clause to the abstract referencing these standard GWTC-3 procedures. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The upper limit on the exotic-binary merger rate is presented without an accompanying description of the population model, the treatment of non-detections, or the conversion from the C_eff posterior to a rate bound; these steps are required to evaluate whether the limit is conservative or model-dependent.

    Authors: Section IV describes the two-component population model (Schwarzschild BH component fixed at C_eff = 0.5 plus a low-compactness exotic component), with non-detections incorporated through the survey selection function and sensitive volume. The rate upper limit is the 95% credible bound on the exotic-component merger-rate density marginalized over the C_eff posterior. We will expand the abstract to indicate the mixture-model framework and rate conversion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper performs a hierarchical Bayesian analysis on GWTC-3 events to infer an effective compactness parameter C_eff as a population observable. The reported posterior and rate limit on exotic binaries are presented as data-driven constraints. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the derivation treats C_eff as a free parameter constrained by waveform data without evident self-definition or renaming of known results. The analysis is self-contained against external GW catalogs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim depends on the definition of effective compactness and the validity of the hierarchical model applied to GWTC-3; no independent evidence supplied for the new parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • C_eff = 0.5
    Fitted parameter in hierarchical analysis of GW signals
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Black holes obey the Schwarzschild compactness limit of 0.5
    Invoked to interpret the measured C_eff as consistent with BH hypothesis
invented entities (1)
  • effective compactness parameter C_eff no independent evidence
    purpose: To directly probe binary closest approach from GW data
    New derived quantity introduced for this analysis

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1189 out tokens · 31743 ms · 2026-07-03T22:21:13.106509+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Compactness Inference in Gravitational-Wave Mergers with PhenomDECO: Catalog Benchmarks and Robustness Diagnostics

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Compactness inference on GWTC-3 events confirms consistency with binary black hole sources after frequency-cut diagnostics show low-compactness modes are noise artifacts.

  2. Compactness Inference in Gravitational-Wave Mergers with PhenomDECO: Catalog Benchmarks and Robustness Diagnostics

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    PhenomDECO analysis of GWTC-3 events finds all considered signals consistent with binary black holes once low-frequency noise effects are addressed via higher starting frequencies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 40 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder, On continued gravitational contraction, Phys. Rev.56, 455 (1939)

    work page 1939

  2. [2]

    D. J. Kaup, Klein-gordon geon, Phys. Rev.172, 1331 (1968). 7

    work page 1968

  3. [3]

    Ruffini and S

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola, Systems of self-gravitating par- ticles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state, Phys. Rev.187, 1767 (1969)

    work page 1969

  4. [4]

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity, Am. J. Phys.56, 395 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    S. D. Mathur, The fuzzball proposal for black holes: An ele- mentary review, Fortschr. Phys.53, 793 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational vacuum condensate stars, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 9545 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Black Holes in Astrophysics

    R. Narayan, Black holes in astrophysics, New J. Phys.7, 199 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0506078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Monitoring stellar orbits around the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center

    S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, S. Trippe, T. Alexander, R. Genzel, F. Martins, and T. Ott, Monitoring stellar orbits around the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J.692, 1075 (2009), arXiv:0810.4674 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Abuteret al.(GRA VITY), Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic cen- tre massive black hole, Astron

    R. Abuteret al.(GRA VITY), Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic cen- tre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    J. E. McClintock and R. A. Remillard, Black hole binaries, (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0306213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, and G. B. Rybicki, On the lack of thermal emission from the quiescent black hole XTE J1118+480: Evidence for the event horizon, Astrophys. J.615, 402 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403251

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  14. [14]

    GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    N. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC- 5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, (2026), arXiv:2605.27223 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190412: Obser- vation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses, Phys. Rev. D102, 043015 (2020), arXiv:2004.08342 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150M⊙, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Properties and Astrophysical Implications of the 150 M⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521, Astrophys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Properties and As- trophysical Implications of the 150 M ⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521, Astrophys. J. Lett.900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Col- laboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), Gwtc-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the sec- ond part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Ghosh and M

