arxiv: 2512.02156 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · 🪐 quant-ph · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Testing ER = EPR with Hydrogen

Irfan Javed , Edward Wilson-Ewing

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph gr-qchep-th

keywords ER=EPR conjecturequantum wormholeshydrogen hyperfine structureentangled particleseffective chargequantum gravity

0 comments

The pith

If electric fields leak into wormholes connecting entangled particles, the hyperfine structure of hydrogen changes and the atom may carry a small net charge.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a test of the ER = EPR idea that entangled particles are joined by quantum wormholes. It assumes part of the electric field around a charged particle leaks into the wormhole and works out the consequences for a hydrogen atom. This leakage would shift the hyperfine energy levels. Non-traversable wormholes would also leave the neutral atom with a nonzero effective charge. High-precision data on hydrogen spectra and charge can then bound how large any such leakage could be.

Core claim

Under the assumption that some of the electric field surrounding an entangled charged particle leaks into the wormhole, this effect will modify the hyperfine structure of the hydrogen atom. In addition, if the quantum wormholes are non-traversable, this will also lead to a non-zero total effective charge for the hydrogen atom. These effects provide strong constraints on the amplitude of this potential ER = EPR effect, given high-precision measurements of the hydrogen atom's hyperfine structure and total charge.

What carries the argument

Leakage of electric field lines from an entangled charged particle into the quantum wormhole that connects it to its partner, which changes the electromagnetic potential experienced by the electron in the hydrogen atom.

If this is right

The hyperfine splitting interval in hydrogen receives an extra correction proportional to the leakage amplitude.
A neutral hydrogen atom acquires a small nonzero effective charge when the connecting wormholes are non-traversable.
Existing or future high-precision spectroscopy and charge-neutrality tests of hydrogen directly limit the strength of any ER = EPR wormhole effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same leakage mechanism could be applied to other light atoms such as deuterium to obtain independent bounds.
Absence of the predicted shifts would suggest that electric fields remain fully outside any wormholes or that the ER = EPR conjecture requires additional structure.
Experiments that prepare entangled pairs of charged particles in controlled superpositions might detect analogous electromagnetic signatures.

Load-bearing premise

Some of the electric field around an entangled charged particle leaks into the connecting quantum wormhole.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of the hydrogen hyperfine transition frequency that agrees with the standard quantum-electrodynamics value to the precision needed to rule out the predicted shift, or a direct confirmation that a neutral hydrogen atom carries exactly zero net charge.

read the original abstract

According to the ER = EPR conjecture, entangled particles are connected by quantum wormholes. Under the assumption that some of the electric field surrounding an entangled charged particle leaks into the wormhole, we show that this effect will modify the hyperfine structure of the hydrogen atom. In addition, if the quantum wormholes are non-traversable, this will also lead to a non-zero total effective charge for the hydrogen atom. These effects provide strong constraints on the amplitude of this potential ER = EPR effect, given high-precision measurements of the hydrogen atom's hyperfine structure and total charge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps an assumed electric-field leakage into ER=EPR wormholes onto shifts in hydrogen hyperfine structure and net charge, but the leakage is introduced by hand rather than derived.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper proposes testing ER=EPR by assuming some electric field from an entangled charged particle leaks into the connecting wormhole. That leakage would change the effective fields felt by the electron in hydrogen, shifting the hyperfine splitting, and for non-traversable wormholes it would leave the atom with a nonzero net charge. Precision measurements could then bound the leakage amplitude. The concrete link to atomic observables is new compared with most ER=EPR work, which stays at the level of black-hole or information paradoxes. The authors do a clear job showing how existing high-precision hydrogen data could constrain the size of the effect and they separate the traversable and non-traversable cases sensibly. The central weakness is that the leakage fraction itself is not derived from the ER=EPR conjecture, from any explicit wormhole geometry, or from a flux calculation at atomic distances. The predicted shifts therefore scale directly with a free parameter, turning the result into a constraint on that parameter rather than a sharp, parameter-free test. The nonzero-charge claim also sits uneasily with Gauss’s law and charge conservation on the boundary without further justification. This is aimed at researchers already interested in low-energy or tabletop probes of quantum gravity and entanglement. A reader following ER=EPR phenomenology would get a useful new angle to consider, even if the assumption remains speculative. I would send it to peer review so referees can press on whether the leakage can be motivated from the bulk geometry or whether the whole approach needs to be reframed as pure phenomenology.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, according to the ER=EPR conjecture, entangled charged particles are connected by quantum wormholes into which some of the surrounding electric field leaks. This leakage modifies the hyperfine structure of the hydrogen atom via changes to the local electric and magnetic fields experienced by the electron. For non-traversable wormholes the effect additionally produces a non-zero total effective charge for the neutral hydrogen atom. High-precision measurements of hyperfine splitting and charge neutrality are then invoked to place constraints on the amplitude of the leakage.

