Pith. sign in

REVIEW 18 cited by

Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.13650 v2 pith:2OUI3ZU7 submitted 2022-04-28 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CVstat.ML

Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scale

classification cs.LG cs.CRcs.CVstat.ML
keywords dp-sgdaccuracyclassificationimageprivacyprivatesotatraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal privacy guarantee preventing adversaries with access to a machine learning model from extracting information about individual training points. Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), the most popular DP training method for deep learning, realizes this protection by injecting noise during training. However previous works have found that DP-SGD often leads to a significant degradation in performance on standard image classification benchmarks. Furthermore, some authors have postulated that DP-SGD inherently performs poorly on large models, since the norm of the noise required to preserve privacy is proportional to the model dimension. In contrast, we demonstrate that DP-SGD on over-parameterized models can perform significantly better than previously thought. Combining careful hyper-parameter tuning with simple techniques to ensure signal propagation and improve the convergence rate, we obtain a new SOTA without extra data on CIFAR-10 of 81.4% under (8, 10^{-5})-DP using a 40-layer Wide-ResNet, improving over the previous SOTA of 71.7%. When fine-tuning a pre-trained NFNet-F3, we achieve a remarkable 83.8% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet under (0.5, 8*10^{-7})-DP. Additionally, we also achieve 86.7% top-1 accuracy under (8, 8 \cdot 10^{-7})-DP, which is just 4.3% below the current non-private SOTA for this task. We believe our results are a significant step towards closing the accuracy gap between private and non-private image classification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ContinuousBench: Can Differentially Private Synthetic Text Improve Capabilities?

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ContinuousBench shows non-private synthetic text transfers corpus-specific capabilities while state-of-the-art DP methods fail to do so even at ε=100.

  2. Private and Stable Test-Time Adaptation with Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Differential privacy versions of TTA methods achieve privacy on ImageNet-C with small accuracy cost and can improve stability via clipping in continual settings.

  3. Less Random, More Private: What is the Optimal Subsampling Scheme for DP-SGD?

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Balanced Iteration Subsampling achieves stronger privacy amplification than Poisson subsampling in DP-SGD by eliminating participation variance while keeping uniform marginal participation.

  4. PACZero: PAC-Private Fine-Tuning of Language Models via Sign Quantization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PACZero achieves zero mutual information privacy for LLM fine-tuning via sign-quantized zeroth-order gradients, delivering near-non-private accuracy on SST-2 and SQuAD at I=0.

  5. PACZero: PAC-Private Fine-Tuning of Language Models via Sign Quantization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PACZero achieves zero mutual information privacy in LLM fine-tuning via sign-quantized subset-aggregated ZO gradients, delivering near non-private accuracy on SST-2 at I=0.

  6. FIBER: A Differentially Private Optimizer with Filter-Aware Innovation Bias Correction

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FiBeR adds a closed-form filter-aware correction A(ω)σ_w² to the second-moment term for temporally filtered DP gradients, improving adaptive optimization performance.

  7. DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DPrivBench shows that top LLMs handle basic differential privacy mechanisms but fail on advanced algorithms, exposing gaps in automated DP reasoning.

  8. DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    DPrivBench is a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs on differential privacy reasoning, with results showing good performance on textbook mechanisms but substantial failures on advanced algorithms.

  9. DPQuant: Efficient and Differentially-Private Model Training via Dynamic Quantization Scheduling

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DPQuant uses epoch-wise probabilistic layer rotation and DP loss sensitivity to quantize only a changing subset of layers, reducing accuracy degradation from quantization noise in DP-SGD and delivering up to 2.21x thr...

  10. High-Dimensional Private Linear Regression with Optimal Rates

    stat.ML 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0

    DP-GD achieves minimax optimal non-asymptotic risk O(γ + γ²/ρ²) for well-conditioned high-dimensional data and power-law scaling for ill-conditioned power-law spectra, with the exponent depending on the privacy parameter ρ.

  11. Privacy Leakage via Output Label Space and Differentially Private Continual Learning

    cs.LG 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Identifies output label space as a privacy side-channel in DP continual learning, formalizes DP for CL, and demonstrates two mitigation methods yielding higher accuracy than prior work.

  12. Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descent

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    DP-NGD enables second-order optimization under differential privacy by decoupling curvature estimation onto public data, performing isotropic DP operations in a whitened space, and dynamically clamping curvature eigen...

  13. Private and Stable Test-Time Adaptation with Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Casting Tent, EATA, SAR, DeYO, and COME into DP-TTA via per-sample clipping and Gaussian noise yields adequate privacy on ImageNet-C at modest accuracy and compute cost, with clipping sometimes improving stability.

  14. Cyclic Adaptive Private Synthesis for Sharing Real-World Data in Education

    cs.CY 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CAPS provides an iterative differentially private synthesis method that outperforms one-shot baselines on authentic educational real-world data.

  15. Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD

    cs.LG 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Shuffled DP-SGD requires σ ≥ 1/√(2 ln M) or κ ≥ (1/√8)(1 - 1/√(4π ln M)) to limit adversarial advantage, preventing strong privacy and high utility simultaneously.

  16. Beyond Membership: Limitations of Add/Remove Adjacency in Differential Privacy

    cs.CR 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Add/remove adjacency in DP overstates attribute privacy relative to substitute adjacency; new auditing attacks confirm inconsistency with add/remove reports but consistency with substitute accounting.

  17. Memory-Efficient Differentially Private Training with Gradient Random Projection

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    DP-GRAPE reduces memory in differentially private neural network training by using random Gaussian projections on gradients instead of SVD, achieving comparable privacy-utility tradeoffs to DP-SGD and scaling to 6.7B ...

  18. On Optimal Hyperparameters for Differentially Private Deep Transfer Learning

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Empirical study of DP transfer learning reveals that larger clipping bounds outperform under tight privacy and cumulative DP noise explains batch-size effects better than existing heuristics.