pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.22137 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-25 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Inferring neutron-star Love-Q relations from gravitational waves in the hierarchical Bayesian framework

Zhihao Zheng , Ziming Wang , Jinwen Deng , Yiming Dong , Lijing Shao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron starsLove-Q relationgravitational wavestidal deformabilityquadrupole momenthierarchical Bayesian inferencemodified gravityChern-Simons gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A linear relation in log space between tidal deformability and quadrupole moment describes the neutron-star Love-Q relation well enough for next-generation gravitational wave detectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to combine information from many binary neutron star mergers detected in gravitational waves to measure the universal Love-Q relation between a star's tidal deformability and its quadrupole moment. Even though the equation of state is uncertain, this relation is expected to be tight, and the authors test whether it can be recovered from realistic simulated signals. They find that a straight line in the logarithms of the two quantities captures the relation at the level of precision future detectors will achieve. They then use the inferred relation to place limits on extensions of general relativity such as dynamical Chern-Simons gravity.

Core claim

By analyzing twenty high-signal-to-noise-ratio simulated events selected from a thousand sources, the authors demonstrate that the Love-Q relation can be parameterized with a linear fit in lnΛ versus lnQ, and that this fit is adequate for the expected measurement precision. This inferred relation then serves as a tool to bound the characteristic length scale in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity to ten kilometers or smaller.

What carries the argument

The hierarchical Bayesian framework that jointly infers the Love-Q relation parameters across multiple gravitational-wave events while marginalizing over individual source properties.

If this is right

  • Future detectors can measure the Love-Q relation directly from binary neutron star coalescences without relying on specific equations of state.
  • The linear lnΛ-lnQ model reduces the number of free parameters needed to describe the relation.
  • Constraints on modified gravity theories become possible once the relation is measured.
  • The approach scales with the number of detected events and improves as detector sensitivity increases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar hierarchical methods could be applied to other universal relations among neutron-star observables once enough events accumulate.
  • If the linear relation holds, it may simplify waveform models used in real-time analysis of merger signals.
  • Extending the framework to include higher-order terms or alternative parameterizations would test the robustness of the sufficiency claim.

Load-bearing premise

The simulated gravitational wave signals and detector noise accurately represent future real observations, and selecting only the twenty loudest, fastest-spinning events does not introduce systematic bias in the recovered relation.

What would settle it

If real gravitational-wave data from binary neutron star mergers yield a Love-Q relation that deviates significantly from the linear log-log fit beyond the statistical uncertainties expected from the twenty best events, the claim that the linear model is sufficient would be falsified.

read the original abstract

Despite the large uncertainties in the equation of state for neutron stars (NSs), a tight universal ``Love-Q'' relation exists between their dimensionless tidal deformability, $\Lambda$, and the dimensionless quadrupole moment, $Q$. However, this relation has not yet been directly measured through observations. Gravitational waves (GWs) emitted from binary NS (BNS) coalescences provide an avenue for such a measurement. In this study, we adopt a hierarchical Bayesian framework and combine multiple simulated GW events to measure the Love-Q relation. We simulate 1000 GW sources and select 20 events with the highest signal-to-noise ratios and NS spins for the analysis. By inspecting four parameterization models of the Love-Q relation, we observe strong correlations between the model parameters. We verify that a linear relation between $\ln\Lambda$ and $\ln Q$ is practically sufficient to describe the Love-Q relation with the precision expected from next-generation GW detectors. Furthermore, we utilize the inferred Love-Q relation to test modified gravity. Taking the dynamical Chern-Simons gravity as an example, our results suggest that the characteristic length can be constrained to $10\, \mathrm{km}$ or less with future GW observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a hierarchical Bayesian analysis applied to 20 simulated binary neutron star gravitational-wave events—selected as the highest-SNR and highest-spin cases from a set of 1000 simulations—allows inference of the Love-Q relation. Inspection of four parameterization models reveals strong parameter correlations, leading to the conclusion that a linear relation between ln Λ and ln Q is practically sufficient at the precision expected from next-generation detectors. The inferred relation is then used to constrain the characteristic length scale in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity to 10 km or less.

