Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.09425 v3 pith:2OUKUJ36 submitted 2021-04-19 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CV

Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?

classification cs.LG cs.CRcs.CV
keywords distributionsgenerativeproxymodelsrobustadversarialimproverobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While additional training data improves the robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial examples, it presents the challenge of curating a large number of specific real-world samples. We circumvent this challenge by using additional data from proxy distributions learned by advanced generative models. We first seek to formally understand the transfer of robustness from classifiers trained on proxy distributions to the real data distribution. We prove that the difference between the robustness of a classifier on the two distributions is upper bounded by the conditional Wasserstein distance between them. Next we use proxy distributions to significantly improve the performance of adversarial training on five different datasets. For example, we improve robust accuracy by up to 7.5% and 6.7% in $\ell_{\infty}$ and $\ell_2$ threat model over baselines that are not using proxy distributions on the CIFAR-10 dataset. We also improve certified robust accuracy by 7.6% on the CIFAR-10 dataset. We further demonstrate that different generative models bring a disparate improvement in the performance in robust training. We propose a robust discrimination approach to characterize the impact of individual generative models and further provide a deeper understanding of why current state-of-the-art in diffusion-based generative models are a better choice for proxy distribution than generative adversarial networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adversarial Frontiers: Minimum-Norm Attack Ensembles for Robustness Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A greedy, query-budgeted attack-ensemble framework approximates the minimum-perturbation frontier and yields an ε-free defense ranking (DOI).

  2. A Prototypical Signature Approach for Writer-Independent Offline Signature Verification

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Prototypical signatures enable generation of diverse negative samples for writer-independent offline signature verification, improving skilled forgery detection and allowing scalable linear SVM alternatives to RBF models.

  3. Sample-wise Adaptive Weighting for Transfer Consistency in Adversarial Distillation

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    SAAD adaptively weights adversarial training samples by their transferability to the teacher, yielding higher AutoAttack robustness than prior distillation methods on CIFAR and Tiny-ImageNet without extra compute.