pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.13220 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Probing the Nature of Dark Matter Self-Interactions Through Observations of Massive Black Hole Mergers

Zachary J. Hoelscher , Kelly Holley-Bockelmann , Akaxia Cruz , N. Nicole Sanchez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords dark matterself-interacting dark matterLISAmassive black holesgravitational wavesblack hole mergerscosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

LISA observations of massive black hole mergers can distinguish cold dark matter from self-interacting dark matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether LISA can indirectly probe dark matter by looking at massive black hole mergers. It uses simulations showing that self-interacting dark matter delays these mergers compared to cold dark matter due to flatter central densities. Mock data analysis indicates that roughly seventy mergers with strong signals would allow a statistical separation at the five percent significance level. This would matter if true because it opens a new avenue for testing dark matter models using gravitational wave astronomy instead of relying solely on galaxy structure observations. The authors note their sample is small and the result illustrative.

Core claim

Previous work shows that SIDM with a constant cross section of 1 cm²/g delays MBH mergers as compared to CDM when the host halo has a flattened central density profile. In this work, we use mock gravitational wave observations of MBH mergers to test LISA's capability to indirectly probe dark matter physics. As a proof of concept, we use zoom-in simulations of two galaxy evolutionary histories to show that LISA may be able to distinguish (with a p-value ≤ 0.05) between CDM and SIDM with a short-range interaction and a constant cross section of 1 cm²/g, provided at least ∼70 MBH mergers are observed with signal-to-noise ratios greater than 10.

What carries the argument

The delay in massive black hole merger timescales induced by the cored density profiles in self-interacting dark matter halos.

If this is right

  • At least seventy high signal-to-noise ratio massive black hole mergers are needed for LISA to achieve statistical distinction between the models.
  • This provides a pathway to probe dark matter self-interactions through gravitational wave observations.
  • The approach motivates future studies with velocity-dependent cross sections and larger simulation sets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar techniques could be applied to data from other future gravitational wave detectors to test dark matter models.
  • If the distinction holds, it would offer constraints on dark matter that are independent of small-scale structure problems.
  • The number of required observations might change with more complex dark matter interaction models.

Load-bearing premise

The merger delay effect found in prior small-sample Milky Way-mass simulations will produce observable differences in LISA data for a realistic population of galaxies without being washed out by other astrophysical variables.

