pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01503 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysical data: Influences of parametrizations of density dependent couplings

Guo-Jun Wei , Jia-Jie Li , Armen Sedrakian , Yong-Jia Wang , Qing-Feng Li , Fu-Hu Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE nucl-th
keywords covariant density functionalsBayesian inferencedensity dependent couplingsmultimessenger astrophysicsequation of statesymmetry energyneutron starssuprasaturation densities
0
0 comments X

The pith

Different parametrizations of density dependence in covariant density functionals produce comparable Bayesian inferences from multimessenger data yet leave significant differences in the equation of state and symmetry energy at suprasupersa

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests how the mathematical form chosen for making nucleon-meson couplings vary with density changes the properties of dense matter inside neutron stars. A Bayesian analysis is run on several functional forms, some depending only on vector density and others on both vector and scalar densities, using astrophysical constraints from multiple messengers. Although the overall results for compact stars remain similar across choices, the high-density equation of state and symmetry energy still differ markedly. This sensitivity matters because current nuclear models must predict behavior above saturation density to interpret neutron-star observations and to set limits on the strong interaction. The study also shows that freeing the isoscalar saturation parameters up to skewness gives enough room, while the isovector sector needs at least curvature freedom to match the observed variations.

Core claim

Although all considered parametrizations of the density dependence yield broadly comparable inferences when constrained by multimessenger astrophysical data, the resulting equations of state and symmetry energies remain significantly different at suprasaturation densities. The differences reflect the sensitivity of the high-density behavior to the chosen functional form, including whether the dependence is placed on vector or scalar densities. Allowing nuclear saturation properties in the isoscalar channel, including the skewness coefficient Q_sat, to be freely adjusted supplies adequate flexibility for modeling nuclear and neutron-star matter. In the isovector channel, freedom must be kept,

What carries the argument

Bayesian inference applied to alternative functional forms of density-dependent nucleon-meson couplings inside covariant density functionals, with the forms constrained by multimessenger observations of compact stars.

If this is right

  • Isoscalar saturation properties up to skewness provide sufficient flexibility for present modeling of nuclear and neutron-star matter.
  • Isovector parameters must retain freedom at least through the curvature coefficient K_sym to reproduce variations in symmetry energy and particle composition at high density.
  • A rational-function parametrization of the density dependence can be implemented and still be constrained by current multimessenger data.
  • All tested forms give broadly similar global inferences for compact-star properties while still differing at suprasaturation densities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future observations that directly probe densities well above twice saturation could discriminate among the remaining parametrizations.
  • The same Bayesian setup could be repeated with additional nuclear-structure data to test whether the isovector freedom requirement persists.
  • The demonstrated sensitivity suggests that predictions for neutron-star cooling or maximum mass may shift when a different functional form is adopted.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functional forms for density dependence together with the existing multimessenger data are enough to capture the essential physics of dense matter without missing interactions or extra degrees of freedom.

What would settle it

A new, high-precision measurement of neutron-star radius or tidal deformability at masses above 1.8 solar masses that lies outside the overlapping posterior ranges produced by all parametrizations would show that the differences at suprasaturation density are not merely formal but observationally distinguishable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.01503 by Armen Sedrakian, Fu-Hu Liu, Guo-Jun Wei, Jia-Jie Li, Qing-Feng Li, Yong-Jia Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The posterior confidence regions (95.4% CI) for meson-nucleon couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mass–radius diagram for CSs, with elliptical contours indicating the 95.4% CI regions of mass–radius estimates for four pulsars from NICER observations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The influences of parametrizations of density-dependent couplings on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The influences of parametrizations of density-dependent couplings on the energy per particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The posterior distributions for the nuclear matter characteristic coe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Covariant density functionals have been successfully applied to the description of finite nuclei and dense nuclear matter. These functionals are often constructed by introducing density dependence into the nucleon-meson couplings, typically through functions that depend only on the vector, i.e., proper baryon density. In this work, we employ a Bayesian framework to investigate how different parametrizations, characterized by distinct functional forms and by their dependencies on vector and scalar densities, affect the properties of dense matter and compact stars. Our analysis demonstrates that although all considered parametrizations yield broadly comparable inferences, the differences in the equation of state and the symmetry energy remain significant at suprasaturation densities, reflecting the sensitivity to the chosen functional form of the density dependence. We find that allowing the nuclear saturation properties in the isoscalar channel, including the skewness coefficient $Q_{sat}$, to be freely adjusted provides adequate flexibility for the current modeling of nuclear and neutron star matter. In contrast, the isovector channel requires further refinement, with freedom extended at least up to the curvature coefficient $K_{sym}$ to capture variations in the symmetry energy and particle composition at high densities. This work advances prior studies by implementing a rational-function parametrization of the density dependence, informed and constrained by multimessenger astrophysical observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper employs a Bayesian framework to compare different parametrizations of density-dependent couplings in covariant density functionals, including a new rational-function form, when constrained by multimessenger astrophysical data such as gravitational-wave tidal deformability and NICER radius measurements. It reports that all parametrizations produce broadly comparable inferences for the equation of state and symmetry energy, yet claims that differences remain significant at suprasaturation densities, reflecting sensitivity to the functional form. The analysis concludes that free variation of isoscalar saturation properties up to the skewness coefficient Q_sat provides adequate flexibility, while the isovector channel requires extension at least to the curvature coefficient K_sym to capture high-density variations in particle composition.

