REVIEW 4 cited by
The Efficiency Misnomer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Efficiency Misnomer
read the original abstract
Model efficiency is a critical aspect of developing and deploying machine learning models. Inference time and latency directly affect the user experience, and some applications have hard requirements. In addition to inference costs, model training also have direct financial and environmental impacts. Although there are numerous well-established metrics (cost indicators) for measuring model efficiency, researchers and practitioners often assume that these metrics are correlated with each other and report only few of them. In this paper, we thoroughly discuss common cost indicators, their advantages and disadvantages, and how they can contradict each other. We demonstrate how incomplete reporting of cost indicators can lead to partial conclusions and a blurred or incomplete picture of the practical considerations of different models. We further present suggestions to improve reporting of efficiency metrics.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding
Speculative decoding accelerates exact sampling from large autoregressive models by 2-3x on T5-XXL by running smaller approximation models in parallel to propose token sequences that the large model then verifies in b...
-
Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language Models
Empirical benchmarks show distribution similarity between adaptation and pretraining data increases practical privacy leakage in DP-adapted LLMs at fixed theoretical guarantees, with LoRA providing strongest protectio...
-
Accelerating Vision Transformers with Adaptive Patch Sizes
APT adaptively varies patch sizes within a single image to reduce ViT token count, delivering 40-50% throughput gains on large models with no downstream performance loss.
-
Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling
Repeated sampling scales problem coverage log-linearly with sample count, improving SWE-bench Lite performance from 15.9% to 56% using 250 samples.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.