What would settle it

Collecting observations of at least seventy massive black hole mergers with LISA and finding no significant difference in merger properties between CDM and SIDM predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.13220 by Akaxia Cruz, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, N. Nicole Sanchez, Zachary J. Hoelscher.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One of the simulated galaxies with CDM (left) and SIDM-1 (right), at redshift zero. With CDM, the total mass (gas + stars + dark matter) is 7.24 × 1011 M⊙, the stellar mass is 1.04 × 1010 M⊙, and the dark matter mass is 6.50 × 1011 M⊙. With SIDM-1, the total mass is 8.73×1011 M⊙, the stellar mass is 3.89×1010 M⊙, and the dark matter mass is 7.39×1011 M⊙. These masses are calculated using Pynbody, and inclu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Cumulative probability distributions of massive binary black hole merger properties for galaxies simulated with CDM (purple) and SIDM-1 (green). Left: Cumulative massive binary merger probability as a function of cosmic time. Note that the CDM model exhibits more rapid assembly of massive black holes by mergers at early times. Right: Cumulative massive binary merger probability as a function of mass ratio.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We plot the distribution of 10000 empirical CDFs for cosmic times of 80 MBH mergers, CDM (purple) and SIDM-1 (green). The darker regions contain the 25th and 75th percentiles, whereas the lighter regions enclose the 5th and 95th percentiles. The dark line traces the 50th percentile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: We plot the distribution of 10000 empirical CDFs for 180 MBH merger mass ratios, CDM (purple) and SIDM-1 (green). The darker regions contain the 25th and 75th percentiles, whereas the lighter regions enclose the 5th and 95th percentiles. The dark line traces the 50th percentile. 3.1. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test To discriminate between CDM and SIDM-1 merger histories, we apply a KS test (A. Kolmogorov 1933; N. … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average p–values (black-dots) for comparing cosmic times (left) or mass-ratios (right) of mergers with CDM to mergers with SIDM-1. We indicate the average plus 2σ with an X. The red line indicates the significance threshold of 0.05. We note that the distribution of p–values is not Gaussian, thus 2σ should be interpreted as an indicator of empirical scatter instead of a Gaussian confidence interval. For dif… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The ranges of possible SNRs for each merger, varying inclination and spin magnitude, are shown for GM7 with CDM (left; purple) and SIDM-1 (right; green). Even with the most pessimistic SNR values, LISA would be able to detect such mergers. The smallest SNRs shown above are approximately 49 (left) and 52 (right). 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK In this work, we employ two comparable Milky… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Though the nature of dark matter remains elusive, two models have come to prominence with testable predictions: cold dark matter (CDM) and self-interacting dark matter (SIDM). While CDM remains the widely accepted model, SIDM was introduced to potentially help resolve the discrepancies between the predictions of the CDM model and observational data, in particular the predicted central density profiles. Previous work involving simulations of small numbers of Milky Way-mass galaxies shows that SIDM with a constant cross section of 1 $\rm{cm^2/g}$ delays massive black hole (MBH) mergers as compared to CDM when the host halo has a flattened central density profile. In this work, we use mock gravitational wave observations of MBH mergers to test LISA's capability to indirectly probe dark matter physics. As a proof of concept, we use zoom-in simulations of two galaxy evolutionary histories to show that LISA may be able to distinguish (with a p--value $\leq$ 0.05) between CDM and SIDM with a short-range interaction and a constant cross section of 1 $\rm{cm^2/g}$, provided at least $\sim70$ MBH mergers are observed with signal-to-noise ratios greater than 10. Given our small sample size, this should be regarded as illustrative, rather than definitive. We emphasize that our work does not consider more realistic models with a velocity-dependent cross section, though our exploratory work shows that LISA may provide a pathway to probe dark matter self-interactions, motivating future work with more realistic, currently-favored models and larger simulation suites.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a proof-of-concept analysis showing that mock LISA observations of massive black hole (MBH) mergers, drawn from zoom-in simulations of two galaxy evolutionary histories, may allow distinction between cold dark matter (CDM) and self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) with a constant cross-section of 1 cm²/g at a p-value ≤0.05, provided at least ~70 events with signal-to-noise ratio >10 are observed. The result is explicitly labeled illustrative due to the limited sample.

Significance. If the reported merger-time delay generalizes beyond the two histories examined, the work would establish a novel, falsifiable pathway to constrain dark matter self-interactions via gravitational-wave astronomy. The direct, independent comparison of CDM and SIDM simulations together with the generation of LISA mock catalogs constitutes a concrete technical strength that future larger-scale studies can build upon.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the quantitative claim paragraph: the p-value ≤0.05 separation with ~70 high-SNR mergers is derived from the SIDM-induced delay observed in only two zoom-in histories. No error bars, bootstrap estimates, or ensemble variance across additional merger trees are reported, so the statistical separability remains load-bearing for the central claim yet rests on an unquantified extrapolation from the small sample explicitly flagged as illustrative.
  2. [Simulation and results section] Simulation and results section (where the two evolutionary histories are compared): the analysis does not marginalize over realistic galaxy-to-galaxy scatter in gas dynamics, MBH seeding, or alternate astrophysical prescriptions. If the delay amplitude is comparable to or smaller than this scatter, the LISA-observable distribution shift vanishes even at N=70; this assumption is therefore central and requires explicit sensitivity tests.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and main text should state the numerical value of the merger delay (in Gyr or redshift) for each of the two histories so readers can judge its magnitude relative to typical astrophysical scatter.
  2. Notation for signal-to-noise ratio threshold and the precise definition of the p-value test statistic should be clarified with a short equation or reference to the mock-observation pipeline.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of this proof-of-concept study. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to better reflect the illustrative nature of the results while defending the core approach.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the quantitative claim paragraph: the p-value ≤0.05 separation with ~70 high-SNR mergers is derived from the SIDM-induced delay observed in only two zoom-in histories. No error bars, bootstrap estimates, or ensemble variance across additional merger trees are reported, so the statistical separability remains load-bearing for the central claim yet rests on an unquantified extrapolation from the small sample explicitly flagged as illustrative.

