Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 9 cited by

OpenEgo pairs 1,107 hours of hand video with action language

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

OpenEgo is a 1,107-hour unified egocentric manipulation dataset with standardized 21-joint hand poses and timestamped action language, plus a small validation showing a language-conditioned policy learns short-horizon hand trajectories.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection OpenEgo is a genuinely useful consolidation effort, but its headline advantage over EgoDex rests on language primitives whose quality and generation are never demonstrated. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2509.05513 v1 pith:JFT5LUVL submitted 2025-09-05 cs.CV cs.AIcs.RO

OpenEgo: A Large-Scale Multimodal Egocentric Dataset for Dexterous Manipulation

Ahad Jawaid , Yu Xiang This is my paper
classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.RO
keywords egocentric videodexterous manipulationhand pose estimationaction primitivesimitation learningvision-language-actionMANO hand modeldataset consolidation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

OpenEgo is a consolidated egocentric video dataset that merges six public sources into one standardized format: 1,107 hours, 290 manipulation tasks, more than 600 environments, and 344.5k recordings. Its two distinctive ingredients are unified 21-joint hand poses expressed in the camera frame and intention-aligned action primitives — timestamped descriptions of which object is acted on and how, tagged with left/right/both hands. The authors argue this combination closes a gap in existing corpora, which typically offer scale OR dexterous hand labels OR fine-grained language, but not all three. They back the claim with a demonstration that a language-conditioned policy trained on a small slice of OpenEgo can predict future 3D hand trajectories, with errors that grow smoothly as the prediction horizon lengthens.

Core claim

The central claim of the paper is that OpenEgo provides the largest egocentric dataset to date that joins dexterous hand supervision with fine-grained language action primitives. Hand poses from all six source datasets are standardized to a 21-joint MANO layout and transformed to camera-frame coordinates; for sources without native 3D pose, 2D landmarks are back-projected through per-pixel depth. Each video is annotated with intention-aligned primitives that name the object and action and carry absolute start and end timestamps, together with high-level task labels. The authors further show that a language-conditioned imitation-learning policy trained on 0.1% of the dataset can predict dexte

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the unification pipeline plus the annotation format. First, every source's hand pose is mapped to MANO's 21-joint layout in the camera frame: sources with native MANO parameters are converted directly, world-frame poses are transformed by per-frame extrinsics, and sources without native pose use 2D landmark detection with depth back-projection. Second, each recording receives intention-aligned action primitives — a timestamped (t_start, t_end) description of the manipulated object and action, with an actor label (left_hand, right_hand, both_hands) for manipulation segments or 'person' for navigation segments. These primitives are what make the dataset usable for

Load-bearing premise

The dataset's distinctive advantage rests on its automatically generated, only-partially-verified language primitives: if their timestamps drift or their object/action descriptions are wrong for long or ambiguous manipulations, the language-conditioned policies are trained on misaligned targets.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of OpenEgo clips, have human annotators mark the true onset and offset of each manipulation and name the object and action, then compute temporal overlap and description agreement between the human segments and the released primitives. If agreement is low for long or ambiguous actions, or if descriptions frequently name the wrong object, the intention-aligned claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single language-conditioned imitation policy can be trained directly from egocentric video to predict future 3D hand trajectories, using OpenEgo's unified hand joints as supervision.
  • Hierarchical vision-language-action models can use action primitives as high-level plans and the aligned hand trajectories as low-level executions within one dataset.
  • Results across the six source datasets become comparable because hand poses share one joint layout, one coordinate frame, and one visibility-mask convention.
  • The dataset's 290 tasks and 600+ environments provide a scale of dexterous demonstrations that prior egocentric corpora lacked, making it a candidate training source for world models and foundation vision-language models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The real test of OpenEgo is the quality of its automatic primitive labeling; the paper reports partial verification, so a human-annotation agreement study on a random sample would separate the dataset's potential from its current annotation noise.
  • The reported experiments use only 0.1% of the data, so the trajectory-prediction numbers should be read as a sanity check. Training at larger scale, and ablating language conditioning against pose-only conditioning, would show whether the primitives actually improve dexterous prediction.
  • Because the six sources differ in camera, illumination, and hand appearance, OpenEgo could serve as a pretraining pool for hand-pose estimators that generalize across capture setups, an implicit benefit the paper does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces OpenEgo, a consolidated egocentric manipulation dataset built from six public sources (CaptainCook4D, HOI4D, HoloAssist, EgoDex, HOT3D, HO-Cap). It reports 1107 hours, 119.6M frames, 290 tasks, 344.5k recordings, and 600+ environments, with hand poses standardized to a MANO-21 layout in the camera frame and with timestamped, intention-aligned language action primitives. The authors validate the resource by training a ViLT-based language-conditioned policy to predict future 3D hand joint trajectories on a 0.1% subset, reporting increasing AED/FED/DTW errors with prediction horizon. The paper claims to be the largest egocentric dataset combining dexterous hand annotations with fine-grained language primitives, and promises future release at a website.

