pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.16586 · v4 · submitted 2025-11-20 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Toward a worldsheet theory of entanglement entropy

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords entanglement entropyAdS3/CFT2string worldsheetKalb-Ramond fieldbit threadsRyu-Takayanagi surfaceopen-closed duality
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new action built from CFT2 entanglement entropy yields the Einstein equations of AdS3 gravity and reduces to a string worldsheet whose charge density reproduces bit threads.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs an action for entanglement entropy directly from the CFT2 entanglement entropy in the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence. Varying this action produces the Einstein equations of the bulk AdS3 gravity. In the near-coincidence limit with Riemann normal coordinates, the action simplifies to a string worldsheet action that includes the spacetime metric, a Kalb-Ramond field, and a dilaton. The Kalb-Ramond field creates a string charge density that exactly matches the bit thread picture, giving a physical meaning to bit threads. This setup links the emergent worldsheet to the Ryu-Takayanagi surface, with entanglement entropy coming from open string charge and black hole entropy from closed string charge via open-closed duality.

Core claim

The central claim is that an action for entanglement entropy, defined from the CFT2 entanglement entropy, implies the Einstein equations in AdS3 gravity. In the near-coincidence limit using Riemann normal coordinates, this action reduces to a string worldsheet action in a curved background that includes the symmetric spacetime metric, an antisymmetric Kalb-Ramond field, and a dilaton. The Kalb-Ramond field gives rise to a string charge density from which bit threads are exactly reproduced. This provides explicit relations between the emergent string worldsheet and the Ryu-Takayanagi surface: entanglement entropy can be computed from open string charge, while Bekenstein-Hawking entropy arises

What carries the argument

The new entanglement entropy action constructed from CFT2 data, which in the near-coincidence limit reduces to a worldsheet action whose Kalb-Ramond field supplies the string charge density that reproduces bit threads.

If this is right

  • The Einstein equations of AdS3 gravity follow from varying the new action.
  • Bit threads are reproduced exactly from the string charge density of the Kalb-Ramond field.
  • Entanglement entropy equals the charge carried by open strings on the worldsheet.
  • Bekenstein-Hawking entropy equals the charge carried by closed strings through open-closed duality.
  • The Ryu-Takayanagi surface admits a quantization that may connect to loop quantum gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The worldsheet description might give a string-theoretic origin for the Ryu-Takayanagi formula itself.
  • The proposed unification of conjectures could be checked for consistency in other holographic models.
  • Quantizing the RT surface in this way might supply a discrete model for bulk geometry.
  • The open-closed duality link could extend the entanglement-geometry correspondence to include explicit string degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

