Small-scale Cosmic Signatures of Feebly Interacting Massive Particles

Alexis Kassiteridis; Patrick Hager

REVIEW

Small-scale Cosmic Signatures of Feebly Interacting Massive Particles

Patrick Hager, Alexis Kassiteridis

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 23 Sep 2020 · 51 references

Pith's verdict: Good idea, missing derivation: the analytic FIMP distributions and the averaged-mass mapping to Lyman-alpha bounds are both unproven, so the strong small-scale claims outrun the evidence.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 27, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2009.11308 (version 2)

Pith IDFIJDNZG5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationAlexis Kassiteridis, Patrick Hager. "Small-scale Cosmic Signatures of Feebly Interacting Massive Particles." arXiv:2009.11308 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/FIJDNZG5

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Tom, the headline: this paper has a genuinely useful idea—closed-form phase-space distributions for FIMP production through generic dimension-l SM operators—but the two load-bearing steps are not demonstrated: the derivation of Eqs. (2.6) and (2.8) is skipped, and the conversion of a single averaged cutoff mass to Lyman-alpha bounds on thermal WDM is not justified for a non-thermal spectrum. The self-announced need for simulations in Sec. 6 undercuts the abstract's claim that the models 'solidly solve' the small-scale problems.

What is actually new: I think the analytic form for f_l^{2->2} (Eq. 2.8) is not in the earlier numerical treatments [24,25], and the systematic mapping from arbitrary dimension-l operators to the phase-space distribution is a helpful contribution if the derivation is supplied. The paper also does a decent job of collecting the relevant constraints—Lyman-alpha, BBN, cluster, Tremaine-Gunn—and showing that there is a narrow multi-keV window consistent with all of them. The qualitative idea that a FIMP with a warm spectrum and self-interactions could address the small-scale crisis is plausible and consistent with the SIDM literature.

Where it is soft: the central formulas are asserted after 'some algebra and numerics' without an appendix or derivation; a referee cannot check them. More importantly, Eq. (3.7) collapses a momentum-dependent free-streaming suppression into a single number Mfs and then compares that number to thermal WDM bounds. The linear power spectrum is a momentum-weighted superposition of single-momentum modes; Lyman-alpha data constrain the shape of the transfer function, not just one effective mass scale. The authors explicitly concede in Secs. 4.2 and 6 that the exact impact requires simulations that they have not carried out. So the headline result—a mass bound and a 'solid' solution window—rests on a mapping that hasn't been validated. There is also an internal inconsistency: the prototype scalar mass of 3.55 keV (Sec. 5) is below the paper's own strong bound of 5.8 keV from Sec. 4.1; it satisfies the weak bound, but the strong claim is then not coherent. Borrowing the ETHOS-4 tuned model's SIDM cross-sections is fragile because these FIMP models lack the dark acoustic oscillations that are part of that model; the authors note this too.

All that said, I don't think the paper is a waste of time. The ideas are clear, the references are honest, and the limitations are admitted at the end, even if the title and abstract overstate. The right outcome is major revision, not automatic acceptance: derive or put in an appendix the phase-space formulas, replace the single-mass mapping with an actual calculation or a clear validity argument (or, at least, an honest statement that the Lyman-alpha bounds are only indicative), and resolve the 3.55 keV discrepancy. It deserves a serious referee, and I would not desk-reject it.

Referee report

Significance

If the analytic distribution functions were correct and the free-streaming cutoff mapping were justified, the paper would provide a useful way to translate FIMP phase-space production into small-scale structure constraints. The bounds are not internally circular: they rely on external Lyman-α observations and a fixed relic density, and f0 cancels in the normalized cutoff. The paper also makes concrete, falsifiable predictions for DM masses and mediator scales. However, the central tools are asserted without derivation, and the application of thermal-WDM Lyman-α bounds to a non-thermal multi-momentum population is not validated. The advertised conclusion that the models 'solidly solve' the small-scale problems is therefore not supported by the presented evidence.