Significance. If the dataset is released and the language primitives are of high quality, OpenEgo would be a valuable community resource: it unifies several existing datasets into a common coordinate frame and adds a layer of temporally localized action descriptions that EgoDex lacks. The effort to standardize hand pose formats and provide visibility masks is useful, and the coordinate transforms in Eqs. (1)-(2) are clearly specified. However, the central differentiator over prior work—the intention-aligned language primitives—is currently unsubstantiated: the generation procedure is not described, verification statistics are absent, and the small-scale experiments do not isolate the contribution of the language signal. The paper also provides no downloadable artifact, so all quantitative claims are unverifiable at present.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Language primitives] The central claim that OpenEgo improves on EgoDex by providing 'intention-aligned' language primitives is not supported. The generation procedure is not described: how are primitives produced, how is 'intention onset' determined, and how are timestamps assigned? The Limitations section admits that annotations are 'automatically generated and only partially verified' and that 'temporal drift can occur for long or ambiguous actions.' No human-verification statistics, inter-annotator agreement, or temporal alignment accuracy are reported. Without these, the claimed advantage over EgoDex collapses. Please specify the annotation pipeline, provide verification metrics, and include examples of primitives with timestamps.
  2. [§4, Experiments] The validation experiments do not test whether the language primitives provide useful learning signal. The ViLT policy is trained with language prompts, but there is no ablation without language, with shuffled prompts, or with corrupted timestamps. Table 2 reports only three aggregated trajectory metrics on a single held-out split, with no baselines, no comparison to training on EgoDex alone, and no breakdown by primitive quality. Since the dataset's value proposition is the combination of dexterous annotations and language, the experiments need to isolate the language component. Even a simple ablation (language vs. no language, or OpenEgo vs. source-only annotations) would substantially strengthen the claim.
  3. [Table 1 and §3, Overview] The claimed '290 manipulation tasks' appears to be the sum of the per-source task counts in Table 1. If task categories overlap across datasets (e.g., 'cutting' in HOI4D and EgoDex), summing overcounts the union of distinct tasks. The paper should state whether 290 is a union of task labels, report overlap statistics, and define what counts as a distinct task. This is load-bearing because 290 tasks is a headline number distinguishing OpenEgo from smaller datasets.
  4. [Abstract and §3] The paper promises release of 'all resources and instructions' at a website but at review time no data, code, annotation examples, or evaluation scripts are available. All dataset statistics (1107 hours, 119.6M frames, 344.5k recordings, annotation quality) are therefore unverifiable. For a dataset paper, providing at least a sample of annotations, a datasheet, and a clear release plan or link to a repository is necessary; otherwise the manuscript is a proposal rather than a fully documented resource.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, Figure 1] Figure 1 is not referenced in the text. Please add a reference or remove it.
  2. [Table 1, header] The abbreviation '# Record.' is unclear; spell out 'Recordings' in the table header. Also, the final column labeled 'Coord.' is terse; clarify that it refers to the source coordinate frame of hand-pose annotations.
  3. [§3, Overview] The source of '1.4k distinct objects' and 'at least 258 unique participants' is not defined. State how these counts were computed across datasets, especially where identities are not explicitly annotated.
  4. [§4, Policy and training] The ViLT policy is referenced via 'prior work [25, 11]' without a description of the architecture or input tokenization. A brief explanation of how the language prompt and RGB frame are fused would make the experiment self-contained.
  5. [Appendix A] The license section states that EgoDex annotation files will be released 'with permission from the authors' but does not explain how users will obtain them. Clarify the distribution mechanism.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: OpenEgo is a dataset-consolidation paper whose only quantitative 'prediction' is a held-out learning benchmark, not a fitted parameter or self-imported result.