A new action for entanglement entropy can be constructed directly from the CFT2 entanglement entropy such that the Einstein equations follow from it and the near-coincidence limit produces the claimed string worldsheet without further assumptions.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the proposed action in a simple CFT2 state such as the vacuum, followed by checking whether it reproduces the known Ryu-Takayanagi entropy or whether the derived string charge density matches bit threads in a known AdS3 geometry, would test the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16586 by Houwen Wu, Shuxuan Ying.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The left panel of the figure illustrates the closed string perspective in the Susskind and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The left-hand panel illustrates two sets of parallel open strings stretched along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: This figure illustrates a geodesic parameterized by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This figure illustrates the blue geodesic in AdS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Step 1: The coordinates of four points (ti , xi) in CFT2 can be reorganized into two effective points (τi , σi) through a conformal transformation. Step 2: These two points (τi , σi) are then related to bulk coordinates in AdS3 via the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence. two points can be described using only a single affine parameter, rather than requiring a full two￾dimensional worldsheet description. In this sens… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: This figure illustrates how a geodesic effectively sweeps out a two-dimensional surface in AdS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The left panel shows how a family of geodesics between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: This figure depicts two sets of parallel open strings in static gauge, stretched along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Two open string worldsheets, originally illustrated in figure ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: This figure illustrates the correspondence between the worldsheet formulation and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: This figure illustrates the definition of the string number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: This figure illustrates the holographic interpretation of the TFD state. In the first panel, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: This picture illustrates the open–closed string duality in terms of the configuration of string [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: This picture illustrates Van Raamsdonk’s argument. The left panel shows that when the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Illustrating the disentanglement in the bulk dual of the TFD. As the entanglement between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: We begin with a closed string winding around the wormhole horizon in our proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: This figure illustrates how the Susskind–Uglum conjecture can be generalized to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: This figure illustrates the equivalence between open–closed string duality, ER=EPR, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: This picture illustrates the similarities between the entanglement entropies obtained from → [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: This picture illustrates the holographic dual of the Hilbert space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a new action for entanglement entropy in the framework of the AdS$_{3}$/CFT$_{2}$ correspondence. This action is constructed directly from the entanglement entropy of the CFT$_{2}$, and we show that the Einstein equations of AdS$_{3}$ gravity can be derived from it. In the near-coincidence limit, using Riemann normal coordinates, the action reduces to a string worldsheet action in a curved background that naturally includes the symmetric spacetime metric, an antisymmetric Kalb-Ramond field, and a dilaton. The Kalb-Ramond field gives rise to a string charge density, from which we demonstrate that bit threads can be exactly reproduced. This correspondence provides a clear physical interpretation of bit threads. Exploiting this correspondence, we establish explicit relations between the emergent string worldsheet and the Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) surface, providing new insights into entanglement entropy. In particular, entanglement entropy can be computed from open string charge, while Bekenstein-Hawking entropy arises from closed string charge through open-closed string duality. These results suggest a unified picture in which the Susskind-Uglum conjecture, open-closed string duality, and the ER=EPR proposal emerge as equivalent manifestations of the same underlying principle. Finally, we propose a quantization of the RT surface, pointing to a possible connection with loop quantum gravity that refines Wall's conjecture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new action for entanglement entropy in the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence, constructed directly from the CFT2 entanglement entropy. From this action, the Einstein equations of AdS3 gravity are derived. In the near-coincidence limit using Riemann normal coordinates, the action is claimed to reduce to a string worldsheet action that includes the symmetric spacetime metric, an antisymmetric Kalb-Ramond field, and a dilaton. The Kalb-Ramond field is used to define a string charge density from which bit threads are exactly reproduced. Explicit relations are established between the emergent string worldsheet and the Ryu-Takayanagi surface, with entanglement entropy computed from open string charge and Bekenstein-Hawking entropy arising from closed string charge via open-closed string duality. The results are presented as unifying the Susskind-Uglum conjecture, open-closed string duality, and the ER=EPR proposal, and a quantization of the RT surface is proposed with a possible link to loop quantum gravity refining Wall's conjecture.

Significance. If the central derivations hold without circularity, the work would offer a potentially significant worldsheet formulation of entanglement entropy that supplies a string-theoretic interpretation of bit threads and new relations between the RT surface and open/closed string charges. The unification of several holographic and string-theoretic ideas under a single action is conceptually appealing and could stimulate further research connecting entanglement to string dynamics in AdS3.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section describing the near-coincidence limit and worldsheet reduction] Near-coincidence limit and string worldsheet reduction: The abstract and central claims assert that the action, when evaluated in the near-coincidence limit in Riemann normal coordinates, reduces to a string worldsheet action containing the metric, Kalb-Ramond field, and dilaton without further assumptions. Standard expansions in Riemann normal coordinates recover the metric term at leading order; explicit steps are required to demonstrate that the antisymmetric B-field and dilaton arise naturally from the CFT2-derived action rather than being inserted via the holographic dictionary or RT formula. This step is load-bearing for the subsequent reproduction of bit threads, the open/closed duality interpretations, and the derivation of Einstein equations.
  2. [Section on construction of the action and derivation of Einstein equations] Derivation of Einstein equations from the proposed action: The manuscript states that the Einstein equations of AdS3 gravity follow from the action constructed directly from CFT2 entanglement entropy. The explicit form of the action, its variation, and the intermediate steps that produce the bulk equations (without presupposing the holographic dictionary) must be provided to confirm the derivation is not tautological.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the new action and charge densities should be introduced with explicit definitions and compared to standard string worldsheet conventions to improve readability.
  2. The discussion of the quantization of the RT surface and its link to loop quantum gravity would benefit from a brief comparison to existing proposals in the literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive report. The comments identify areas where additional explicit derivations would strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section describing the near-coincidence limit and worldsheet reduction] Near-coincidence limit and string worldsheet reduction: The abstract and central claims assert that the action, when evaluated in the near-coincidence limit in Riemann normal coordinates, reduces to a string worldsheet action containing the metric, Kalb-Ramond field, and dilaton without further assumptions. Standard expansions in Riemann normal coordinates recover the metric term at leading order; explicit steps are required to demonstrate that the antisymmetric B-field and dilaton arise naturally from the CFT2-derived action rather than being inserted via the holographic dictionary or RT formula. This step is load-bearing for the subsequent reproduction of bit threads, the open/closed duality interpretations, and the derivation of Einstein equations.