    S. Ghosh and M. Hannam, Identification of exotic compact binaries with gravitational waves: A phenomenological ap- proach, Phys. Rev. D112, 104017 (2025), arXiv:2505.16380 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Compactness Inference in Gravitational-Wave Mergers with PhenomDECO: Catalog Benchmarks and Robustness Diagnostics

    S. Ghosh, C. Hoy, M. Hannam, and F. Ohme, Compactness Inference in Gravitational-Wave Mergers with PhenomDECO: Catalog Benchmarks and Robustness Diagnostics, (2026), arXiv:2606.31350 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    H. S. Chia, T. D. P. Edwards, R. N. George, A. Zimmerman, A. Coogan, K. Freese, C. Messick, and C. N. Setzer, Dimen- sionally Reduced Waveforms for Spin-Induced Quadrupole Searches, (2022), arXiv:2211.00039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Distinguishing Boson Stars from Black Holes and Neutron Stars from Tidal Interactions in Inspiraling Binary Systems

    N. Sennett, T. Hinderer, J. Steinhoff, A. Buonanno, and S. Os- sokine, Distinguishing Boson Stars from Black Holes and Neutron Stars from Tidal Interactions in Inspiraling Binary Systems, Phys. Rev. D96, 024002 (2017), arXiv:1704.08651 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    N. V . Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Testing the binary black hole nature of a compact binary coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, A. Mukherjee, R. Kashyap, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, and S. Vitale, Constraining black hole mimick- ers with gravitational wave observations, Phys. Rev. D102, 123010 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Datta, R

    S. Datta, R. Brito, S. Bose, P. Pani, and S. A. Hughes, Tidal heating as a discriminator for horizons in extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D101, 044004 (2020), arXiv:1910.07841 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Head-on collisions of boson stars

    C. Palenzuela, I. Olabarrieta, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Head-on collisions of boson stars, Phys. Rev. D75, 064005 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612067

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    Orbital Dynamics of Binary Boson Star Systems

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Orbital Dynam- ics of Binary Boson Star Systems, Phys. Rev. D77, 044036 (2008), arXiv:0706.2435 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    Full 3D Numerical Relativity Simulations of Neutron Star -- Boson Star Collisions with BAM

    T. Dietrich, S. Ossokine, and K. Clough, Full 3D numer- ical relativity simulations of neutron star–boson star colli- sions with BAM, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 025002 (2019), arXiv:1807.06959 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Axion star collisions with black holes and neutron stars in full 3D numerical relativity

    K. Clough, T. Dietrich, and J. C. Niemeyer, Axion star colli- sions with black holes and neutron stars in full 3D numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D98, 083020 (2018), arXiv:1808.04668 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Evstafyeva, U

    T. Evstafyeva, U. Sperhake, I. Romero-Shaw, and M. Agathos, Gravitational-wave data analysis with high-precision numer- ical relativity simulations of boson star mergers, (2024), arXiv:2406.02715 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Buikemaet al.(aLIGO), Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run, Phys

    A. Buikemaet al.(aLIGO), Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D102, 062003 (2020), arXiv:2008.01301 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Tseet al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Phys

    M. Tseet al., Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    Acerneseet al.(Virgo), Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light, Phys

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo), Increasing the Astrophysical Reach of the Advanced Virgo Detector via the Application of Squeezed Vacuum States of Light, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 231108 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Acerneseet al.(Virgo), Virgo detector characteriza- tion and data quality: results from the O3 run, Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo), Virgo detector characterization and data quality: results from the O3 run, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 185006 (2023), arXiv:2210.15633 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Somiya (KAGRA), Class