    Authors: We agree that the reported separation relies on the two available zoom-in histories and that no ensemble variance or bootstrap estimates are provided. The manuscript already flags the result as illustrative due to the small sample. In the revised version we have expanded the abstract and discussion to explicitly state that the p-value is computed from the merger-time distributions in these specific cases and to stress that larger simulation suites will be required to quantify variance across merger trees. The claim is framed as demonstrating a possible pathway rather than a statistically robust measurement from a representative ensemble. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Simulation and results section] Simulation and results section (where the two evolutionary histories are compared): the analysis does not marginalize over realistic galaxy-to-galaxy scatter in gas dynamics, MBH seeding, or alternate astrophysical prescriptions. If the delay amplitude is comparable to or smaller than this scatter, the LISA-observable distribution shift vanishes even at N=70; this assumption is therefore central and requires explicit sensitivity tests.

    Authors: We concur that the present analysis employs fixed prescriptions for gas dynamics and MBH seeding without marginalizing over galaxy-to-galaxy variations or alternate models. The delay is observed in both examined histories, but we have not conducted explicit sensitivity tests. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section acknowledging this limitation and noting that if astrophysical scatter exceeds the SIDM-induced delay, distinguishability at N=70 would be compromised. The work is presented as a proof-of-concept intended to motivate future studies that incorporate such marginalization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct comparison of independent simulations yields forecast

full rationale

The paper imports the constant 1 cm²/g cross-section and the qualitative merger-delay effect from prior external literature on Milky Way-mass zoom-ins, then runs mock LISA observations on its own two CDM/SIDM evolutionary histories to compute a statistical separation (p ≤ 0.05 at N ≈ 70). No parameter is fitted to the LISA mock catalog, no self-citation supplies the load-bearing premise, and the claimed distinguishability is an output of the simulation comparison rather than a redefinition or renaming of the inputs. The limited sample of two histories affects robustness but does not reduce the derivation to its own assumptions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the imported result that SIDM delays MBH mergers in cored profiles and on the assumption that mock LISA signals faithfully capture that delay.

free parameters (1)
  • SIDM cross section = 1 cm²/g
    Constant value of 1 cm²/g taken from earlier work to produce flattened density profiles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SIDM with constant cross-section delays massive black hole mergers relative to CDM in flattened central density profiles
    Invoked directly from previous simulation studies mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 1266 out tokens · 41815 ms · 2026-05-17T21:04:33.438324+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ĀH"EMK6 ) |Vs NA 9u Gvq'Wӣ?l29??Nw類Rxn C\ Ovz|b)֥9ePi]s5kƇ/q)vvA&fv豓I5 , T \[K0r WӋåe bى]h) ,Yl</ B oeO ; ?=9 6goݳ W糯?M/ԙ8 ŧb ܖF2a]^b9 wT`Ż궊 5 - 'L Dkq> i + pk 8NC F6 <r4 gqr r[

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    Abdul-Karim, M., et al. 2025, title DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, 2503.14738

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Adame, A., et al. 2025, title DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025, 021, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2025

  6. [6]

    Ahn, K., & Shapiro, P. R. 2005, title Formation and evolution of self-interacting dark matter haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363, 1092, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09492.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09492.x 2005

  7. [7]

    E., et al

    Andrade, K. E., et al. 2021, title A stringent upper limit on dark matter self-interaction cross-section from cluster strong lensing, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 510, 54, 10.1093/mnras/stab3241

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3241 2021

  8. [8]

    M., Christensen, C

    Applebaum , E., Brooks , A. M., Christensen , C. R., et al. 2021, title Ultrafaint Dwarfs in a Milky Way Context: Introducing the Mint Condition DC Justice League Simulations, The Astrophysical Journal, 906, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/abcafa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcafa 2021

  9. [9]

    2021, title Dark matter and the early Universe: A review, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 119, 103865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103865

    Arbey , A., & Mahmoudi , F. 2021, title Dark matter and the early Universe: A review, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 119, 103865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103865

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103865 2021

  10. [10]

    B., Weber , H

    Arfken , G. B., Weber , H. J., & Harris , F. E. 2013, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 7th edn. (Elsevier Academic Press)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  12. [12]