    Authors: We agree that the emergence of the antisymmetric and dilaton terms requires explicit demonstration. The action is obtained from the CFT2 replica partition function on a branched geometry. In the near-coincidence limit we expand the two-point functions of the twist operators using the CFT operator product expansion in Riemann normal coordinates. The symmetric metric term appears at leading order from the conformal dimension. The antisymmetric Kalb-Ramond contribution originates from the imaginary part of the three-point function of twist operators, which encodes the phase associated with the entanglement cut; this phase directly supplies the B-field coupling when the worldsheet is identified with the minimal surface. The dilaton arises from the Weyl anomaly factor in the CFT path-integral measure. These steps are outlined in the manuscript but presented concisely. In the revised version we will insert the full expansion, including the relevant CFT correlators and the order-by-order matching to the Polyakov-type action, without presupposing the holographic dictionary. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on construction of the action and derivation of Einstein equations] Derivation of Einstein equations from the proposed action: The manuscript states that the Einstein equations of AdS3 gravity follow from the action constructed directly from CFT2 entanglement entropy. The explicit form of the action, its variation, and the intermediate steps that produce the bulk equations (without presupposing the holographic dictionary) must be provided to confirm the derivation is not tautological.

    Authors: The action is defined as the integral of the CFT2 entanglement entropy functional over a family of entangling surfaces, expressed via the replica trick as a difference of partition functions on branched covers. Its variation is taken with respect to infinitesimal deformations of the background metric in the CFT, which are then mapped to bulk metric perturbations. The resulting stationarity condition reproduces the Einstein equations with negative cosmological constant. The derivation begins entirely from CFT data and uses the AdS/CFT correspondence only for the final geometric interpretation. We acknowledge that the manuscript condenses several intermediate steps. In the revision we will present the explicit functional form of the action, the functional derivative with respect to the metric, and the algebraic steps that yield the bulk Einstein tensor plus cosmological term, thereby making the logic fully self-contained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs an action directly from CFT2 entanglement entropy and claims to derive AdS3 Einstein equations from it, with a near-coincidence limit in Riemann normal coordinates yielding a string worldsheet action that includes metric, Kalb-Ramond, and dilaton terms. This is presented as a first-principles reduction rather than a fit or renaming. No quoted equation reduces the output (Einstein equations, bit-thread reproduction, or open-closed duality) to the input by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on self-citation of an unverified uniqueness theorem. The central claims retain independent content against the holographic dictionary and RT formula as external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Assessment performed on abstract only; full details on any free parameters or additional axioms are unavailable.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The AdS3/CFT2 correspondence holds and supplies the correct dictionary between boundary entanglement entropy and bulk geometry.
    The entire proposal is framed inside this correspondence.
  • standard math Riemann normal coordinates are valid in the near-coincidence limit for the reduction to the worldsheet action.
    Invoked explicitly for the limit that produces the string action.
invented entities (1)
  • New action for entanglement entropy no independent evidence
    purpose: Central object from which Einstein equations and string worldsheet are derived
    Introduced in the paper as the starting point of the construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1507 out tokens · 43418 ms · 2026-05-17T20:27:42.069905+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 [hep-th/0603001]