Significance. If the leakage fraction could be derived from a controlled ER=EPR dictionary or explicit bulk geometry, the proposal would constitute a rare attempt to extract a low-energy, falsifiable signature of quantum gravity from atomic spectroscopy. The manuscript correctly identifies that existing hyperfine data already reach parts-per-billion precision, so even a small effect could be bounded; however, the present formulation remains a phenomenological rescaling rather than a sharp prediction.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / model section] Abstract and the model section: the central claim that leakage modifies the hyperfine splitting (via altered Coulomb and magnetic-dipole interactions) is introduced as an assumption rather than derived from the ER=EPR dictionary, a specific throat geometry, or a flux calculation through a Planck-scale bridge at atomic distances. No equation quantifies the leakage fraction from first principles; the shift is therefore proportional to a free amplitude parameter whose value is constrained rather than predicted.
[non-traversable wormholes discussion] Section discussing non-traversable wormholes: the assertion of a non-zero effective charge for the hydrogen atom assumes the wormhole functions as an open flux sink. No explicit check is performed against Gauss’s law in the boundary theory or against charge conservation in the CFT, leaving open whether the claimed net charge is consistent with the underlying holographic setup.

minor comments (2)

[throughout] Notation for the leakage amplitude should be introduced once with a clear symbol and kept consistent; currently the parameter appears under several informal descriptions.
[results section] A brief comparison table of the predicted hyperfine shift versus current experimental uncertainty would help readers assess the constraining power immediately.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity on the phenomenological nature of the proposal.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / model section] Abstract and the model section: the central claim that leakage modifies the hyperfine splitting (via altered Coulomb and magnetic-dipole interactions) is introduced as an assumption rather than derived from the ER=EPR dictionary, a specific throat geometry, or a flux calculation through a Planck-scale bridge at atomic distances. No equation quantifies the leakage fraction from first principles; the shift is therefore proportional to a free amplitude parameter whose value is constrained rather than predicted.

Authors: We agree that the leakage fraction is introduced as a phenomenological assumption motivated by the ER=EPR conjecture rather than derived from a specific dictionary, throat geometry, or first-principles flux calculation. The manuscript explores observable consequences under this assumption and uses precision data to constrain the amplitude. We have revised the abstract and model section to state explicitly that the amplitude is a free parameter whose value is bounded by experiment, and that the work provides constraints on a possible ER=EPR effect rather than a sharp prediction from a complete holographic model. revision: yes
Referee: [non-traversable wormholes discussion] Section discussing non-traversable wormholes: the assertion of a non-zero effective charge for the hydrogen atom assumes the wormhole functions as an open flux sink. No explicit check is performed against Gauss’s law in the boundary theory or against charge conservation in the CFT, leaving open whether the claimed net charge is consistent with the underlying holographic setup.

Authors: The non-zero effective charge follows from treating the non-traversable wormhole as a flux sink in the effective low-energy description. We acknowledge that a rigorous verification against Gauss’s law in the boundary theory and charge conservation in the CFT would require a more complete holographic construction, which lies beyond the scope of the present phenomenological analysis. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the revised section on non-traversable wormholes that explicitly notes this assumption and its implications for holographic consistency. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation is conditional on explicit leakage assumption with independent calculation

full rationale

The paper states its central assumption explicitly ('some of the electric field surrounding an entangled charged particle leaks into the wormhole') and derives the hyperfine modification and effective charge as direct consequences of that assumption using standard atomic physics. No equation or result reduces to the input by construction; the leakage amplitude remains a free parameter that is constrained by data rather than fitted and relabeled as a prediction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided text. The chain is self-contained and falsifiable via precision measurements of hydrogen.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the ER=EPR conjecture plus an additional ad-hoc assumption that electric field leaks into the wormhole; no independent evidence or derivation for the leakage is supplied.

