Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Detecting Harmful Memes and Their Targets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.00413 v1 pith:2OEGVINE submitted 2021-09-24 cs.CL cs.LGcs.MMcs.SI

Detecting Harmful Memes and Their Targets

classification cs.CL cs.LGcs.MMcs.SI
keywords harmfulmemesmememodelsmultimodalsocialdetectingentities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Among the various modes of communication in social media, the use of Internet memes has emerged as a powerful means to convey political, psychological, and socio-cultural opinions. Although memes are typically humorous in nature, recent days have witnessed a proliferation of harmful memes targeted to abuse various social entities. As most harmful memes are highly satirical and abstruse without appropriate contexts, off-the-shelf multimodal models may not be adequate to understand their underlying semantics. In this work, we propose two novel problem formulations: detecting harmful memes and the social entities that these harmful memes target. To this end, we present HarMeme, the first benchmark dataset, containing 3,544 memes related to COVID-19. Each meme went through a rigorous two-stage annotation process. In the first stage, we labeled a meme as very harmful, partially harmful, or harmless; in the second stage, we further annotated the type of target(s) that each harmful meme points to: individual, organization, community, or society/general public/other. The evaluation results using ten unimodal and multimodal models highlight the importance of using multimodal signals for both tasks. We further discuss the limitations of these models and we argue that more research is needed to address these problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond a Joke: Multi-Angle Reasoning for Detecting and Explaining Harmful Humor in Memes

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    MAR-12 improves humor and hate detection in memes by prompting a VLM through twelve reasoning perspectives, attention-weighting them, and generating explanations from the weighted evidence.

  2. Unpacking Hateful Memes: Presupposed Context and False Claims

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A hateful-meme detector that combines presupposed-context fusion, LLM-based social perception, and cross-modal reference graphs outperforms prior models on three benchmarks and transfers to fake news.

  3. Toxic Memes: A Survey of Computational Perspectives on the Detection and Explanation of Meme Toxicities

    cs.CL 2024-06 accept novelty 6.0

    A PRISMA-based survey of 158 computational works on toxic meme detection introduces a new toxicity taxonomy and a framework linking target, intent, and conveyance tactics while noting trends in LLMs and cross-modal methods.

  4. When Jokes Cross the Line: Analyzing Regular Humor and Dark Humor in YouTube Shorts

    cs.MM 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TwistedHumor dataset shows dark humor in YouTube Shorts clusters around critique, coping, awkwardness and identity with more mixed and toxic audience reactions than regular humor.