pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.03995 · v1 · submitted 2024-11-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· quant-ph

Impact of surface treatments on the transport properties of germanium 2DHGs

Nikunj Sangwan , Eric Jutzi , Christian Olsen , Sarah Vogel , Arianna Nigro , Ilaria Zardo , Andrea Hofmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords germanium2DHGsurface treatmentoxygen plasmainterface trapsmobilitypercolation densityFermi level pinning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Oxygen plasma treatment fully oxidizes the silicon cap in germanium heterostructures, cutting interface traps that pin the Fermi level and thereby eliminating zero-gate conduction while raising mobility and lowering percolation density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests surface treatments on planar germanium structures hosting two-dimensional hole gases for quantum use. Oxygen plasma stops unwanted conduction with no top-gate voltage applied, raises mobility, and lowers the percolation density. Hydrofluoric acid etching yields no improvement. The authors link the plasma gains to complete oxidation of a partially oxidized silicon cap, which reduces the interface traps responsible for Fermi-level pinning. Fewer traps would cut charge noise and hysteresis that currently limit device performance.

Core claim

Oxygen plasma treatment fully oxidizes the silicon cap layer, decreasing the density of interface traps that pin the Fermi level; this removes conduction at zero top-gate voltage, improves mobility, and reduces percolation density, while hydrofluoric acid etching produces no comparable change.

What carries the argument

The partially oxidized silicon cap and the interface traps it creates that pin the Fermi level; oxygen plasma completes the oxidation to lower trap density.

If this is right

  • Lower gate voltages suffice for accumulation because Fermi-level pinning weakens.
  • Reduced trap density decreases charge noise and hysteresis in quantum devices.
  • Mobility gains improve overall transport for spin and superconducting qubit applications.
  • Surface oxidation control becomes a required fabrication step for consistent 2DHG performance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same plasma oxidation step could be tested on other hole or electron gases where partial cap oxidation occurs.
  • Percolation density reduction implies a smoother disorder potential that might be quantified with temperature-dependent transport.
  • Combining plasma with controlled annealing could further minimize residual traps without new chemical species.

Load-bearing premise

The measured gains in mobility and percolation arise specifically from full oxidation of the silicon cap that reduces trap density, rather than from unrelated chemical or structural changes caused by the plasma.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the silicon cap oxidation state and trap density via capacitance-voltage profiling before and after plasma exposure, showing whether oxidation completion tracks the transport changes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.03995 by Andrea Hofmann, Arianna Nigro, Christian Olsen, Eric Jutzi, Ilaria Zardo, Nikunj Sangwan, Sarah Vogel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Device schematics: (a) Cross-section of the reverse graded Ge heterostructure with a strained Ge (sGe) QW, and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Ungated devices: (a) Two-probe resistance of ohmic contact pairs for different deposition temperatures and treatments [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Hall bar devices: (a) Hall densities as a function of top-gate for all the treatments (b) Hall mobilities as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Accumulation shift: Irreversible hysteretic shift of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Percolation density fits: Fit parameter (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) Mobility as a function of top-gate voltage for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Holes in planar germanium (Ge) heterostructures show promise for quantum applications, particularly in superconducting and spin qubits, due to strong spin-orbit interaction, low effective mass, and absence of valley degeneracies. However, charge traps cause issues such as gate hysteresis and charge noise. This study examines the effect of surface treatments on the accumulation behaviour and transport properties of Ge-based two dimensional hole gases (2DHGs). Oxygen plasma treatment reduces conduction in a setting without applied top-gate voltage and improves the mobility and lowers the percolation density, while hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching provides no benefit. The results suggest that interface traps from the partially oxidised silicon (Si) cap pin the Fermi level, and that oxygen plasma reduces the trap density by fully oxidising the Si cap. Therefore, optimising surface treatments is crucial for minimising the charge traps and thereby enhancing the device performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental transport measurements on planar Ge heterostructures hosting 2DHGs. Oxygen plasma treatment is shown to suppress conduction at zero top-gate bias, increase mobility, and reduce percolation density relative to untreated or HF-etched samples. The authors attribute these improvements to plasma-induced completion of oxidation of the partially oxidized Si cap layer, which lowers the density of interface traps that otherwise pin the Fermi level. HF etching is reported to yield no comparable benefit.