Major objections (3)

[Section 2, Eqs. (2.6) and (2.8)] The analytic phase-space distribution functions are the foundation of the entire paper, but they are introduced with the phrase 'after some algebra and numerics' and no derivation or numerical validation is provided. A reader cannot check whether these functions actually solve the Boltzmann equation, and all subsequent bounds inherit this uncertainty. At minimum, an appendix with the derivation or a comparison with a numerical Boltzmann solver is needed.
[Section 3.2, Eq. (3.7)] The paper collapses a momentum-dependent, non-thermal free-streaming population into the single number Mfs(µ1) by averaging Mfs(π) with the phase-space distribution. Free-streaming suppression is not governed by a single averaged mass scale: the linear power spectrum is a momentum-weighted superposition of single-momentum modes, and Lyman-α data constrain the shape of the transfer function, not just one mass scale. The paper does not show that the resulting P(k) matches that of a thermal WDM particle with the quoted mass, so the bounds m ≳ 5.8 (3.1) keV in Section 4.1 are not established.
[Sections 4.2 and 6] The paper borrows the ETHOS-4 tuned model's SIDM cross-section targets and the statement that these cross sections solve the small-scale problems, while explicitly conceding that the feeble models do not admit dark acoustic oscillations and that 'further study and simulations are needed.' Since the ETHOS-4 solution relies on the combined effect of the power-spectrum cutoff and dark acoustic damping, applying the same cross-section values to models without dark acoustic oscillations does not demonstrate a solution to the cusp/core, too-big-to-fail, or diversity problems. This is a load-bearing gap for the central 'solidly solves' claim.

Minor objections (4)

[Eq. (2.6)] The symbol π is used both for the comoving momentum and for the numerical constant in the same formula, making Eq. (2.6) very hard to read; a different notation for the comoving momentum should be used.
[Figure 1] The horizontal-axis label in Figure 1 is garbled ('�_�� μ'); the axis label must be typeset correctly, and the figure caption should state which DM mass and production channel are shown.
[Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Preciscely' in Section 1, 'without loss of of generality' in Section 5, and 'selﬁnteracting' in reference [21], which should be corrected.
[Section 3.2, Eq. (3.5)] The passage from Eq. (3.4) to Eq. (3.5) is not shown; in particular, the definition of z2 and the relation to the comoving momentum π1 in Eq. (3.6) need more precise explanation.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