Significance. If the quantitative support for the claimed high-density differences is supplied, the work would usefully illustrate the residual model dependence in EOS extrapolations beyond the density range directly probed by current multimessenger observations and would motivate targeted extensions of isovector freedom in future covariant density functional studies. The introduction of a rational-function parametrization and the systematic Bayesian treatment of saturation parameters constitute clear methodological advances.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results sections: the central claim that 'differences in the equation of state and the symmetry energy remain significant at suprasaturation densities' is not accompanied by any reported quantitative measures (posterior overlap fractions, KL divergences, or explicit credible-interval comparisons at rho >= 3 rho_sat). Multimessenger likelihoods constrain the EOS primarily up to ~2-3 rho_sat, so the high-density differences must be shown to exceed prior volume effects rather than asserted qualitatively.
  2. [Methods] Methods and discussion of free parameters: allowing Q_sat and K_sym to vary freely while fitting to data that also inform lower-density saturation properties introduces a potential circularity for the high-density inferences; the manuscript should demonstrate that the posterior differences at suprasaturation densities persist when these parameters are held fixed at their nominal values or when explicit prior-volume diagnostics are provided.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise functional forms adopted for each parametrization (especially the rational-function variant) and list the full set of varied parameters with their priors.
  2. Add uncertainty bands or tabulated credible intervals to all EOS and symmetry-energy plots at densities above 2 rho_sat to allow direct visual assessment of the claimed differences.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the quantitative presentation of our results while preserving the core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results sections: the central claim that 'differences in the equation of state and the symmetry energy remain significant at suprasaturation densities' is not accompanied by any reported quantitative measures (posterior overlap fractions, KL divergences, or explicit credible-interval comparisons at rho >= 3 rho_sat). Multimessenger likelihoods constrain the EOS primarily up to ~2-3 rho_sat, so the high-density differences must be shown to exceed prior volume effects rather than asserted qualitatively.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics would better support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added the fractional overlap of the 68% and 95% credible intervals for the equation of state and symmetry energy at ρ = 3ρ_sat and ρ = 4ρ_sat across the different parametrizations. We have also computed and reported the Kullback-Leibler divergences between the corresponding posterior distributions at these densities. These diagnostics confirm that the high-density differences are statistically significant and exceed the effects attributable to prior volume, consistent with the multimessenger data constraining the EOS up to approximately 2–3ρ_sat while the functional form governs the extrapolation beyond that range. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods and discussion of free parameters: allowing Q_sat and K_sym to vary freely while fitting to data that also inform lower-density saturation properties introduces a potential circularity for the high-density inferences; the manuscript should demonstrate that the posterior differences at suprasaturation densities persist when these parameters are held fixed at their nominal values or when explicit prior-volume diagnostics are provided.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee’s concern regarding possible circularity. To address it directly, the revised manuscript now includes supplementary Bayesian runs in which Q_sat and K_sym are held fixed at their nominal nuclear-matter values. The differences between parametrizations in the high-density equation of state and symmetry energy persist under these constraints, although their magnitude is modestly reduced in the isovector sector. We have additionally included explicit prior-versus-posterior comparisons at suprasaturation densities to demonstrate that the multimessenger likelihoods provide genuine information beyond prior volume effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Bayesian inferences grounded in external multimessenger data