free parameters (1)

leakage amplitude
The strength of the field leakage into the wormhole is introduced as a free parameter whose value is bounded by hydrogen data rather than derived.

axioms (2)

domain assumption ER=EPR conjecture holds for entangled charged particles
The paper begins from this conjecture to motivate the wormhole connection.
ad hoc to paper some electric field leaks into the wormhole
Explicitly stated assumption required to produce the hyperfine and charge effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5382 in / 1326 out tokens · 53973 ms · 2026-05-17T02:22:15.614914+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

[1]

Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602,arXiv:hep-th/0603001

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[2]

Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP08(2006) 045, arXiv:hep-th/0605073

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[3]

Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,

M. Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,” Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2323–2329,arXiv:1005.3035

work page arXiv 2010
[4]

Gravitational Dynamics From Entanglement "Thermodynamics"

N. Lashkari, M. B. McDermott, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Gravitational dynamics from entanglement ’thermodynamics’,” JHEP04(2014) 195, arXiv:1308.3716

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[5]

Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs

T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R. C. Myers, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs,” JHEP03(2014) 051, arXiv:1312.7856

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[6]

Apparent horizons, black hole entropy and loop quantum gravity

V. Husain, “Apparent horizons, black hole entropy and loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 084019, arXiv:gr-qc/9806115

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[7]

Entanglement Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity

W. Donnelly, “Entanglement entropy in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 104006, arXiv:0802.0880

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[8]

Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity

D. Oriti, “Group field theory as the 2nd quantization of Loop Quantum Gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) 085005,arXiv:1310.7786

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[9]

Group Field theory and Tensor Networks: towards a Ryu-Takayanagi formula in full quantum gravity

G. Chirco, D. Oriti, and M. Zhang, “Group field theory and tensor networks: towards a Ryu–Takayanagi formula in full quantum gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35(2018) 115011,arXiv:1701.01383

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[10]

Gluing polyhedra with entanglement in loop quantum gravity

B. Bayta¸ s, E. Bianchi, and N. Yokomizo, “Gluing polyhedra with entanglement in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 026001,arXiv:1805.05856

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[11]

On the Architecture of Spacetime Geometry

E. Bianchi and R. C. Myers, “On the Architecture of Spacetime Geometry,” Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 214002,arXiv:1212.5183

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[12]

Universality of Gravity from Entanglement

B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Universality of Gravity from Entanglement,”arXiv:1405.2933

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[13]

Fermions and Topology

L. Smolin, “Fermions and topology,” arXiv:gr-qc/9404010

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[14]

Disordered locality in loop quantum gravity states

F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin, “Disordered locality in loop quantum gravity states,” Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007) 3813–3824,arXiv:gr-qc/0702044

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[15]

Quantum Graphity: a model of emergent locality

T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou, and S. Severini, “Quantum Graphity: A Model of emergent locality,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 104029,arXiv:0801.0861

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[16]

Disordered Locality as an Explanation for the Dark Energy

C. Prescod-Weinstein and L. Smolin, “Disordered Locality as an Explanation for the Dark Energy,” Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 063505,arXiv:0903.5303

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[17]

Phenomenology of Space-time Imperfection I: Nonlocal Defects

S. Hossenfelder, “Phenomenology of Space-time Imperfection I: Nonlocal Defects,” Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 124030,arXiv:1309.0311

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[18]

Cool horizons for entangled black holes

J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 781–811,arXiv:1306.0533

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[19]

Are entangled particles connected by wormholes? Support for the ER=EPR conjecture from entropy inequalities

H. Gharibyan and R. F. Penna, “Are entangled particles connected by wormholes? Evidence for the ER=EPR conjecture from entropy inequalities,” Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 066001,arXiv:1308.0289

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[20]

Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement

V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf, and S. F. Ross, “Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31(2014) 185015,arXiv:1406.2663

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[21]

Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM

L. Susskind, “Dear Qubitzers, GR=QM,” arXiv:1708.03040

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[22]