FIMP dark matter from SM sources must weigh more than 5.8 keV

The reading

The paper aims to turn FIMP dark matter, normally thought of as nearly undetectable, into a cosmologically constrained candidate by computing the shape of its momentum distribution. It claims that Standard Model sources produce a quasi-thermal phase-space distribution, $f\propto e^{-\pi}/\sqrt{\pi}$ for 1-to-2 Higgs decay and $f\propto e^{-\pi}\pi^{5-\ell}$ for generic dimension-$\ell$ 2-to-2 operators, which freezes in and then determines how much small-scale structure is washed out by free-streaming. Using this distribution with Lyman-$\alpha$ forest bounds, it derives a lower bound $m\gtrsim 5.8\,(3.1)$ keV on FIMP mass and identifies a narrow multi-keV region where self-interactions are strong enough to solve the dwarf-galaxy problems of $\Lambda$CDM without violating cluster-scale constraints. If correct, weakly coupled dark sectors near the keV scale are not just viable but preferred by cosmic structure observations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the analytic solution $f(\pi,\mu)$ of the Boltzmann equation in comoving-momentum variables, $\pi=p/T$ measured at production temperature $T_1$, with $\mu \equiv \Lambda/T$ the reduced source mass. It carries the argument because all observables, including the relic density, $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$, and especially the free-streaming cut-off mass $M_{\rm fs}$, are obtained by direct integration over this distribution, avoiding numerical phase-space solves. Its late-time limits, $f_0e^{-\pi}/\sqrt{\pi}$ and $f_0e^{-\pi}\pi^{5-\ell}$, are what make the mass bounds and the self-interacting dark matter window concrete; the exponential in $\pi$ is the analytic expression of the free-streaming wipeout of dwarf-scale perturbations.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the phase-space distribution of FIMPs produced from Standard Model fields can be written in closed form, and that this closed form changes the inferred small-scale structure bounds. For 1-to-2 decay of a Higgs boson in local thermal equilibrium, the late-time distribution per mode approaches $f^{1\to2}_{\mathrm{DM}} = f_0 e^{-\pi}/\sqrt{\pi}$; for 2-to-2 annihilation through a dimension-$\ell$ operator before electroweak symmetry breaking it approaches $f_\ell^{2\to2}=f_0 e^{-\pi}\pi^{5-\ell}$, where $\pi$ is the comoving momentum at production. Feeding this distribution through the standard free-streaming cut-off relation gives protohalo masses that are compatible with the observed Lyman-$\alpha$ forest only for $m\gtrsim5.8$ keV (strong bound) or $m\gtrsim3.1$ keV (weak bound) for the 1-to-2 channel, with nearly identical values for the 2-to-2 channel. The paper further claims that within the surviving multi-keV window, self-couplings of order $\lambda\sim10^{-7}$ for a 3.55 keV scalar, or light-mediator fermionic models with mediator masses of order eV, reproduce the tuned cross sections that solve the missing satellite, cusp-core, too-big-to-fail, and diversity problems simultaneously while satisfying cluster-scale upper bounds on $\sigma_T/m$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire mass window rests on treating the standard warm-dark-matter free-streaming cut-off and the Lyman-$\alpha$ bounds, calibrated for a thermal warm dark matter spectrum, as directly applicable to the non-thermal FIMP distribution; the paper notes that the exact dwarf-scale impact requires simulations not performed here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A Standard Model-sourced FIMP of mass around 3.55 keV with a tiny quartic self-coupling yields a free-streaming cut-off near $10^8\,M_\odot$, the scale needed to suppress satellite halos while staying inside the weaker Lyman-$\alpha$ bound.
The derived lower bound $m\gtrsim5.8$ keV means sub-keV FIMP models, including those motivated by the 3.55 keV X-ray line, are inconsistent with the strong Lyman-$\alpha$ bound unless production happens later or through additional portal fields.
For fermionic FIMPs, cluster-scale constraints push the dark force mediator mass to the eV scale for multi-keV dark matter, making sub-weak-scale new physics a concrete prediction of the scenario.
The three-temperature characterization ($T_0$, $T_1$, $T_2$) lets any SM-sourced freeze-in model be mapped to structure observables without solving the full Boltzmann equation numerically.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Replacing the $M_{\rm fs}$ estimate with a full linear Boltzmann computation of the transfer function from $f\propto e^{-\pi}\pi^{5-\ell}$ could shift the 5.8 keV bound by a factor of order one; the paper's coefficient-of-variation argument suggests the shift is modest, but that comparison is not made here.
The same analytic distributions could be applied to late-decay portals or to dark-sector thermalization after freeze-in, extending the method beyond direct Higgs sourcing.
A confirmed identification of the 3.55 keV X-ray line as dark matter decay would sharpen this scenario into a specific particle model, but the paper does not claim that identification.
Because the toy models lack dark acoustic oscillations, the mapping to the tuned dark-sector benchmark is qualitative; a testable extension is to simulate dwarf halos with the explicit $f(\pi)$ and self-interactions to check whether the predicted cored profiles and satellite suppression actually emerge.

Original abstract

Feebly Interacting Massive Particles (FIMPs), if they exist, should be notoriously difficult to detect even indirectly. In order to constrain them, we derive bounds for feeble theories sourced via Standard Model fields by investigating their predicted signatures regarding small-scale structure formation. To achieve this, we obtain an analytic approximation for the phase-space distribution function for a generic dimension $\ell$ scattering operator. As a proof of concept, realizations of such theories are discussed, which provide a viable thermal evolution and are able to solidly solve the enduring small-scale structure challenges appearing in $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,616 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.12 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Feebly Interacting Massive Particles (FIMPs), if they exist, should be notoriously difficult to detect even indirectly. In order to constrain them, we derive bounds for feeble theories sourced via Standard Model fields by investigating their predicted signatures regarding small-scale structure formation. To achieve this, we obtain an analytic approximation for the phase-space distribution function for a generic dimension $\ell$ scattering operator. As a proof of concept, realizations of such theories are discussed, which provide a viable thermal evolution and are able to solidly solve the enduring small-scale structure challenges appearing in $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Feebly Interacting Massive Particles (FIMPs), if they exist, should be notoriously difficult to detect even indirectly.	background 0.99	0.05	0.05	hedged possibility 0.81
s1	In order to constrain them, we derive bounds for feeble theories sourced via Standard Model fields by investigating their predicted signatures regarding small-scale structure formation.	contribution 0.97	0.93	0.13	asserted 0.96
s2	To achieve this, we obtain an analytic approximation for the phase-space distribution function for a generic dimension $\ell$ scattering operator.	method 0.98	0.94	0.04	asserted 0.99
s3	As a proof of concept, realizations of such theories are discussed, which provide a viable thermal evolution and are able to solidly solve the enduring small-scale structure challenges appearing in $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.	result 0.58	0.57	0.59	asserted 0.77

