The "Red Radio Ring": Ionised and Molecular Gas in a Starburst/Active Galactic Nucleus at z sim 2.55
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:26 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The Red Radio Ring at z=2.55 has a starburst-powered interstellar medium once dust attenuation on the [NII]205 line is accounted for.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The attenuation corrected ratio of L_NII205 / L_IR(8-1000μm) = 2.7 × 10^{-4} is consistent with the dispersion of local and z > 4 SFGs, and the dust SED, CO line SED and L_NII205 line-to-IR luminosity ratio of the RRR is consistent with a starburst-powered ISM.
What carries the argument
The [NII]205 fine-structure line combined with multiple CO transitions and the FIR SED to map co-spatial ionized and molecular phases while applying a uniform dust screen correction.
If this is right
- Dust attenuation corrections must be applied when interpreting FIR fine-structure lines in dusty high-redshift systems.
- The [NII]-derived star-formation rate underestimates the IR-derived rate by a factor of four.
- The molecular gas column density exceeds 10^24 cm^{-2} and the gas-to-dust ratio is 100 under the adopted screen model.
- The object's line and continuum properties align with both local and z>4 star-forming galaxies.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Dust corrections of similar magnitude may be required for other FIR fine-structure lines observed in lensed or infrared-luminous galaxies at comparable redshifts.
- The co-spatiality result could be tested with higher-resolution ALMA data to check whether the phases remain aligned on sub-kiloparsec scales.
- The high inferred column density implies that future observations of additional dense-gas tracers could quantify the fraction of gas available for star formation.
Load-bearing premise
The uniform dust screen approximation used to derive a mean molecular gas column density greater than 10^24 cm^{-2} and a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100.
What would settle it
A spatially resolved map showing the [NII]205 emission offset from the CO emission peaks or a direct measurement of the unattenuated [NII] flux that yields a line-to-IR ratio outside the star-forming galaxy dispersion.
Figures
read the original abstract
We report the detection of the far-infrared (FIR) fine-structure line of singly ionised nitrogen, \Nplusa, within the peak epoch of galaxy assembly, from a strongly lensed galaxy, hereafter ``The Red Radio Ring''; the RRR, at z = 2.55. We combine new observations of the ground-state and mid-J transitions of CO (J$_{\rm up} =$ 1,5,8), and the FIR spectral energy distribution (SED), to explore the multi-phase interstellar medium (ISM) properties of the RRR. All line profiles suggest that the HII regions, traced by \Nplusa, and the (diffuse and dense) molecular gas, traced by the CO, are co-spatial when averaged over kpc-sized regions. Using its mid-IR-to-millimetre (mm) SED, we derive a non-negligible dust attenuation of the \Nplusa line emission. Assuming a uniform dust screen approximation results a mean molecular gas column density $> 10^{24}$\, cm$^{-2}$, with a molecular gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100. It is clear that dust attenuation corrections should be accounted for when studying FIR fine-structure lines in such systems. The attenuation corrected ratio of $L_{\rm NII205} / L_{\rm IR(8-1000\mu m)} = 2.7 \times 10^{-4}$ is consistent with the dispersion of local and $z >$ 4 SFGs. We find that the lower-limit, \Nplusa -based star-formation rate (SFR) is less than the IR-derived SFR by a factor of four. Finally, the dust SED, CO line SED and $L_{\rm NII205}$ line-to-IR luminosity ratio of the RRR is consistent with a starburst-powered ISM.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports the detection of the [N II] 205 μm fine-structure line in the strongly lensed 'Red Radio Ring' galaxy at z = 2.55. It combines new CO (J_up = 1, 5, 8) observations and the mid-IR to mm SED to argue that H II regions (traced by [N II]) and molecular gas (traced by CO) are co-spatial on kpc scales, derives a molecular gas column density > 10^{24} cm^{-2} and gas-to-dust ratio of 100 under a uniform dust screen, and concludes that the attenuation-corrected L_[N II]205 / L_IR(8-1000 μm) = 2.7 × 10^{-4} is consistent with local and z > 4 star-forming galaxies, implying a starburst-powered ISM.