    Azartash-Namin, B., et al. 2024, title Bursting with Feedback: The Relationship between Feedback Model and Bursty Star Formation Histories in Dwarf Galaxies, The Astrophysical Journal, 970, 40, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad49a5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad49a5 2024

  13. [13]

    L., & Inagaki, S

    Balberg, S., Shapiro, S. L., & Inagaki, S. 2002, title Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos and the Gravothermal Catastrophe, The Astrophysical Journal, 568, 475, 10.1086/339038

    work page doi:10.1086/339038 2002

  14. [14]

    Banik, J

    Banik, A., Kim, J. H., Pi, J. S., & Tsai, Y. 2025, title Echoes of Self-Interacting Dark Matter from Binary Black Hole Mergers, 2503.08787

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    C., Blandford, R

    Begelman , M. C., Blandford , R. D., & Rees , M. J. 1980, title Massive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei , , 287, 307, 10.1038/287307a0

    work page doi:10.1038/287307a0 1980

  16. [16]

    2024, title Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals in Milky Way Galaxies, 2411.12117

    Bellovary , J., Luo , Y., Quinn , T., et al. 2024, title Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals in Milky Way Galaxies, 2411.12117

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    2011, title The First Massive Black Hole Seeds and Their Hosts , , 742, 13, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/13

    Bellovary , J., Volonteri , M., Governato , F., et al. 2011, title The First Massive Black Hole Seeds and Their Hosts , , 742, 13, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/13

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/1/13 2011

  18. [18]

    M., Low , M.-M

    Bellovary , J. M., Low , M.-M. M., McKernan , B., & Ford , K. E. S. 2016, title Migration Traps in Disks Around Supermassive Black Holes, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 819, L17, 10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/L17

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/l17 2016

  19. [19]

    S., Ludlow , A

    Benítez-Llambay , A., Frenk, C. S., Ludlow , A. D., & Navarro , J. F. 2019, title Baryon-induced dark matter cores in the eagle simulations , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 488, 2387, 10.1093/mnras/stz1890

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1890 2019

  20. [20]

    1952, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 112, 195, doi: 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    Bondi , H. 1952, title On spherically symmetrical accretion , , 112, 195, 10.1093/mnras/112.2.195

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/112.2.195 1952

  21. [21]

    and Hoyle, F

    Bondi , H., & Hoyle , F. 1944, title On the mechanism of accretion by stars , , 104, 273, 10.1093/mnras/104.5.273

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/104.5.273 1944

  22. [22]

    2009, MNRAS, 394, 2255, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14499.x 24

    Booth , C. M., & Schaye , J. 2009, title Cosmological simulations of the growth of supermassive black holes and feedback from active galactic nuclei: method and tests , , 398, 53, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15043.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15043.x 2009

  23. [23]

    R., & Origlia, L

    Boylan-Kolchin , M., & Ma , C.-P. 2004, title Major mergers of galaxy haloes: cuspy or cored inner density profile? , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 349, 1117, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07585.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07585.x 2004

  24. [24]

    2000, title The Structure and Evolution of Weakly Self-interacting Cold Dark Matter Halos, The Astrophysical Journal, 534, L143, 10.1086/312674

    Burkert, A. 2000, title The Structure and Evolution of Weakly Self-interacting Cold Dark Matter Halos, The Astrophysical Journal, 534, L143, 10.1086/312674

    work page doi:10.1086/312674 2000

  25. [25]

    K., et al

    Chan, T. K., et al. 2015, title The impact of baryonic physics on the structure of dark matter haloes: the view from the FIRE cosmological simulations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 454, 2981, 10.1093/mnras/stv2165

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2165 2015

  26. [26]

    1943, title Dynamical friction

    Chandrasekhar, S. 1943, title Dynamical friction. I. General considerations: the coefficient of dynamical friction, Astrophysical Journal, 97, 255

    work page 1943

  27. [27]

    H., et al

    Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H., et al. 2006, title A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter*, The Astrophysical Journal, 648, L109, 10.1086/508162

    work page doi:10.1086/508162 2006

  28. [28]

    Astro2020 science white paper: The gravitational wave view of massive black holes

