REVIEW 6 cited by
Evaluating Spatial Understanding of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Evaluating Spatial Understanding of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities across a variety of tasks. Despite the models only seeing text in training, several recent studies suggest that LLM representations implicitly capture aspects of the underlying grounded concepts. Here, we explore LLM representations of a particularly salient kind of grounded knowledge -- spatial relationships. We design natural-language navigation tasks and evaluate the ability of LLMs, in particular GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and Llama2 series models, to represent and reason about spatial structures. These tasks reveal substantial variability in LLM performance across different spatial structures, including square, hexagonal, and triangular grids, rings, and trees. In extensive error analysis, we find that LLMs' mistakes reflect both spatial and non-spatial factors. These findings suggest that LLMs appear to capture certain aspects of spatial structure implicitly, but room for improvement remains.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
QSTRBench: a New Benchmark to Evaluate the Ability of Language Models to Reason with Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Calculi
QSTRBench is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on compositional reasoning, converse relations, and conceptual neighbourhoods across QSTR calculi including a newly published RCC-22 CN, showing models exceed chance but fa...
-
El Agente Quntur: A research collaborator agent for quantum chemistry
El Agente Quntur is a new multi-agent system that uses reasoning over literature and software documentation to autonomously handle the full workflow of quantum chemistry experiments in ORCA.
-
Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching
RMCT matches the rate of target behaviors like bias-following across input perturbations to reduce sycophancy in LLMs while preserving verbalization of bias cues.
-
Formalizing Latent Thoughts: Four Axioms of Thought Representation in LLMs
Four axioms (Causality, Minimality, Separability, Stability) are formalized for latent thought representations; audits of open LLMs on 23 tasks show none satisfy all four and representations add little beyond input em...
-
Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing
VILASR integrates visual drawing operations with reasoning in LVLMs via cold-start synthetic training, reflective rejection sampling, and reinforcement learning, yielding an 18.4% average gain on spatial reasoning benchmarks.
-
Gemma 3 Technical Report
Gemma 3 introduces multimodal open models with architectural changes for efficient long context, trained via distillation and a new post-training recipe that makes the 4B version competitive with prior 27B models and ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.