Significance. If the uniform-screen attenuation correction is robust, the work demonstrates the importance of accounting for dust attenuation when using FIR fine-structure lines at high redshift and adds a well-observed lensed system to the sample of multi-phase ISM studies. The combination of multiple CO transitions, [N II], and SED fitting provides concrete observational constraints on co-spatiality and luminosity ratios in an extreme z ~ 2.5 object.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract (SED and attenuation paragraph): The headline consistency of the corrected L_NII205 / L_IR = 2.7 × 10^{-4} with the dispersion of local and z > 4 SFGs (and the resulting starburst-powered ISM conclusion) rests on the uniform dust screen model used to derive the attenuation factor, N_H2 > 10^{24} cm^{-2}, and GDR = 100. The manuscript does not test or quantify how a mixed or clumpy dust-gas geometry would alter the effective optical depth at 205 μm and therefore the de-attenuated ratio.
- [Abstract] Abstract: The molecular gas-to-dust mass ratio is listed as a derived quantity of 100, yet it functions as an input assumption within the uniform-screen column-density calculation; the text should clarify whether this value is fixed a priori or independently constrained by the data.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: The reported ratio 2.7 × 10^{-4} is given without uncertainties, which are required to evaluate whether it truly lies within the dispersion of comparison samples.
- [Abstract] Abstract: No error bars, full line flux tables, or SED fit parameters are referenced, making immediate verification of the numerical results difficult.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (SED and attenuation paragraph): The headline consistency of the corrected L_NII205 / L_IR = 2.7 × 10^{-4} with the dispersion of local and z > 4 SFGs (and the resulting starburst-powered ISM conclusion) rests on the uniform dust screen model used to derive the attenuation factor, N_H2 > 10^{24} cm^{-2}, and GDR = 100. The manuscript does not test or quantify how a mixed or clumpy dust-gas geometry would alter the effective optical depth at 205 μm and therefore the de-attenuated ratio.
Authors: We agree that the analysis adopts the uniform dust screen as a simplifying approximation and does not explore alternative mixed or clumpy geometries. This is a standard assumption in the literature for estimating attenuation from SED-derived dust columns when spatially resolved information is limited. In the revised version we will explicitly state the assumption in the abstract and relevant sections, add a brief discussion of how clumpy geometries could reduce the effective optical depth at 205 μm, and note that the quoted attenuation factor and column density are specific to the uniform-screen case. The broader conclusion that dust attenuation must be considered for FIR fine-structure lines at high redshift remains unchanged. revision: partial
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The molecular gas-to-dust mass ratio is listed as a derived quantity of 100, yet it functions as an input assumption within the uniform-screen column-density calculation; the text should clarify whether this value is fixed a priori or independently constrained by the data.
Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the GDR = 100 is an adopted input value, drawn from typical local-galaxy measurements, and is used to convert the dust surface density (inferred from the attenuation) into a molecular gas column density. It is not independently constrained by the present dataset. We will revise the abstract and the corresponding methods paragraph to remove any implication that the ratio is derived and to state clearly that it is an assumed input. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity; derivations are observational and self-contained
full rationale
The paper reports new line detections and SED data for the RRR, applies an explicit uniform dust screen assumption to the observed mid-IR-to-mm SED to derive N_H2 and GDR, computes the attenuation-corrected L_NII205/L_IR ratio from those measurements, and compares the result to independent literature samples of local and z>4 SFGs. No quantity is obtained by fitting a parameter to a data subset and then relabeling it a prediction; the gas-to-dust ratio is output from the SED rather than presupposed; no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the central claim rests upon. The chain therefore remains independent of its own fitted outputs and is externally falsifiable against other galaxies.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- molecular gas-to-dust mass ratio
axioms (1)
- domain assumption uniform dust screen approximation for attenuation correction
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Assuming a uniform dust screen approximation results a mean molecular gas column density >10^24 cm^{-2}, with a molecular gas-to-dust mass ratio of 100... The attenuation corrected ratio of L_NII205 / L_IR(8-1000μm) = 2.7 × 10^{-4} is consistent with the dispersion of local and z > 4 SFGs
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Using its mid-IR-to-millimetre (mm) SED, we derive a non-negligible dust attenuation... dust emissivity index β=2.0... dust temperature Td=55 K
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...