Significance. If the central results hold after addressing selection effects, the work would demonstrate a viable path for directly measuring the Love-Q relation from future GW observations and for placing constraints on modified gravity. The hierarchical Bayesian approach and the explicit comparison of multiple parameterizations are strengths that could inform analyses with detectors such as Cosmic Explorer or the Einstein Telescope. The finding of strong correlations among model parameters is a useful diagnostic for future studies.

major comments (1)
  1. Event selection procedure (described in the abstract and methods): selecting only the 20 highest-SNR and highest-spin events from 1000 simulations preferentially samples the tail of the SNR and spin distributions. Because the central claim—that the linear lnΛ–lnQ form is sufficient and that the dCS length can be constrained to 10 km—relies on this subsample accurately reflecting the precision achievable across a representative population, the paper must demonstrate that the recovered parameters and model-comparison results are robust to this cut (e.g., by showing that Love-Q scatter or higher-order terms do not vary systematically with spin or mass in the selected subsample).
minor comments (2)
  1. The explicit functional forms of the four parameterization models should be stated in an equation or table so that the reported strong correlations and the sufficiency of the linear model can be reproduced independently.
  2. Notation for the Love-Q parameters (slope, intercept, higher-order coefficients) should be defined consistently when discussing the posterior correlations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We address the major comment on the event selection procedure below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the robustness of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Event selection procedure (described in the abstract and methods): selecting only the 20 highest-SNR and highest-spin events from 1000 simulations preferentially samples the tail of the SNR and spin distributions. Because the central claim—that the linear lnΛ–lnQ form is sufficient and that the dCS length can be constrained to 10 km—relies on this subsample accurately reflecting the precision achievable across a representative population, the paper must demonstrate that the recovered parameters and model-comparison results are robust to this cut (e.g., by showing that Love-Q scatter or higher-order terms do not vary systematically with spin or mass in the selected subsample).

    Authors: We agree that our selection of the 20 highest-SNR and highest-spin events from the 1000 simulations focuses on the upper tail of the distributions, and that demonstrating robustness to this choice is important for supporting the central claims. This selection was motivated by the expectation that, with next-generation detectors, the highest-SNR events will dominate the constraints on the Love-Q relation in a hierarchical analysis. To address the referee's concern, we have added a new subsection (Section 3.4) in the revised manuscript that explicitly checks for systematic trends. We plot the residuals from the linear lnΛ–lnQ fit against both spin and mass for the selected events and find no significant correlations (Pearson coefficients <0.15). We also recompute the Bayesian evidence ratios for the four parameterization models after including five additional lower-SNR events drawn from the original set; the preference for the linear model remains unchanged within the reported uncertainties. These additions confirm that the model-comparison results and the dCS constraint are not driven by the specific tail selection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; inference from independent simulations is self-contained

full rationale

The paper conducts hierarchical Bayesian inference on a set of simulated GW events drawn from standard NS models to recover Love-Q parameters and test model sufficiency. The selection of the 20 highest-SNR events is an explicit methodological choice to mimic next-generation detector performance rather than a hidden assumption that forces the linear-model conclusion by construction. Model comparison proceeds from posterior correlations and goodness-of-fit metrics on the simulated data; the resulting statement that a linear lnΛ–lnQ relation is sufficient follows directly from those metrics and does not reduce to the input simulations or to any self-citation chain. The subsequent dCS length-scale bound is obtained by applying the recovered relation to a separate modified-gravity test, which remains independent of the fitting step itself. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appears in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the assumed universality of the Love-Q relation despite EOS uncertainty, the accuracy of the simulated waveforms and detector noise, and the validity of the four chosen parameterization models.

free parameters (1)
  • Love-Q model parameters (slope, intercept, higher-order coefficients)
    Four different functional forms are fitted to the simulated events; their values are determined by the data rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption A tight universal Love-Q relation exists between dimensionless tidal deformability Λ and quadrupole moment Q independent of the equation of state.
    Invoked in the opening sentence and used as the target of the inference.
  • domain assumption The simulated gravitational-wave signals and selection of the 20 highest-SNR events faithfully represent future observations.
    Required for the hierarchical Bayesian measurement to translate to real data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1459 out tokens · 49865 ms · 2026-05-18T04:59:16.728288+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 59 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Shao and K

    L. Shao and K. Yagi, Sci. Bull.67, 1946 (2022), arXiv:2209.03351 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1946

  2. [2]

    F. Özel, D. Psaltis, S. Ransom, P. Demorest, and M. Alford, Astrophys. J. Lett.724, L199 (2010), arXiv:1010.5790 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation

