REVIEW 4 cited by
Deep Neural Networks and Brain Alignment: Brain Encoding and Decoding (Survey)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Deep Neural Networks and Brain Alignment: Brain Encoding and Decoding (Survey)
read the original abstract
Can artificial intelligence unlock the secrets of the human brain? How do the inner mechanisms of deep learning models relate to our neural circuits? Is it possible to enhance AI by tapping into the power of brain recordings? These captivating questions lie at the heart of an emerging field at the intersection of neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Our survey dives into this exciting domain, focusing on human brain recording studies and cutting-edge cognitive neuroscience datasets that capture brain activity during natural language processing, visual perception, and auditory experiences. We explore two fundamental approaches: encoding models, which attempt to generate brain activity patterns from sensory inputs; and decoding models, which aim to reconstruct our thoughts and perceptions from neural signals. These techniques not only promise breakthroughs in neurological diagnostics and brain-computer interfaces but also offer a window into the very nature of cognition. In this survey, we first discuss popular representations of language, vision, and speech stimuli, and present a summary of neuroscience datasets. We then review how the recent advances in deep learning transformed this field, by investigating the popular deep learning based encoding and decoding architectures, noting their benefits and limitations across different sensory modalities. From text to images, speech to videos, we investigate how these models capture the brain's response to our complex, multimodal world. While our primary focus is on human studies, we also highlight the crucial role of animal models in advancing our understanding of neural mechanisms. Throughout, we mention the ethical implications of these powerful technologies, addressing concerns about privacy and cognitive liberty. We conclude with a summary and discussion of future trends in this rapidly evolving field.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Coarse-to-fine Hierarchical Architecture with Sequential Mamba for Brain Reconstruction
CHASMBrain uses dual-stream Mamba in a coarse-to-fine hierarchy to predict fMRI from images, reporting 0.429 Pearson correlation and 0.261 MSE on NSD with causal evidence that patch and CLS streams specialize to early...
-
Decoding Alignment without Encoding Alignment: A critique of similarity analysis in neuroscience
Decoding alignment metrics can remain high and unchanged even when encoding manifold topology is causally altered, so they do not imply similar function or computation across neural populations.
-
EEG2Vision: A Multimodal EEG-Based Framework for 2D Visual Reconstruction in Cognitive Neuroscience
EEG2Vision reconstructs images from EEG using diffusion models plus LLM-guided boosting, with reconstruction quality holding up reasonably as electrode count drops from 128 to 24 channels.
-
Expectation and Acoustic Neural Network Representations Enhance Music Identification from Brain Activity
Separating acoustic and expectation ANN representations as teacher targets improves EEG music identification beyond baselines and seed ensembles.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.