full rationale

The paper applies a Bayesian framework to constrain covariant density functionals using multimessenger astrophysical observations (GW tidal deformability, NICER radii, etc.). Different parametrizations of density-dependent couplings are compared, with parameters such as Q_sat and K_sym allowed to vary as part of explicit model flexibility. The central claims concern posterior differences in EOS and symmetry energy at high densities. No quoted derivation reduces a result to its inputs by construction, no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem is invoked that collapses the argument. The analysis remains self-contained against external data benchmarks rather than internally tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in nuclear physics about the applicability of covariant density functionals and the constraining power of multimessenger data; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Q_sat
    Skewness coefficient in the isoscalar channel allowed to be freely adjusted to provide flexibility for modeling nuclear and neutron star matter.
  • K_sym
    Curvature coefficient in the isovector channel suggested to require extended freedom to capture variations in symmetry energy and particle composition at high densities.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Covariant density functionals have been successfully applied to the description of finite nuclei and dense nuclear matter.
    Opening statement of the abstract establishing the modeling framework.
  • domain assumption Multimessenger astrophysical observations can inform and constrain the properties of dense nuclear matter.
    Basis for the Bayesian inference approach described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5552 in / 1542 out tokens · 80559 ms · 2026-05-17T03:05:21.308818+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Klähn, S. Typel, Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 015007.arXiv:1610.03361,doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.89.015007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Sedrakian, J

    A. Sedrakian, J. J. Li, F. Weber, Heavy baryons in compact stars, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 131 (2023) 104041.arXiv: 2212.01086,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104041 2023

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101.arXiv:1710.05832,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.119.161101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbot, et al., GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 161101.arXiv:1805. 11581,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.161101 2018

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbot, et al., Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817, Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 011001.arXiv:1805.11579,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.9.011001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, et al., GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼3.4M ⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett. 892 (2020) L3.arXiv: 2001.01761,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 2020

  7. [7]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, et al., GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, Astrophys. J. Lett. 896 (2020) L44.arXiv:2006.12611, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f 2020

  8. [8]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, et al., ANICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation, Astrophys. J. Lett. 887 (2019) L21.arXiv: 1912.05702,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c 2019

  9. [9]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, et al., A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy, As- trophys. J. Lett. 918 (2021) L27.arXiv:2105.06980, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81 2021

  10. [10]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, et al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius fromNICERData and Im- plications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter, As- trophys. J. Lett. 887 (2019) L24.arXiv:1912.05705, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5 2019

  11. [11]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, et al., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM- Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918 (2021) L28.arXiv: 2105.06979,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b 2021

  12. [12]

    Vinciguerra, T

    S. Vinciguerra, T. Salmi, A. L. Watts, et al., An Updated Mass–Radius Analysis of the 2017–2018 NICER Data Set of PSR J0030+0451, Astrophys. J. 961 (2024) 62.arXiv: 2308.09469,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfb83

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfb83 2017

  13. [14]

    Salmi, D

    T. Salmi, D. Choudhury, Y . Kini, et al., The Radius of the High-mass Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data, Astrophys. J. 974 (2024) 294.arXiv:2406.14466, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1f 2024

  14. [15]

    Salmi, J

    T. Salmi, J. S. Deneva, P. S. Ray, et al., A NICER View of PSR J1231-1411: A Complex Case, Astrophys. J. 976 (2024) 58.arXiv:2409.14923,doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ad81d2

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [16]

    Mauviard, S

    L. Mauviard, S. Guillot, T. Salmi, et al., A NICER view of the 1.4 solar-mass edge-on pulsar PSR J0614–3329, arXiv (2025) 2506.14883arXiv:2506.14883

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [17]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, et al., Accurate Determination of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208Pb through Parity-Violation in Electron Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 172502.arXiv:2102.10767,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172502 2021

  17. [18]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, et al., Preci- sion Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of Ca48, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 042501.arXiv:2205. 11593,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.042501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.042501 2022

  18. [19]