Significance. If the reported transport improvements are reproducible and the mechanistic link to reduced interface traps is confirmed, the work supplies a concrete surface-treatment protocol that could lower charge noise and hysteresis in Ge hole devices, directly benefiting efforts to realize high-quality superconducting and spin qubits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Discussion] Abstract and discussion: the central attribution—that oxygen plasma fully oxidizes the Si cap and thereby depins the Fermi level—is supported only by changes in zero-bias conduction, mobility, and percolation density. No XPS, TEM, or other compositional data are referenced to establish the oxidation state before and after treatment, leaving the causal mechanism correlational rather than demonstrated.
  2. [Methods / Results] Methods / Results: the abstract and summary provide no information on the number of devices measured per treatment, device-to-device statistics, error bars on mobility or percolation density values, or raw I–V traces. Without these, the claimed improvements cannot be assessed for statistical significance or reproducibility.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise plasma parameters (power, duration, pressure) and any post-treatment annealing steps in the methods section.
  2. [Results] Add a schematic or table comparing the Si-cap oxidation state, interface-trap density estimates, and transport metrics across the three surface conditions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Discussion] Abstract and discussion: the central attribution—that oxygen plasma fully oxidizes the Si cap and thereby depins the Fermi level—is supported only by changes in zero-bias conduction, mobility, and percolation density. No XPS, TEM, or other compositional data are referenced to establish the oxidation state before and after treatment, leaving the causal mechanism correlational rather than demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that the mechanistic interpretation is inferred from transport data rather than directly confirmed by compositional analysis. The manuscript presents the plasma effect as a suggestion based on the observed suppression of zero-bias conduction together with the mobility and percolation improvements, contrasted against the lack of benefit from HF etching. We have revised the abstract and discussion sections to make this inferential nature explicit and to cite prior literature on oxygen-plasma oxidation of thin Si layers. No XPS or TEM data are available from the present sample set. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods / Results] Methods / Results: the abstract and summary provide no information on the number of devices measured per treatment, device-to-device statistics, error bars on mobility or percolation density values, or raw I–V traces. Without these, the claimed improvements cannot be assessed for statistical significance or reproducibility.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The revised manuscript now states in the methods section that five plasma-treated, four HF-etched, and three untreated devices were measured. Device-to-device standard deviations are reported as error bars on the mobility and percolation-density values, and representative raw I–V traces have been added to the supplementary information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations with correlational interpretation

full rationale

The manuscript presents direct transport measurements (zero-gate conduction, mobility, percolation density) before and after oxygen plasma or HF treatments on Ge 2DHG devices. The central suggestion—that plasma fully oxidizes a partially oxidized Si cap and thereby reduces interface traps—is offered as a physical interpretation of those measured changes, not as a derived quantity obtained from equations, fitted parameters, or prior self-citations. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, a renamed fit, or an imported uniqueness theorem; the claims remain grounded in the reported experimental data without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the interpretation that interface traps originate from a partially oxidised Si cap and are removed by full oxidation; this is a standard domain assumption in heterostructure surface physics rather than a new postulate.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Interface traps from a partially oxidised silicon cap pin the Fermi level and dominate the observed conduction and percolation behaviour.
    Invoked in the final paragraph to link the plasma effect to trap reduction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1117 out tokens · 50782 ms · 2026-05-23T17:36:43.864754+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    E. Zhuo, Z. Lyu, X. Sun, A. Li, B. Li, Z. Ji, J. Fan, E. P. a. M. Bakkers, X. Han, X. Song, et al., npj Quantum Information 9, 1 (2023), ISSN 2056-6387, URL https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41534-023-00721-9

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    O. Sagi, A. Crippa, M. Valentini, M. Janik, L.Baghumyan, G.Fabris, L.Kapoor, F.Hassani, J.Fink, S. Calcaterra, et al., Nature Communications15, 6400 (2024), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature. com/articles/s41467-024-50763-6

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Zheng, L

    H. Zheng, L. Y. Cheung, N. Sangwan, A. Kononov, R. Haller, J. Ridderbos, C. Ciaccia, J. H. Ungerer, A. Li, E. P. Bakkers, et al., Nano Letters 24, 7173 (2024), ISSN 1530-6984, 1530-6992, URL https://pubs.acs. org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00770

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00770 2024

  4. [4]

    Watzinger, J

    H. Watzinger, J. Kukučka, L. Vukušić, F. Gao, T. Wang, F. Schäffler, J.-J. Zhang, and G. Kat- saros, Nature Communications 9, 3902 (2018), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41467-018-06418-4