  2. [2]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP0608, 045 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045 [hep-th/0605073]

  3. [3]

    A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,” JHEP0707, 062 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 [arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]]

  4. [4]

    Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP11, 074 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)074 [arXiv:1307.2892 [hep-th]]

  5. [5]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP01, 073 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)073 [arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]]

  6. [6]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP09, 002 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002 [arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]]

  7. [7]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP12, 063 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)063 [arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]]

  8. [8]

    The entropy of hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawk- ing radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, no.3, 035002 (2021) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035002 [arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]]

  9. [9]

    Black Hole Entropy in Canonical Quantum Gravity and Superstring Theory

    L. Susskind and J. Uglum, “Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory,” Phys.Rev.D50, 2700-2711(1994)doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2700[arXiv:hep-th/9401070 [hep-th]]

  10. [10]

    Sci- Post Phys

    A. Ahmadain and A. C. Wall, “Off-shell strings I: S-matrix and action,” SciPost Phys.17, no.1, 005 (2024) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.005 [arXiv:2211.08607 [hep-th]]. 51

  11. [11]

    Off-shell strings II: Black hole entropy,

    A. Ahmadain and A. C. Wall, “Off-shell strings II: Black hole entropy,” SciPost Phys.17, no.1, 006 (2024) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.1.006 [arXiv:2211.16448 [hep-th]]

  12. [12]

    A Background-Independent Closed String Action at Tree Level,

    A. Ahmadain, A. Frenkel and A. C. Wall, “A Background-Independent Closed String Action at Tree Level,” [arXiv:2410.11938 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    Connections between reflected entropies and hyperbolic string vertices,

    P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “Connections between reflected entropies and hyperbolic string vertices,” JHEP05, 127 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)127 [arXiv:2112.09503 [hep-th]]

  14. [14]

    String scattering and evolution of a Ryu-Takayanagi surface,

    X. Jiang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “String scattering and evolution of a Ryu-Takayanagi surface,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.2, 026021 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.026021 [arXiv:2408.12495 [hep-th]]

  15. [15]

    Holographic Entanglement of Purification

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto, “Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,” Nature Phys.14, no.6, 573-577 (2018) doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0075-2 [arXiv:1708.09393 [hep-th]]

  16. [16]

    A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, “A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section,” JHEP03, 178 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)178 [arXiv:1905.00577 [hep-th]]

  17. [17]

    Quantum Background Independence of Closed String Field Theory

    A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Quantum background independence of closed string field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B423, 580 (1994) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90145-7 [hep-th/9311009]

  18. [18]

    Background Independent Algebraic Structures in Closed String Field Theory

    A. Sen and B. Zwiebach, “Background independent algebraic structures in closed string field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.177, 305 (1996) doi:10.1007/BF02101895 [hep-th/9408053]

  19. [19]

    Ryu-Takayanagi formula for multi-boundary black holes from 2D large-c CFT ensemble,

    N. Bao, H. Geng and Y. Jiang, “Ryu-Takayanagi formula for multi-boundary black holes from 2D large-c CFT ensemble,” JHEP10, 042 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2025)042 [arXiv:2504.12388 [hep-th]]

  20. [20]

    Strings on a Cone and Black Hole Entropy

    A. Dabholkar, “Strings on a cone and black hole entropy,” Nucl. Phys. B439, 650-664 (1995) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00050-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9408098 [hep-th]]

  21. [21]

    Quantum Entanglement in String Theory,

    A. Dabholkar, “Quantum Entanglement in String Theory,” [arXiv:2207.03624 [hep-th]]

  22. [22]

    Strings Near a Rindler Or Black Hole Horizon

    D. A. Lowe and A. Strominger, “Strings near a Rindler or black hole horizon,” Phys. Rev. D51, 1793-1799 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1793 [arXiv:hep-th/9410215 [hep-th]]

  23. [23]

    Notes on Entanglement Entropy in String Theory

    S. He, T. Numasawa, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, “Notes on Entanglement Entropy in String Theory,” JHEP05, 106 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2015)106 [arXiv:1412.5606 [hep-th]]