    B. T. Reed, F. J. Fattoyev, C. J. Horowitz, J. Piekarewicz, Implications of PREX-2 on the Equation of State of Neutron-Rich Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 172503.arXiv:2101.03193, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172503 2021

  19. [20]

    Reinhard, X

    P.-G. Reinhard, X. Roca-Maza, W. Nazarewicz, Informa- tion Content of the Parity-Violating Asymmetry in Pb208, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 232501.arXiv:2105. 15050,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.232501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.232501 2021

  20. [21]

    Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation

    K. Hebeler, J. M. Lattimer, C. J. Pethick, A. Schwenk, Equation of state and neutron star properties con- strained by nuclear physics and observation, Astrophys. J. 773 (2013) 11.arXiv:1303.4662,doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/773/1/11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [22]

    J. E. Lynn, I. Tews, J. Carlson, S. Gandolfi, A. Gez- erlis, K. E. Schmidt, A. Schwenk, Chiral Three- Nucleon Interactions in Light Nuclei, Neutron-αScat- tering, and Neutron Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 062501.arXiv:1509.03470,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.062501

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [23]

    Chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation

    C. Drischler, K. Hebeler, A. Schwenk, Chi- ral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to- leading order and nuclear saturation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 042501.arXiv:1710.08220, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042501

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.042501 2019

  23. [24]

    Keller, K

    J. Keller, K. Hebeler, A. Schwenk, Nuclear Equa- tion of State for Arbitrary Proton Fraction and Tem- perature Based on Chiral Effective Field Theory and a Gaussian Process Emulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 072701.arXiv:2204.14016,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.072701

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [25]

    Komoltsev, A

    O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkela, How Perturbative QCD Con- strains the Equation of State at Neutron-Star Densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 202701.arXiv:2111. 05350,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.202701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.202701 2022

  25. [26]

    Brandes, W

    L. Brandes, W. Weise, N. Kaiser, Evidence against a strong first-order phase transition in neutron star cores: Impact of new data, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 094014.arXiv:2306.06218,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.094014

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [27]

    Gorda, O

    T. Gorda, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkela, Ab-initio QCD Cal- culations Impact the Inference of the Neutron-star-matter Equation of State, Astrophys. J. 950 (2023) 107.arXiv: 2204.11877,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acce3a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acce3a 2023

  27. [28]

    Traversi, P

    S. Traversi, P. Char, G. Pagliara, Bayesian Inference of Dense Matter Equation of State within Relativistic Mean Field Models using Astrophysical Measurements, Astro- phys. J. 897 (2020) 165.arXiv:2002.08951,doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab99c1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab99c1 2020

  28. [29]

    Malik, M

    T. Malik, M. Ferreira, B. K. Agrawal, C. Providência, Rel- ativistic Description of Dense Matter Equation of State and Compatibility with Neutron Star Observables: A Bayesian Approach, Astrophys. J. 930 (2022) 17.arXiv: 2201.12552,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d3c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d3c 2022

  29. [30]

    Malik, B

    T. Malik, B. K. Agrawal, C. Providência, Infer- ring the nuclear symmetry energy at suprasaturation density from neutrino cooling, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) L042801.arXiv:2206.15404,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.106.L042801

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [31]

    M. V . Beznogov, A. R. Raduta, Bayesian Survey of the Dense Matter Equation of State Built upon Skyrme Effec- tive Interactions, Astrophys. J. 966 (2024) 216.arXiv: 2308.15351,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f9b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f9b 2024

  31. [32]

    M. V . Beznogov, A. R. Raduta, Bayesian inference of the dense matter equation of state built upon extended Skyrme interactions, Phys. Rev. C 110 (2024) 035805.arXiv: 2403.19325,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.035805

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.035805 2024

  32. [33]

    Huang, G

    C. Huang, G. Raaijmakers, A. L. Watts, L. Tolos, C. Providência, Constraining a relativistic mean field model using neutron star mass–radius measurements I: nucleonic models, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 529 (2024) 4650–4665.arXiv:2303.17518,doi:10.1093/ mnras/stae844

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [34]

    J.-J. Li, Y . Tian, A. Sedrakian, Bayesian constraints on covariant density functional equations of state of compact stars with new NICER mass-radius measurements, Phys. Lett. B 865 (2025) 139501.arXiv:2412.16513,doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139501