full rationale

The paper does not derive a theoretical result from inputs, so the main circularity patterns (self-definitional equations, fitted inputs called predictions, imported uniqueness theorems, ansatz-by-citation, renaming) do not apply. The central claim is a data resource: six public datasets are reprocessed into a unified 21-joint camera-frame hand-pose format with added language primitives, totaling 1107 hours. The validation experiment trains a ViLT policy on 0.1% of OpenEgo and evaluates on a held-out 10% of demonstrations (Section 4), which is a conventional internal benchmark for a dataset paper and not a case of fitting a parameter to data and then predicting the same quantity. One source dataset (HO-Cap) is from the same lab as the authors, but it contributes only 0.67 hours of the 1107-hour total and is not load-bearing for the consolidation or largest-dataset claim. The language-primitive quality issue — the paper's Limitations state the annotations are 'automatically generated and only partially verified' and that 'temporal drift can occur for long or ambiguous actions' — is a legitimate correctness/utility concern for the dataset's differentiator, but it is not a circularity: no claim reduces by construction to its own input, and the stated limitations are explicit rather than hidden. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited with quote and reduction, and the appropriate score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The annotation schema (language primitives with actors and timestamps) is a labeling convention, not a postulated entity. The central claim rests mainly on the accuracy and consistency of the hand-pose unification and language labeling.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Back-projecting Mediapipe 2D hand landmarks with per-pixel depth from the source dataset yields metric 3D joints in the camera frame (Eq. 1).
    Used to create hand-pose annotations for CaptainCook4D and as fallback for HOI4D frames lacking MANO parameters; the paper does not evaluate the accuracy of this back-projection on those sources.
  • domain assumption The joint layouts of the six datasets can be mapped to the MANO 21-joint layout without losing anatomical meaning (e.g., dropping 4 joints from EgoDex's 25-joint format and reindexing).
    Section 3 Hand joints; this is load-bearing for the claim of a 'standardized 21-joint hand pose'.
  • domain assumption The automatically generated language primitives are 'intention-aligned' and temporally accurate enough for language-conditioned policy learning.
    Limitations item 2 admits they are only partially verified and temporal drift can occur; this premise is central to the dataset's novelty over EgoDex, which already provides large-scale dexterous labels.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of OpenEgo: A Large-Scale Multimodal Egocentric Dataset for Dexterous Manipulation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JFT5LUVL

@misc{pith2026250905513,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: OpenEgo: A Large-Scale Multimodal Egocentric Dataset for Dexterous Manipulation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JFT5LUVL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05513}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Egocentric human videos provide scalable demonstrations for imitation learning, but existing corpora often lack either fine-grained, temporally localized action descriptions or dexterous hand annotations. We introduce OpenEgo, a multimodal egocentric manipulation dataset with standardized hand-pose annotations and intention-aligned action primitives. OpenEgo totals 1107 hours across six public datasets, covering 290 manipulation tasks in 600+ environments. We unify hand-pose layouts and provide descriptive, timestamped action primitives. To validate its utility, we train language-conditioned imitation-learning policies to predict dexterous hand trajectories. OpenEgo is designed to lower the barrier to learning dexterous manipulation from egocentric video and to support reproducible research in vision-language-action learning. All resources and instructions will be released at www.openegocentric.com.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05513 by Ahad Jawaid, Yu Xiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of high- and low-level task annotations in OpenEgo. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hand-Object Interaction in the Age of Large Foundation Models:Reconstruction, Generation, and Embodied Transfer

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A taxonomy of eight foundation-model priors organizes HOI reconstruction, generation, and embodied transfer, mapping what knowledge large models inject and where.

  2. Open-AoE: An Open Egocentric Manipulation Dataset and Toolchain for Embodied Learning

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Open-AoE releases 2,000 hours of smartphone egocentric manipulation video with MANO hand poses, camera trajectories, atomic action labels, and training tools for VLA and world-model pipelines.