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (51)

[1]

T. Bringmann, H.T. Ihle, J. Kersten and P. Walia,Suppressing structure formation at dwarf galaxy scales and below: late kinetic decoupling as a compelling alternative to warm dark – 15 – matter, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 103529 [1603.04884]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[2]

M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, C. Simpson and A. Jenkins,Dwarf galaxies in CDM and SIDM with baryons: observational probes of the nature of dark matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 444 (2014) 3684 [1405.5216]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[3]

P. Hut and S.D.M. White,CAN A NEUTRINO DOMINATED UNIVERSE BE REJECTED?, Nature 310 (1984) 637

View on Pith 1984
[4]

SDSS collaboration, The 3-D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS, Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 702 [astro-ph/0310725]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[5]

N.A. Bahcall, J.P. Ostriker, S. Perlmutter and P.J. Steinhardt,The Cosmic triangle: Assessing the state of the universe, Science 284 (1999) 1481 [astro-ph/9906463]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[6]

G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[7]

H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev,Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[8]

J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

View on Pith 1983
[9]

H. Goldberg,Constraint on the Photino Mass from Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (1983) 1419

View on Pith 1983
[10]

G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait,Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[11]

S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, 1705.02358

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[12]

A. Borriello and P. Salucci,The Dark matter distribution in disk galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.323 (2001) 285 [astro-ph/0001082]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[13]

J. Zavala, Y.P. Jing, A. Faltenbacher, G. Yepes, Y. Hoﬀman, S. Gottlober et al.,The velocity function in the local environment from LCDM and LWDM constrained simulations, Astrophys. J. 700 (2009) 1779 [0906.0585]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[14]

M.R. Lovell, V. Eke, C.S. Frenk, L. Gao, A. Jenkins, T. Theuns et al.,The Haloes of Bright Satellite Galaxies in a Warm Dark Matter Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.420 (2012) 2318 [1104.2929]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[15]

J. Heeck and D. Teresi,Cold keV dark matter from decays and scatterings, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 035018 [1706.09909]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[16]

S. Boulebnane, J. Heeck, A. Nguyen and D. Teresi,Cold light dark matter in extended seesaw models, JCAP 04 (2018) 006 [1709.07283]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[17]

A. Kamada and K. Yanagi,Constraining FIMP from the structure formation of the Universe: analytic mapping frommW DM, JCAP 11 (2019) 029 [1907.04558]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[18]

V. Iršič et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-α forest data, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 023522 [1702.01764]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[19]

M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, C. Pfrommer, T. Bringmann and K. Sigurdson, ETHOS – an eﬀective theory of structure formation: dark matter physics as a possible explanation of the small-scale CDM problems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.460 (2016) 1399 [1512.05349]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[20]

J.A. Schewtschenko, C.M. Baugh, R.J. Wilkinson, C. Bœhm, S. Pascoli and T. Sawala,Dark matter–radiation interactions: the structure of Milky Way satellite galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461 (2016) 2282 [1512.06774]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[21]

J. McDonald,Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selﬁnteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.88 (2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249]. – 16 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[22]

N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A32 (2017) 1730023 [1706.07442]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[23]

H. Matsui and M. Nojiri,Higgs sector extension of the neutrino minimal standard model with thermal freeze-in production mechanism, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 025045 [1503.01293]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[24]

K.J. Bae, A. Kamada, S.P. Liew and K. Yanagi,Light axinos from freeze-in: production processes, phase space distributions, and Ly-α forest constraints, JCAP 01 (2018) 054 [1707.06418]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[25]

C. Dvorkin, T. Lin and K. Schutz,Making dark matter out of light: freeze-in from plasma eﬀects, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 115009 [1902.08623]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[26]

E. Hardy,Higgs portal dark matter in non-thermal cosmologies, 1804.06783

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[27]