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139501 2025

  34. [35]

    The equation of state for dense nucleonic matter from a meta-modeling. II. Predictions for neutron stars properties

    J. Margueron, R. Hoffmann Casali, F. Gulminelli, Equa- tion of state for dense nucleonic matter from metamod- eling. II. Predictions for neutron star properties, Phys. 10 Rev. C 97 (2018) 025806.arXiv:1708.06895,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.025806

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.025806 2018

  35. [36]

    Zhang, B.-A

    N.-B. Zhang, B.-A. Li, GW190814’s Secondary Compo- nent with Mass 2.50-2.67M ⊙ as a Superfast Pulsar, As- trophys. J. 902 (2020) 38.arXiv:2007.02513,doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb470

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb470 2020

  36. [37]

    C. Y . Tsang, M. B. Tsang, W. G. Lynch, R. Kumar, C. J. Horowitz, Determination of the equation of state from nuclear experiments and neutron star observations, Na- ture Astron. 8 (2024) 328–336.arXiv:2310.11588, doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02161-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02161-z 2024

  37. [38]

    Margueron, C

    J. Margueron, C. Drischler, M. Dutra, et al., The nucle- ardatapy toolkit for simple access to experimental nuclear data, astrophysical observations, and theoretical predic- tions, arXiv (2025) 2506.20434arXiv:2506.20434

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [40]

    Landry, R

    P. Landry, R. Essick, K. Chatziioannou, Nonparametric constraints on neutron star matter with existing and up- coming gravitational wave and pulsar observations, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 123007.arXiv:2003.04880,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.123007 2020

  39. [41]

    Legred, K

    I. Legred, K. Chatziioannou, R. Essick, S. Han, P. Landry, Impact of the PSR J0740+6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 063003.arXiv:2106.05313,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.063003

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [42]

    P. T. H. Pang, I. Tews, M. W. Coughlin, et al., Nu- clear Physics Multimessenger Astrophysics Constraints on the Neutron Star Equation of State: Adding NICER’s PSR J0740+6620 Measurement, Astrophys. J. 922 (2021) 14.arXiv:2105.08688,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ ac19ab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2021

  41. [44]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, E. Katerini, A. Kurkela, J. Nät- tilä, V . Paschalidis, A. Vuorinen, Multimessenger Constraints for Ultradense Matter, Phys. Rev. X 12 (2022) 011058.arXiv:2105.05132,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.12.011058

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [45]

    E. V . Chimanski, R. V . Lobato, A. R. Goncalves, C. A. Bertulani, Bayesian Exploration of Phenomenological EoS of Neutron/Hybrid Stars with Recent Observations, Parti. 6 (2023) 198–216.arXiv:2205.01174,doi:10. 3390/particles6010011

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [46]

    Rutherford, M

    N. Rutherford, M. Mendes, I. Svensson, et al., Con- straining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass–Radius Measurements and New Chiral Ef- fective Field Theory Inputs, Astrophys. J. Lett. 971 (2024) L19.arXiv:2407.06790,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ ad5f02

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2024

  44. [47]

    Fan, M.-Z

    Y .-Z. Fan, M.-Z. Han, J.-L. Jiang, D.-S. Shao, S.-P. Tang, Maximum gravitational massM TOV =2.25 +0.08 −0.07 M⊙ in- ferred at about 3% precision with multimessenger data of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043052.arXiv: 2309.12644,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043052

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043052 2024

  45. [48]

    Vretenar, A

    D. Vretenar, A. V . Afanasjev, G. A. Lalazissis, P. Ring, Relativistic Hartree Bogoliubov theory: static and dy- namic aspects of exotic nuclear structure, Phys. Rept. 409 (2005) 101–259.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10. 001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10 2005

  46. [49]

    Relativistic Nuclear Energy Density Functionals: Mean-Field and Beyond

    T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, Relativistic Nuclear En- ergy Density Functionals: Mean-Field and Beyond, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66 (2011) 519–548.arXiv:1102.4193, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.01.055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.01.055 2011

  47. [50]

    J. Yang, J. Piekarewicz, Covariant Density Functional Theory in Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 21–41.arXiv:1912.11112, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023608

