Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

CityGPT: Empowering Urban Spatial Cognition of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13948 v2 pith:AK2SCD36 submitted 2024-06-20 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords textitllmsurbanspatialcapabilitiescityinstructionlanguagetasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models(LLMs), with their powerful language generation and reasoning capabilities, have already achieved notable success in many domains, e.g., math and code generation. However, they often fall short when tackling real-life geospatial tasks within urban environments. This limitation stems from a lack of physical world knowledge and relevant data during training. To address this gap, we propose \textit{CityGPT}, a systematic framework designed to enhance LLMs' understanding of urban space and improve their ability to solve the related urban tasks by integrating a city-scale `world model' into the model. Firstly, we construct a diverse instruction tuning dataset, \textit{CityInstruction}, for injecting urban knowledge into LLMs and effectively boosting their spatial reasoning capabilities. Using a combination of \textit{CityInstruction} and open source general instruction data, we introduce a novel and easy-to-use self-weighted fine-tuning method (\textit{SWFT}) to train various LLMs (including ChatGLM3-6B, Llama3-8B, and Qwen2.5-7B) to enhance their urban spatial capabilities without compromising, or even improving, their general abilities. Finally, to validate the effectiveness of our proposed framework, we develop a comprehensive text-based spatial benchmark \textit{CityEval} for evaluating the performance of LLMs across a wide range of urban scenarios and geospatial tasks. Extensive evaluation results demonstrate that smaller LLMs trained with \textit{CityInstruction} by \textit{SWFT} method can achieve performance that is competitive with, and in some cases superior to, proprietary LLMs when assessed using \textit{CityEval}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLMs Learn to Map the World from Local Descriptions?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 0.5B LLM trained on templated local descriptions from a synthetic grid city infers unseen distances and directions, encodes coordinates in its hidden states, and plans shortest paths, but fails under navigation pert...

  2. USTBench: Benchmarking and Dissecting Spatiotemporal Reasoning of LLMs as Urban Agents

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    USTBench is the first benchmark that decomposes urban spatiotemporal reasoning into understanding, forecasting, planning, and reflection, and shows LLMs struggle most with planning and reflection.

  3. Can Urban Blight Be Accessed with Vision-language Models: A Case Study in Detroit

    cs.CV 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Open-source vision-language models with an XGBoost ensemble can assess residential blight from street-view images, but reported performance is inflated by test-set threshold tuning.

  4. Mitigating Geospatial Knowledge Hallucination in Large Language Models: Benchmarking and Dynamic Factuality Aligning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark called GEOHALUBENCH measures how often LLMs invent, omit, or confuse real-world places and relations, and a dynamic-beta KTO method reduces these errors on the benchmark.

  5. Large Language Model Powered Intelligent Urban Agents: Concepts, Capabilities, and Applications

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper defines urban LLM agents, surveys their sensing, memory, reasoning, execution, and learning workflows, and organizes their applications across planning, transportation, environment, safety, and society.

Pith tools