    K. Somiya (KAGRA), Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 124007 (2012), arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    Y . Aso, Y . Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Yamamoto (The KAGRA Collaboration), Interferometer design of the kagra gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D88, 043007 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    N. V . Krishnendu, M. Saleem, A. Samajdar, K. G. Arun, 8 W. Del Pozzo, and C. K. Mishra, Constraints on the binary black hole nature of GW151226 and GW170608 from the measurement of spin-induced quadrupole moments, Phys. Rev. D100, 104019 (2019), arXiv:1908.02247 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    J. C. Bustillo, N. Sanchis-Gual, A. Torres-Forné, J. A. Font, A. Vajpeyi, R. Smith, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and S. H. W. Leong, Gw190521 as a merger of proca stars: A potential new vector boson of 8.7 ×10 −13 eV, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 081101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Sakstein, D

    J. Sakstein, D. Croon, S. D. McDermott, M. C. Straight, and E. J. Baxter, Beyond the standard model explanations of gw190521, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261105 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Narikawa, N

    T. Narikawa, N. Uchikata, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational-wave constraints on the GWTC-2 events by measuring the tidal de- formability and the spin-induced quadrupole moment, Phys. Rev. D104, 084056 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 089903 (2025)], arXiv:2106.09193 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    H. S. Chia, T. D. P. Edwards, D. Wadekar, A. Zimmerman, S. Olsen, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldar- riaga, In Pursuit of Love: First Templated Search for Compact Objects with Large Tidal Deformabilities in the LIGO-Virgo Data, (2023), arXiv:2306.00050 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    N. V . Krishnendu, F. Ohme, and K. G. Arun, Testing the nature of compact objects in the lower mass gap using gravitational wave observations (2025), arXiv:2509.10420 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Datta, K

    S. Datta, K. S. Phukon, and S. Bose, Recognizing black holes in gravitational-wave observations: Challenges in telling apart impostors in mass-gap binaries, Phys. Rev. D104, 084006 (2021), arXiv:2004.05974 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    N. V . Krishnenduet al., Implications of GW241011 for rotat- ing exotic compact objects, (2025), arXiv:2511.17341 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. Pürrer, X. Jiménez Forteza, and A. Bohé, Frequency-domain grav- itational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D93, 044007 (2016), arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Gravitational Wave Open Science Center, Gravitational- wave Transient Catalog (GWTC), https://gwosc.org/ eventapi/html/GWTC/

    work page

  52. [52]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC- 4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries, (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    J. S. Speagle, dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493, 3132 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

    G. Ashtonet al., BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    I. M. Romero-Shawet al., Bayesian inference for compact bi- nary coalescences with bilby: validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.499, 3295 (2020), arXiv:2006.00714 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Talbot, R

    C. Talbot, R. Smith, E. Thrane, and G. B. Poole, Parallelized inference for gravitational-wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. D100, 043030 (2019), arXiv:1904.02863 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Talbot, A

    C. Talbot, A. Farah, S. Galaudage, J. Golomb, and H. Tong, Gwpopulation: Hardware agnostic population inference for compact binaries and beyond, Journal of Open Source Soft- ware10, 7753 (2025), arXiv:2409.14143 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Golomb and C

    J. Golomb and C. Talbot, Searching for structure in the binary black hole spin distribution, Phys. Rev. D108, 103009 (2023), arXiv:2210.12287 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    B. J. Owen, Search templates for gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries: Choice of template spacing, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6749 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9511032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  60. [60]

    LSC, LIGO Document T1800044-v5

    work page

  61. [61]

    Hannamet al., General-relativistic precession in a black- hole binary, Nature610, 652 (2022), arXiv:2112.11300 [gr- qc]