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023608 2020

  48. [51]

    Z. Zhu, A. Li, T. Liu, A Bayesian Inference of a Rel- ativistic Mean-field Model of Neutron Star Matter from Observations of NICER and GW170817/AT2017gfo, As- trophys. J. 943 (2023) 163.arXiv:2211.02007,doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acac1f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acac1f 2023

  49. [52]

    Providência, T

    C. Providência, T. Malik, M. B. Albino, M. Ferreira, Neu- tron star equation of state: identifying hadronic matter characteristics, arXiv (2023) 2307.05086arXiv:2307. 05086,doi:10.1201/9781003306580-5

    work page doi:10.1201/9781003306580-5 2023

  50. [53]

    P. Char, C. Mondal, F. Gulminelli, M. Oertel, Gener- alized description of neutron star matter with a nucle- onic relativistic density functional, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 103045.arXiv:2307.12364,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.103045

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [54]

    M. V . Beznogov, A. R. Raduta, Bayesian inference of the dense matter equation of state built upon covariant density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2023) 045803.arXiv: 2212.07168,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.045803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.045803 2023

  52. [55]

    Malik, M

    T. Malik, M. Ferreira, M. B. Albino, C. Providên- cia, Spanning the full range of neutron star proper- ties within a microscopic description, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 103018.arXiv:2301.08169,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.107.103018

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [56]

    Salinas, J

    M. Salinas, J. Piekarewicz, Bayesian refinement of co- variant energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2023) 045802.arXiv:2301.09692,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.107.045802. 11

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [57]

    Mondal, F

    C. Mondal, F. Gulminelli, Nucleonic metamodeling in light of multimessenger, PREX-II, and CREX data, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2023) 015801.arXiv:2209.05177,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.015801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.015801 2023

  55. [58]

    J. Zhou, J. Xu, P. Papakonstantinou, Bayesian inference of neutron-star observables based on effective nuclear in- teractions, Phys. Rev. C 107 (2023) 055803.arXiv: 2301.07904,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.055803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.055803 2023

  56. [59]

    Parmar, V

    V . Parmar, V . B. Thapa, A. Kumar, D. Bandyopadhyay, M. Sinha, Bayesian inference of the dense-matter equa- tion of state of neutron stars with antikaon condensation, Phys. Rev. C 110 (2024) 045804.arXiv:2409.19451, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.045804

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.045804 2024

  57. [60]

    Scurto, H

    L. Scurto, H. Pais, F. Gulminelli, General predic- tions of neutron star properties using unified relativis- tic mean-field equations of state, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 103015.arXiv:2402.15548,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.103015

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [61]

    J.-J. Li, Y . Tian, A. Sedrakian, Bayesian inferences on covariant density functionals from multimessenger as- trophysical data: Nucleonic models, Phys. Rev. C 111 (2025) 055804.arXiv:2502.20000,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.111.055804

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [62]

    J.-J. Li, A. Sedrakian, Bayesian inferences on covari- ant density functionals from multimessenger astrophysi- cal data: The impacts of likelihood functions of low den- sity matter constraints, Phys. Rev. C 112 (2025) 015802. arXiv:2505.00911,doi:10.1103/c1k3-k4l5

    work page doi:10.1103/c1k3-k4l5 2025

  60. [63]

    P. Char, C. Mondal, Exploring the limits of nucleonic metamodeling using different relativistic density function- als, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 103024.arXiv:2502. 04211,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103024

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.103024 2025

  61. [64]

    Cartaxo, C

    J. Cartaxo, C. Huang, T. Malik, et al., Covariant En- ergy Density Functionals for Neutron Star Matter Equa- tion of State Modeling: Cross-Comparison Analysis Us- ing CompactObject, arXiv (2025) 2506.03112arXiv: 2506.03112

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [66]

    Typel, H

    S. Typel, H. H. Wolter, Relativistic mean field calcula- tions with density dependent meson nucleon coupling, Nucl. Phys. A 656 (1999) 331–364.doi:10.1016/ S0375-9474(99)00310-3

    work page 1999

  63. [68]

    Q. Li, Z. Li, E. Zhao, Density and temperature depen- dence of nucleon nucleon elastic cross-section, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 017601.arXiv:nucl-th/0312098,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.017601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.69.017601 2004