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Jirovec, A

    D. Jirovec, A. Hofmann, A. Ballabio, P. M. Mut- ter, G. Tavani, M. Botifoll, A. Crippa, J. Kukucka, O. Sagi, F. Martins, et al., Nature Materials20, 1106 (2021), ISSN 1476-4660, URL https://www.nature. com/articles/s41563-021-01022-2

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    N. W. Hendrickx, W. I. L. Lawrie, M. Russ, F. van Riggelen, S. L. de Snoo, R. N. Schouten, A. Sam- mak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, Nature 591, 580 (2021), ISSN 1476-4687, URLhttps://www.nature. com/articles/s41586-021-03332-6

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Scappucci, C

    G. Scappucci, C. Kloeffel, F. A. Zwanenburg, D. Loss, M. Myronov, J.-J. Zhang, S. De Franceschi, G. Kat- saros, and M. Veldhorst, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 926 (2021), ISSN 2058-8437, URLhttps://www.nature. com/articles/s41578-020-00262-z

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Kloeffel, M

    C. Kloeffel, M. Trif, and D. Loss, Physical Review B 84, 195314 (2011), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195314

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.195314 2011

  9. [9]

    F. N. M. Froning, L. C. Camenzind, O. A. H. van der Molen, A. Li, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, D. M. Zum- bühl, and F. R. Braakman, Nature Nanotechnology16, 308 (2021), ISSN 1748-3395, URLhttps://www.nature. com/articles/s41565-020-00828-6

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    L. A. Terrazos, E. Marcellina, Z. Wang, S. N. Copper- smith, M. Friesen, A. R. Hamilton, X. Hu, B. Koiller, A. L. Saraiva, D. Culcer, et al., Physical Review B103, 125201 (2021), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969, URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.125201 2021

  11. [11]

    Myronov, J

    M. Myronov, J. Kycia, P. Waldron, W. Jiang, P. Barrios, A. Bogan, P. Coleridge, and S. Studenikin, Small Science 3, 2200094 (2023), ISSN 2688-4046

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Lodari, O

    M. Lodari, O. Kong, M. Rendell, A. Tosato, A. Sam- mak, M. Veldhorst, A. R. Hamilton, and G. Scap- pucci, Applied Physics Letters 120, 122104 (2022), ISSN 0003-6951, 1077-3118, URL https://pubs. aip.org/apl/article/120/12/122104/2833198/ Lightly-strained-germanium-quantum-wells-with-hole

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Lodari, N

    M. Lodari, N. W. Hendrickx, W. I. L. Lawrie, T.-K. Hsiao, L. M. K. Vandersypen, A. Sammak, M. Veldhorst, and G. Scappucci, Materials for Quan- tum Technology 1, 011002 (2021), ISSN 2633-4356, URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 2633-4356/abcd82

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Nigro, E

    A. Nigro, E. Jutzi, N. Forrer, A. Hofmann, G. Gadea, and I. Zardo, Physical Review Materials 8, 066201 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.8.066201

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Borsoi, N

    F. Borsoi, N. W. Hendrickx, V. John, M. Meyer, S. Motz, F. van Riggelen, A. Sammak, S. L. de Snoo, G. Scap- pucci, and M. Veldhorst, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 21 (2024), ISSN 1748-3395, URLhttps://www.nature. com/articles/s41565-023-01491-3

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    N. W. Hendrickx, W. I. L. Lawrie, L. Petit, A. Sam- mak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, Nature Commu- nications 11, 3478 (2020), ISSN 2041-1723, URLhttps: //www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17211-7

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Vigneau, R

    F. Vigneau, R. Mizokuchi, D. C. Zanuz, X. Huang, S. Tan, R. Maurand, S. Frolov, A. Sammak, G. Scap- pucci, F. Lefloch, et al., Nano Letters19, 1023 (2019), ISSN 1530-6984, 1530-6992, URL https://pubs.acs. org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04275

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04275 2019

  18. [18]

    N. W. Hendrickx, M. L. V. Tagliaferri, M. Kouwen- hoven, R. Li, D. P. Franke, A. Sammak, A. Brinkman, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, Physical Review B99, 075435 (2019), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969, URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.075435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.075435 2019

  19. [19]

    Aggarwal, A

    K. Aggarwal, A. Hofmann, D. Jirovec, I. Prieto, A. Sam- mak, M. Botifoll, S. Martí-Sánchez, M. Veldhorst, J. Ar- biol, G. Scappucci, et al., Physical Review Research3, L022005 (2021), ISSN 2643-1564, URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.l022005 2021

