REVIEW 7 cited by
LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios
read the original abstract
Recent advances in the intrinsic reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have given rise to LLM-based agent systems that exhibit near-human performance on a variety of automated tasks. However, although these systems share similarities in terms of their use of LLMs, different reasoning frameworks of the agent system steer and organize the reasoning process in different ways. In this survey, we propose a systematic taxonomy that decomposes agentic reasoning frameworks and analyze how these frameworks dominate framework-level reasoning by comparing their applications across different scenarios. Specifically, we propose an unified formal language to further classify agentic reasoning systems into single-agent methods, tool-based methods, and multi-agent methods. After that, we provide a comprehensive review of their key application scenarios in scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, social simulation, and economics. We also analyze the characteristic features of each framework and summarize different evaluation strategies. Our survey aims to provide the research community with a panoramic view to facilitate understanding of the strengths, suitable scenarios, and evaluation practices of different agentic reasoning frameworks.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Co-Evolving Skill Generation and Policy Optimization
Framework estimates context-dependent marginal utility of candidate skills via reward gaps in matched base vs. skill-augmented rollouts to filter skills and co-train policy as generator.
-
TimeSage-MT: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Time Series Reasoning
TimeSage-MT introduces a multi-turn benchmark for agentic time series reasoning and shows frontier LLMs drop sharply on decision-oriented tasks due to memory and uncertainty failures.
-
GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration
GraphBit is a DAG-based engine-orchestrated framework for agentic LLMs that achieves 67.6% accuracy with zero hallucinations on GAIA benchmarks.
-
Agentic Frameworks for Reasoning Tasks: An Empirical Study
An empirical evaluation of 22 agentic frameworks on BBH, GSM8K, and ARC benchmarks shows stable performance in 12 frameworks but highlights orchestration failures and weaker mathematical reasoning.
-
Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Radiology Report Generation
MARL-Rad trains region-specific and global agents with reinforcement learning on clinical rewards to produce more accurate radiology reports than prior methods on MIMIC-CXR and IU X-ray datasets.
-
E3-TIR: Enhanced Experience Exploitation for Tool-Integrated Reasoning
E3-TIR integrates expert prefixes, guided branches, and self-exploration via mix policy optimization to deliver 6% better tool-use performance with under 10% of the usual synthetic data and 1.46x ROI.
-
Multi-Agent Systems: From Classical Paradigms to Large Foundation Model-Enabled Futures
A survey comparing classical multi-agent systems with large foundation model-enabled multi-agent systems, showing how the latter enables semantic-level collaboration and greater adaptability.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.