O. Balducci, S. Hofmann and A. Kassiteridis,Cosmic structure formation in a ﬂavoured U(1) dark sector at small scales, 1810.07198

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[28]

O. Balducci, S. Hofmann and A. Kassiteridis,Cosmological Singlet Diagnostics of Neutrinophilic Dark Matter, 1710.09846

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[29]

O. Balducci, S. Hofmann and A. Kassiteridis,Small-scale structure from charged leptophilia, 1812.02182

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[30]

G.K. Karananas and A. Kassiteridis,Small-scale structure from neutron dark decay, JCAP 1809 (2018) 036 [1805.03656]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[31]

XENON collaboration, Observation of Excess Electronic Recoil Events in XENON1T, 2006.09721

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[32]

T. Bringmann and S. Hofmann,Thermal decoupling of WIMPs from ﬁrst principles, JCAP 0704 (2007) 016 [hep-ph/0612238]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[33]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [1502.01589]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[34]

A.M. Green, S. Hofmann and D.J. Schwarz,The First wimpy halos, JCAP 0508 (2005) 003 [astro-ph/0503387]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[35]

S. Hofmann, D.J. Schwarz and H. Stoecker,Damping scales of neutralino cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 083507 [astro-ph/0104173]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[36]

C. Boehm, P. Fayet and R. Schaeﬀer,Constraining dark matter candidates from structure formation, Phys. Lett. B518 (2001) 8 [astro-ph/0012504]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[37]

L.G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann and C. Pfrommer,Is dark matter with long-range interactions a solution to all small-scale problems ofΛ CDM cosmology?, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 231301 [1205.5809]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[38]

J.S. Bullock,Notes on the Missing Satellites Problem, 1009.4505

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[39]

J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yèche, C. Magneville and M. Viel,Lyman-alpha Forests cool Warm Dark Matter, JCAP 1608 (2016) 012 [1512.01981]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[40]

A. Kamada, N. Yoshida, K. Kohri and T. Takahashi,Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Warm Dark Matter models and in models with Long-Lived Charged Massive Particles, JCAP 1303 (2013) 008 [1301.2744]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[41]

L.E. Strigari, M. Kaplinghat and J.S. Bullock,Dark Matter Halos with Cores from Hierarchical Structure Formation, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 061303 [astro-ph/0606281]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[42]

S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 115007 [1302.3898]. – 17 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[43]

O.D. Elbert, J.S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, A.S. Graus and M. Rocha,A Testable Conspiracy: Simulating Baryonic Eﬀects on Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J. 853 (2018) 109 [1609.08626]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[44]

K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, T. Bringmann and A. Sokolenko,Constraining self-interacting dark matter with scaling laws of observed halo surface densities, 1712.06602

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[45]

K. Enqvist, K. Kainulainen and V. Semikoz,Neutrino annihilation in hot plasma, Nucl. Phys. B374 (1992) 392

View on Pith 1992
[46]

A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy and D. Iakubovskyi,A Lower bound on the mass of Dark Matter particles, JCAP 0903 (2009) 005 [0808.3902]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[47]

R.H. Cyburt, B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive and T.-H. Yeh,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 015004 [1505.01076]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[48]

R.S.L. Hansen and S. Vogl,Thermalizing sterile neutrino dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 251305 [1706.02707]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[49]

A. Merle and M. Totzauer,keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: Basic Concepts and Subtle Features, JCAP 1506 (2015) 011 [1502.01011]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[50]

J. König, A. Merle and M. Totzauer,keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: The Most General Case, JCAP 1611 (2016) 038 [1609.01289]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[51]

E. Bulbul, M. Markevitch, A. Foster, R.K. Smith, M. Loewenstein and S.W. Randall,Detection of An Unidentiﬁed Emission Line in the Stacked X-ray spectrum of Galaxy Clusters, Astrophys. J. 789 (2014) 13 [1402.2301]. – 18 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Related analysis within specific models can be found in Refs. [ref] .