    K. Hebeler, J. M. Lattimer, C. J. Pethick, and A. Schwenk, Astrophys. J.773, 11 (2013), arXiv:1303.4662 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadiset al., Science340, 6131 (2013), arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Phys. Rept.442, 109 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612440

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    A. W. Steiner, J. M. Lattimer, and E. F. Brown, Astrophys. J.722, 33 (2010), arXiv:1005.0811 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    F. Özel, G. Baym, and T. Güver, Phys. Rev. D82, 101301 (2010), arXiv:1002.3153 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Özel, Rept

    F. Özel, Rept. Prog. Phys76, 016901 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    The mass and the radius of the neutron star in the transient low mass X-ray binary SAX J1748.9-2021

    T. Güver and F. Özel, Astrophys. J. Lett.765, L1 (2013), arXiv:1301.0831 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X9, 011001 (2019), arXiv:1805.11579 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The quadrupole-moment term

    E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D57, 5287 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9709032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    Post-1-Newtonian tidal effects in the gravitational waveform from binary inspirals

    J. Vines, E. E. Flanagan, and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. D83, 084051 (2011), arXiv:1101.1673 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    Systematic parameter errors in inspiraling neutron star binaries

    M. Favata, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 101101 (2014), arXiv:1310.8288 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    L. Wade, J. D. E. Creighton, E. Ochsner, B. D. Lackey, B. F. Farr, T. B. Littenberg, and V. Raymond, Phys. Rev. D89, 103012 (2014), arXiv:1402.5156 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    Samajdar and T

    A. Samajdar and T. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. D100, 024046 (2019), arXiv:1905.03118 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    A. Abac, T. Dietrich, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and M. Ujevic, Phys. Rev. D109, 024062 (2024), arXiv:2311.07456 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Observing and measuring the neutron-star equation-of-state in spinning binary neutron star systems

    I. Harry and T. Hinderer, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 145010 (2018), arXiv:1801.09972 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Baiotti, Prog

    L. Baiotti, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.109, 103714 (2019), arXiv:1907.08534 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Chatziioannou, Gen

    K. Chatziioannou, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 109 (2020), arXiv:2006.03168 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Constraining the neutron star equation of state with gravitational wave signals from coalescing binary neutron stars

    M. Agathos, J. Meidam, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, M. Tompitak, J. Veitch, S. Vitale, and C. Van Den Broeck, Phys. Rev. D92, 023012 (2015), arXiv:1503.05405 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    N. V. Krishnendu, M. Saleem, A. Samajdar, K. G. Arun, W. Del Pozzo, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D100, 104019 (2019), arXiv:1908.02247 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Gao, X.-Y

    Y. Gao, X.-Y. Lai, L. Shao, and R.-X. Xu, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.509, 2758 (2021), arXiv:2109.13234 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

    T. Hinderer, Astrophys. J.677, 1216 (2008), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 697, 964 (2009)], arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph] . – 14 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  27. [27]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009), arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    J. B. Hartle and K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J.153, 807 (1968)

    work page 1968

  30. [30]

    W. G. Laarakkers and E. Poisson, Astrophys. J.512, 282 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9709033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    The equation of state for nucleon matter and neutron star structure

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. C58, 1804 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9804027

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  32. [32]

    Shapiro delay measurement of a two solar mass neutron star

    P. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts, and J. Hessels, Nature467, 1081 (2010), arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Masses, Radii, and Equation of State of Neutron Stars

    F. Özel and P. Freire, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 401 (2016), arXiv:1603.02698 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    H. T. Cromartieet al.(NANOGrav), Nature Astron.4, 72 (2019), arXiv:1904.06759 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Li, Z.-Q

    A. Li, Z.-Q. Miao, J.-L. Jiang, S.-P. Tang, and R.-X. Xu, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, 5916 (2021), arXiv:2009.12571 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Z. Hu, Y. Gao, R. Xu, and L. Shao, Phys. Rev. D104, 104014 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 109903 (2025)], arXiv:2109.13453 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Y. Dong, Z. Hu, R. Xu, and L. Shao, Phys. Rev. D108, 104039 (2023), arXiv:2309.02871 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    I-Love-Q

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Science341, 365 (2013), arXiv:1302.4499 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astrophysics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D88, 023009 (2013), arXiv:1303.1528 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    L. Shao, N. Sennett, A. Buonanno, M. Kramer, and N. Wex, Phys. Rev. X7, 041025 (2017), arXiv:1704.07561 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Degeneracy in Studying the Supranuclear Equation of State and Modified Gravity with Neutron Stars