-
[2]
Alaghband-Zadeh S., Banerji M., Hewett P. C., McMahon R. G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016MNRAS.459..999A 459, 999
-
[3]
Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5
-
[4]
Baron D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.480.3993B 480, 3993
-
[5]
Bennett C. L., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174761 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1994ApJ...434..587B 434, 587
-
[6]
Bennett C. L., Larson D., Weiland J. L., Hinshaw G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/135 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794..135B 794, 135
-
[7]
B \'e thermin M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527739 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A\
-
[8]
Bothwell M. S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts562 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.3047B 429, 3047
-
[9]
Brisbin D., Ferkinhoff C., Nikola T., Parshley S., Stacey G. J., Spoon H., Hailey-Dunsheath S., Verma A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJ...799...13B 799, 13
-
[10]
Brott I., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011A&A...530A.115B 530, A115
-
[11]
Ca \ n ameras R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425128 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A\
-
[12]
Calzetti D., Armus L., Bohlin R. C., Kinney A. L., Koornneef J., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308692 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C 533, 682
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000
-
[13]
Calzetti D., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/520082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2007ApJ...666..870C 666, 870
-
[14]
Carilli C. L., Walter F., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140953 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA\
-
[15]
Casey C. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/139 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761..139C 761, 139
-
[16]
Chen C.-C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa863a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...846..108C 846, 108
-
[17]
Cicone C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322464 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014A&A...562A..21C 562, A21
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322464 2014
-
[18]
Cicone C., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424980 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015A&A...574A..14C 574, A14
-
[19]
Cicone C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad32a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...863..143C 863, 143
-
[20]
Colgan S. W. J., Haas M. R., Erickson E. F., Rubin R. H., Simpson J. P., Russell R. W., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172991 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1993ApJ...413..237C 413, 237
-
[21]
Combes F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118750 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A\
-
[22]
Cormier D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015A&A...578A..53C 578, A53
-
[23]
Cresci G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/2015ApJ...799...82C 799, 82
-
[24]
Crowther P. A., 2007, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2007ARA&A..45..177C 45, 177
-
[25]
D'Agostino J. J., Poetrodjojo H., Ho I. T., Groves B., Kewley L., Madore B. F., Rich J., Seibert M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.479.4907D 479, 4907
-
[26]
Daddi E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425043 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A\
-
[27]
A., Helou G., Contursi A., Silbermann N
Dale D. A., Helou G., Contursi A., Silbermann N. A., Kolhatkar S., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319077 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2001ApJ...549..215D 549, 215
-
[28]
Dalla Vecchia C., Schaye J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13322.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2008MNRAS.387.1431D 387, 1431
-
[29]
Decarli R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...752....2D 752, 2
-
[30]
Decarli R., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2014ApJ...782L..17D 782, L17
-
[31]
D \' az-Santos T., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...774...68D 774, 68
-
[32]
D \' az-Santos T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81d7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...846...32D 846, 32
-
[33]
Dietrich J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.480.3562D 480, 3562
-
[34]
M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1998ApJ...507..615D 507, 615
Downes D., Solomon P. M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1998ApJ...507..615D 507, 615
-
[35]
Ekstr \"o m S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A
-
[36]
Elbaz D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732370 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018A&A...616A.110E 616, A110
-
[37]
Farrah D., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...776...38F 776, 38
-
[38]
Feltre A., Hatziminaoglou E., Fritz J., Franceschini A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21695.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012MNRAS.426..120F 426, 120
-
[39]
Ferkinhoff C., Hailey-Dunsheath S., Nikola T., Parshley S. C., Stacey G. J., Benford D. J., Staguhn J. G., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010ApJ...714L.147F 714, L147
-
[40]
Ferkinhoff C., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/740/1/L29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011ApJ...740L..29F 740, L29
-
[41]
Ferkinhoff C., Brisbin D., Nikola T., Stacey G. J., Sheth K., Hailey-Dunsheath S., Falgarone E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/260 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJ...806..260F 806, 260
-
[42]
A., Spinoglio L., Pereira-Santaella M., Malkan M
Fern \'a ndez-Ontiveros J. A., Spinoglio L., Pereira-Santaella M., Malkan M. A., Andreani P., Dasyra K. M., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016ApJS..226...19F 226, 19
-
[43]
B., 1965, @doi [ ] 10.1086/148317 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965ApJ...142..531F 142, 531