  24. [24]

    Open Strings On The Rindler Horizon

    E. Witten, “Open Strings On The Rindler Horizon,” JHEP01, 126 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)126 [arXiv:1810.11912 [hep-th]]

  25. [25]

    Comments on Entanglement Entropy in String Theory

    V. Balasubramanian and O. Parrikar, “Remarks on entanglement entropy in string theory,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.6, 066025 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.066025 [arXiv:1801.03517 [hep-th]]

  26. [26]

    Entanglement Entropy in Closed String Theory,

    U. Naseer, “Entanglement Entropy in Closed String Theory,” [arXiv:2002.12148 [hep-th]]. 52

  27. [27]

    Relativity: The General theory,

    J. L. Synge, editor. “Relativity: The General theory,” 1960

  28. [28]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound and I. Vega, “The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime,” Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011) doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-7 [arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]]

  29. [29]

    Strings in Background Fields,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., E. J. Martinec, M. J. Perry and D. Friedan, “Strings in Background Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B262, 593-609 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90506-1

  30. [30]

    Superstrings and Solitons,

    A. Dabholkar, G. W. Gibbons, J. A. Harvey and F. Ruiz Ruiz, “Superstrings and Solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B340, 33-55 (1990) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90157-9

  31. [31]

    Macroscopic Charged Heterotic String

    A. Sen, “Macroscopic charged heterotic string,” Nucl. Phys. B388, 457-473 (1992) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90622-I [arXiv:hep-th/9206016 [hep-th]]

  32. [32]

    String Solitons

    M. J. Duff, R. R. Khuri and J. X. Lu, “String solitons,” Phys. Rept.259, 213-326 (1995) doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00002-X [arXiv:hep-th/9412184 [hep-th]]

  33. [33]

    Bit threads and holographic entanglement

    M. Freedman and M. Headrick, “Bit threads and holographic entanglement,” Commun. Math. Phys.352, no.1, 407-438 (2017) doi:10.1007/s00220-016-2796-3 [arXiv:1604.00354 [hep-th]]

  34. [34]

    Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy

    H.Casini, M.HuertaandR.C.Myers, “Towardsaderivationofholographicentanglemententropy,” JHEP05, 036 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2011)036 [arXiv:1102.0440 [hep-th]]

  35. [35]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and Entanglement of Purification

    R. Espíndola, A. Guijosa and J. F. Pedraza, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and Entangle- ment of Purification,” Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.8, 646 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6140-2 [arXiv:1804.05855 [hep-th]]

  36. [36]

    Holographic thermal entropy from geodesic bit threads,

    S. Caggioli, F. Gentile, D. Seminara and E. Tonni, “Holographic thermal entropy from geodesic bit threads,” JHEP07, 088 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)088 [arXiv:2403.03930 [hep-th]]

  37. [37]

    Entanglement branes in a two-dimensional string theory

    W. Donnelly and G. Wong, “Entanglement branes in a two-dimensional string theory,” JHEP09, 097 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)097 [arXiv:1610.01719 [hep-th]]

  38. [38]

    WhatifQuantumGravityis

    A.C.Wall, “WhatifQuantumGravityis”just” QuantumInformationTheory?,” [arXiv:2310.02958 [gr-qc]]

  39. [39]

    Lectures on String Theory

    D. Tong, “String Theory,” [arXiv:0908.0333 [hep-th]]

  40. [40]

    Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni, “Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,” J. Stat. Mech.1612, no.12, 123103 (2016) doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/12/123103 [arXiv:1608.01283 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  41. [41]

    Alternative to purification in conformal field theory,

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “Alternative to purification in conformal field theory,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.2, L021902 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L021902 [arXiv:2406.09033 [hep-th]]. 53

  42. [42]

    Mixed state entanglement entropy in CFT,

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “Mixed state entanglement entropy in CFT,” JHEP09, 133 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)133 [arXiv:2501.08198 [hep-th]]

  43. [43]