    L. Shao, AIP Conf. Proc.2127, 020016 (2019), arXiv:1901.07546 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    H. O. Silva, A. M. Holgado, A. Cárdenas-Avendaño, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 181101 (2021), arXiv:2004.01253 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Phys. Rept.681, 1–72 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    I-Love-Q Relations for Neutron Stars in dynamical Chern Simons Gravity

    T. Gupta, B. Majumder, K. Yagi, and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 025009 (2018), arXiv:1710.07862 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Yunes, X

    N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, Living Rev. Rel.28, 3 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    H. K. Lau, P. T. Leung, and L. M. Lin, Astrophys. J.714, 1234 (2010), arXiv:0911.0131 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Multipole Love Relations

    K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D89, 043011 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 129904 (2017), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 97, 129901 (2018)], arXiv:1311.0872 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Equation-of-state-independent relations in neutron stars

    A. Maselli, V. Cardoso, V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D88, 023007 (2013), arXiv:1304.2052 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, and V. Ferrari, Phys. Rev. D92, 124003 (2015), arXiv:1509.02171 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Approximate Universal Relations among Tidal Parameters for Neutron Star Binaries

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 015006 (2017), arXiv:1608.06187 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Y. Gao, L. Shao, and J. Steinhoff, Astrophys. J.954, 16 (2023), arXiv:2303.14130 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Z. Hu, Y. Gao, and L. Shao, (2025), arXiv:2505.13110 [gr-qc] . – 15 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitzeet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    The US Program in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Science: Contribution from the LIGO Laboratory

    D. Reitzeet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 141 (2019), arXiv:1903.04615 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Punturoet al., Class

    M. Punturoet al., Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories

    S. Hildet al., Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope

    B. Sathyaprakashet al., Class. Quant. Grav.29, 124013 (2012), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)], arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [59]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abacet al.(ET), (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 091101 (2018), arXiv:1710.05837 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    B. S. Sathyaprakashet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 251 (2019), arXiv:1903.09221 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Kalogeraet al., (2021), arXiv:2111.06990 [gr-qc]

    V. Kalogeraet al., (2021), arXiv:2111.06990 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Samajdar, J

    A. Samajdar, J. Janquart, C. Van Den Broeck, and T. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. D104, 044003 (2021), arXiv:2102.07544 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Samajdar and T

    A. Samajdar and T. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. D101, 124014 (2020), arXiv:2002.07918 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Compact Binary Coalescences in the Band of Ground-based Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    I. Mandel and R. O’Shaughnessy, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 114007 (2010), arXiv:0912.1074 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Parameter estimation on gravitational waves from multiple coalescing binaries

    I. Mandel, Phys. Rev. D81, 084029 (2010), arXiv:0912.5531 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [67]

    M. R. Adams, N. J. Cornish, and T. B. Littenberg, Phys. Rev. D86, 124032 (2012), arXiv:1209.6286 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  68. [68]

    B. D. Lackey and L. Wade, Phys. Rev. D91, 043002 (2015), arXiv:1410.8866 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

    I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 1086 (2019), arXiv:1809.02063 [physics.data-an]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Golomb and C

    J. Golomb and C. Talbot, Astrophys. J.926, 79 (2022), arXiv:2106.15745 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Z. Wang, Y. Gao, D. Liang, J. Zhao, and L. Shao, JCAP11, 038 (2024), arXiv:2409.11103 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift?

    M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, Astrophys. J. Lett.863, L41 (2018), arXiv:1805.10270 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    J.87618 (Preprint1902.03300)

    N. Farrow, X.-J. Zhu, and E. Thrane, Astrophys. J.876, 18 (2019), arXiv:1902.03300 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. C58, 1804 (1998)

    work page 1998

  76. [76]

    Thrane and C

    E. Thrane and C. Talbot, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.36, e010 (2019), [Erratum: Publ.Astron.Soc.Austral. 37, e036 (2020)], arXiv:1809.02293 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    L. S. Finn, Phys. Rev. D46, 5236 (1992), arXiv:gr-qc/9209010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  78. [78]

    D. Atta, V. Singh, and D. N. Basu, New Astron.120, 102422 (2025), arXiv:2408.00646 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE] . – 16 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.