  3. HARP-VLA: Human-Robot Aligned Representation Learning for Vision-Language-Action Model

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HARP aligns human-robot visual and latent action representations via paired bridges and unpaired dynamics supervision to boost VLA policy performance on manipulation tasks.

  4. HumanNet: Scaling Human-centric Video Learning to One Million Hours

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HumanNet is a 1M-hour human-centric video dataset with interaction annotations that enables better vision-language-action model performance than equivalent robot data in a controlled test.

  5. Hand-Object Interaction in the Age of Large Foundation Models:Reconstruction, Generation, and Embodied Transfer

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Foundation-model HOI work is organized into eight geometric, semantic, and visual sub-priors that enter six reconstruction/generation tasks and three robot-transfer routes.

  6. Not All Actions Are Equal: Rethinking Conditioning for Dexterous World Model

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DexAC-WM improves FID, FVD, and PCK in high-DoF action-conditioned video prediction via structured action modeling and semantic grounding on EgoDex and EgoVerse.

  7. Towards Robotic Dexterous Hand Intelligence: A Survey

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A structured survey of dexterous robotic hand research that reviews hardware, control methods, data resources, and benchmarks while identifying major limitations and future directions.

  8. Data Pyramid for Embodied Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Embodied training data form a five-layer pyramid—real-robot, UMI, ego/exo, simulation, general V–L—ordered by the trade-off between scale and robot alignment, and model capabilities track how those layers are mixed.

  9. World Action Models: A Survey

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey that clarifies boundaries and organizes World Action Models by generation requirements and predictive substrates, identifying a trend toward generating less of the future.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Introducing hot3d: An egocentric dataset for 3d hand and object tracking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09598, 2024

    Prithviraj Banerjee, Sindi Shkodrani, Pierre Moulon, Shreyas Hampali, Fan Zhang, Jade Fountain, Edward Miller, Selen Basol, Richard Newcombe, Robert Wang, et al. Introducing hot3d: An egocentric dataset for 3d hand and object tracking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09598, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734, 2025

    Johan Bjorck, Fernando Castañeda, Nikita Cherniadev, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, Linxi Fan, Yu Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Scaling egocentric vision: The epic-kitchens dataset

    Dima Damen, Hazel Doughty, Giovanni Maria Farinella, Sanja Fidler, Antonino Furnari, Evangelos Kazakos, Davide Moltisanti, Jonathan Munro, Toby Perrett, Will Price, et al. Scaling egocentric vision: The epic-kitchens dataset. InProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 720–736, 2018

    2018

  4. [4]

    Tenenbaum, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel

    Yilun Du, Mengjiao Yang, Bo Dai, Hanjun Dai, Ofir Nachum, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Dale Schuurmans, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Ro- hit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, Miguel Martin, Tushar Nagarajan, Ilija Radosavovic, Santhosh Kumar Ramakrishnan, Fiona Ryan, Jayant Sharma, Michael Wray, Mengmeng Xu, Eric Zhongcong Xu, Chen Zhao, Siddhant Bansal, Dhruv Batra, Vincent Car...

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, 2020

    2020

  7. [7]

    Egodex: Learning dexterous manipulation from large-scale egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11709, 2025

    Ryan Hoque, Peide Huang, David J Yoon, Mouli Sivapurapu, and Jian Zhang. Egodex: Learning dexterous manipulation from large-scale egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11709, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Manuel Y . Galliker, Dibya Ghosh, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Devin LeBlanc, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsc...

    2025

  9. [9]

    Egomimic: Scaling imitation learning via egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24221, 2024

    Simar Kareer, Dhruv Patel, Ryan Punamiya, Pranay Mathur, Shuo Cheng, Chen Wang, Judy Hoffman, and Danfei Xu. Egomimic: Scaling imitation learning via egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24221, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, et al. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:44776–44791, 2023

    Bo Liu, Yifeng Zhu, Chongkai Gao, Yihao Feng, Qiang Liu, Yuke Zhu, and Peter Stone. Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:44776–44791, 2023. 5

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Hoi4d: A 4d egocentric dataset for category-level human-object interaction

