REVIEW 4 cited by
Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks
read the original abstract
The last decade of machine learning has seen drastic increases in scale and capabilities. Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly being deployed in the real world. However, they are difficult to analyze, raising concerns about using them without a rigorous understanding of how they function. Effective tools for interpreting them will be important for building more trustworthy AI by helping to identify problems, fix bugs, and improve basic understanding. In particular, "inner" interpretability techniques, which focus on explaining the internal components of DNNs, are well-suited for developing a mechanistic understanding, guiding manual modifications, and reverse engineering solutions. Much recent work has focused on DNN interpretability, and rapid progress has thus far made a thorough systematization of methods difficult. In this survey, we review over 300 works with a focus on inner interpretability tools. We introduce a taxonomy that classifies methods by what part of the network they help to explain (weights, neurons, subnetworks, or latent representations) and whether they are implemented during (intrinsic) or after (post hoc) training. To our knowledge, we are also the first to survey a number of connections between interpretability research and work in adversarial robustness, continual learning, modularity, network compression, and studying the human visual system. We discuss key challenges and argue that the status quo in interpretability research is largely unproductive. Finally, we highlight the importance of future work that emphasizes diagnostics, debugging, adversaries, and benchmarking in order to make interpretability tools more useful to engineers in practical applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small
GPT-2 small solves indirect object identification via a circuit of 26 attention heads organized into seven functional classes discovered through causal interventions.
-
Weight-Space Physics: Interpretable Hypernetworks for Lattice Quantum Field Theories
A JEPA-based hypernetwork maps lattice field theory couplings to flow-model weights, and the geometry of those weights recovers the phase transition, intrinsic dimension, and Ising critical exponent of 2D scalar field...
-
Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces
A latent mediation framework with sparse autoencoders enables non-additive token-level influence attribution in LLMs by learning orthogonal features and back-propagating attributions.
-
Domain Restriction via Multi SAE Layer Transitions
Multi-layer SAE transitions capture domain-specific signatures that distinguish OOD texts in Gemma-2 models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.