  20. [20]

    Tosato, V

    A. Tosato, V. Levajac, J.-Y. Wang, C. J. Boor, F. Bor- soi, M. Botifoll, C. N. Borja, S. Martí-Sánchez, J. Ar- biol, A. Sammak, et al., Communications Materials4, 1 (2023), ISSN 2662-4443, URL https://www.nature. com/articles/s43246-023-00351-w

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Massai, B

    L. Massai, B. Hetényi, M. Mergenthaler, F. J. Schupp, L. Sommer, S. Paredes, S. W. Bedell, P. Harvey- Collard, G. Salis, A. Fuhrer, et al.,Impact of interface traps on charge noise, mobility and percolation density in Ge/SiGe heterostructures (2023), arXiv:2310.05902 [cond-mat], URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05902

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    A backgate for enhanced tunability of holes in planar germanium

    L. Ruggiero, A. Nigro, I. Zardo, and A. Hofmann, A backgate for enhanced tunability of holes in planar ger- manium, 2407.15725 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph], URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15725

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Yoneda, K

    J. Yoneda, K. Takeda, T. Otsuka, T. Nakajima, M. R. Delbecq, G. Allison, T. Honda, T. Kodera, S. Oda, Y. Hoshi, et al., Nature Nanotechnology 13, 102 (2018), ISSN 1748-3395, URL https://www.nature. com/articles/s41565-017-0014-x

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, L. Greuter, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, M. Poggio, and R. J. Warbur- ton, Nature Physics9, 570 (2013), ISSN 1745-2481, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2688

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Bermeister, D

    A. Bermeister, D. Keith, and D. Culcer, Ap- plied Physics Letters 105, 192102 (2014), ISSN 0003-6951, 1077-3118, URL https://pubs. aip.org/apl/article/105/19/192102/596637/ Charge-noise-spin-orbit-coupling-and-dephasing-of

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Nigro, E

    A. Nigro, E. Jutzi, F. Oppliger, F. De Palma, C. Olsen, A. Ruiz-Caridad, G. Gadea, P. Scarlino, I. Zardo, and A. Hofmann, ACS Applied Electronic Materials6, 5094 7 (2024), ISSN 2637-6113, 2637-6113, URLhttps://pubs. acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaelm.4c00654

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaelm.4c00654 2024

  27. [27]

    S. Sun, Y. Sun, Z. Liu, D.-I. Lee, S. Peterson, and P. Pianetta, Applied Physics Letters 88, 021903 (2006), ISSN 0003-6951, 1077-3118, URL https: //pubs.aip.org/apl/article/88/2/021903/921491/ Surface-termination-and-roughness-of-Ge-100

    work page 2006

  28. [28]

    Ponath, A

    P. Ponath, A. B. Posadas, R. C. Hatch, and A. A. Demkov, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 31, 031201 (2013), ISSN 2166-2746, 2166-2754, URL https: //pubs.aip.org/jvb/article/31/3/031201/102398/ Preparation-of-a-clean-Ge-001-surface-using-oxygen

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Ponath, A

    P. Ponath, A. B. Posadas, and A. A. Demkov, Applied Physics Reviews 4, 021308 (2017), ISSN 1931-9401, URL https://pubs. aip.org/apr/article/4/2/021308/279713/ Ge-001-surface-cleaning-methods-for-device

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    M. D. Groner, J. W. Elam, F. H. Fabreguette, and S. M. George, Thin Solid Films413, 186 (2002), ISSN 0040- 6090, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0040609002004388

    work page 2002

  31. [31]

    M. D. Groner, F. H. Fabreguette, J. W. Elam, and S. M. George, Chemistry of Materials 16, 639 (2004), ISSN 0897-4756, 1520-5002, URL https://pubs.acs. org/doi/10.1021/cm0304546

    work page doi:10.1021/cm0304546 2004

  32. [32]

    Sioncke, A

    S. Sioncke, A. Delabie, G. Brammertz, T. Conard, A. Franquet, M. Caymax, A. Urbanzcyk, M. Heyns, M. Meuris, J. L. Van Hemmen, et al., Journal of The Electrochemical Society 156, H255 (2009), ISSN 00134651, URL https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1149/1.3076143

    work page doi:10.1149/1.3076143 2009

  33. [33]