    Yunze Liu, Yun Liu, Che Jiang, Kangbo Lyu, Weikang Wan, Hao Shen, Boqiang Liang, Zhoujie Fu, He Wang, and Li Yi. Hoi4d: A 4d egocentric dataset for category-level human-object interaction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21013–21022, 2022

    2022

  13. [13]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017

    Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Mediapipe: A framework for building perception pipelines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08172, 2019

    Camillo Lugaresi, Jiuqiang Tang, Hadon Nash, Chris McClanahan, Esha Uboweja, Michael Hays, Fan Zhang, Chuo-Ling Chang, Ming Guang Yong, Juhyun Lee, et al. Mediapipe: A framework for building perception pipelines.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08172, 2019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  15. [15]

    Towards generalist robot learning from internet video: A survey.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 83, 2025

    Robert McCarthy, Daniel CH Tan, Dominik Schmidt, Fernando Acero, Nathan Herr, Yilun Du, Thomas G Thuruthel, and Zhibin Li. Towards generalist robot learning from internet video: A survey.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 83, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Open x- embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhiram Maddukuri, Abhishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Pooley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, Ajinkya Jain, et al. Open x- embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6892–6903. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Captain- cook4d: A dataset for understanding errors in procedural activities.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:135626–135679, 2024

    Rohith Peddi, Shivvrat Arya, Bharath Challa, Likhitha Pallapothula, Akshay Vyas, Bhavya Gouripeddi, Qifan Zhang, Jikai Wang, Vasundhara Komaragiri, Eric Ragan, et al. Captain- cook4d: A dataset for understanding errors in procedural activities.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:135626–135679, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Humanoid policy˜ human policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13441, 2025

    Ri-Zhao Qiu, Shiqi Yang, Xuxin Cheng, Chaitanya Chawla, Jialong Li, Tairan He, Ge Yan, David J Yoon, Ryan Hoque, Lars Paulsen, et al. Humanoid policy˜ human policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13441, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Motion tracks: A unified representation for human-robot transfer in few-shot imitation learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06994, 2025

    Juntao Ren, Priya Sundaresan, Dorsa Sadigh, Sanjiban Choudhury, and Jeannette Bohg. Motion tracks: A unified representation for human-robot transfer in few-shot imitation learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06994, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bodies together.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02610, 2022

    Javier Romero, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J Black. Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bodies together.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02610, 2022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Hi robot: Open-ended instruction following with hierarchical vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19417, 2025

    Lucy Xiaoyang Shi, Brian Ichter, Michael Equi, Liyiming Ke, Karl Pertsch, Quan Vuong, James Tanner, Anna Walling, Haohuan Wang, Niccolo Fusai, et al. Hi robot: Open-ended instruction following with hierarchical vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19417, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Neural codec language models are zero-shot text to speech synthesizers, 2023

    Chengyi Wang, Sanyuan Chen, Yu Wu, Ziqiang Zhang, Long Zhou, Shujie Liu, Zhuo Chen, Yanqing Liu, Huaming Wang, Jinyu Li, Lei He, Sheng Zhao, and Furu Wei. Neural codec language models are zero-shot text to speech synthesizers, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Ho-cap: A capture system and dataset for 3d reconstruction and pose tracking of hand-object interaction

    Jikai Wang, Qifan Zhang, Yu-Wei Chao, Bowen Wen, Xiaohu Guo, and Yu Xiang. Ho-cap: A capture system and dataset for 3d reconstruction and pose tracking of hand-object interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06843, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Holoassist: an egocentric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assistants in the real world

    Xin Wang, Taein Kwon, Mahdi Rad, Bowen Pan, Ishani Chakraborty, Sean Andrist, Dan Bohus, Ashley Feniello, Bugra Tekin, Felipe Vieira Frujeri, et al. Holoassist: an egocentric human interaction dataset for interactive ai assistants in the real world. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 20270–20281, 2023

    2023

  25. [25]

    Any-point trajectory modeling for policy learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00025, 2023

    Chuan Wen, Xingyu Lin, John So, Kai Chen, Qi Dou, Yang Gao, and Pieter Abbeel. Any-point trajectory modeling for policy learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00025, 2023. 6 A Licenses and Attribution OpenEgo combines six publicly available egocentric datasets. We respect the license terms of each source and provide proper attribution in all releases: •Captai...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.