Lower Mass Bounds on FIMP Dark Matter Produced via Freeze-In · Introduction · 0.92

What it cites · 79 sentences without a confident label

Contests 2 papers

In addition, the masses are not free to choose, we demand that $m_V≲m_F$ and, therefore, theories like the minimal scalar sourced sterile neutrinos [ref] are unable to reproduce the SIDM paradigm.

keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: Basic Concepts and Subtle Features · The Parameter Space of Feeble Theories · contest 0.75
In addition, the masses are not free to choose, we demand that $m_V≲m_F$ and, therefore, theories like the minimal scalar sourced sterile neutrinos [ref] are unable to reproduce the SIDM paradigm.

keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: The Most General Case · The Parameter Space of Feeble Theories · contest 0.75

Builds on 2 papers

The treatment of these theories on the level of distribution functions has recently gained some attention [ref] , and we extend this treatment by giving analytical approximations for general dimension-$ℓ$ interactions between the SM and the dark sector.

Light Axinos from Freeze-in: production processes, phase space distributions, and Ly-$\alpha$ forest constraints · Introduction · 0.97
The treatment of these theories on the level of distribution functions has recently gained some attention [ref] , and we extend this treatment by giving analytical approximations for general dimension-$ℓ$ interactions between the SM and the dark sector.

Making dark matter out of light: freeze-in from plasma effects · Introduction · 0.97

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Instead of solving the Boltzmann equation approximately, following the methods discussed in [ref] , we approach the problem in a more accurate way regarding the needs of this work.

Cosmological singlet diagnostics of neutrinophilic dark matter · Large-scale Cosmic Structure · 0.96

Uses data or values from 1 paper

We note that the DM is populated as long as the hot DM bound of 1$%$ [ref] is achieved, namely around $μ=9.1≡μ_1$; this is the proper definition of $t_1$: the time when the DM relic abundance has been populated.

Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters · The General Phase-space Distribution Function · 0.93

Compares with 10 papers

Such values are very close to the ones found in the literature regarding the lowest warm DM mass [ref] .

New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-$\alpha$ forest data · Feeble Theories at Dwarf Scales · 0.85
To the best of our knowledge, our results, and our mass intervals, yield, for the first time, much more concrete predictions about the minimal DM extensions of the SM than found in [ref] ; in a sense, we concentrate more on confronting the small-scale issues of $Λ$CDM rather than the general model building of feeble theories.

Cold light dark matter in extended seesaw models · Introduction · 1.00
To the best of our knowledge, our results, and our mass intervals, yield, for the first time, much more concrete predictions about the minimal DM extensions of the SM than found in [ref] ; in a sense, we concentrate more on confronting the small-scale issues of $Λ$CDM rather than the general model building of feeble theories.

Constraining FIMP from the structure formation of the Universe: analytic mapping from $m_{\mathrm{WDM}}$ · Introduction · 1.00

Cites as support 4 papers

More precisely, the derived protohalo masses alleviate the missing satellite problem and the SIDM cross-sections, together with the cut-off of the linear matter power spectrum, as explained in [ref] , and are able to flatten the cuspy profile and solve the massive subhalos issues of CDM simultaneously, and are compatible with all present constraints at the dwarf and cluster scales.

ETHOS - An Effective Theory of Structure Formation: Dark matter physics as a possible explanation of the small-scale CDM problems · Discussion and Conclusion · 0.97
More precisely, it is suggested by the authors of [ref] , [ref] and [ref] , that an exponential suppression of the linear matter power spectrum at dwarf scales (sub-kpc distances) alleviates the missing satellite problem of $Λ$CDM cosmology.

Is dark matter with long-range interactions a solution to all small-scale problems of \Lambda CDM cosmology? · Feeble Theories at Dwarf Scales · 0.96
More precisely, it is suggested by the authors of [ref] , [ref] and [ref] , that an exponential suppression of the linear matter power spectrum at dwarf scales (sub-kpc distances) alleviates the missing satellite problem of $Λ$CDM cosmology.

Constraining Dark Matter candidates from structure formation · Feeble Theories at Dwarf Scales · 0.96

Cites as background 8 papers

Moreover, within $Λ$CDM, there are four main small-scale problems concerning DM, for a pedagogical introduction see e.g. [ref] .

Suppressing structure formation at dwarf galaxy scales and below: late kinetic decoupling as a compelling alternative to warm dark matter · Introduction · 0.97
We start by reviewing the general assumption in WIMP theories, stated in [ref] and [ref] , that the cold DM modes are in local kinetic equilibrium with some abundant (usually ultra-relativistic) species.