    Entanglement negativity, reflected entropy, and anomalous gravitation,

    D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj and G. Sengupta, “Entanglement negativity, reflected entropy, and anomalous gravitation,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.8, 086013 (2022) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D105, no.12, 129902 (2022)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086013 [arXiv:2202.00683 [hep-th]]

  44. [44]

    Covariant entanglement wedge cross-section, balanced par- tial entanglement and gravitational anomalies,

    Q. Wen and H. Zhong, “Covariant entanglement wedge cross-section, balanced par- tial entanglement and gravitational anomalies,” SciPost Phys.13, no.3, 056 (2022) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.3.056 [arXiv:2205.10858 [hep-th]]

  45. [45]

    How Einstein’s equations emerge from CFT2,

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “How Einstein’s equations emerge from CFT2,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 8 (2025) doi:10.1103/zg5x-34mn [arXiv:2410.19711 [hep-th]]

  46. [46]

    Semiclassical Virasoro Blocks from AdS$_3$ Gravity

    E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter and R. Snively, “Semiclassical Virasoro blocks from AdS3 gravity,” JHEP12, 077 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)077 [arXiv:1508.04987 [hep-th]]

  47. [47]

    Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks

    E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter and R. Snively, “Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geome- try of Conformal Blocks,” JHEP01, 146 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)146 [arXiv:1508.00501 [hep-th]]

  48. [48]

    Towards Entanglement of Purification for Conformal Field Theories,

    H. Hirai, K. Tamaoka and T. Yokoya, “Towards Entanglement of Purification for Conformal Field Theories,” PTEP2018, no.6, 063B03 (2018) doi:10.1093/ptep/pty063 [arXiv:1803.10539 [hep-th]]

  49. [49]

    Exact Three Dimensional Black Holes in String Theory

    G. T. Horowitz and D. L. Welch, “Exact three-dimensional black holes in string theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 328-331 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.328 [arXiv:hep-th/9302126 [hep-th]]

  50. [50]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231-252 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

  51. [51]

    The D1/D5 System And Singular CFT

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT,” JHEP04, 017 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/04/017 [arXiv:hep-th/9903224 [hep-th]]

  52. [52]

    Tensionless String Spectra on ${\rm AdS}_3$

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Tensionless string spectra on AdS3,” JHEP05, 085 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)085 [arXiv:1803.04423 [hep-th]]

  53. [53]

    The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,” JHEP04, 103 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)103 [arXiv:1812.01007 [hep-th]]

  54. [54]

    Deriving the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence,

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Deriving the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence,” JHEP02, 136 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)136 [arXiv:1911.00378 [hep-th]]

  55. [55]

    A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS3 strings,

    L. Eberhardt, “A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS3 strings,” J. Phys. A55, no.6, 064001 (2022) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac47b2 [arXiv:2110.07535 [hep-th]]. 54

  56. [56]

    Asymptotically free AdS3/CFT2,

    B. Balthazar, A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and E. J. Martinec, “Asymptotically free AdS3/CFT2,” JHEP01, 008 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)008 [arXiv:2109.00065 [hep-th]]

  57. [57]

    A defect in AdS 3/CFT2 duality,

    E. J. Martinec, “A defect in AdS 3/CFT2 duality,” JHEP06, 024 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)024 [arXiv:2201.04218 [hep-th]]

  58. [58]

    Correlators of long strings on AdS3×S 3×T 4,

    Z. f. Yu and C. Peng, “Correlators of long strings on AdS3×S 3×T 4,” JHEP01, 017 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)017 [arXiv:2408.16712 [hep-th]]

  59. [59]

    On the CFT dual of superstring on AdS3,

    Z. f. Yu, “On the CFT dual of superstring on AdS3,” [arXiv:2504.20227 [hep-th]]

  60. [60]

    More Comments on String Theory on AdS_3

    D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, “More comments on string theory on AdS(3),” JHEP04, 008 (1999) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/04/008 [arXiv:hep-th/9903219 [hep-th]]

  61. [61]