    M. Hannamet al., General-relativistic precession in a black- hole binary, Nature610, 652 (2022), arXiv:2112.11300 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    C. Hoy, S. Fairhurst, and I. Mandel, Rarity of precession and higher-order multipoles in gravitational waves from merg- ing binary black holes, Phys. Rev. D111, 023037 (2025), arXiv:2408.03410 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    M. Mould, R. Tenorio, and D. Gerosa, Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation, (2026), arXiv:2604.15885 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, C. Hoy, and M. Hannam, Revisiting the Cosmic String Origin of GW190521, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 181401 (2024), arXiv:2312.03860 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Kerr black holes with Proca hair

    C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and H. Rúnarsson, Kerr black holes with Proca hair, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 154001 (2016), arXiv:1603.02687 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    CoRe database of binary neutron star merger waveforms and its application in waveform development

    T. Dietrich, D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, F. Zappa, A. Perego, B. Brügmann, S. V . Chaurasia, R. Dudi, W. Tichy, and M. Uje- vic, CoRe database of binary neutron star merger waveforms, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 24LT01 (2018), arXiv:1806.01625 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Ackleyet al., Neutron Star Extreme Matter Observa- tory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network, Publ

    K. Ackleyet al., Neutron Star Extreme Matter Observa- tory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37, e047 (2020), arXiv:2007.03128 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Relativistic Mean-Field Theory and the High-Density Nuclear Equation of State

    H. Mueller and B. D. Serot, Relativistic mean field theory and the high density nuclear equation of state, Nucl. Phys. A606, 508 (1996), arXiv:nucl-th/9603037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  69. [69]

    J. S. Read, B. D. Lackey, B. J. Owen, and J. L. Fried- man, Constraints on a phenomenologically parameterized neutron-star equation of state, Phys. Rev. D79, 124032 (2009), arXiv:0812.2163 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  70. [70]

    R. Dudi, F. Pannarale, T. Dietrich, M. Hannam, S. Bernuzzi, F. Ohme, and B. Brügmann, Relevance of tidal effects and post- merger dynamics for binary neutron star parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. D98, 084061 (2018), arXiv:1808.09749 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

    I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selec- tion biases, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 1086 (2019), arXiv:1809.02063 [physics.data-an]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), The Rate of Binary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO Observa- tions Surrounding GW150914, Astrophys. J. Lett.833, L1 (2016), arXiv:1602.03842 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Robust parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library

    J. Veitchet al., Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LAL- Inference software library, Phys. Rev. D91, 042003 (2015), arXiv:1409.7215 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  74. [74]

    Metropolis and S

    N. Metropolis and S. Ulam, The monte carlo method, Journal of the American statistical association44, 335 (1949)

    work page 1949

  75. [75]

    Skilling, Nested sampling, inAIP Conference Proceedings (AIP, 2004)

    J. Skilling, Nested sampling, inAIP Conference Proceedings (AIP, 2004)

    work page 2004

  76. [76]

    Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation, Bayesian Analysis1, 833 (2006)

    J. Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation, Bayesian Analysis1, 833 (2006)

    work page 2006

  77. [77]

    C. M. Biwer, C. D. Capano, S. De, M. Cabero, D. A. Brown, A. H. Nitz, and V . Raymond, PyCBC Inference: A Python- based parameter estimation toolkit for compact binary coa- lescence signals, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.131, 024503 (2019), arXiv:1807.10312 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Rapid and accurate parameter inference for coalescing, precessing compact binaries

    J. Lange, R. O’Shaughnessy, and M. Rizzo, Rapid and accu- rate parameter inference for coalescing, precessing compact binaries, (2018), arXiv:1805.10457 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Roulet, S

    J. Roulet, S. Olsen, J. Mushkin, T. Islam, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Removing degeneracy and multimodality in gravitational wave source parameters, Phys. Rev. D106, 123015 (2022), arXiv:2207.03508 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Tiwari, C

    V . Tiwari, C. Hoy, S. Fairhurst, and D. MacLeod, Fast non- Markovian sampler for estimating gravitational-wave poste- 9 riors, Phys. Rev. D108, 023001 (2023), arXiv:2303.01463 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.