Observing a Wormhole,

D.-C. Dai and D. Stojkovic, “Observing a Wormhole,” Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 083513,arXiv:1910.00429

work page arXiv 2019
[23]

Potential Consequences of Wormhole-Mediated Entanglement,

E. Wilson-Ewing, “Potential Consequences of Wormhole-Mediated Entanglement,” Found. Phys.51 (2021) 87,arXiv:2108.07607

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Testing theER=EPRconjecture,

D.-C. Dai, D. Minic, D. Stojkovic, and C. Fu, “Testing theER=EPRconjecture,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 066004,arXiv:2002.08178

work page arXiv 2020
[25]

Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,

P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis, and A. C. Wall, “Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,” JHEP12 (2017) 151,arXiv:1608.05687

work page arXiv 2017
[26]

Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell theory,

J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, C. Knoll, and E. Radu, “Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 101102, arXiv:2010.07317

work page arXiv 2021
[27]

ER = EPR revisited: On the Entropy of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge,

H. Verlinde, “ER = EPR revisited: On the Entropy of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge,”arXiv:2003.13117

work page arXiv 2003
[28]

The Hydrogen Atom as an Entangled Electron-Proton System

P. Tommasini, E. Timmermans, and A. F. R. de Toledo Piza, “The Hydrogen atom as an entangled electron proton system,” Am. J. Phys.66(1998) 881, arXiv:quant-ph/9709052

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[29]

Hydrogenic entanglement,

S. Qvarfort, S. Bose, and A. Serafini, “Hydrogenic entanglement,” New J. Phys.22(2020) 093062, arXiv:2002.10383

work page arXiv 2020
[30]

CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022,

P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, “CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022,” Rev. Mod. Phys.97(2025) 025002,arXiv:2409.03787

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Two-photon frequency comb spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen,

A. Grinin, A. Matveev, D. C. Yost, L. Maisenbacher, V. Wirthl, R. Pohl, T. W. H¨ ansch, and T. Udem, “Two-photon frequency comb spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen,” Science370(2020) abc7776

work page 2020
[32]

Determination of the Rydberg constant from the emission spectra of H and He+,

K. D. Shaffer, “Determination of the Rydberg constant from the emission spectra of H and He+,” Ramifications2(2020) 5

work page 2020
[33]

Hint for axial-vector contact interactions in the data on e+e- -> e+e-(gamma) at centre-of-mass energies 192-208 GeV

D. Bourilkov, “Hint for axial vector contact interactions in the data on e+ e- —>e+ e-(gamma) at center-of-mass energies 192-GeV - 208-GeV,” Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 071701,arXiv:hep-ph/0104165

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[34]

New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant from the Electron g Value and QED,

G. Gabrielse, D. Hanneke, T. Kinoshita, M. Nio, and B. C. Odom, “New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant from the Electron g Value and QED,” Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 030802. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 99, 039902 (2007)]

work page 2006
[35]

D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2018

work page 2018
[36]

21-cm cosmology

J. R. Pritchard and A. Loeb, “21-cm cosmology,” Rept. Prog. Phys.75(2012) 086901,arXiv:1109.6012. 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[37]

Measurement of the unperturbed hydrogen hyperfine transition frequency,

H. Hellwig, R. F. C. Vessot, M. W. Levine, P. W. Zitzewitz, D. W. Allan, and D. J. Glaze, “Measurement of the unperturbed hydrogen hyperfine transition frequency,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement19(2007) 200–209

work page 2007
[38]

Search for a Small Charge Carried by Molecules,

J. G. King, “Search for a Small Charge Carried by Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett.5(1960) 562–565

work page 1960
[39]

Nonequilibrium entanglement between levitated masses under optimal control,

A. N. Poddubny, K. Winkler, B. A. Stickler, U. Deli´ c, M. Aspelmeyer, and A. V. Zasedatelev, “Nonequilibrium entanglement between levitated masses under optimal control,”arXiv:2408.06251

work page arXiv
[40]

Steady-state entanglement of interacting masses in free space through optimal feedback control,

K. Winkler, A. V. Zasedatelev, B. A. Stickler, U. Deli´ c, A. Deutschmann-Olek, and M. Aspelmeyer, “Steady-state entanglement of interacting masses in free space through optimal feedback control,” arXiv:2408.07492

work page arXiv
[41]

Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles via nuclear-electronic spin entanglement,

T. Fernholz, H. Krauter, K. Jensen, J. F. Sherson, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, “Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles via nuclear-electronic spin entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 073601

work page 2008
[42]

Coherent spin dynamics between electron and nucleus within a single atom,

L. M. Veldman, E. W. Stolte, M. P. Canavan, R. Broekhoven, P. Willke, L. Farinacci, and S. Otte, “Coherent spin dynamics between electron and nucleus within a single atom,” Nature Commun.15(2024) 7951,arXiv:2309.03749

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Demonstrating Experimentally the Encoding and Dynamics of an Error-Correctable Logical Qubit on a Hyperfine-Coupled Nuclear Spin Qudit,

S. Lim, M. V. Vaganov, J. Liu, and A. Ardavan, “Demonstrating Experimentally the Encoding and Dynamics of an Error-Correctable Logical Qubit on a Hyperfine-Coupled Nuclear Spin Qudit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 070603,arXiv:2405.20827

work page arXiv 2025
[44]

Millimeter-wave spectroscopy in cesium Rydberg states. Quantum defects, fine-and hyperfine-structure measurements,

P. Goy, J. M. Raimond, G. Vitrant, and S. Haroche, “Millimeter-wave spectroscopy in cesium Rydberg states. Quantum defects, fine-and hyperfine-structure measurements,” Phys. Rev. A26(1982) 2733

work page 1982
[45]

Accurate energies ofnS,nP,nD,nF, andnGlevels of neutral cesium,

K.-H. Weber and C. J. Sansonetti, “Accurate energies ofnS,nP,nD,nF, andnGlevels of neutral cesium,” Phys. Rev. A35(1987) 4650

work page 1987
[46]

Millimeter-wave spectroscopy of cold Rb Rydberg atoms in a magneto-optical trap: Quantum defects of thens,np, andndseries,

W. Li, I. Mourachko, M. W. Noel, and T. F. Gallagher, “Millimeter-wave spectroscopy of cold Rb Rydberg atoms in a magneto-optical trap: Quantum defects of thens,np, andndseries,” Phys. Rev. A67(2003) 052502

work page 2003
[47]

Rbnfquantum defects from millimeter-wave spectroscopy of cold 85Rb Rydberg atoms,

J. Han, Y. Jamil, D. V. L. Norum, P. J. Tanner, and T. F. Gallagher, “Rbnfquantum defects from millimeter-wave spectroscopy of cold 85Rb Rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. A74(2006) 054502

work page 2006
[48]

Measurement of absolute transition frequencies of 87Rb tonSandnD Rydberg states by means of electromagnetically induced transparency,

M. Mack, F. Karlewski, H. Hattermann, S. H¨ ockh, F. Jessen, D. Cano, and J. Fort´ agh, “Measurement of absolute transition frequencies of 87Rb tonSandnD Rydberg states by means of electromagnetically induced transparency,” Phys. Rev. A83(2011) 052515

work page 2011
[49]

Precision measurement of the ionization energy of Cs I,

J. Deiglmayr, H. Herburger, H. Saßmannshausen, P. Jansen, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, “Precision measurement of the ionization energy of Cs I,” Phys. Rev. A93(2016) 013424

work page 2016
[50]

Precision measurement of the ionization energy and quantum defects of 39K I,

M. Peper, F. Helmrich, J. Butscher, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, F. Merkt, and J. Deiglmayr, “Precision measurement of the ionization energy and quantum defects of 39K I,” Phys. Rev. A100(2019) 012501

work page 2019
[51]

A Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. Geraci, P. Barker, M. S. Kim, and G. Milburn, “Spin Entanglement Witness for Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 240401,arXiv:1707.06050

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[52]

Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity

C. Marletto and V. Vedral, “Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 240402,arXiv:1707.06036

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[53]

On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries,

M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, “On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries,” Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 64–68, arXiv:1808.05842

work page arXiv 2019
[54]

Locally Mediated Entanglement in Linearized Quantum Gravity,

M. Christodoulou, A. Di Biagio, M. Aspelmeyer, ˇC. Brukner, C. Rovelli, and R. Howl, “Locally Mediated Entanglement in Linearized Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 100202,arXiv:2202.03368

work page arXiv 2023