Field G. B., 1965, @doi [ ] 10.1086/148317 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965ApJ...142..531F 142, 531
-
[44]
Fischer J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014676 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010A&A...518L..41F 518, L41
-
[45]
Fixsen D. J., Bennett C. L., Mather J. C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307962 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...526..207F 526, 207
-
[46]
Frayer D. T., Maddalena R. J., Ivison R. J., Smail I., Blain A. W., Vanden Bout P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac49a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...860...87F 860, 87
-
[47]
Fu H., Jullo E., Cooray A., Bussmann R. S., Ivison R. J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/134 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753..134F 753, 134
-
[48]
Geach J. E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1243 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..502G 452, 502
-
[49]
Geach J. E., Ivison R. J., Dye S., Oteo I., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aae375 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...866L..12G 866, L12
-
[50]
Genzel R., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16969.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.407.2091G 407, 2091
-
[51]
Ginsburg A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853..171G 853, 171
-
[52]
Glikman E., Simmons B., Mailly M., Schawinski K., Urry C. M., Lacy M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJ...806..218G 806, 218
-
[53]
Goldsmith P. F., Y ld z U. A., Langer W. D., Pineda J. L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJ...814..133G 814, 133
-
[54]
Graci \'a -Carpio J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/728/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011ApJ...728L...7G 728, L7
-
[55]
Greene J. E., Zakamska N. L., Ho L. C., Barth A. J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/732/1/9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011ApJ...732....9G 732, 9
-
[56]
G \"u sten R., Nyman L. A ., Schilke P., Menten K., Cesarsky C., Booth R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065420 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2006A&A...454L..13G 454, L13
-
[57]
Hailey-Dunsheath S., Nikola T., Stacey G. J., Oberst T. E., Parshley S. C., Bradford C. M., Ade P. A. R., Tucker C. E., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/595840 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...689L.109H 689, L109
-
[58]
Hailey-Dunsheath S., Nikola T., Stacey G. J., Oberst T. E., Parshley S. C., Benford D. J., Staguhn J. G., Tucker C. E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714L.162H 714, L162
-
[59]
Harrington K. C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw614 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.4383H 458, 4383
-
[60]
Harrington K. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3043 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.474.3866H 474, 3866
-
[61]
Helou G., Soifer B. T., Rowan-Robinson M., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184556 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...298L...7H 298, L7
-
[62]
Herrera-Camus R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016ApJ...826..175H 826, 175
-
[63]
Heyminck S., Kasemann C., G \"u sten R., de Lange G., Graf U. U., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2006A&A...454L..21H 454, L21
-
[64]
Hickox R. C., Alexander D. M., 2018, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018ARA&A..56..625H 56, 625
-
[65]
Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Kere s D., 2008, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/524362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2008ApJS..175..356H 175, 356
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/524362 2008
-
[66]
Kamenetzky J., Rangwala N., Glenn J., Maloney P. R., Conley A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/93 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016ApJ...829...93K 829, 93
-
[67]
Kennicutt J. R. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..189K 36, 189
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 1998
-
[68]
Kennicutt R. C., Evans N. J., 2012, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ARA&A..50..531K 50, 531
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 2012
-
[69]
Kirkpatrick A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa911d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...849..111K 849, 111
-
[70]
Klein B., Philipp S. D., Kr \"a mer I., Kasemann C., G \"u sten R., Menten K. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065415 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2006A&A...454L..29K 454, L29
-
[71]
Kruijssen J. M. D., Longmore S. N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1634 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.2598K 435, 2598
-
[72]
Lamarche C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/123 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...836..123L 836, 123
-
[73]
Lamarche C., et al., 2018, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018arXiv180909630L p. arXiv:1809.09630 ( @eprint arXiv 1809.09630 )
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[74]
Leung T. K. D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019ApJ...871...85L 871, 85
-
[75]
Lu N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6476 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..230....1L 230, 1
-
[76]
Lu N., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad3c9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...864...38L 864, 38
-
[77]
Madau and Dickinson, 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA\
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 2014
-
[78]
Maeder A., Meynet G., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2000A&A...361..159M 361, 159
work page 2000
-
[79]
Magdis G. E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2931 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016MNRAS.456.4533M 456, 4533
-
[80]
Magnelli B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322217 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.