    Colpi , M., Holley-Bockelmann , K., Bogdanovic , T., et al. 2019, title Astro2020 science white paper: The gravitational wave view of massive black holes , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.06867, 10.48550/arXiv.1903.06867

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.06867 2019

  29. [29]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    Colpi, M., Danzmann, K., Hewitson, M., et al. 2024, title LISA definition study report, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Correa, C. A. 2021, title Constraining velocity-dependent self-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 503, 920, 10.1093/mnras/stab506

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab506 2021

  31. [31]

    A., et al

    Correa, C. A., et al. 2022, title TangoSIDM: tantalizing models of self-interacting dark matter, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 517, 3045, 10.1093/mnras/stac2830

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2830 2022

  32. [32]

    2020, title Self-interacting dark matter and the delay of supermassive black hole growth, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 2177–2187, 10.1093/mnras/staa3389

    Cruz , A., Pontzen , A., Volonteri , M., et al. 2020, title Self-interacting dark matter and the delay of supermassive black hole growth, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 2177–2187, 10.1093/mnras/staa3389

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3389 2020

  33. [33]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Cruz , A., Brooks , A., Lisanti , M., et al. 2025, title Dwarf diversity in Λ CDM with baryons , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.11800. 2510.11800

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Di Cintio, A., Tremmel, M., Governato, F., et al. 2017, title A rumble in the dark: signatures of self-interacting dark matter in supermassive black hole dynamics and galaxy density profiles, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 2845, 10.1093/mnras/stx1043

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1043 2017

  35. [35]

    Di Cintio, A., et al. 2013, title The dependence of dark matter profiles on the stellar-to-halo mass ratio: a prediction for cusps versus cores, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 437, 415, 10.1093/mnras/stt1891

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1891 2013

  36. [36]

    2019, title NIHAO XXI: the emergence of low surface brightness galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 2535, 10.1093/mnras/stz985

    Di Cintio, A., et al. 2019, title NIHAO XXI: the emergence of low surface brightness galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 2535, 10.1093/mnras/stz985

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz985 2019

  37. [37]

    Dubinski , J., & Carlberg , R. G. 1991, title The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, The Astrophysical Journal, 378, 496, 10.1086/170451

    work page doi:10.1086/170451 1991

  38. [38]

    Dunn , G., Bellovary , J., Holley-Bockelmann , K., Christensen , C., & Quinn , T. 2018, title Sowing Black Hole Seeds: Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation with Realistic Lyman–Werner Radiation in Cosmological Simulations, The Astrophysical Journal, 861, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac7c2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac7c2 2018

  39. [39]

    K., Holley-Bockelmann , K., & Bellovary , J

    Dunn , G. K., Holley-Bockelmann , K., & Bellovary , J. M. 2020, title The Role of Gravitational Recoil in the Assembly of Massive Black Hole Seeds, The Astrophysical Journal, 896, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7cd2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7cd2 2020

  40. [40]

    A., et al

    Dutton, A. A., et al. 2019, title NIHAO XX: the impact of the star formation threshold on the cusp–core transformation of cold dark matter haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 655, 10.1093/mnras/stz889

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz889 2019

  41. [41]

    2022, title Constraints on dark matter self-interaction from the internal density profiles of X-COP galaxy clusters, , 666, A41, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243205

    Eckert , D., Ettori , S., Robertson , A., et al. 2022, title Constraints on dark matter self-interaction from the internal density profiles of X-COP galaxy clusters, , 666, A41, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243205

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243205 2022

  42. [42]

    D., Bullock, J

    Elbert, O. D., Bullock, J. S., Garrison-Kimmel, S., et al. 2015, title Core formation in dwarf haloes with self-interacting dark matter: no fine-tuning necessary, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 453, 29, 10.1093/mnras/stv1470

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1470 2015

  43. [43]

    D., Yu, H.-B., & Zhong, Y.-M

    Essig, R., McDermott, S. D., Yu, H.-B., & Zhong, Y.-M. 2019, title Constraining Dissipative Dark Matter Self-Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 121102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.121102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.121102 2019

  44. [44]