Small-scale structure from charged leptophilia · Efficiency of Momentum Exchange · 0.90
We start by reviewing the general assumption in WIMP theories, stated in [ref] and [ref] , that the cold DM modes are in local kinetic equilibrium with some abundant (usually ultra-relativistic) species.

Cosmic structure formation in a flavoured U$\left(1\right)$ dark sector at small scales · Efficiency of Momentum Exchange · 0.90

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

T. Bringmann, H.T. Ihle, J. Kersten and P. Walia,Suppressing structure formation at dwarf galaxy scales and below: late kinetic decoupling as a compelling alternative to warm dark – 15 – matter, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 103529 [1603.04884]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[2] [2]

M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, C. Simpson and A. Jenkins,Dwarf galaxies in CDM and SIDM with baryons: observational probes of the nature of dark matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 444 (2014) 3684 [1405.5216]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[3] [3]

P. Hut and S.D.M. White,CAN A NEUTRINO DOMINATED UNIVERSE BE REJECTED?, Nature 310 (1984) 637

View on Pith 1984

[4] [4]

SDSS collaboration, The 3-D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS, Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 702 [astro-ph/0310725]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[5] [5]

N.A. Bahcall, J.P. Ostriker, S. Perlmutter and P.J. Steinhardt,The Cosmic triangle: Assessing the state of the universe, Science 284 (1999) 1481 [astro-ph/9906463]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[6] [6]

G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[7] [7]

H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev,Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[8] [8]

J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

View on Pith 1983

[9] [9]

H. Goldberg,Constraint on the Photino Mass from Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (1983) 1419

View on Pith 1983

[10] [10]

G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait,Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[11] [11]

S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, 1705.02358

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[12] [12]

A. Borriello and P. Salucci,The Dark matter distribution in disk galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.323 (2001) 285 [astro-ph/0001082]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[13] [13]

J. Zavala, Y.P. Jing, A. Faltenbacher, G. Yepes, Y. Hoﬀman, S. Gottlober et al.,The velocity function in the local environment from LCDM and LWDM constrained simulations, Astrophys. J. 700 (2009) 1779 [0906.0585]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[14] [14]

M.R. Lovell, V. Eke, C.S. Frenk, L. Gao, A. Jenkins, T. Theuns et al.,The Haloes of Bright Satellite Galaxies in a Warm Dark Matter Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.420 (2012) 2318 [1104.2929]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[15] [15]

J. Heeck and D. Teresi,Cold keV dark matter from decays and scatterings, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 035018 [1706.09909]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[16] [16]

S. Boulebnane, J. Heeck, A. Nguyen and D. Teresi,Cold light dark matter in extended seesaw models, JCAP 04 (2018) 006 [1709.07283]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[17] [17]

A. Kamada and K. Yanagi,Constraining FIMP from the structure formation of the Universe: analytic mapping frommW DM, JCAP 11 (2019) 029 [1907.04558]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[18] [18]

V. Iršič et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman-α forest data, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 023522 [1702.01764]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[19] [19]

M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, C. Pfrommer, T. Bringmann and K. Sigurdson, ETHOS – an eﬀective theory of structure formation: dark matter physics as a possible explanation of the small-scale CDM problems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.460 (2016) 1399 [1512.05349]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[20] [20]

J.A. Schewtschenko, C.M. Baugh, R.J. Wilkinson, C. Bœhm, S. Pascoli and T. Sawala,Dark matter–radiation interactions: the structure of Milky Way satellite galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461 (2016) 2282 [1512.06774]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[21] [21]

J. McDonald,Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selﬁnteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.88 (2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249]. – 16 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[22] [22]

N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A32 (2017) 1730023 [1706.07442]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[23] [23]

H. Matsui and M. Nojiri,Higgs sector extension of the neutrino minimal standard model with thermal freeze-in production mechanism, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 025045 [1503.01293]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[24] [24]

K.J. Bae, A. Kamada, S.P. Liew and K. Yanagi,Light axinos from freeze-in: production processes, phase space distributions, and Ly-α forest constraints, JCAP 01 (2018) 054 [1707.06418]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[25] [25]

C. Dvorkin, T. Lin and K. Schutz,Making dark matter out of light: freeze-in from plasma eﬀects, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 115009 [1902.08623]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[26] [26]

