REVIEW 15 cited by
REALTALK: A 21-Day Real-World Dataset for Long-Term Conversation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
REALTALK: A 21-Day Real-World Dataset for Long-Term Conversation
read the original abstract
Long-term, open-domain dialogue capabilities are essential for chatbots aiming to recall past interactions and demonstrate emotional intelligence (EI). Yet, most existing research relies on synthetic, LLM-generated data, leaving open questions about real-world conversational patterns. To address this gap, we introduce REALTALK, a 21-day corpus of authentic messaging app dialogues, providing a direct benchmark against genuine human interactions. We first conduct a dataset analysis, focusing on EI attributes and persona consistency to understand the unique challenges posed by real-world dialogues. By comparing with LLM-generated conversations, we highlight key differences, including diverse emotional expressions and variations in persona stability that synthetic dialogues often fail to capture. Building on these insights, we introduce two benchmark tasks: (1) persona simulation where a model continues a conversation on behalf of a specific user given prior dialogue context; and (2) memory probing where a model answers targeted questions requiring long-term memory of past interactions. Our findings reveal that models struggle to simulate a user solely from dialogue history, while fine-tuning on specific user chats improves persona emulation. Additionally, existing models face significant challenges in recalling and leveraging long-term context within real-world conversations.
Forward citations
Cited by 15 Pith papers
-
MedMemoryBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Personalized Healthcare
MedMemoryBench supplies a 2,000-session synthetic medical trajectory dataset and an evaluate-while-constructing streaming protocol to expose memory saturation and reasoning failures in current agent architectures for ...
-
Tangram: Unlocking Non-Uniform KV Cache for Efficient Multi-turn LLM Serving
Tangram makes non-uniform KV cache compression practical for LLM serving with deterministic budget allocation, head group paging, and ahead-of-time load balancing, achieving up to 2.6x throughput gains.
-
BehaviorBench: Modeling Real-World User Decisions from Behavioral Traces
BehaviorBench reconstructs 2,000 real wallets into 141k belief and 1.4M trade prediction tasks to test if personalization from history improves model performance over non-personalized baselines.
-
MemGym: a Long-Horizon Memory Environment for LLM Agents
MemGym unifies agent gyms into a memory benchmark with isolated scoring across tool-use, research, coding, and computer-use regimes plus a lightweight reward model for tractable coding evaluation.
-
MMEB-V3: Measuring the Performance Gaps of Omni-Modality Embedding Models
MMEB-V3 benchmark shows omni-modality embedding models fail to enforce instruction-specified modality constraints and exhibit asymmetric, query-biased retrieval.
-
LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark
LMEB benchmark shows that embedding models' performance on traditional retrieval does not transfer to long-horizon memory tasks, larger models do not always perform better, and LMEB measures capabilities orthogonal to MTEB.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new benchmark for self-evolving memory in LLM agents across task streams, with baseline ExpRAG and proposed ReMem method that integrates reasoning, actions, and memory updates for continual improvement.
-
EvoEmbedding: Evolvable Representations for Long-Context Retrieval and Agentic Memory
EvoEmbedding generates evolvable embeddings via a latent memory updated during sequential processing, outperforming larger models on long-context retrieval and generalizing to 10x longer contexts in downstream tasks.
-
Connecting the Dots: Benchmarking Reflective Memory in Long-Horizon Dialogue
RefMem-Bench benchmarks reflective memory in dialogue with 26K instances across eight dimensions, and REMIND improves model accuracy via hierarchical evidence retrieval, grounding, and abstraction.
-
H-Mem: A Novel Memory Mechanism for Evolving and Retrieving Agent Memory via a Hybrid Structure
H-Mem introduces a hybrid tree-plus-graph memory mechanism that evolves short-term agent memories into long-term summaries and enables efficient retrieval, reporting state-of-the-art QA results on three benchmarks.
-
Towards Continuous Sign Language Conversation from Isolated Signs
Constructs continuous sign conversation data from isolated signs using retrieval and diffusion models to train a direct sign-to-sign conversational AI.
-
LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark
LMEB is a 22-dataset, 193-task zero-shot benchmark showing that long-horizon memory retrieval is hard, not solved by scale, and largely orthogonal to MTEB passage-retrieval skill.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new streaming benchmark and evaluation framework for self-evolving memory in LLM agents, unifying over ten memory modules and introducing the ReMem pipeline for continual improvement on multi-turn and ...
-
EpiCache: Episodic KV Cache Management for Long-Term Conversation on Resource-Constrained Environments
EpiCache clusters long conversation history into coherent episodes for per-episode KV cache eviction, delivering up to 30% accuracy gains and 3.7x peak memory reduction on LongConvQA tasks under fixed budgets.
-
Exploring Cross-Scenario Generality of Agentic Memory Systems: Diagnostics and a Strong Baseline
An agentic harness letting the LLM self-manage flat text-file storage via tool calls outperforms eight prior memory systems on cross-scenario generality across QA, chat, trajectory, stress-test, and long-horizon tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.