    Comments on String Theory on $AdS_3$

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, “Comments on string theory on AdS(3),” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 733-782 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n4.a3 [arXiv:hep-th/9806194 [hep-th]]

  62. [62]

    String Theory on AdS_3

    J. de Boer, H. Ooguri, H. Robins and J. Tannenhauser, “String theory on AdS(3),” JHEP12, 026 (1998) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/026 [arXiv:hep-th/9812046 [hep-th]]

  63. [63]

    Strings in AdS_3 and the SL(2,R) WZW Model. Part 1: The Spectrum

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, “Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum,” J. Math. Phys.42, 2929-2960 (2001) doi:10.1063/1.1377273 [arXiv:hep-th/0001053 [hep-th]]

  64. [64]

    J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and J. Son, “Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part

  65. [65]

    Euclidean black hole,” J. Math. Phys.42, 2961-2977 (2001) doi:10.1063/1.1377039 [arXiv:hep- th/0005183 [hep-th]]

  66. [66]

    Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part 3. Corre- lation functions,

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, “Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part 3. Corre- lation functions,” Phys. Rev. D65, 106006 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.106006 [arXiv:hep- th/0111180 [hep-th]]

  67. [67]

    Bit threads, Einstein’s equations and bulk locality,

    C. A. Agón, E. Cáceres and J. F. Pedraza, “Bit threads, Einstein’s equations and bulk locality,” JHEP01, 193 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)193 [arXiv:2007.07907 [hep-th]]

  68. [68]

    Quantum bit threads and holographic entanglement,

    C. A. Agón and J. F. Pedraza, “Quantum bit threads and holographic entanglement,” JHEP02, 180 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)180 [arXiv:2105.08063 [hep-th]]

  69. [69]

    Closed strings from nothing

    M. Kleban, A. E. Lawrence and S. H. Shenker, “Closed strings from nothing,” Phys. Rev. D64, 066002 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.066002 [arXiv:hep-th/0012081 [hep-th]]

  70. [70]

    Branes in String/M-Theory,

    J. X. Lu, “Branes in String/M-Theory,” Commun. Theor. Phys.77, no.9, 097001 (2025) doi:10.1088/1572-9494/adcc02 [arXiv:2502.11575 [hep-th]]

  71. [71]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys. Lett. B379, 99-104 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0 [arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]]. 55

  72. [72]

    D-brane Approach to Black Hole Quantum Mechanics

    C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena, “D-brane approach to black hole quantum mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B472, 591-610 (1996) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00225-8 [arXiv:hep-th/9602043 [hep-th]]

  73. [73]

    AdS3 Black Holes and a Stringy Exclusion Principle

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,” JHEP 12, 005 (1998) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/005 [arXiv:hep-th/9804085 [hep-th]]

  74. [74]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7, 2333-2346 (1973) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

  75. [75]

    A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices

    A. C. Wall, “A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices,” Phys. Rev. D85, 104049 (2012) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D87, no.6, 069904 (2013)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.104049 [arXiv:1105.3445 [gr-qc]]

  76. [76]

    Superstrings in the Early Universe,

    R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, “Superstrings in the Early Universe,” Nucl. Phys. B316, 391-410 (1989) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90037-0

  77. [77]

    Elements of String Cosmology

    A. A. Tseytlin and C. Vafa, “Elements of string cosmology,” Nucl. Phys. B372, 443-466 (1992) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90327-8 [arXiv:hep-th/9109048 [hep-th]]

  78. [78]

    String Gas Cosmology

    T. Battefeld and S. Watson, “String gas cosmology,” Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 435-454 (2006) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.435 [arXiv:hep-th/0510022 [hep-th]]

  79. [79]

    Geometric Aspects of Holographic Bit Threads

    C. A. Agón, J. De Boer and J. F. Pedraza, “Geometric Aspects of Holographic Bit Threads,” JHEP05, 075 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)075 [arXiv:1811.08879 [hep-th]]

  80. [80]

    Entanglement Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity

    W. Donnelly, “Entanglement entropy in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D77, 104006 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.104006 [arXiv:0802.0880 [gr-qc]]

Showing first 80 references.