E. Hardy,Higgs portal dark matter in non-thermal cosmologies, 1804.06783

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[27] [27]

O. Balducci, S. Hofmann and A. Kassiteridis,Cosmic structure formation in a ﬂavoured U(1) dark sector at small scales, 1810.07198

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[28] [28]

O. Balducci, S. Hofmann and A. Kassiteridis,Cosmological Singlet Diagnostics of Neutrinophilic Dark Matter, 1710.09846

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[29] [29]

O. Balducci, S. Hofmann and A. Kassiteridis,Small-scale structure from charged leptophilia, 1812.02182

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[30] [30]

G.K. Karananas and A. Kassiteridis,Small-scale structure from neutron dark decay, JCAP 1809 (2018) 036 [1805.03656]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[31] [31]

XENON collaboration, Observation of Excess Electronic Recoil Events in XENON1T, 2006.09721

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[32] [32]

T. Bringmann and S. Hofmann,Thermal decoupling of WIMPs from ﬁrst principles, JCAP 0704 (2007) 016 [hep-ph/0612238]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[33] [33]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [1502.01589]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[34] [34]

A.M. Green, S. Hofmann and D.J. Schwarz,The First wimpy halos, JCAP 0508 (2005) 003 [astro-ph/0503387]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[35] [35]

S. Hofmann, D.J. Schwarz and H. Stoecker,Damping scales of neutralino cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 083507 [astro-ph/0104173]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[36] [36]

C. Boehm, P. Fayet and R. Schaeﬀer,Constraining dark matter candidates from structure formation, Phys. Lett. B518 (2001) 8 [astro-ph/0012504]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[37] [37]

L.G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann and C. Pfrommer,Is dark matter with long-range interactions a solution to all small-scale problems ofΛ CDM cosmology?, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 231301 [1205.5809]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[38] [38]

J.S. Bullock,Notes on the Missing Satellites Problem, 1009.4505

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[39] [39]

J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yèche, C. Magneville and M. Viel,Lyman-alpha Forests cool Warm Dark Matter, JCAP 1608 (2016) 012 [1512.01981]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[40] [40]

A. Kamada, N. Yoshida, K. Kohri and T. Takahashi,Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Warm Dark Matter models and in models with Long-Lived Charged Massive Particles, JCAP 1303 (2013) 008 [1301.2744]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[41] [41]

L.E. Strigari, M. Kaplinghat and J.S. Bullock,Dark Matter Halos with Cores from Hierarchical Structure Formation, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 061303 [astro-ph/0606281]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[42] [42]

S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 115007 [1302.3898]. – 17 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[43] [43]

O.D. Elbert, J.S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, A.S. Graus and M. Rocha,A Testable Conspiracy: Simulating Baryonic Eﬀects on Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J. 853 (2018) 109 [1609.08626]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[44] [44]

K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, T. Bringmann and A. Sokolenko,Constraining self-interacting dark matter with scaling laws of observed halo surface densities, 1712.06602

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[45] [45]

K. Enqvist, K. Kainulainen and V. Semikoz,Neutrino annihilation in hot plasma, Nucl. Phys. B374 (1992) 392

View on Pith 1992

[46] [46]

A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy and D. Iakubovskyi,A Lower bound on the mass of Dark Matter particles, JCAP 0903 (2009) 005 [0808.3902]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[47] [47]

R.H. Cyburt, B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive and T.-H. Yeh,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 015004 [1505.01076]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[48] [48]

R.S.L. Hansen and S. Vogl,Thermalizing sterile neutrino dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 251305 [1706.02707]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[49] [49]

A. Merle and M. Totzauer,keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: Basic Concepts and Subtle Features, JCAP 1506 (2015) 011 [1502.01011]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[50] [50]

J. König, A. Merle and M. Totzauer,keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: The Most General Case, JCAP 1611 (2016) 038 [1609.01289]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[51] [51]

E. Bulbul, M. Markevitch, A. Foster, R.K. Smith, M. Loewenstein and S.W. Randall,Detection of An Unidentiﬁed Emission Line in the Stacked X-ray spectrum of Galaxy Clusters, Astrophys. J. 789 (2014) 13 [1402.2301]. – 18 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014