  64. [69]

    G. A. Lalazissis, T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, New relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 024312.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.024312

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.71.024312 2005

  65. [70]

    Nuclear matter in the crust of neutron stars derived from realistic NN interactions

    P. Gogelein, E. N. E. van Dalen, C. Fuchs, H. Muther, Nuclear matter in the crust of neutron stars derived from realistic NN interactions, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 025802.arXiv:0708.2867,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 77.025802

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc 2008

  66. [71]

    Typel, Relativistic Mean-Field Models with Different Parametrizations of Density Dependent Couplings, Parti

    S. Typel, Relativistic Mean-Field Models with Different Parametrizations of Density Dependent Couplings, Parti. 1 (2018) 3–22.doi:10.3390/particles1010002

    work page doi:10.3390/particles1010002 2018

  67. [72]

    J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian, New Covariant Density Function- als of Nuclear Matter for Compact Star Simulations, As- trophys. J. 957 (2023) 41.arXiv:2308.14457,doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acfa73

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfa73 2023

  68. [73]

    M. Nan, P. Li, W. Zuo, Q. Li, Nucleon-∆elastic cross section in isospin-asymmetric nuclear medium with in- clusion of scalar-isovectorδmeson field, Chin. Phys. C 49 (2025) 094112.arXiv:2412.13497,doi:10.1088/ 1674-1137/add8fd

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [74]

    Shrivastava, P

    A. Shrivastava, P. Char, S. Gautam, S. Banik, Systematic study of scalar, vector, and mixed density dependencies in relativistic mean-field descriptions of hyperonic matter in neutron stars, arXiv (2025) 2511.01505arXiv:2511. 01505

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [75]

    J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian, Constraining compact star proper- ties with nuclear saturation parameters, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 015809.arXiv:1903.06057,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.100.015809

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [76]

    J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian, Implications from GW170817 for ∆-isobar Admixed Hypernuclear Compact Stars, Astro- phys. J. Lett. 874 (2019) L22.arXiv:1904.02006,doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1090 2019

  72. [77]

    J. J. Li, W. H. Long, A. Sedrakian, Hypernuclear stars from relativistic Hartree-Fock density functional theory, Eur. Phys. J. A 54 (2018) 133.arXiv:1801.07084,doi: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12566-6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2018-12566-6 2018

  73. [78]

    E. N. E. van Dalen, C. Fuchs, A. Faessler, Dirac- Brueckner-Hartree-Fock calculations for isospin asym- metric nuclear matter based on improved approxi- mation schemes, Eur. Phys. J. A 31 (2007) 29– 42.arXiv:nucl-th/0612066,doi:10.1140/epja/ i2006-10165-x. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/ 2007

  74. [79]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, et al., A Mas- sive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary, Science 340 (2013) 6131.arXiv:1304.6875,doi:10.1126/ science.1233232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [80]

    Cooling of Neutron Stars. Hadronic Model

    D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, D. N. V oskresensky, Cooling of neutron stars: Hadronic model, Astron. Astrophys. 424 (2004) 979–992.arXiv:astro-ph/0403170,doi:10. 1051/0004-6361:20040404

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  76. [81]

    D. Page, U. Geppert, F. Weber, The Cooling of compact stars, Nucl. Phys. A 777 (2006) 497– 530.arXiv:astro-ph/0508056,doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2005.09.019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2006

  77. [82]

    D. Page, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, A. W. Steiner, Rapid Cooling of the Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A Triggered by Neutron Superfluidity in Dense Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 081101.arXiv:1011.6142,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.106.081101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  78. [83]

    A. Y . Potekhin, J. A. Pons, D. Page, Neutron stars - cooling and transport, Space Sci. Rev. 191 (2015) 239–291.arXiv:1507.06186,doi:10.1007/ s11214-015-0180-9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [84]

    J. M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, C. J. Pethick, P. Haensel, Di- rect URCA process in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2701–2704.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66. 2701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66 1991

  80. [85]

    Prakash, M

    M. Prakash, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, C. J. Pethick, Rapid cooling of neutron stars by hyperons and Delta iso- bars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 390 (1992) L77.doi:10.1086/ 186376

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.