    J.-S. Kim, A. M. Tyryshkin, and S. A. Lyon, Applied Physics Letters 110, 123505 (2017), ISSN 0003-6951, 1077-3118, URL https://pubs. aip.org/apl/article/110/12/123505/33194/ Annealing-shallow-Si-SiO2-interface-traps-in

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Kim, S.-H

    S. Kim, S.-H. Lee, I. H. Jo, J. Seo, Y.-E. Yoo, and J. H. Kim, Scientific Reports 12, 5124 (2022), ISSN 2045-2322, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41598-022-09054-7

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Paghi, S

    A. Paghi, S. Battisti, S. Tortorella, G. De Simoni, and F. Giazotto,Cryogenic behavior of high-permittivity gate dielectrics: The impact of the atomic layer deposi- tion temperature and the lithography pattering method , 2407.04501 [cond-mat], URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2407.04501

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Dimoulas, P

    A. Dimoulas, P. Tsipas, A. Sotiropoulos, and E. K. Evangelou, Applied Physics Letters 89, 252110 (2006), ISSN 0003-6951, 1077-3118, URL https: //pubs.aip.org/apl/article/89/25/252110/921609/ Fermi-level-pinning-and-charge-neutrality-level-in

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Morita, T

    M. Morita, T. Ohmi, E. Hasegawa, M. Kawakami, and M. Ohwada, Journal of Applied Physics 68, 1272 (1990), ISSN 0021-8979, 1089-7550, URL https: //pubs.aip.org/jap/article/68/3/1272/18021/ Growth-of-native-oxide-on-a-silicon-surface

    work page 1990

  38. [38]

    Bohling and W

    C. Bohling and W. Sigmund, Silicon 8, 339 (2016), ISSN 1876-9918, URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12633-015-9366-8

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Degli Esposti, B

    D. Degli Esposti, B. Paquelet Wuetz, V. Fezzi, M. Lodari, A. Sammak, and G. Scappucci, Applied Physics Letters 120, 184003 (2022), ISSN 0003-6951, 1077-3118, URL https://pubs. aip.org/apl/article/120/18/184003/2833621/ Wafer-scale-low-disorder-2DEG-in-28Si-SiGe-without

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    J. Xu, S. Li, W. Zhang, S. Yan, C. Liu, X. Yuan, X. Ye, and H. Li, Applied Surface Science544, 148889 (2021), ISSN 01694332, URL https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0169433220336485

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Benick, A

    J. Benick, A. Richter, T.-T. A. Li, N. E. Grant, K. R. McIntosh, Y. Ren, K. J. Weber, M. Hermle, and S. W. Glunz, in 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Con- ference (IEEE, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2010), pp. 000891– 000896, ISBN 9781424458905 9781424458929, URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5614148/

    work page arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    J. R. Weber, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van De Walle, Journal of Applied Physics 109, 033715 (2011), ISSN 0021-8979, 1089-7550, URL https: //pubs.aip.org/jap/article/109/3/033715/925070/ Native-defects-in-Al2O3-and-their-impact-on-III-V

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    F. V. E. Hensling, C. Xu, F. Gunkel, and R. Dittmann, Scientific Reports7, 39953 (2017), ISSN 2045-2322, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39953

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Martinez, S

    B. Martinez, S. de Franceschi, and Y.-M. Niquet, Variability mitigation in epitaxial-heterostructure-based spin qubit devices via gate layout optimization (2024), arXiv:2402.18991 [cond-mat], URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/2402.18991

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Cui, G.-H

    X. Cui, G.-H. Lee, Y. D. Kim, G. Arefe, P. Y. Huang, C.-H. Lee, D. A. Chenet, X. Zhang, L. Wang, F. Ye, etal., NatureNanotechnology 10, 534(2015), ISSN1748- 3395, URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano. 2015.70

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Monroe, Y

    D. Monroe, Y. H. Xie, E. A. Fitzgerald, P. J. Silverman, and G. P. Watson, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Struc- tures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 11, 1731 (1993), ISSN 1071-1023, 1520-8567, URL https: //pubs.aip.org/jvb/article/11/4/1731/1074186/ Comparison-of-mobility-limiting-mechanisms-in-high

    work page 1993

  47. [47]

    L. A. Tracy, E. H. Hwang, K. Eng, G. A. Ten Eyck, E. P. Nordberg, K. Childs, M. S. Carroll, M. P. Lilly, and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review B 79, 235307 (2009), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.79.235307

    work page 2009