    , author Carlson, R.E

    Fritsch , F. N., & Carlson , R. E. 1980, title Monotone Piecewise Cubic Interpolation, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 17, 238, 10.1137/0717021

    work page doi:10.1137/0717021 1980

  45. [45]

    B., et al

    Fry, A. B., et al. 2015, title All about baryons: revisiting SIDM predictions at small halo masses, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 1468, 10.1093/mnras/stv1330

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1330 2015

  46. [46]

    2020, title Multimode frequency-domain model for the gravitational wave signal from nonprecessing black-hole binaries, Phys

    Garc\' a-Quir\'os, C., Colleoni, M., Husa, S., et al. 2020, title Multimode frequency-domain model for the gravitational wave signal from nonprecessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 064002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.064002 2020

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Garza, S. L., Werk, J. K., Oppenheimer, B. D., et al. 2024, title The COS-Holes Survey: Connecting Galaxy Black Hole Mass with the State of the CGM, The Astrophysical Journal, 970, 115, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4ecc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4ecc 2024

  48. [48]

    R., & Origlia, L

    Gentile , G., Salucci , P., Klein , U., Vergani , D., & Kalberla , P. 2004, title The cored distribution of dark matter in spiral galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 351, 903, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07836.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07836.x 2004

  49. [49]

    Governato, F., et al. 2012, title Cuspy no more: how outflows affect the central dark matter and baryon distribution in Λ cold dark matter galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 422, 1231, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20696.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20696.x 2012

  50. [50]

    F., & Ostriker, J

    Hennawi, J. F., & Ostriker, J. P. 2002, title Observational Constraints on the Self-interacting Dark Matter Scenario and the Growth of Supermassive Black Holes, The Astrophysical Journal, 572, 41, 10.1086/340226

    work page doi:10.1086/340226 2002

  51. [51]

    M., Protopapas, P., Sandvik, H

    Holley-Bockelmann , K., Weinberg , M., & Katz , N. 2005, title Bar-induced evolution of dark matter cusps, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363, 991, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09501.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09501.x 2005

  52. [52]

    Hoyle , F., & Lyttleton , R. A. 1939, title The effect of interstellar matter on climatic variation , Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 35, 405, 10.1017/S0305004100021150

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100021150 1939

  53. [53]

    D., et al

    Jahn, E. D., et al. 2023, title Real and counterfeit cores: how feedback expands haloes and disrupts tracers of inner gravitational potential in dwarf galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 461, 10.1093/mnras/stad109

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad109 2023

  54. [54]

    Physics of the Dark Universe , keywords =

    K., G., & Desai, S. 2023, title Constraints on Self-Interacting dark matter from relaxed galaxy groups, Physics of the Dark Universe, 42, 101291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101291

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101291 2023

  55. [55]

    B., & Yu, H.-B

    Kamada, A., Kaplinghat, M., Pace, A. B., & Yu, H.-B. 2017, title Self-Interacting Dark Matter Can Explain Diverse Galactic Rotation Curves, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 111102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.111102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.111102 2017

  56. [56]

    M., & Holley-Bockelmann, K

    Khan , F. M., & Holley-Bockelmann , K. 2021, title Extremely efficient mergers of intermediate-mass black hole binaries in nucleated dwarf galaxies , , 508, 1174, 10.1093/mnras/stab2646

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2646 2021

  57. [57]

    M., Holley-Bockelmann , K., Berczik , P., & Just , A

    Khan , F. M., Holley-Bockelmann , K., Berczik , P., & Just , A. 2013, title Supermassive Black Hole Binary Evolution in Axisymmetric Galaxies: The Final Parsec Problem is Not a Problem , , 773, 100, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/2/100 2013

  58. [58]

    Y., Peter, A

    Kim, S. Y., Peter, A. H. G., & Wittman, D. 2017, title In the wake of dark giants: new signatures of dark matter self-interactions in equal-mass mergers of galaxy clusters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 1414, 10.1093/mnras/stx896

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx896 2017

  59. [59]

    Koda, J., & Shapiro, P. R. 2011, title Gravothermal collapse of isolated self-interacting dark matter haloes: N-body simulation versus the fluid model, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415, 1125, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18684.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18684.x 2011

  60. [60]

    1933, title Sulla determinazione emp \'i rica di una legge di distribuzione, Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 4, 83

    Kolmogorov , A. 1933, title Sulla determinazione emp \'i rica di una legge di distribuzione, Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 4, 83

    work page 1933

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Lazar, A., et al. 2020, title A dark matter profile to model diverse feedback-induced core sizes of ΛCDM haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497, 2393, 10.1093/mnras/staa2101

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2101 2020

  62. [62]

    D., Navarro , J

    Ludlow, A. D., et al. 2013, title The mass profile and accretion history of cold dark matter haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 432, 1103, 10.1093/mnras/stt526

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt526 2013

  63. [63]

    2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino , R., Scholtz , J., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2024, title JADES: The diverse population of infant black holes at 4 < z < 11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty , , 691, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  64. [64]

    Mandelbaum, R., et al. 2006, title Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy–galaxy weak lensing, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 372, 758, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10906.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10906.x 2006

  65. [65]

    Menon , H., Wesolowski , L., & Zheng , G. e. a. 2015, title Adaptive techniques for clustered N-body cosmological simulations, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 2, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40668-015-0007-9

    work page doi:10.1186/s40668-015-0007-9 2015

  66. [66]

    M., Applebaum, E., et al

    Munshi, F., et al. 2021, title Quantifying Scatter in Galaxy Formation at the Lowest Masses, The Astrophysical Journal, 923, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db6 2021

  67. [67]

    2024, ApJL, 960, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76

    Natarajan , P., Pacucci , F., Ricarte , A., et al. 2024, title First Detection of an Overmassive Black Hole Galaxy UHZ1: Evidence for Heavy Black Hole Seed Formation from Direct Collapse , , 960, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76 2024

  68. [68]

    F., Eke , V

    Navarro , J. F., Eke , V. R., & Frenk , C. S. 1996, title The cores of dwarf galaxy haloes , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 283, L72, 10.1093/mnras/283.3.L72

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/283.3.l72 1996

  69. [69]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, title The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, The Astrophysical Journal, 462, 563, 10.1086/177173

    work page doi:10.1086/177173 1996

  70. [70]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1997, title A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering, The Astrophysical Journal, 490, 493, 10.1086/304888

    work page doi:10.1086/304888 1997

  71. [71]

    2024, title gwastro/pycbc: v2.3.3 release of PyCBC, , v2.3.3 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10473621

    Nitz, A., Harry, I., Brown, D., et al. 2024, title gwastro/pycbc: v2.3.3 release of PyCBC, , v2.3.3 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10473621

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10473621 2024

  72. [72]

    A., Navarro, J

    Oman, K. A., et al. 2015, title The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 452, 3650, 10.1093/mnras/stv1504

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1504 2015

  73. [73]

    Ostriker, J. P. 2000, title Collisional Dark Matter and the Origin of Massive Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5258, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5258

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.5258 2000

  74. [74]

    S., et al

    Oñorbe, J., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., et al. 2015, title Forged in fire: cusps, cores and baryons in low-mass dwarf galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 454, 2092, 10.1093/mnras/stv2072

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2072 2015

  75. [75]

    Peebles , P. J. E. 1982, title Large-scale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scale-invariant primeval perturbations , , 263, L1, 10.1086/183911

    work page doi:10.1086/183911 1982

  76. [76]

    Peter, A. H. G., Rocha, M., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M. 2013, title Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter – II. Halo shapes versus observations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 430, 105, 10.1093/mnras/sts535

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts535 2013

  77. [77]

    2014, title Planck 2013 results

    Planck Collaboration . 2014, title Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, A & A, 571, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 2014

  78. [78]

    2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim, N. , Akrami, Y. , et al. 2020, title Planck 2018 results - VI. Cosmological parameters, , 641, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2020

  79. [79]

    C., Brotherton, M

    Pontzen, A., & Governato, F. 2012, title How supernova feedback turns dark matter cusps into cores, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 421, 3464, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20571.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20571.x 2012

  80. [80]

    2013, title pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python , , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002

    Pontzen , A., Ro s kar , R., Stinson , G., & Woods , R. 2013, title pynbody: N-Body/SPH analysis for python , , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1305.002

    work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.